Voices of Passion (Muses please)

Author
Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4062
  • Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
  • Status: offline
2012/03/01 20:19:17 (permalink)

Voices of Passion (Muses please)

Or, getting the heart out!  If you are not concerned about passionate singing, this thread is probably not for you.
 
The muse is oft difficult to cough up ... she is so moody!  Methinks everyone has a valid muse smoldering in oceans of emotion ... ready to unleash upon the world.  But how to resurrect the sleeping beauty?
 
My friends: Give me a unique hearty cr&p vox: enthused, passionate, convincing, loving, and/or inspired ... over the floods of pro-sounding vox-dribble ... that spues forth like commercials ... at the wide gate.
 
Some questions I hope you ponder (and share prognostications on) are:
 
1) What is heart-felt, in your opinion?
 
2) How might you detect the fake from the real?
 
3) What inspires your soul vox?
 
4) How oft do you detect the fake and real ... in yourself, in professionals, and/or other talents you encounter.
 
Perhaps there is no 100% correct answer.  I have my opinions, but I'd rather hear yours.  If you want to talk about pining love and such ... fine!  But, I'd like to know what enables your muse at other times as well.  I'm certain things like beatz, instruments you play, etc., help stir up the slumbering muse.

Philip  
(Isa 5:12 And the harp, and the viol, the tabret, and pipe, and wine, are in their feasts: but they regard not the work of the LORD)

Raised-Again 3http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=12307501
#1

23 Replies Related Threads

    Rain
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9736
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
    • Location: Las Vegas
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/02 04:28:11 (permalink)
    This isn't really an answer, more of an observation.

    These days, a lot of people seem to mistake anything that's over the top for heart-felt. Maybe because we're numb and disensitized.

    Whether it's a very grainy voice, or someone who just screams at the top of their lungs or one of those RnB singer who just can't seem to stop and rest on a note for more than a millisecond.

    IMHO, that's simple lack of taste, a bit vulgar.

    I have no doubt that many of those fellows actually "feel" something, but I think it's got more to do w/ an exacerbated self-consciousness than anything. At any rate, this makes me su****ious, right upfront.

    I saw my wife's best friend singing Zeppelin's Since I've Been Loving You, last year or the year before. One of the most intense live moments I've ever witnessed. It wasn't about self-consciousness and squeezing every possible note and inflection out of the song, or showing how high or low she could sing. The opposite, she sang nothing but the song.

    I think it's a tough bird to catch. The minute you try to feel, the table usually turns, and the focus shifts on the singer, rather than the song. Maybe it's a matter of having enough control to just completely let go, let the song take you where it's going rather than using it to express yourself.

    I don't know. I don't have that talent.


    post edited by Rain - 2012/03/02 04:29:41

    TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
    #2
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/02 05:51:26 (permalink)
    the singer has to have an emotive connection to the song.  not just the lyrics but the blend of the lyrics and melody.  if the song doesn't mean anything to the singer then there will be no passion in the singer's voice.

    can passion be achieved without deeply spiritual or emotional meaning?  yes - even a simple song can evoke passion in a singer as long as that vocalist connects with the song in a way that has meaning to him/her.

    I don't think passion in a vocal performance can be "faked" - even if the song doesn't have real meaning to the vocalist, if the vocalist is very good at being a vocalist, then a connection of passion can be made by that vocalist for that performance when necessary to bring out the passion in the performance.  so the passion isn't faked, it's real, even if the vocalist is singing something that doesn't mean much to him/her, they MAKE it mean something to themselves at the time it's necessary for the performance.

    that's kind of like acting.  "becoming the part."  the vocalist becomes the person who IS passionate about the subject for the perfomance.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #3
    Kalle Rantaaho
    Max Output Level: -5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7005
    • Joined: 2006/01/09 13:07:59
    • Location: Finland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/02 06:02:33 (permalink)
    If the singer conciously tries to impress someone or match someone he/she most likely fails. If the performer trusts the song and lets it carry him/herself something may happen.

    SONAR PE 8.5.3, Asus P5B, 2,4 Ghz Dual Core, 4 Gb RAM, GF 7300, EMU 1820, Bluetube Pre  -  Kontakt4, Ozone, Addictive Drums, PSP Mixpack2, Melda Creative Pack, Melodyne Plugin etc.
    The benefit of being a middle aged amateur is the low number of years of frustration ahead of you.
    #4
    ChuckC
    Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1488
    • Joined: 2010/02/13 01:22:55
    • Location: Port Charlotte, Fl
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/02 08:40:38 (permalink)
        I agree,  the singer has to be able to put themselves in the right frame of mind and make a connection to the song and the lyrics or it fails.   I am certainly not a phenominal "vocalist"and I don't have a 7 octave range but I have been singing for 20+ years and I think I have pretty good control.  The comments I usually get from fans are generally about the power in my voice and the conviction they percieve me to have while performing.   On my original stuff I don't write songs than mean nothing or don't make sense so I have a genuine connection, on covers I may not, but I can make a kind of synthetic connection and SELL IT to the crowd for the sake of the performance.
    Now, if I hate the song, I can't help it personally and I deliver it the best I can but without much heart.  For instance, we had so many requests for that song Kryptonite from 3 doors down that we now play it.  I hate that song more than getting the runs and I deliver it about the same. 

       Sorry to talk about "me" so much there but I don't have experiance with "you" so that's where I am coming from for the sake of this conversation....

    ADK Built DAW, W7, Sonar Platinum, Studio One Pro,Yamaha HS8's & HS8S  Presonus Studio/Live 24.4.2, A few decent mic pre's,  lots of mics, 57's,58 betas, Sm7b, LD Condensors, Small condensors, Senn 421's,  DI's,  Sans Amp, A few guitar amps etc. Guitars : Gib. LP, Epi. Lp, Dillion Tele, Ibanez beater, Ibanez Ergodyne 4 String bass, Mapex Mars series 6 pc. studio kit, cymbals and other sh*t.
    http://www.everythingiam.net/
    http://www.stormroomstudios.com
    Some of my productions: http://soundcloud.com/stormroomstudios
    #5
    Philip
    Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4062
    • Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/03 22:13:05 (permalink)
    Hahahaha!  Not too many 'passionate' singers these days!

    I'm certain you 4 brave souls are top notch singers, Rain, Reece, Kalle, and Chuck.

    You all seem to understand the frailties of the cranky muse and the best ways to 'cajole' her.

    Doing covers, per Chuck and Kalle, is usually lose lose ... for my muse ... when the recording key is clicked.

    1) But, imitating all my favs and singing judiciously (if not explosively) at every possible event ... before the public ... does validate things a bit.

