Stereo tools

Author
bandontherun19
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 824
  • Joined: 2011/08/28 00:09:57
  • Status: offline
2012/04/27 21:48:33 (permalink)

Stereo tools

I've used the channel tools that come with Sonar, and I like them. I saw a comment from one of the mix masters (Danny) who said he was using some of the PSP tools? i.e.,
 
http://www.pspaudioware.com/plugins/tools_and_meters/psp_stereoenhancer/
 
I'm wondering if anyone else is using these tools, and how they feel these might compare with the channel tools I have with my Sonar Pro DAW SW.
 
Thank you.

All you need is love, just ask the Beatles?
----------
#1

7 Replies Related Threads

    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Stereo tools 2012/04/28 01:03:34 (permalink)
    I've not used that particular plugin, but I've used several like it. I'd advise approaching it as if it were potentially toxic. 

    Do you see anywhere in the PSP text where it says the stereo enhancer won't destroy your mono compatibility?  I'd suggest downloading the demo, throw it on a full mix, sit back and go WOW! Then click on the interleave button on the master bus to throw it into mono. If it doesn't turn your mix into a steaming pile of doodoo, buy it.


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #2
    bandontherun19
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 824
    • Joined: 2011/08/28 00:09:57
    • Status: offline
    Re:Stereo tools 2012/04/29 21:26:21 (permalink)
    I appreciate that Flipper, but I'm not needing to mono anything. Is that for radio? I'm just a weekend warrior ;-) But I put in a few hours durring the week too. It's my passion, but I'm not a pro like you and some of the other folks here. I like to improve my sound though? One day I'd like to be "pretty good." I'll never be as good as the mix masters here, I have no delusions about that. My goal is just to be better than average. Or "AT LEAST" average.

    All you need is love, just ask the Beatles?
    ----------
    #3
    Zo
    Max Output Level: -25 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5036
    • Joined: 2008/01/25 20:49:55
    • Status: offline
    Re:Stereo tools 2012/04/29 22:09:38 (permalink)
    DrMS is a beast ...and you can re inject side in center and vice versa ..that allows mono also

    For sale  (PM me) : transfert ilok included
    Eventide Ultrachannel make offers
    Softube Summit EQ
    IK Neve 1081 , Neve precision Comp/Lim
    EastWest Goshtwriter
    Soundforge Pro 12
     
    #4
    vintagevibe
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2446
    • Joined: 2003/12/15 21:45:06
    • Location: Atlanta, Ga
    • Status: offline
    Re:Stereo tools 2012/04/29 22:33:46 (permalink)
    bitflipper


    I've not used that particular plugin, but I've used several like it. I'd advise approaching it as if it were potentially toxic. 

    Do you see anywhere in the PSP text where it says the stereo enhancer won't destroy your mono compatibility?  I'd suggest downloading the demo, throw it on a full mix, sit back and go WOW! Then click on the interleave button on the master bus to throw it into mono. If it doesn't turn your mix into a steaming pile of doodoo, buy it.

    These days why do you care if it is mono compatible?  Who is going to listen to it in mono?
    #5
    DW_Mike
    Max Output Level: -6 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6907
    • Joined: 2006/11/29 18:06:40
    • Location: The arm-pit of the good 'ol US...New Jersey
    • Status: offline
    Re:Stereo tools 2012/04/29 22:44:45 (permalink)
    vintagevibe


    bitflipper


    I've not used that particular plugin, but I've used several like it. I'd advise approaching it as if it were potentially toxic. 

    Do you see anywhere in the PSP text where it says the stereo enhancer won't destroy your mono compatibility?  I'd suggest downloading the demo, throw it on a full mix, sit back and go WOW! Then click on the interleave button on the master bus to throw it into mono. If it doesn't turn your mix into a steaming pile of doodoo, buy it.

    These days why do you care if it is mono compatible?  Who is going to listen to it in mono?

    I seem to recall hearing stories about how back in the day, family's used to sit around the radio, tune in their favorite (only) AM station and rock the house.

    Up here in the North East there's still a few AM stations.
    From what I can make out it's mostly bad sports commentary and loads of squealing static.

