skylightron
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 277
- Joined: 2011/09/03 18:05:39
- Status: offline
Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
Melodyne Essential is going for $49.99 at Musicians Friend's today in their Stupid Deal of the Day. Do you guys think this is worth picking up if V-vocal is already a feature of recent Sonar and X1 in general? FL Studio also has a pitch correction plugin that sells for $99. It looks cooler than Melodynes with its dark GUI. Do you guys know if New Tone can be used in Sonar or standalone?
|
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24398
- Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
- Location: NC
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 15:31:13
(permalink)
Melodyne beats VV so yeah.... Looking cool or working like it's supposed to...... which would you rather have? Melodyne is one of the best pitch correction packages on the market. If you want clean, artifact free, transparent pitch fixes, Melodyne is the ticket to buy. Just my opinion. I have it and love it. I use Editor. I did a bunch of comparing before I bought it.
My website & music: www.herbhartley.com MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface BMI/NSAI "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer "
|
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9871
- Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 15:58:08
(permalink)
Melodyne beats VV so yeah.... Looking cool or working like it's supposed to...... which would you rather have? Melodyne is one of the best pitch correction packages on the market. If you want clean, artifact free, transparent pitch fixes, Melodyne is the ticket to buy. Just my opinion. I have it and love it. I use Editor. I did a bunch of comparing before I bought it. Yep! Melodyne has no equal when it comes to intonation correction. SUPER quick/easy...
|
fooman
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1382
- Joined: 2006/06/26 14:47:44
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 16:14:45
(permalink)
However it's known to be buggy with Sonar. I have to real-time bounce after the X1d update. Minor annoyance I guess. I've read about memory leaks as well, but don't know of any concrete facts or scenarios. Saying all that...I couldn't do without Melodyne.
|
californiamusic
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 223
- Joined: 2005/08/07 10:06:46
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 16:44:43
(permalink)
I've tried a few.. Melodyne is no doubt the best. It does work buggy as a Sonar plugin, I'm guessing they will address that soon enough ( Right??!?) ; )
Intel i7-4770 - 3.9GHZ DDR3 - 32GB RAM Sonar PlatinumPresonus Studio 192 Motu 2408 MK3 Waves v9 Spectrasonics Omnisphere, Stylus RMX, Trilion Novation V-Station, Gladiator, ReFX Nexus, Lounge Lizard, Alchemy www.soundcloud.com/glenntolliver
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 17:09:16
(permalink)
And there is a significant number of Sonar users who experience no problems running V-Vocal. Just saying, for sake of balance
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
ProjectM
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3941
- Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 17:23:54
(permalink)
Is V-Vocal updated? I haven't used it in a long time but I remember it being fiddly to use and with less than excellent results. There's a possibillity that I never managed to learn it properly. Anyway, I ended up geting Melodyne instead which I have never had any problems with. I never leave it in the project tho, as soon as I'm done editing I do (as someone else say) a real-time bounce and get rid of it. Never had a crash and the results are amazing! On a different note - I work professionally with Nuendo as well and have used the built in pitch correction inside Nuendo quite extensively. Melodyne even beats that to the ground. It's absolutely fantastic. However, if you're after an autotune effect, it's not that great. But that's positive I guess if your primary goal is to keep things sounding natural. For that you can't beat Melodyne (sorry V-Vocal  ) I'm using the Editor as well.
(Sonar Platinum - Win10 x64) - iMac and 13" MacBook - Logic Pro X ++ - UA Apollo Twin DUO - NI Maschine MKII - NI Komplete Kontrol S61 - Novation Nocturne - KRK Rokit 6 SoundcloudNegative Vibe Records
|
simpleman
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 262
- Joined: 2009/05/16 01:20:33
- Location: Down to Earth
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 18:07:56
(permalink)
V-Vocal is probably not going to be part of Sonar, for the next version update (this was mentioned by one of the Cakewalk guys, Brandon?) Melodyne is the best for correction purposes;Autotune is the best for vocal sound altering. FL-Studio has always been good at vocal FXing, so I assume Newtone enhances that. I still prefer V-Vocal over Newtone, even though newTone is is easier like moving one note at a time. For me Newtone gets more phasey moving an entire clip over a wider range versus V-Vocal. If V-Vocal is abandoned, hopefully Cakewalk has something better planned.
|
benjaminfrog
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 477
- Joined: 2006/11/05 12:26:57
- Location: Minneapolis
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 18:15:40
(permalink)
Seems like Auto-Tune gets no love. I have both Melodyne and Auto-Tune and get better quality results from Auto-Tune - ***graphical, not auto, mode***. Melodyne's interface is less cluttered and perhaps more intuitive, but, in my experience, unless you slice the Ss off of every single word (that has an S) and exclude them from processing, the results sound phasey and unnatural. I totally respect the opinion of the folks who prefer Melodyne, but it gets talked about as though it were a foregone conclusion that Melodyne is the best. That said, $50 is pretty cheap and Melodyne sounds a lot better than V-Vocal. My preference for Auto-Tune aside, I'd say go for it.