    2) Letting the song 'sweep' you:
    -- Sometimes its the beatz
    -- Sometimes the words
    -- Sometimes the groove, hook, melody, and/or chords

    3) Acting is fine, for me; but getting lost in the song is 'key' ... which I think we all agree.

    4) Personal, political, and/or spiritual struggles ... never hurt my muse!  But technical contrivances oft destroys the heart.

    5) Seeing my 9 y/o daughter (Joy) 'come alive' before the public is interesting.  The stage-fright validates her 'seriousness' but not her emotives (which are currently subdued in public ... hahahaha!)

    OK, you other timid ones, LOL, don't be bashful ... chime in a bit, please!

    Philip  
    (Isa 5:12 And the harp, and the viol, the tabret, and pipe, and wine, are in their feasts: but they regard not the work of the LORD)

    Raised-Again 3http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=12307501
    #6
    Danny Danzi
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 5810
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
    • Location: DanziLand, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/04 00:16:37 (permalink)
    Some questions I hope you ponder (and share prognostications on) are:
     
    1) What is heart-felt, in your opinion?
     
    2) How might you detect the fake from the real?
     
    3) What inspires your soul vox?
     
    4) How oft do you detect the fake and real ... in yourself, in professionals, and/or other talents you encounter.

     
    You always come up with interesting topics, Philip. Don't ever change...you keep this place alive. :) This is really a tough call in my opinion. You either feel something, or you don't and it's like getting blood from a stone. A vocal presentation in my case, depends on what the music and melodies do for me.
     
    Also, the lyrics themselves have to be "musical". There are a few songs in the song forum right now that have decent melodies, yet have words that sound like they were trying to write an intelligent book over a musical song. Some words and phrases in my opinion, are just not musical or inspiring. If a singer can't live the words, they don't sing the song as expressive.
     
    Sure we can act and go through the motions, but that's the difference between a pure performance and one that just sounds like someone doing it "because". For example, I have always loved the passion of Whitney Houston (God rest her soul) and Celine Dion. When they sing something, I tear up. Especially Whitney when she was healthy. Now, I also love Mariah Carey, but because she adds in so many vocal acrobatics, to me it loses feel. Granted, that's HER idea of feel, but to me, it takes away from the passion in her voice.
     
    We can say the same about some guitar solo's. For example, I think old Slowhand Clapton gets a bit too much recognition for being a melodic player. Sure he has his moments of greatness that we can't deny, but David Gilmour has 1000 more in my opinion. My point with that? Some players throw out feel in the only way they know how and it may come by way of technique. It doesn't mean they don't have feel, it means they "feel" differently than some of us might. There's a shred guitarist that goes by the name of Michael Angelo....and he's no painter. LOL! I don't particularly like his style of shred because it comes off as all speed for the sake of speed, but he IS impressive at what he does if you're into the whole technique thing. When he does hang on a note, it doesn't sound very good. Fast, nervous vibrato...sort of like Ted Nugent. That stuff just doesn't do anything for me. But...that is HIS vibe of what feel is.
     
    So, if we think about this too seriously, it becomes very subjective. Sometimes something just flows and you feel it with an awesome performance...other times, that feel may need to be created or "acted" out so to speak. This is one of my pet peeves with my own song writing. If I can't write a hook that allows me to be passionate in a vocal, I (unfortunately) will not work on or record the song. It's rare for me to just come up with cool riffs anymore like I used to years ago.
     
    The reason being? A good riff is just a good riff...and it actually becomes a useless riff if you can't come up with a good vocal line for it. Granted, you can use the riff in a song as a power jam or something, but I like to write my melodies first and then create the music bed around them. It just works better for me and I'm not stuck with a bunch of licks that sounded good "because they were cool".
     
    I have enough "cool sounding riffs". What I need are more melodies and hooks. That's where it's at for me. I can sing passionately about any topic...but the melody has to be there. The song has to take me somewhere. The beat means nothing to me as long as it's in time. The sound behind it...I can totally shut out if that melody leads me. When you and I worked together on the songs we did, the melodies I provided allowed me to be myself. There was no reason to hold back or be something that I'm not. I didn't need to act (other than when I did the rap part in that one song...which is standard for me being an Ebonics Major lol!) or say any prayers or ask for guidance.
     
    I listen to something, and melodies jump out at me. Sometimes they fit, sometimes they don't. Most times though, it would take me re-writing an entire song to get things right (which you've seen when we've worked together...sometimes I've asked you to really change things up) and the person I may be working with may not want to do that. It depends on what my role is on the project. Sometimes things come in etched in stone and my hands are sort of tied. Other times, we have a basic foundation where I'm allowed to spread my wings and experiment. Every situation is different.
     
    But in my situation, the answer is...I either hear something and pursue it, or I do my best to come up with something that compliments what I've been given.
     
    The answer to 1: Heartfelt is something you perform with conviction, to the best of your ability, with passion and confidence. However that turns out to sound....it is what it is. Everyone's "at the end of the day performance" will be a different form of feel or heart so to speak.
     
    Answer to 2: To be honest, I don't think I've ever listened to something and said "that just sounds fake". Someone not giving their all or trying to over-sing/play is something totally different. I really can't comment on this the way you'd probably want me to because I don't have an answer.
     
    Answer to 3: Melodies, living/singing/playing the part...as well as the inspiration the song gives me. Certain songs just do nothing for me. Again, when that happens, it's like trying to get blood from a stone.
     
    Answer to 4: Pretty much the same as answer 2. I can't really comment on this other than speaking for myself.....and as you know, I have never done anything that I haven't believed in...thus, in my opinion, I've never "faked" a performance. Even when I did the rap part in your song, I wrote the words to that part. They were strong words that I have prayed to God myself. Adding the urban type style to it came easy for me and was actually not an act.
     
    Where I come from, any white guy attempting to talk black while making it sound obviously like a bust is in for death. You do it right or you don't do it at all. It truly IS a language in my neck of the woods. Just like I'd pick up an English accent while in England or any other country/language I'd subject myself to for a period of time. The same with my bruthers I'm close to. It was never a joke to me...I seriously was interested in the culture, the language and everything that went with it.
     
    Being interested to me means learning and accepting the culture. And learn I did. I bring all of this up because I took that part in the song we did VERY seriously. There was never a laugh on my end other than "man, I can't believe how authentic this sounds." You should have heard what my black friends said about it....they absolutely loved it and started calling me "Lil D. Biggs". LOL!!!!
     
    I don't think there really is a 100% answer either due to how subjective this is as well as how differently we all attack something. Then of course stylistic preference comes to mind as well as the music that's driving the inspiration. I know none of this may be helpful, but it's the best I can come up with for you. :)
     
    -Danny

    My Site
    Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
    #7
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/04 08:29:58 (permalink)

    I once explained to a band I was in that I just couldn't bring myself to sing "Take a Walk on the Wild Side"... about a month later the band broke up and reformed without that guy who wouldn't sing a heart felt rendition of "Take a Walk on Wild Side".