    I usually can only put up with about 3 to 5 minutes of that before I pop my 8 Track back in.

    Mike
    post edited by chefmike8888 - 2012/04/29 22:45:55

    Sonar X3 ~ Scarlett 18i6 ~ Home Build DAW  
    GA-Z77X-UD5H
    Intel i7 3770k 4.2GHz
    32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite (4x8) 
    2x Samsung 250GB SSD 
    1TB WD Black HDD @ 7200RPM 6Gb/s 64MB 
    Corsair H80i Liquid cooler 
    Noctua Silent Fans ~ 3x120mm ~ 1x140mm 
    Seasonic Platinum 760w PSU 
    Windows 7 Pro 64Bit.
    #6
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Stereo tools 2012/04/29 23:29:38 (permalink)

    These days why do you care if it is mono compatible?  Who is going to listen to it in mono?

    The only time you hear music in proper stereo is when you're sitting in the sweet spot, equilaterally triangulated on the speakers. Sit to one side or listen from the next room, and you're hearing a blend of both channels. The further you get from the speakers, the less  stereophonic it becomes. The left and right components are being summed acoustically rather than electronically, but they are still being summed.

    Now some nitpickers are going to say that acoustical summing isn't the same thing as electrical summing. Technically, it isn't. It's much more complex and often less objectionable due to the effect of room reflections that blur the potential phase cancellations that destroy mono compatibility. But it's still there and still perceptible as a loss of fullness.

    You can prove this yourself. Take a mono track and clone it. Pan each of the tracks hard left and right, then invert the phase of one of them. What you've done is intentionally set up the worst possible mono-incompatibility scenario. If mono compatibility really didn't matter, there'd be no problem. Play it back in your headphones and it sounds OK. Play it through your speakers and it doesn't sound so great. Step a few feet back from the speakers and it sounds even worse.

    Then of course there's the possibility that your music does get played on radio or television. Many radio and TV receivers are mono, or very narrow stereo. If you're listening to the TV through speakers mounted on each side of the display, and you're 10-12 feet away and off to one side, then you're essentially hearing monophonic sound. AM radio is usually mono. FM radio is usually stereo, but some of the separation is lost so that it's less stereophonic from the midrange on down.

    Mono isn't some historical footnote from 1960, it's everywhere.


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #7
    vintagevibe
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2446
    • Joined: 2003/12/15 21:45:06
    • Location: Atlanta, Ga
    • Status: offline
    Re:Stereo tools 2012/04/30 21:47:10 (permalink)
    bitflipper



    These days why do you care if it is mono compatible?  Who is going to listen to it in mono?

    The only time you hear music in proper stereo is when you're sitting in the sweet spot, equilaterally triangulated on the speakers. Sit to one side or listen from the next room, and you're hearing a blend of both channels. The further you get from the speakers, the less  stereophonic it becomes. The left and right components are being summed acoustically rather than electronically, but they are still being summed.

    Now some nitpickers are going to say that acoustical summing isn't the same thing as electrical summing. Technically, it isn't. It's much more complex and often less objectionable due to the effect of room reflections that blur the potential phase cancellations that destroy mono compatibility. But it's still there and still perceptible as a loss of fullness.

    You can prove this yourself. Take a mono track and clone it. Pan each of the tracks hard left and right, then invert the phase of one of them. What you've done is intentionally set up the worst possible mono-incompatibility scenario. If mono compatibility really didn't matter, there'd be no problem. Play it back in your headphones and it sounds OK. Play it through your speakers and it doesn't sound so great. Step a few feet back from the speakers and it sounds even worse.

    Then of course there's the possibility that your music does get played on radio or television. Many radio and TV receivers are mono, or very narrow stereo. If you're listening to the TV through speakers mounted on each side of the display, and you're 10-12 feet away and off to one side, then you're essentially hearing monophonic sound. AM radio is usually mono. FM radio is usually stereo, but some of the separation is lost so that it's less stereophonic from the midrange on down.

    Mono isn't some historical footnote from 1960, it's everywhere.



    Seem like just listening from a different room would do the trick.

    #8
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1