Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase???

Author
piano39
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 60
  • Joined: 2005/02/01 21:19:16
  • Status: offline
2012/06/20 20:24:30 (permalink)

Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase???

  I searched the forum for this topic, but didn't see it addressed directly, so here goes: I have been using Cakewalk sequncers since about 1997. About two years ago, I upgraded from Sonar Producer 8 to X1 Producer. Also about that time, I purchased a used Motif ES6. The Motif sounds terrific, but had a terrible learning curve. After two years, though, I got this thing down. It is easy to just turn it on, and record a song in an evening. I then bounce it over to Sonar for mixdowns, arrangements, etc. The problem is the better that I get with the Motif production facilities (patterns, phrases, arps, etc), the more I like it. Also, I find myself dreading using Sonar. Just too much dicking around. I set up templates for the Motif, but there is too much mouse grabbing to be productive. Plus, there are too many WTF moments with Sonar. I spent about three evenings last winter trying to get Dimension Pro to load sounds that were on the PC. By the way, my DAW PC has never been on the internet. I do not have many crashes, but upgrading any software is a real PITA. This is all about workflow. I am now seriously considering upgrade to a Motif XF. Among other things, it now includes a version of Cubase. I am sure that the Motif will talk better to Cubase than to Sonar. Here's my questions- any Motif users out there have similar experiences? Would you rather use the Motif or Sonar for most basic tracks, etc? How about Cubase vs Sonar, overall?
#1

12 Replies Related Threads

    piano39
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 60
    • Joined: 2005/02/01 21:19:16
    • Status: offline
    Re:Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase??? 2012/06/20 20:26:24 (permalink)
    I swear- when I composed this post, I had clear paragraphs with line spaces between each. Hope you can read one long run on post.
    #2
    Fog
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12302
    • Joined: 2008/02/27 21:53:35
    • Location: UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase??? 2012/06/20 21:38:32 (permalink)
    use google chrome to avoid the paragraph thingy.
    but as for sonar , cubase. I use both.. 

    as I grew up with cubase/c-lab/logic/notator on the ST (yer showing my age) , so thats part of why I stick with cubase as well.

    each (and reason) have aspects I like and dislike.. sure yamaha bought into steinberg, as much as roland did with cakewalk.. thats just how it's gone.

    can't speak for the motif , but maybe there is stuff relating to that and sonar also :) . you have did a bit of googling ? that normally is fruitful.

    find it odd your having "issue" with DP , it's straight forward... I assume you have a decent asio based card?






    #3
    piano39
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 60
    • Joined: 2005/02/01 21:19:16
    • Status: offline
    Re:Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase??? 2012/06/20 21:46:49 (permalink)
    My problems with DP have to do with their file management system. I have a Presonus firestudio card that works fine. I loaded some of the DP stuff that Cakewalk gave away for free and that's when my trouble started. DP couldn't find most of the stuff. All my other VST synths have better file management than DP. I have (easily) over 1000 sounds in my Sampletank directory. Easy to add more sounds, back-up, etc. IIRC, DP puts the different files that make up a patch in different directories.
    #4
    Mystic38
    Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1622
    • Joined: 2010/08/30 17:40:34
    • Location: Mystic, CT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase??? 2012/06/20 22:44:03 (permalink)
    What is wrong with the ES that you want to go to the XF for? gear lust?..:) ..i mean, what problem will be fixed?.. it still will be hard to sequence with, with a small screen and slow clunky UI.

    I have the S70xs and use no form of templates whatsoever, and simply use the instrument definition files in Sonar to select voices... I can sit at the piano, select sounds, and use the iPad/AC7 core as a remote control for Sonar for selecting, arming and hitting rec/play...

    even tho the UI is 10x better than the motif, I would not go back to sequencing on the Fantom G (my workstation) unless it was simple phrase capture/idea generation... It is much easier to sequence fully and directly in Sonar, then if you play live, port onto your workstation if you need.

    So, not know where your process issues are with Sonar/ES i dont see how Cubase can help?... with midi sync and instrument definitions, you have everything you need.. perhaps a more clear understanding of what problems you are seeing (that i am not)..

    Note that the free Cubase is the AI or LE version... not the equivalent to X1 producer..