    I've often wondered if and when they ever figured out what the song is about. :-)

    I reacted by playing instrumentals for the next 5 years. :-S

    I agree with Beagle, Great singing is all about the connection between the song and the songs idea... it really doesn't have much to do with hard or soft or loud or quiet until after the singer has established that basic connection with the theme of the song. Even if the song is purely frivolous... the singer can bring a sense of frivolity to the take and make it gel... it doesn't have to be serious and important just to nail the vibe... because not all vibes are serious and important.

    At some point I reflected on the fact that words can take the form of violence (sort of like that Jane's Addiction song) in that they force ideas onto other folks and I started to really enjoy playing instrumentals that left lots of room for listeners to levitate their own personal thoughts into the listening experience. I have no idea what is going on in their head. I hope it's not "wow that guy sucks".  I get a lot on enjoyment leaving that space in the music for everybody to use as they may.


    Good times!


    best regards,
    mike




    #8
    michaelhanson
    Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3529
    • Joined: 2008/10/31 15:19:56
    • Location: Mesquite, Texas
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/04 23:51:15 (permalink)
    Great topic Philip, the timing of this thread really hit home.  On another forum, today I had some one comment on one of my songs by saying that the music and lyrics were really good, but that my vocals sounded timid and that I needed to "go for it", more and let loose.  I was holding back, was the comment.  Then I read this thread and it started me thinking...is he saying that I am not singing the song with enough passion, or is he saying that he wants me to fly into this vocal range that I just can not do. 

    I mean, it has taken me many years of singing to develope into this level of medocrity.  I am please if I am in pitch and on rhythm.  Now, I have to "go for it", as if I am on American Idol.  Well, I responded by saying....dude, right now this is about as good as it gets for me.

    But, I guess the question is about passion.  Philip, for me that is an easy one.  I pretty much write all the songs that I record, and they generally have some meaning for me and are somewhat personal for me.  So, the vehicle should be in place that I am already, passionate about the song.  Much like Danny kind of alluded too, I don't really record the song unless the melody, groove, or hook is not already doing something for me.  I know that I am passionate about the song, but does it come out in the recording... I don't know.  I guess it is in the ear of the listener to decide.  Maybe I need to emphisize the passion more in my tone...but then am I faking it?  All good questions and great conversation in this thread.

    Mike

    https://soundcloud.com/michaeljhanson
    https://www.facebook.com/michaeljhanson.music
    iTunes:
    https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/scandalous-grace/id1180730765
     
    Platinum Lifetime, Focusrite 8i6 & 2i4, Gibson LP, ES335, Fender Strat, 4003 Rickenbacker
    BMI
    #9
    Danny Danzi
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 5810
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
    • Location: DanziLand, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/05 01:42:05 (permalink)
    MakeShift


    Great topic Philip, the timing of this thread really hit home.  On another forum, today I had some one comment on one of my songs by saying that the music and lyrics were really good, but that my vocals sounded timid and that I needed to "go for it", more and let loose.  I was holding back, was the comment.  Then I read this thread and it started me thinking...is he saying that I am not singing the song with enough passion, or is he saying that he wants me to fly into this vocal range that I just can not do. 

    I mean, it has taken me many years of singing to develope into this level of medocrity.  I am please if I am in pitch and on rhythm.  Now, I have to "go for it", as if I am on American Idol.  Well, I responded by saying....dude, right now this is about as good as it gets for me.

    But, I guess the question is about passion.  Philip, for me that is an easy one.  I pretty much write all the songs that I record, and they generally have some meaning for me and are somewhat personal for me.  So, the vehicle should be in place that I am already, passionate about the song.  Much like Danny kind of alluded too, I don't really record the song unless the melody, groove, or hook is not already doing something for me.  I know that I am passionate about the song, but does it come out in the recording... I don't know.  I guess it is in the ear of the listener to decide.  Maybe I need to emphisize the passion more in my tone...but then am I faking it?  All good questions and great conversation in this thread.

    Mike, keep in mind brother...there are 3 types of critiques....you'll usually get one of these or a combination.
     
    1. The guy that tells you what may be right or wrong.
     
    2. The guy that tells you what you need to do in his image based on "if he did the song".
     
    3. The guy that attempts to produce you based on what he hears where you *may* be falling short.
     
    With 1, it's cut and dry and what we get most of the time when we post up a tune. With 2, this is pretty common also and in a sense, most of these types of people have good intentions. However they miss the obvious and that is, to enjoy the song in the manner in which it was created and delivered as "your art", not theirs. With #3, sometimes this hurts, but sometimes it's truthful. You have to consider the source. If I made a comment to you about holding back....I don't think you would be offended by it, right? For me to say something like that to you, it would mean something I heard sounds like something I know in my heart you can do better.
     
    Maybe you played something a little conservative....maybe you could have added a bit more rasp, growl or forceful execution, maybe the words you sang were lacking impact because in this particular tune, another form of delivery may have been more appropriate. This is what producers do. They listen to you and know what your limits are. That said, they can look beyond those limits and make comments to push you in the right direction. Sometimes this works, sometimes if fails. I've heard a few of your songs now and have a decent grasp on what you're capable of. If this other person that commented does not, chalk it up as a voice for the sake of a voice or, attempt what they said and see if something magical happens.
     
    The key is knowing the limitations on another while professionally delivering the news to them to "maybe try this". Sometimes we try to be so perfect, we literally sound too perfect. A little dirt under the nails is a good thing. Sometimes we sing too clean in something to where it sounds like we're trying to be clean and execute other than let it rip and be ourselves.
     
    The other side of that coin is, sometimes what we put out is all we know and we ARE sort of being ourselves TO ourselves. But this other form of "yourself" may not have been discovered by you yet. Fear of the unknown, ya know? When you try what someone may suggest, sometimes it puts you in a frame of mind you were never in before...and this is where the magic happens or you can discover something in yourself that you didn't even know you were capable of.
     
    I believe I have brought a lot of this out of Philip. He's always been conscious of his voice to where I've told him the same words as you got from that person "let it go man...be you". One of the things I like with Philip's voice is his delivery. It's honest, it's passionate and it's sincere. Sure, we all want to be better singers...that comes with time. But the first thing we need is confidence and the ability to not say no to something. You try anything and everything as long as you're able.
     
    Here's an example that's a bit off topic, but you may understand what I'm saying a bit better after. I've been a guitarist that is really involved with technique my entire life. Intense lead guitar and rhythm at the same time, stepping on pedals and making sound changes in time at all times and for a reason, certain techniques that need to be pulled off in a heartbeat....the list goes on and on.
     
