Suggestions to make the smart tools smarter

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re:Suggestions to make the smart tools smarter 2012/07/04 22:24:44 (permalink)
Mr. Mike


John, your answer is the worst kind of hyperbole. Essentially it says, yes, it sucks but he should have been aware of that. Therefore he is wrong. Not logical,  but effective to the legions that follow your opinion and need the approval of the forum. I do not suffer from these illusions. I see the forum for what it is. The problem is you've all started to believe your own press. You have nothing that I can see to back up your claims. You keep saying it's better. but you provide no examples.

And another thing. When a founder leaves, it's bad thing. A very bad thing. It disturbs me on many levels.

What answer? I thought I was letting you have the last word. Have a happy 4th!

Best
John
#31
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Suggestions to make the smart tools smarter 2012/07/05 01:10:49 (permalink)
Mr. Mike


Wow. The arrogance. I understand the tools. I really do. I'll try and explain this as calmly as I can. 

No arrogance in my first reply, only the answer to what I thought were genuine questions in your post #6, which you apparently completely ignored to complain later about modifier keys.

Of course you can complain all you want, but lets face it, your approach was hardly honest was it? If you'd have simply said you don't like the 'new' way as much as 8.5 and then gone into full rant, I for one probably would have ignored the thread but I genuinely tried to answer what I thought was a genuine question. 

Only to find out a couple of post later that you aren't at all interested in the answers but simply want another 8.5 is better than X1 argument thread. It might be, I don't think so personally and neither do I care. I frequent these boards to help out where I can, learn where I can and have a laugh at some of the banter.


I don't like answering questions only to find out that the question asker isn't in the least bit interested in the answer, only in generating an argument. I'll finish this post and then bow out and leave you to it.....

In 8.5 I can edit all my envelopes, slip edit the track, move the track, do anything I need to do without any center clicking, shift clicking or any other nonsense. I can do it in the dark. I can do it on the fly with the music playing. This type of editing is something I do a lot of. Quite frankly, I hate it. My least favorite but essential task. 

To edit a typical 4 envelope track I have to shift click edit, shift click edit etc. My question to you is simply, how is this better? Some of you have made sport of me. Insinuating I don't understand the tools. Perhaps I need to read the manual.

One of the bigger complaints pre-X1 was the way envelopes and automation was implemented, that was probably why it was changed. As to how is it better..... It's no longer possible to accidentally edit or move the wrong thing. If you've never moved a clip by mistake while trying to edit automation you're much better at it than me. Perhaps it was dumbed down for us dumb boys? 


I suppose if envelope count is fairly low there probably isn't much of an advantage but once the envelopes start piling up and there's a lot of criss crossing going on the 'new' edit filter makes accidental editing of other envelopes impossible and IMHO better. The shift + click method is one way of switching quickly between them, shift + right click will also switch between the last two edit filter states. If you read these boards you'll also know that one of my complaints is that there is no way of seeing the envelope type that is about to be clicked on. If that is ever implimented the automation tools will be pretty much perfect for me.

I keep complaining because I feel I'm right. The tools are not better. They made them stupid proof. I don't need that. If you guys need the program to babysit your editing skills, fine. I don't. I want the old tools back. At lest give me a box I can check.

That's your opinion, I don't agree.

I'd like to use X1. I paid for it and some of the changes make a lot of sense and now that I'm used to it, the interface is better. I'm not as gaga over the Pro Channel as you boys are but I chalk that up to fanboi-ism. Seriously, it's not that good. Any UAD vst is better.

And now a word to the general attitude of the forum and the people that frequent it. It's mean. And arrogant. 


May I suggest a mirror?

Because of the things I mentioned, X1 does not fill my needs. And yet, because I have a 20 year history, I really want it to. When I express these concerns, I'm attacked. It's been insinuated several times that I'm stupid. I assure you, I'm not. And I have read the manual.

So you were asking a loaded question then.... 

In anticipation of the next round of insults. I will continue to use 8.5 which I regard as mostly superior to X1. I'll also continue to monitor this forum because it amuses me. In typical forum fashion, I expect you to pick up the one thing you can make a slight and misguided arugment against and reply. Go for it dood.


You won't get any from me now or in the future, you're going on the ignore list so I don't bother answering any more loaded questions that you don't want an answer to.






#32
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re:Suggestions to make the smart tools smarter 2012/07/05 02:17:07 (permalink)
Mr. Mike


No keystrokes needed to perform those functions in 8.5. How is this an improvement? And with mulitple envelopes that's a lot of keystrokes. I find myself leaving a finger on the shift key as a "workaround". It's already an unpleasant yet vital task and X1 just makes it worse. I wonder what made Cakewalk take a simple and elegant tool system and bog it down with keystrokes.
can you see what this has come to?
 
now people are finding it unpleasant and VITAL to actually hold their finger near or on the shift key.
im sorry but how does that sound?
you could always click your middle mouse wheel to change tools,but then again it would require the vital effort of moving your finger to the middle wheel.
 
every person works a little different in the prv and other windows.
you cant please everyone.
 
what you might find helpful,i might find a vidal task,see where im going?
they didnt build x1 to your modifications,they built it for the general users in mind.
it would sound selfish for me to complain about how bad i think a certain function works,when that same function would be helpful to you.
i know,you miss your little buttons from 8.5.
 
have you checked out benstats toolbar?
 
maybe the reason you find the forum mean and arrogant is because the vibes you give are not as pleasant as you think.
you are not trying to constructively give criticism,you are basically stomping your feet saying "i want my buttons back"
im 100%sure every sonar user would like to see a thing or two or even more improved but there is a way of communicating where people dont take it as an insult like you did here to fbb.
 
hes a guy that is very hard to tick off. and basically dedicates his time to helping others.
there will come a time you might need this forum to answer a question or two.
i would think you might like that.
 
were all kinda just like you in many ways,we love our daws and are recording fanatics,passion for music.
you get what you put in to this forum,if you bite a hand who is trying to help,chances are...your going to get bitten.
 
but you can always start over by simply stating,"is there a better way" ?
 
there is for you at least.
 
check out benstats toolbar mod.
it will give you the buttons you so love back.
and it has a few more options im sure you would like because its aimed at simulating features from 8.5 into sonar x1.
post edited by chuckebaby - 2012/07/05 02:32:02

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#33
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1