    HPE-580T with i7-950, 8G, 1.5T, ATI6850, Win7/64, Motu 828 III Hybrid, Motu Midi Express, Sonar Platinum, Komplete 9, Ableton Live 9 & Push 2, Melodyne Editor and other stuff, KRK VXT8 Monitors
    Virus Ti2 Polar, Fantom G6, Yamaha S70XS, Novation Nova, Novation Nova II, Korg MS2000, Waldorf Micro Q, NI Maschine Studio, TC-VoiceLive Rack, 2012 Gibson Les Paul Standard, 2001 Gibson Les Paul DC, 1999 Fender Am Hardtail Strat, Fender Blues Jr, Orange TH30/PPC212, Tak EF360GF, one mic, no talent.
    #5
    californiamusic
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 223
    • Joined: 2005/08/07 10:06:46
    • Location: Chicago, IL
    • Status: offline
    Re:Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase??? 2012/06/21 00:12:18 (permalink)

    Hey Piano39.  I have the Motif XF8, and had the XS8 and ES8 before, all supreme boards!  I've used Sonar sense version 3 I think.. never really had any issues at all (aside from the typical DAW stuff every so often). 
    What I did was get a Template on the Motif in MIX mode that I liked.. got the effects set up, and the 16 tracks with set instruments the way I liked them (ch.1, drums, ch2, bass, etc.) and in Sonar I have a template with midi channels 1-16 ready to go when I pull it up.  I do all my sequencing and when I like what I have, I convert it to audio in Sonar.. no problems.

    No midi cables, just the 1 USB cable for communication.  Sonar and Cubase are both great programs.. both having much more extensive midi sides then ProTools.  Either program with work great, I just happened to get into Cakewalk early on.  It has everything you need for sure. 

    The XF series is quite abit more advanced then the ES or XS was.. faster, better sounds, and better DA-AD converters.. LOVE it.  ; )

    Intel i7-4770 -  3.9GHZ DDR3  -  32GB RAM
    Sonar Platinum
    Presonus Studio 192
    Motu 2408 MK3
    Waves v9
    Spectrasonics Omnisphere, Stylus RMX, Trilion 
    Novation V-Station, Gladiator, ReFX Nexus, Lounge Lizard, Alchemy

    www.soundcloud.com/glenntolliver
    #6
    Shambler
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 783
    • Joined: 2010/07/06 05:20:19
    • Status: offline
    Re:Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase??? 2012/06/21 06:19:05 (permalink)
    As a past Motif XS user I would say that Cubase does integrate better with the Motif because Yamaha supply a dedicated vst plug-in for it.

    The plug-in is Vst3 so won't work in Sonar, but plenty of people still have problems getting it to work right in Cubase...

    Having said that I now have a Kurzweil and have no problem integrating it to Sonar, it's all about setting it up in a way that works for you.

    SONAR Platypus on Win10 64bit.
    Studio One Pro / Cubase Pro 9.5...just in case.
    8GB i7-2600 3.4GHz Gigabyte  Z68XP-UD3P
    Geforce GTX970
    Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 2nd Gen
    Prophet 12/Rev 2/Virus Snow
    Zebra2/DIVA/NI Komplete 10
    #7
    paulhcp
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 250
    • Joined: 2007/10/06 14:48:59
    • Status: offline
    Re:Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase??? 2012/06/21 07:47:40 (permalink)
    Shambler, Just a off topic question. You say you have a Kurzweil now and I was wondering if you think the piano sound is better then the Yamaha? Thanks

    SONAR X3C PE , Windows Pro 8.1 64 BIT
    I7 2600k,  Gigabyte Z68MA MB, 8 gigs Ram
    Corsair SSD 240, WD ,HD 150GB VelociRaptor, 
    Roland Quad capture, Mackie 824 M2
    Yamaha S90 keyboard,
    Omnisphere, Trillian, kontakt 5., Zebra HZ
    Diva, Addictive keys.
    #8
    Shambler
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 783
    • Joined: 2010/07/06 05:20:19
    • Status: offline
    Re:Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase??? 2012/06/21 10:11:02 (permalink)
    Hi Paul, they both have good piano sounds I don't think one is better than the other, they both sound good and are very usable.