    That's a lot of pressure to put on myself, don't you think? Sing lead vocals, play rhythm guitar, play the leads, step on the right patch changes and expression control while being the front man and entertaining the crowd. For some guys, this comes easy...but there is a price. Most of them aren't good in the actual performance area. They do everything kinda fair, but may excel in the way they move around. For me it's different.
     
    I am thinking so much all the time about being perfect and playing perfect that it affects my physical performance to the point of no longer being fun. I know that I am not perfect even on my best night and that I will never be perfect. But part of my character is to be as perfect as I can be. I can't change that in me. But how you execute and how much you think about something can definitely make a difference. Some guys like Vai and Malmsteen can run all over the stage while playing insane licks. Guys like me need to stay stationary and think about them. If I move like that, I'll never pull the stuff off. That's just me. I can sit here in my room and have a conversation with you while playing these licks...so it's proof I'm well rehearsed enough. But to move while doing them....unfortunately, I'm not that type of player and it bothers me. But, I play pretty consistently live and try not to disappoint so not all is lost. :)
     
    Last weekend, (not this past weekend) the band knew my birthday was on Monday so we sort of celebrated my b-day on stage. Of course I had a few drinks before we even played which is something I NEVER do. Why? Right....because I know how much I need to do when I'm up there and I can't be impaired. So, we take the stage and I'm already feeling a nice buzz. Not drunk, but definitely buzzed to where I wouldn't drive a car at this time.
     
    The first thing I notice is...now I'm thinking even more than I normally do, and it's not so easy. With this buzz come several brain freezes to where I'm starting to get annoyed with myself. When you get annoyed, people hear it in your performance and also see it. Finally, I just gave in to the buzz and enjoyed it. I made up my mind that if something came along that I didn't remember, I'd at least play in key and do something cool while moving to it. Make a mistake...and I'd slap my hand and point my finger at it.
     
    Needless to say, I made more mistakes last weekend than I have ever made during a live performance. However, everyone in my band as well as the people at the show complimented me on how good I was. Go figure! I knew I was off my game and knew why. But, as soon as I let it all go and enjoyed it...that little bit of dirt under my fingernails wasn't such a bad thing. Will I ever perform like that again? You better believe it...but next time I won't be buzzed. I really enjoyed myself. It wasn't because of the buzz, it was because I let all that "perfection" stuff fall by the wayside. I was just me...being human, making mistakes here and there yet totally enjoying myself and everyone saw that. There was only one huge clam where I totally blanked out on something...lol...but other than that, from here on out I'm throwing all caution to the wind and am going to do exactly what you were told...."let go man". People will either like you for who and what you are or they won't. To be so constricted and unhappy due to trying to be perfect is not my idea of enjoyment...and this little show proved that to me.
     
    Not only will I take on this approach with my live playing, but with my studio stuff as well. At the end of the day, if there is stress on you when you do a vocal track or a guitar track to where you are no longer enjoying it as much....the word stress says it all. Remove that stress and just be "MakeShift Mike" doing what he enjoys most. :) I'll be right there with you brother. Hope this helps and explains things a bit...even if I'm sort of off topic. It all walks hand in hand though in my opinion. :)
     
    -Danny
    post edited by Danny Danzi - 2012/03/05 01:45:57

    My Site
    Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
    #10
    jamesg1213
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 21760
    • Joined: 2006/04/18 14:42:48
    • Location: SW Scotland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/05 08:39:17 (permalink)
    Can't help too much 'cos I'm not a singer, but I just wanted to pick up on something Danny said - sometimes there's a perfect marriage of lyrics, voice and melody that get across such a palpable feeling or emotion, it's undeniable.

    Here's a little example, if you don't like the song just forward to about 3:40 where you'll see that the 'Squeeze' song writer Chris Difford has been moved to tears by this performance.

    Justin Currie - If I Ever Loved You

     
    Jyemz
     
     
     



    Thrombold's Patented Brisk Weather Pantaloonettes with Inclementometer
    #11
    michaelhanson
    Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3529
    • Joined: 2008/10/31 15:19:56
    • Location: Mesquite, Texas
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/05 10:07:41 (permalink)
    Hey Danny,

    Thank you for your thoughtful response.  I skimmed through it this morning and want to read it several times to fully soak in all that you have said.  I have been just slammed at work lately, so I have to find some time.  

    I am never offended by critisism and certainly not yours.  I would be unwise not to listen to your advice.  I am always trying to improve as a musician, song writer and vocalist.  Vocals seem to be my biggest challenge though.  I may PM you with more thoughts later if I can find some time, but don't want to turn Philips thread into about me; I think this is such a wonderful topic.  I will say though, it is a challenge to Produce ones self.  

    Mike

    https://soundcloud.com/michaeljhanson
    https://www.facebook.com/michaeljhanson.music
    iTunes:
    https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/scandalous-grace/id1180730765
     
    Platinum Lifetime, Focusrite 8i6 & 2i4, Gibson LP, ES335, Fender Strat, 4003 Rickenbacker
    BMI
    #12
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/05 10:42:06 (permalink)


    #13
    bandontherun19
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 824
    • Joined: 2011/08/28 00:09:57
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/05 17:49:43 (permalink)
    My music is largely the expression of pain, so it is usually fairly intense. The song I wrote for my son, I could not sing it all the way through, and I tried "for weeks..." I could not sing it without breaking down in tears. The same thing with several songs I wrote about a dear friend (Miss April... may she rest in peace.) My music is almost without exception directly related to very powerful emotions and therefore impossible for me not to perform and sing without emotion and intensity.  I've had people listen to some of my music and say, that song made me cry :-( And I tell them, "I cried when I wrote it?"

    And when all else fails? Jumper cables on the nipples never fails.
    post edited by bandontherun19 - 2012/03/05 17:55:00

    All you need is love, just ask the Beatles?
    ----------
    #14
    whack
    Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1188
    • Joined: 2007/10/27 04:15:03
    • Location: Ireland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/05 19:05:14 (permalink)
    Great topic, since I've really only come to realise that I do not give the same level of performance to my own tracks as I have to my covers, which purely arises from lack of confidence and my natural born characteristics in my opinion.


    Music is an expression of your consciousness and when it is sung from this, its the real deal. You can fake it and it can sound good, it can be technically sung on tune and in time but it is when it "moves" you that it is not faked, btw that word itself  has no definition, it cant be measured so yes there is no correct answer to no.2 philip I believe.You can write a song using the typical pop canon recipe and it will sell millions, but it will never compete against that song that pops into your consciousness from nowhere, it just has the easy flowing, came out that way kinda feel about it!!. I reckon all the great classical songs that have stood the test of the time are created like that. Who are your fav artists, do you think they fake their songs?