|
Lanceindastudio
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4604
- Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 18:29:49
(permalink)
Melodyne is not buggy at all here in Sonar X1. Sonar however doesnt fast bounce clips or tracks with it inserted and keep the edits from Melodyne. Sonar 8.5 does fast bounce Melodyne correctly. Melodyne is the most natural sounding, greatest vocal tuning software in existence. Sound of it is vastly superior, much more true to the original vocal take tone. Lance
Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard i7 3770k CPU 32 gigs RAM Presonus AudioBox iTwo Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51 Presonus Eureka Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
|
fireberd
Max Output Level: -38 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3704
- Joined: 2008/02/25 14:14:28
- Location: Inverness, FL
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 18:42:32
(permalink)
I'll find out, I ordered it along with some other items from M/F today. I wasn't going to order it but after the other items, I decided to bite. I tried Auto Tune 7 and it won't work with Sonar 64 bit (they reluctantly refunded my money after admitting it won't run with Sonar 64 bit - they told me to install Sonar 32 bit so it would work).
"GCSG Productions" Franklin D-10 Pedal Steel Guitar (primary instrument). Nashville Telecaster, Bass, etc. ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero M/B, i7 6700K CPU, 16GB Ram, SSD and conventional hard drives, Win 10 Pro and Win 10 Pro Insider Pre-Release Sonar Platinum/CbB. MOTU 896MK3 Hybrid, Tranzport, X-Touch, JBL LSR308 Monitors, Ozone 5, Studio One 4.1 ISRC Registered Member of Nashville based R.O.P.E. Assn.
|
javahut
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 361
- Joined: 2005/11/25 19:35:23
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 18:46:53
(permalink)
Lanceindastudio Sonar however doesnt fast bounce clips or tracks with it inserted and keep the edits from Melodyne. Sonar 8.5 does fast bounce Melodyne correctly. Lance This is a known bug in Sonar X1, though, right? The problem with bouncing to clip not rendering time based/synced effects? I hope so, and that it will be fixed by Cakewalk SOON! Even though Melodyne says they don't support it, putting Melodyne on a clip a bouncing to clip was by far the easiest way to work with it. And it did work fine the last time I tried it... which must have been before X1d. I sent a support question about the fix for this to Cakewalk over 2 days ago, and have yet to receive a reply.
|
Lanceindastudio
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4604
- Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 18:51:12
(permalink)
yeah, it is a SONAR thing. I have reported it. Melodyne fast bounce was fine before X1. Still I can bounce to a track without fast bounce selected and Melodyne bounces fine. Lance
Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard i7 3770k CPU 32 gigs RAM Presonus AudioBox iTwo Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51 Presonus Eureka Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
|
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24398
- Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
- Location: NC
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 19:25:49
(permalink)
I run Editor in X1 essentials build "c". I have no problems and have seen no bugs in Melodyne. I always bounce it or quite often now I simply "apply Audio/process" the track or section of the track I an correcting. I've not had a single issue doing it that way. And the bounce happens pretty quick so I assume it is fast bouncing.
My website & music: www.herbhartley.com MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface BMI/NSAI "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer "
|
Lanceindastudio
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4604
- Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 19:34:48
(permalink)
Good info Guitarhacker. Thanx! Lance
Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard i7 3770k CPU 32 gigs RAM Presonus AudioBox iTwo Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51 Presonus Eureka Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
|
twisted6s
Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2001
- Joined: 2007/08/21 21:10:33
- Location: New York
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 19:39:23
(permalink)
Can Melodyne run as a real time plug like autotune evo?
|
Lanceindastudio
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4604
- Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 19:43:42
(permalink)
The data has to be transferred to the plugin in real time. Then when it is in the plugin, the plugin does not have to be processed, so at that point, the edits are playing back real time essentially. I like to bounce instances of it to save resources and keep the project less complex. Lance
Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard i7 3770k CPU 32 gigs RAM Presonus AudioBox iTwo Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51 Presonus Eureka Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
|
Jimbo21
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 696
- Joined: 2010/02/08 19:35:48
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 20:06:25
(permalink)
I have Melodyne Essential and it does sound better than V-Vocal. But, the Essential doesn't do vibrato pitch changes within a given note. If you have a note where the singer slides up or down into the correct pitch, you can't even that out. On those occasions, I sing it over or use V-Vocal to correct it. So I use both. at some point though, I'm gonna upgrade to Editor if I come across a great deal from Melodyne, and then it's bye bye V-Vocal.
|
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11546
- Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
- Location: Parkesburg, PA
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/01 20:20:17
(permalink)
As big a SONAR fan as I am, I also prefer Melodyne hands down... the Editor version, anyway. But I also use it within Studio One via ARA so it opens in-place similar to the PRV. I haven't used S1 for much else at this point, but for this use it works really well. Add ARA to SONAR and it would be, well, wow.
