Next Pro Channel module-Reverb please!!

Mmm, maybe. Though I see reverbs as typically a bus process using multiple sends. Might be a little limiting in the Pro Channel I think. It maybe deserves a simple reverb plug, but nothing special which people may want to use in a more traditional bus set-up. I'd probably use it for quickly dialling in a verb for demos and ideas, but not for serious mixing.

There's lots of good reverbs. Is creating one limited to the ProChannel a step forward, I wonder.

Perhaps if the bakers solve the ProChannel-FX bin pre-post issue we can use our favorite fx more freely.

I would really welcome fx that don't suddenly disappear over versions or between 32/64/(128?) bit versions.

Yes, bus or channel.

Cake really hasn't updated their tempo-based effects in a while.

A spring reverb as part of a Roland Space echo would be nice.  Echo, reverb - perfect for bus or channel.

And a good seller, I would think, certified by Roland.

@

Personally other than a transparent mastering limiter for x1, Id rather see cake implement it to allow any vst to be routed in any order through the PC, rather than coming up with new modules. Ive decided I'm not paying for any more ad-dons for PC until its more flexible and stable.

  I am looking at buying a decent reverb. A buss reverb would be a nice addition.

I posted in the other PC thread, so sorry for the dupe... I'd love to see a Roland SRV-330 Dimensional Space Reverb plugin. A truly under-appreciated box. Cakewalk can just take the algorithms from Roland and code it up.

I am in one of those places where I seem never to know which reverb I should use.

One reason is I have a rather nice covering of different types all seem to work well enough but what I am looking for is a revarb that is good for stereo ambiance as well as can be used on voice and instruments that uses virtually no CPU and has very simple controls yet is very powerful and costs nothing or very little.  That can be used in the PC and works well with others.

Am I asking too much?

Seriously, I wouldn't mind a PC reverb module. That would solve the first problem. I would like a good multi-channel compressor for PC too.

JazzSinger


There's lots of good reverbs. Is creating one limited to the ProChannel a step forward, I wonder.

Perhaps if the bakers solve the ProChannel-FX bin pre-post issue we can use our favorite fx more freely.

I would really welcome fx that don't suddenly disappear over versions or between 32/64/(128?) bit versions.

This actually is one thing that makes me a bit concerned about the approach to new add-ons as Pro Channel addons.


I'm not against it at all, but it makes me wonder why so may seem, well, lazy to insert a great 3rd party plugin ("reverb" is one example).


I know I find myself being a bit lazy because PC does offer some strong modules now, but not all of them are as strong as some 3rd party plugins.   Hence, there is an easy / lazy way to approach things.


Good or bad?  I dunno, but I do know that when I do use a really strong 3rd party plugin vs and easy to get to / get at PC module, there often is a big sonic difference.


I also find the adjustment knobs/controls on all the PC modules are hyper sensitive.  I find myself having to use SHIFT almost all the time which is kind of a drawback, IMHO.



I'm just sayin' ...

Disagree. There are so many amazing reverb plugins on the market already. I don't see the point in having one strictly for the ProChannel. Are reverbs not best used on a bus for the most part anyway. The ProChannel should stick to the basics. I will say it again - a channel tools module for proper panning and stereo control.

I very often turn to the sonitus plugs, very underrated IMO :-)