    Danny man I think I have that perfectionist syndrome thing too you spoke of, when I start off a new tune, I have great fun, I create the bones of the song and the main riff literally within 10minutes. Then I start getting into the nitty gritty and desperately trying to finish it so to have it just perfect, what always happens is I end up re-recording stuff about a thousand times, I get impatient,really angry, even hysterical and when I listen back to what I recorded the next day, the thing is as stale as a 2 week old loaf of bread. Its an absolute curse sometimes and its why I think most people need someone else to help them in each project just to make the all important "third party" decisions.


    Just like bandontherun19, I find that I connect a lot easier and write sad songs, songs that have beautiful/inspiring melodies and just make you wanna cry and I too have often cried singing them. Then what I struggle to do are the songs that need the rasp,the aggression, the confidence, the interest to capture that different audience and I put it down purely to my own personal character which behind it all is probably a lot more timid than what I wish to show. I know that if I wanna make it as a songwriter,performer or whatever I need to harness that side a little better :-(.


    Actually this is my first ever ridiculously long thread, threatened Danny?!!



    Cian



    www.cmcgmusic.com

    Melody and Meaning
    #15
    Rain
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9736
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
    • Location: Las Vegas
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/06 06:08:41 (permalink)
    This is a great topic, Philip. Thanks for bringing it up. And BTW, I'm not much of a singer anymore. 

    I'm actually wondering how I connect w/ music these days, and the importance "feeling" has. The rambling below sum that up, though I don't have a conclusion for you. It's just what's on my mind.

    Authority, confidence, fun, that I can get. But "emotional connection" is something I have issues w/. Especially considering that, a lot of the time, when people think "heartfelt" and "feeling", they think of something at least very sad and intense. If not over the top and absolutely self conscious. 

    Right now, I feel neither sad, neither happy - but I feel, nonetheless. Slightly irritated by the noise in the hallway. Hungry because I skipped breakfast. Amused when I look at the plush bat on the monitor. These types of feelings constitute the majority of our "feelings" - but there's nothing to brag about there, no matter if these are the vast majority and the most common of all feelings we experience. 

    If a singer could convey that in a song, he'd get my attention, he'd probably really feel what he is singing, much more than say, Trent Reznor singing about his poor sorry ass in Hurt, no matter how good the song is.

    That song wouldn't exist if the guy had a day job or went out for a 5 minutes walk. He probably just needed to grow up and get his head out of his butt for 5 minutes. Which he eventually did. And now his music is boring. :s

    Authenticity and emotional delivery often seem poles apart to me. Unless you play the part, get into the feeling, and, as such, become an actor. But acting isn't feeling - it's blocking what you really feel under the actual circumstances to make room for something else that has nothing to do with the reality you're dealing w/. 

    It's turning a nearly pathological state into a rule. The sad thing about the saddest events in our life is that we go on living and we learn to make room for the pain and live with it. The pathological pain eventually subdues. That's the real tragedy - we learn to cope w/ the unbearable, we run out of tears. I know of one song that tells about exactly that, by the french poet Leo Ferré - and it's the saddest song I've ever heard.

    On a human scale, I don't see what the over the top tragedies and drama brings, not anymore. Clearly, these have been around for the longest time, and we still haven't learned to feel better, learned about ourselves. We still ignore 99% of what we feel because we're so busy impersonating the most pathological cases. We're still like a bunch of twelve years old girls who just broke up, sitting in the dark in our bedroom and listening to that same old painful song over and over and crying our hearts out, feeling sorry for ourselves.

    As such, whether it's Kiss singing Rock'n'Roll All Night or Leonard Cohen singing Hallelujah, in the end, it's all more or less the same, notwithstanding the skills of the lyricist. As long as they aren't singing about Tom Sawyer or a Red Barchetta... ;) 

    As far as writing lyrics and singing myself, the older I get, the more silly it would seem to me to write how I feel and to make a big fuss out of it. I've lost pretty much any sense of self-importance, so I guess I can't be a singer. ;)

    I'd have to ask my wife. She's the singer - she's dynamite, and she "connects" w/ stuff. I'm just an old boring fart. 

    I don't know. To me music is about fun. Enjoying music itself, enjoying the play. That's the only thing authentic - the feelings the song convey besides that are incidental, an excuse to make noise and get out of yourself. 

    TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
    #16
    Danny Danzi
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 5810
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
    • Location: DanziLand, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/06 08:57:47 (permalink)
    Rain


    This is a great topic, Philip. Thanks for bringing it up. And BTW, I'm not much of a singer anymore. 

    I'm actually wondering how I connect w/ music these days, and the importance "feeling" has. The rambling below sum that up, though I don't have a conclusion for you. It's just what's on my mind.

    Authority, confidence, fun, that I can get. But "emotional connection" is something I have issues w/. Especially considering that, a lot of the time, when people think "heartfelt" and "feeling", they think of something at least very sad and intense. If not over the top and absolutely self conscious. 

    Right now, I feel neither sad, neither happy - but I feel, nonetheless. Slightly irritated by the noise in the hallway. Hungry because I skipped breakfast. Amused when I look at the plush bat on the monitor. These types of feelings constitute the majority of our "feelings" - but there's nothing to brag about there, no matter if these are the vast majority and the most common of all feelings we experience. 

    If a singer could convey that in a song, he'd get my attention, he'd probably really feel what he is singing, much more than say, Trent Reznor singing about his poor sorry ass in Hurt, no matter how good the song is.

    That song wouldn't exist if the guy had a day job or went out for a 5 minutes walk. He probably just needed to grow up and get his head out of his butt for 5 minutes. Which he eventually did. And now his music is boring. :s

    Authenticity and emotional delivery often seem poles apart to me. Unless you play the part, get into the feeling, and, as such, become an actor. But acting isn't feeling - it's blocking what you really feel under the actual circumstances to make room for something else that has nothing to do with the reality you're dealing w/. 

    It's turning a nearly pathological state into a rule. The sad thing about the saddest events in our life is that we go on living and we learn to make room for the pain and live with it. The pathological pain eventually subdues. That's the real tragedy - we learn to cope w/ the unbearable, we run out of tears. I know of one song that tells about exactly that, by the french poet Leo Ferré - and it's the saddest song I've ever heard.

    On a human scale, I don't see what the over the top tragedies and drama brings, not anymore. Clearly, these have been around for the longest time, and we still haven't learned to feel better, learned about ourselves. We still ignore 99% of what we feel because we're so busy impersonating the most pathological cases. We're still like a bunch of twelve years old girls who just broke up, sitting in the dark in our bedroom and listening to that same old painful song over and over and crying our hearts out, feeling sorry for ourselves.