    SONAR Platypus on Win10 64bit.
    Studio One Pro / Cubase Pro 9.5...just in case.
    8GB i7-2600 3.4GHz Gigabyte  Z68XP-UD3P
    Geforce GTX970
    Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 2nd Gen
    Prophet 12/Rev 2/Virus Snow
    Zebra2/DIVA/NI Komplete 10
    #9
    konradh
    Max Output Level: -42 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3325
    • Joined: 2006/01/16 16:07:06
    • Status: offline
    Re:Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase??? 2012/06/21 13:28:24 (permalink)
    Interesting conversation.  I bought a Tyros 2 a few years ago because 1-it had the Motif sample set plus a few other really good sounds and 2-I planned to create custom styles (bass, drum, keys, guitars) as starting points for demos and writing—sort of like song creator sets.

    I found creating custom styles so frustrating and tedious that I never created a single one.  I also found that the Tyros 2 works with Sonar, but it was screwy at first.  (You have to know to turn off Local before activating Sonar, you cannot use Local while Sonar is connected, and you may have to reboot the Tyros 2 after Sonar to make it work right under local control.)

    Also, and this was the big thing, you cannot call up all the sounds from Sonar that you can from the panel because some sounds are created on the fly using Tyros 2 effects and cannot be called up from a sequencer just by Bank/Patch number.  The workaround: create a song in the Tyros 2 in which you select all the desired sounds from panel buttons.  Then you can import that song into Sonar and it will call up all the correct sounds.   This is a pain: turn off Sonar, create a song in Tyros 2, save song to USB stick, load that into Sonar, edit everything out except the non-note events that call up the sounds and effects.

    I still like the T2 but I was really disappointed that it never did what I bought it for.  I love many of the sounds and use them daily, but would have gotten something cheaper if I had known what a pain this would be.
    #10
    piano39
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 60
    • Joined: 2005/02/01 21:19:16
    • Status: offline
    Re:Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase??? 2012/06/21 20:25:09 (permalink)
      Like I said, It's all about the workflow. In Motif, I can select a track, hit, rewind and record, and I am recording in 2 seconds. If it's a bad take, I'm 2 seconds away from a fresh take. Do not have to take my eyes off the motif, do not have to grab a mouse and start selecting icons, etc. Once I got used to the Motif way of working, it is about 10 times faster. Even the task of auditioning sounds on the Motif is faster. One of the problems with the bloat that DAWs like Sonar have is that there are too many choices. Too many bad patches that you will never use. You never know until you click on it, wait for it to load, then audition it on the keyboard. For years, I used my Alesis QS7 as a midi keyboard for Sonar. So I was quite used to working with the commands, etc. My point is that it is so much easier to get ideas down on the Motif. I have the Motif ES instrument definition loaded into X1, and that is a help.
    #11
    piano39
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 60
    • Joined: 2005/02/01 21:19:16
    • Status: offline
    Re:Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase??? 2012/06/21 20:27:27 (permalink)
     " What I did was get a Template on the Motif in MIX mode that I liked.. got the effects set up, and the 16 tracks with set instruments the way I liked them (ch.1, drums, ch2, bass, etc.) and in Sonar I have a template with midi channels 1-16 ready to go when I pull it up. I do all my sequencing and when I like what I have, I convert it to audio in Sonar.. no problems. " I also have this set up when I am ready to mix down, etc.
    #12
    californiamusic
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 223
    • Joined: 2005/08/07 10:06:46
    • Location: Chicago, IL
    • Status: offline
    Re:Yamaha Motif Users: Sonar X1 vs Cubase??? 2012/06/21 22:37:13 (permalink)
     The XF8 has a much better window to see what's going on.. but recording in Sonar and seeing it on a 32" monitor is heaven, and having your audio tracks all in the same window, I'd never be able to work in that small Motif window again ; )

    Intel i7-4770 -  3.9GHZ DDR3  -  32GB RAM
    Sonar Platinum
    Presonus Studio 192
    Motu 2408 MK3
    Waves v9
    Spectrasonics Omnisphere, Stylus RMX, Trilion 
    Novation V-Station, Gladiator, ReFX Nexus, Lounge Lizard, Alchemy

    www.soundcloud.com/glenntolliver
    #13
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1