SteveC https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163 SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors; Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO); Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
|
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24398
- Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
- Location: NC
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/02 09:06:47
(permalink)
twisted6s Can Melodyne run as a real time plug like autotune evo? Tony, Not in real time. It requires capturing the recorded audio into melodyne first. That is done by activating capture and then hitting playback and letting it run start to finish. Then the audio can be manipulated. Melodyne syncs to the playback point. If you jump the playback by clicking to a different part of the song during playback .....melodyne is out of sync with the Sonar playback until you stop and restart the playback. You can also start the capture at any point in a song. For example if one note in the first chorus is off, you start capture right before that note and stop shortly after. Make the corrections and then simply apply audio process..... it "prints" the fix to the track and removes the plug. Man I use it that way all the time. quick and easy. Hope that helps.
My website & music: www.herbhartley.com MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface BMI/NSAI "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer "
|
konradh
Max Output Level: -42 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3325
- Joined: 2006/01/16 16:07:06
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/02 09:34:51
(permalink)
Meodyne is better than V-Vocal, but I am not familiar with "Essential." I have Assistant.
|
fooman
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1382
- Joined: 2006/06/26 14:47:44
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/02 09:37:53
(permalink)
Fast bounce broke in X1d. I used it in X1c without issue.
|
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24398
- Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
- Location: NC
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/02 12:46:29
(permalink)
konradh Meodyne is better than V-Vocal, but I am not familiar with "Essential." I have Assistant. essential is the stripped down version.... just what you need and no more, to do pitch correction. The details are removed.
My website & music: www.herbhartley.com MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface BMI/NSAI "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer "
|
Silicon Audio
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 346
- Joined: 2012/03/06 04:33:19
- Location: Northland, New Zealand
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/02 21:03:32
(permalink)
The problem with V-vocal is that it's Roland's code. I don't believe CW even have access to the source code. This is why it's been impossible for CW to fix it. V-vocal is fundamentally broken and unfortunately makes Sonar look bad. Sonar would honestly be better with no vocal intonation tool rather than a broken one. If you include something, people expect it to work. If you don't, people just go and get something 3rd party. My vote is get rid of V-vocal from any future version of Sonar.
"One of the great and beautiful things about music and recordings in general is that legacies live on" - Billy Arnell - April 15 2012
|
Skyline_UK
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2133
- Joined: 2004/04/15 17:55:09
- Location: Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/03 05:55:07
(permalink)
californiamusic I've tried a few.. Melodyne is no doubt the best. It does work buggy as a Sonar plugin, I'm guessing they will address that soon enough ( Right??!?) ; ) Yes, there is a memory leak in it. Yes, they are working on it. Interestingly, I see on the Presonus Studio One forums that Presonus have just discovered a similar resource problem with Melodyne that causes ever-increasing use of memory in Studio 1.
My stuff Intel Sandy Bridge i7 2600 @ 3.4GHz, 4 cores, 8 threads, 16GB RAM.OS & Programs drive: 240GB SSD Data drives: 1 x 1TB drive RAID mirrored, plus extra 1TB data drive Windows 10 Home 64 bit Cakewalk by BandLab 64 bit, Studio One 3, Band In A Box 2016, Ozone 8+ too many other pluginsBandLab page
|
guitardad
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 94
- Joined: 2006/03/16 05:04:11
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/03 08:02:25
(permalink)
Melodyne is fantastic. I just prefer to use it stand alone rather than VST etc. I also use Melodyne Editor version. I always export a vocal or bass line though, fix in Melodyne then import to new track via the browser. For me I like hearing the orig and edited tracks independently. Takes a couple more minutes, but since Melodyne seems to be a resource hog at 64bit, that method is so much better and never has a problem vs working in X1 or other daws.. I never had much appreciation for auto tune or VV as a pitch correction tool. The others work for effects but not for pitch and pitch modulation and other edits.
Sonar X2 w packs/ S8.53PE Win 7 64b Quad Core cpu 2.6ghz 8GB ram Intel mobo Focusrite LS56
|
skylightron
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 277
- Joined: 2011/09/03 18:05:39
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/03 16:13:30
(permalink)
Well I opted not to pick up the Essential version because to upgrade it, it cost a lot more then just starting out with Assistant. And with Assistant, it has a few more features. I figure, V-vocal has all the basic pitch correction features that I would possibly need. So it didn't make sense for me to spend another $49 for basic features. Autotune looks sharp too but doesn't look as easy to use.
|
listen
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 593
- Joined: 2008/09/12 06:07:55
- Status: offline
Re:Melodyne Essential vs. V-vocal vs. New Tone
2012/05/03 17:41:04
(permalink)
V-Vocal does have it place and times; but Melodyne likewise is my go to picth correction tool...
- Listen - FOH Mixer & Recording Studio Manager Nothing but the grace of God - mggtg. VS 700C - R / CONSOLE 1 / NEVE PORTICO 5017 / TASCAM UH-7000 / SONAR PLATINUM / REASON RECORD 9 / VMP 2 / UREI 7110's / UA LA-610 MkII / AUDIENT ASP 880 / CREATION STATION 450 V 5 WINDOWS 10 / HOME 64 - BIT / SKYLAKE CORE i7 (i7 - 6700, 4 CORES/8 THREADS)
|