    As such, whether it's Kiss singing Rock'n'Roll All Night or Leonard Cohen singing Hallelujah, in the end, it's all more or less the same, notwithstanding the skills of the lyricist. As long as they aren't singing about Tom Sawyer or a Red Barchetta... ;) 

    As far as writing lyrics and singing myself, the older I get, the more silly it would seem to me to write how I feel and to make a big fuss out of it. I've lost pretty much any sense of self-importance, so I guess I can't be a singer. ;)

    I'd have to ask my wife. She's the singer - she's dynamite, and she "connects" w/ stuff. I'm just an old boring fart. 

    I don't know. To me music is about fun. Enjoying music itself, enjoying the play. That's the only thing authentic - the feelings the song convey besides that are incidental, an excuse to make noise and get out of yourself. 

    Hey Rain...deep post there brother. Totally respect where you're coming from too. You actually put me in a different place by reading your words....which was pretty cool I must say. :) Let me see if I can maybe let you see the other side like you have let me see your side.
     
    Have you ever had something that affected you so much, you wrote a song about it? It doesn't necesserily have to be sad. Look at Van Halen for example...the old stuff before Hagar was always up beat, party like, some of the words made sense, some didn't...but none of those songs really struck me as "sad". VH was all about up beat and partying/enjoying what they do, ya know? It's feeling because they are living/writing the music.
     
    But getting back to the feeling part. When I've written songs, the topics I chose were topics that I wanted to speak about in song differently than I would just come out and speak about said topics in a conversation with someone. Instead of voicing my anger with my voice, a driven guitar may do it for me. Or a string line that had something to say that literally made you feel something when you heard it. It doesn't need to be about being sad or angry or even happy. But whatever it is...you have to feel something....even if that something is just enjoyment.
     
    Now all the above said, this seems to take on a different twist when you ARE the singer. You not only express musically, but with a melody and words to further drive your point home. If you're not a singer, I sincerely believe it's not the same. I wrote hundreds of songs in my life before I started singing and writing words. All those songs were "cool riffs" or "fun to play" or "wow, that's technical and cool" etc. I felt them, sure...but I didn't feel my songs until I wrote words and melodies behind them...and it took quite a few songs for me to get in the right frame of mind.
     
    Songwriting and feeling that feeling you seem to be missing was like....hmmm...how can I explain this.....oooh, I know! This is terrible...but it's the best way I can tell it. LOL! I smoked weed back in the day...but when I first started smoking, it didn't do anything to me. For 3 years I smoked just to be cool with friends and it never did anything for me. One time...after 3 years, I literally got high...and man, it was something I'll never forget because AFTER that time, I got high all the time no matter how much or how little. Ah to be young again...lol...I miss those times. Hahaha! Anyway...my point in that...for some odd reason, it took time for me to get the effects of this drug everyone loved. Why? Because I think I was just going through the motions without really partying and enjoying myself. I did it to do it...because it was there...because the gang was doing it. Yeah, all the wrong reasons.
     
    Enter writing...I did it to do it...it was there...ideas in my head that I just experimented with for fun. When I got serious about my writing with words and melodies, I started to live the material. When I lived the weed and partied with my friends to party instead of going through the motions...that's when I got high. So I think you might need to just look at your writing a bit differently. Writing music (unless it's instrumental with some sort of melody) doesn't give me the same effect. I don't get high off of it at all. It's just a fun riff even if someone else writes a melody and words...and it becomes a great song. It's not the same as the one you do all on your own. Nothing compares to that really.
     
    For example, I did my own version of the Coffe House Band's "Countdown to Insanity". I had hoped the other guys would have played and sung on my version...but if they would have, that song wouldn't have the meaning it has for me now. Even though Ed, Phil and Steve wrote the song and came up with the initial ideas...me adding my own flair to it and performing it all gave it so much more meaning to me. I lived it. I'm a pop rock writer. In this song, I kept to my pop rock roots but I tried to add a bit of "insanity" to it...as much as a man like me can try to show "insanity". LOL! It wasn't easy...my voice is clean...insane means a little dirt under the nails..maybe a bit of dissonance....maybe some struggling on notes purposely because you're dying inside. I never screamed in my life on any song like I did on the one part of that one. And man...it hurt...BAD! I tried to add some of that in even though that's not the type of person I am nor is it the type of writer I am. But once I lived with the song, it just came out the way it came out and I was quite happy with it....even if I was the only one happy with it. LOL!!!
     
    Sometimes we take a topic of a song and flair up the meaning. That's where your style comes in. The CHB went for a more demented version of the song. Neither is the wrong approach...they felt one way, I felt another. The outcome? Two really good versions of the same song ideas really. So maybe your feelings inside of your music are just different due to how you are living inside your songs...or maybe NOT living inside your songs. There is no right or wrong way to let out your feelings. This is why music is an art...the language of expression.
     
    But I'd seriously try singing and writing your own words and melodies a bit more. Even if they suck and you just do a few ideas for your head. The more you do it, the more in touch you become. At least that's how it has always been for me. I can't just grasp something when I haven't done it a lot. Like I said...hundreds of songs that I never wrote words or melodies for. They were good...but I never "felt" them like the ones I did completely on my own. And, even at that...it took me a good 75 to 100 songs there to really start to feel what I was supposed to feel. :)
     
    -Danny

    My Site
    Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
    #17
    michaelhanson
    Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3529
    • Joined: 2008/10/31 15:19:56
    • Location: Mesquite, Texas
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/06 10:23:58 (permalink)
    Danny,
     
    Interesting observations as always.  

    Though I can’t relate to the “weed” analogy, I got your point…ha.  

    I homed in on the singing your own songs statement.   So, this is what I observed, in a different way through out my life.  I never used to sing and play guitar at all.  I was told I was not a good singer by someone when I was younger, so I just did n’t do it after that.  I would learn songs and riffs and would get technically proficient at playing, but something was missing.  Later in my adult life, after putting the guitar away for about 10 years and then picking it up again, I started singing songs while I played.  What I found in this musical rebirth was that suddenly, I had feel and touch.  I got into a groove with the lyrics that was just mechanical before.  It was like an awakening.  Well, I was still being told I was n’t a very good singer, but I kept at it anyway, just went off by myself to play.  Eventually, my singing got a little better and my feel and touch on the guitar became supportive of the vocals, or the song, however you want to put it.  Now, I actually find that my vocals have more feeling in scratch tracks when I record my voice playing and singing at the same time.  

    In my finished recordings, I don’t do this though, but have often wondered if it would improve the performance…or passion, so to speak.   I would make more guitar flubs and have to practice more to get through the recordings, but it may be something I try some day.  

    These days, whenever I do happen to have a student that I might be teaching guitar too; I always tell them to start singing the songs as soon as they can effectively play them.   They always look at me like I am crazy, but I tell them to remember I said this, cause years from now you are going to understand what I am saying.

    Mike

    https://soundcloud.com/michaeljhanson
    https://www.facebook.com/michaeljhanson.music
    iTunes:
    https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/scandalous-grace/id1180730765
     
    Platinum Lifetime, Focusrite 8i6 & 2i4, Gibson LP, ES335, Fender Strat, 4003 Rickenbacker
    BMI
    #18
    Rain
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9736
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
    • Location: Las Vegas
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/07 05:53:11 (permalink)
    Danny Danzi

    Hey Rain...deep post there brother. Totally respect where you're coming from too. You actually put me in a different place by reading your words....which was pretty cool I must say. :) Let me see if I can maybe let you see the other side like you have let me see your side.
     
    Have you ever had something that affected you so much, you wrote a song about it? It doesn't necesserily have to be sad. Look at Van Halen for example...the old stuff before Hagar was always up beat, party like, some of the words made sense, some didn't...but none of those songs really struck me as "sad". VH was all about up beat and partying/enjoying what they do, ya know? It's feeling because they are living/writing the music.
     
    But getting back to the feeling part. When I've written songs, the topics I chose were topics that I wanted to speak about in song differently than I would just come out and speak about said topics in a conversation with someone. Instead of voicing my anger with my voice, a driven guitar may do it for me. Or a string line that had something to say that literally made you feel something when you heard it. It doesn't need to be about being sad or angry or even happy. But whatever it is...you have to feel something....even if that something is just enjoyment.
     
    Now all the above said, this seems to take on a different twist when you ARE the singer. You not only express musically, but with a melody and words to further drive your point home. If you're not a singer, I sincerely believe it's not the same. I wrote hundreds of songs in my life before I started singing and writing words. All those songs were "cool riffs" or "fun to play" or "wow, that's technical and cool" etc. I felt them, sure...but I didn't feel my songs until I wrote words and melodies behind them...and it took quite a few songs for me to get in the right frame of mind.
     
    Songwriting and feeling that feeling you seem to be missing was like....hmmm...how can I explain this.....oooh, I know! This is terrible...but it's the best way I can tell it. LOL! I smoked weed back in the day...but when I first started smoking, it didn't do anything to me. For 3 years I smoked just to be cool with friends and it never did anything for me. One time...after 3 years, I literally got high...and man, it was something I'll never forget because AFTER that time, I got high all the time no matter how much or how little. Ah to be young again...lol...I miss those times. Hahaha! Anyway...my point in that...for some odd reason, it took time for me to get the effects of this drug everyone loved. Why? Because I think I was just going through the motions without really partying and enjoying myself. I did it to do it...because it was there...because the gang was doing it. Yeah, all the wrong reasons.
     
    Enter writing...I did it to do it...it was there...ideas in my head that I just experimented with for fun. When I got serious about my writing with words and melodies, I started to live the material. When I lived the weed and partied with my friends to party instead of going through the motions...that's when I got high. So I think you might need to just look at your writing a bit differently. Writing music (unless it's instrumental with some sort of melody) doesn't give me the same effect. I don't get high off of it at all. It's just a fun riff even if someone else writes a melody and words...and it becomes a great song. It's not the same as the one you do all on your own. Nothing compares to that really.
     
    For example, I did my own version of the Coffe House Band's "Countdown to Insanity". I had hoped the other guys would have played and sung on my version...but if they would have, that song wouldn't have the meaning it has for me now. Even though Ed, Phil and Steve wrote the song and came up with the initial ideas...me adding my own flair to it and performing it all gave it so much more meaning to me. I lived it. I'm a pop rock writer. In this song, I kept to my pop rock roots but I tried to add a bit of "insanity" to it...as much as a man like me can try to show "insanity". LOL! It wasn't easy...my voice is clean...insane means a little dirt under the nails..maybe a bit of dissonance....maybe some struggling on notes purposely because you're dying inside. I never screamed in my life on any song like I did on the one part of that one. And man...it hurt...BAD! I tried to add some of that in even though that's not the type of person I am nor is it the type of writer I am. But once I lived with the song, it just came out the way it came out and I was quite happy with it....even if I was the only one happy with it. LOL!!!
     
    Sometimes we take a topic of a song and flair up the meaning. That's where your style comes in. The CHB went for a more demented version of the song. Neither is the wrong approach...they felt one way, I felt another. The outcome? Two really good versions of the same song ideas really. So maybe your feelings inside of your music are just different due to how you are living inside your songs...or maybe NOT living inside your songs. There is no right or wrong way to let out your feelings. This is why music is an art...the language of expression.
     
    But I'd seriously try singing and writing your own words and melodies a bit more. Even if they suck and you just do a few ideas for your head. The more you do it, the more in touch you become. At least that's how it has always been for me. I can't just grasp something when I haven't done it a lot. Like I said...hundreds of songs that I never wrote words or melodies for. They were good...but I never "felt" them like the ones I did completely on my own. And, even at that...it took me a good 75 to 100 songs there to really start to feel what I was supposed to feel. :)
     
    -Danny

    Hey Danny. Thanks for chiming in, man. I read that last night and did a whole lot of thinking I guess... And I think I've found my answer, thanks to you - I don't feel that disconnected anymore. lol


    Though I can't say that I'm much of a VH fan too much more, their early stuff I appreciate - there's a pure joy of playing music there. Eddie is one of those guys whom you can hear smiling through his instrument. That I can relate to, that's a connection I haven't lost or which I don't feel is a result of self-indulgence. 

    It always reminds me of Mozart. His music can be sad at times, but it's never so self-conscious. I guess it all boils down to the old debate of the objective artist vs the subjective artist, impersonal vs personal. Expressing universal emotions vs caught up in personal stuff, sensibility vs sensitivity. For some reason, I tend to prefer the more objective aspects, even if there's a grey zone of course. 


    I guess what I'm saying is that I don't feel too inclined to take things on a personal level as much as I tend to identify with emotions. It is that particular distinction that I'm particularly insisting on. It may denote authentic sensibility, but it has nothing to do w/ authenticity of current personal feelings. It's still a play, a representation and the pleasure one takes in being a part of that play. There's pleasure in playing a sad song, because it isn't sadness, only a representation of it. 


    I feel that I ought to be totally objective in order to serve the song, to erase my self, my own feelings and let music play w/ me. Which is why when it comes to lyrics, I'd much rather avoid being personal - though we always are in a way. I also know that intense emotions tend to block my creativity most of the time. I guess I'm too busy living them to take the back seat and chronicle them. That energy doesn't go away, but it loses its focus eventually, and then its possible for me to use it creatively. Pretty much like a martial artist will learn to tune out his anger and his feelings - although he may want to teach that punching bag a lesson when he's really pissed off. But strong emotions (I think) prevent you from properly reacting to what's really happening, they get in the way of our sensibility, they lead to mistakes. 


    I realize I neglected to mention that I was actually guilty of pouring out thousands of pages of lyrics, poems, essays, journals, fiction and blogs - that's why my wife first contacted me - she heard my music, read my stuff and figured I could write for her.  I'm probably more naturally gifted for lyrics and words than for music, and I've also had a more exhaustive formal education in that field, because it's what I studied (french literature). I've always handled the lyrics in my bands and I dare say that they were better than average. 

    That being said, even the "saddest" pages I wrote weren't exempt of joy. In fact, that's the predominant trait that I can see across all I've ever created - the impertinent joy of creation. I need to be amused to create. Amused by my own miserable situation if need be, but amused, always. I'm sure I've exorcised hundreds of personal demons writing those, but it's almost incidental.


    That's a great opportunity I have right now to be writing for my wife, music and lyrics. I've always liked writing for others, it's an exercise I try to do regularly. So I guess I already have a strong penchant for being impersonal and considering things as a play, no matter how serious they can get.

    That discussion came in at the right time. I'll have to start working on lyrics soon and I wasn't sure where I was standing anymore. lol Thanks to Philip and you, I'm back on the track.

    TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
    #19
    Philip
    Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4062
    • Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/11 10:08:17 (permalink)
    Thanks Rain, Danny, Mike, Rob, and Cian,
    Time would fail me to judiciously respond to all your excellent ponderings:
    Of course I consider you and all your invokations to be spot on.
     
    I suppose 'heartfelt' can be introverted or extraverted ... I sort of hoped for the 'in-between' communication ... but dreadfully invoking to pop audiences.
    ... Whence you and I might rant on some deep lyrics and communicate them 'magically' to all deep and simple hearts ... young and old.
     
    IOWs, leadership:  Leading others through your valid emotions ... redeeming them in the end if feasible ... to let the song elements bravely conjoin (as you all have alluded)
     
    Musical chords invariably go from the Tonic-->Dominant/Subdominant/Minor-Substitutions/Tonic ... --> --> ---> the Tonic *hopes and restoration*.
    Message and lyrics may play a strong role, but vibe-magic (conscious or subconscious) must non-verbally communicate deserving strong hooks ... along the 'aspiring' musical emotives.
     
    Too often I hear songs (from the best of you and I) that don't end on a *sensual tonic* (despite the chords continually coming back to the tonic):
     
    A valid singer, IMHO, provides pleasant intervals and climaxes of:
    "Stress relief"
    "Redemtion to the conflict"
    "Fix on the problem"
    "Relief from the pain"
    "Overcoming of tragedy"
    ... Etc.
    Else he/she may be using/abusing music for 'less than its worth' .... IMHO.  I may be wrong.

    Philip  
    (Isa 5:12 And the harp, and the viol, the tabret, and pipe, and wine, are in their feasts: but they regard not the work of the LORD)

    Raised-Again 3http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=12307501
    #20
    Randy P
    Max Output Level: -44.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3070
    • Joined: 2006/11/17 11:02:45
    • Location: smokin with the boys upstairs....
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/11 12:48:27 (permalink)
    For me it's about confidence. Whether a live performance, or recording a vocal track, if I don't have 100% confidence in what's coming, I can hear it instantly. When I do have that confidence, and know what's going to come out, I'm almost always satisfied.

    When listening to hobbyists, beginners in the songs forums, I can hear the lack of confidence almost immediately. It's always interesting to hear a vocalist start a song a little shaky, and by the time the 2nd chorus comes around, they have begun to feel confident, and I can hear it cleary.

    It's crucial to a soulful, passionate performance in my mind, that the singer be well rehearsed, and confident in the ability to hit the notes, phrasing, lyrics and vibe of the song. Once completely comfortable, it's about mental state. Do I feel ready to do it? With recording tracks, I want to be in the right frame of mind for the style. For upbeat, rock style stuff, I'll set myself on track to do it on a Friday or Saturday night. It gets my mind thinking about my live performing days, and gets my brain thinking "performance". For laid back, acoustic, melancholy type songs, nothing works better for me than Sunday afternoon or evening. Might sound strange to some, but it's what works for me.

    Going back to the confidence thing, there are people on the Songs forum here, that I've heard grow in confidence over the last couple of years. It's been great to hear the growth. I don't think Reece will mind me mentioning his growth as a vocalists. We talked about confidence when he first started posting his vocals, and the improvement he's experienced has been nothing short of amazing.

    Something else I've learned that can help a singer give a more confident performance. Turn down your voice in the headphones as you track. It can help you stop thinking about how you sound, and start thinking about what you are going to do. Then it becomes about letting it happen. That's when the passion and soul happen.

    Randy


    http://www.soundclick.com/riprorenband

    The music biz is a cruel and shallow money trench,a plastic hallway where thieves & pimps run free and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side. Hunter S. Thompson
    #21
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/11 13:18:13 (permalink)
    Thanks Randy!  Nope!  I don't mind you sharing that at all!  Anyone who has been on the forums through my journey already knows this as well!

    and I continue to learn and grow!  I won't stop growing until they put me in the ground!

    and I do agree 100% with what Randy is saying.  confidence is imperative!  without it the performance is just not ever going to "get there" and if the singer doesn't convey confidence in his/her performance then it will not evoke any emotion in the audience except "what time is it?" 

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #22
    SongCraft
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3902
    • Joined: 2007/09/19 17:54:46
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/11 16:25:19 (permalink)

    Great comments/contributions to this topic, not much more I can add.

    Here's my take on it; 

    IMO if a singer wrote the lyrics or can relate to it 100% they usually feel it more and instinctively know how to convey the song with great confidence and expression.

    Another importance is to have (to begin with) are well written lyrics that actually 'sound' great (powerful melodies + lyrics) and is probably why some song lyrics don't make much sense but were a huge hit and are likely timeless classics. Writing songs of such greatness is not easy but if done it has the ability to capture the emotions, to reach out and touch the soul. Oh and golly gosh could also make you famous LOL!!
     



     
     
    #23
    Philip
    Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4062
    • Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
    • Status: offline
    Re:Voices of Passion (Muses please) 2012/03/11 17:24:19 (permalink)
    Thanks Randy, Reece, and SongCraft,

    Hahahaha!

    Confidence (and timidity) are such elusive terms, to me.  Not that I disagree with you Randy and Reece ... its just that ...

    [Timid + faithful] > [Hyper-Confident + insincere performance]

    I've know many singers (here) that bite off more than they can chew, hyper-confident, etc. ... but fail to deliver convincing performances.

    Philip  
    (Isa 5:12 And the harp, and the viol, the tabret, and pipe, and wine, are in their feasts: but they regard not the work of the LORD)

    Raised-Again 3http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=12307501
    #24
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1