bbdude
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 248
- Joined: 2004/04/15 11:34:07
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Status: offline
RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
I'm thinking about upgrading from my current RME FF800 to an RME FF UFX. With my current setup, (FF800 + Presonus Digimax FS), I have 18 AtoD inputs and 8 AtoD outputs. I need an additional 8 AtoD and 8 DtoA channels. I would get this by continuing to operate the FF800 as an ADAT unit, along with my Digimax FS into the UFX. Also would like to finally get rid of my external analog mixer, which I parallel off my mic pres and other outboard line-level gear. I use the mixer & external FX for headphone/monitor mixes and studio-live band practices, warm-up sessions before recording, etc. I'm thinking all of these monitor mixer and monitor FX functions could be done in the box with the FF UFX. So, the question is: Are any of you folks who own a UFX running with this many channels (24+ inputs, 10+ outputs)? If so, how well is it working for you in terms of sound quality, stability, reliability, and useability of the TotalMix FX features for live monitoring?
Bob the bbdude RME FF-UFX , RME FF800 DAW PC built by ADK , Core i7 3770 IVB Sonar X3e Producer, Win 7-Pro 64-bit
|
7-string_guy
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 430
- Joined: 2008/04/18 20:05:58
- Location: Earth, I think
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/09/13 15:49:01
(permalink)
I just wanted to say that I love my RME FF400 unit....great for the solo artist...what you are talking about is way out of my league....sorry I couldn't help.
I7 2600k 3.4g on a ASUS MB with 16 gb of ram FireFace 400 AI / Sonar 8.5 Producer / ToonTrack Superior Drummer 2 Alesis M1 Active MKII / Ibanez 7 string / Fender Super-Sonic Schecter studio 5 bass / Boss Dr. Rhythm 880 , also Yamaha DTX full rack drum pad trigger system
|
panup
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2538
- Joined: 2006/05/23 09:34:35
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/09/14 20:02:53
(permalink)
> So, the question is: Are any of you folks who own a UFX running with this many channels (24+ inputs, 10+ outputs)? > If so, how well is it working for you in terms of sound quality, stability, reliability, and useability of the TotalMix FX features for live monitoring? I used two Fireface 800 units over 7 years, 300 days/year. I bought UFX in January. I sold one FF800 and kept the other as a spare unit for UFX. I use all UFX input and output channels in recording studio environment. External Apogee A/D and D/A converters are connected to ADATs, Fractal Audio AXE FX II via AES/EBU and all the line ins/outs and mic pres are also in use. I handle all monitoring using TotalMix FX. Internal DSP is a nice improvement compared to FF800. I keep [ ] DSP EQ+D for Record unchecked to get raw signal into SONAR while sending equalized + dynamically processed tracks back to the tracking room for the players. Internal reverb is also helpful for some vocalists - easy and fast to use and frees up external reverb unit patching. RME driver quality is absolutely fantastic. UFX has worked perfectly without ANY issues every minute it has been in use. I have minor stability issues with SONAR X1 & RNE driver & Win7 Firewire driver combination but after examining problem I've found it's not RME's fault - it's the buggy Win7 1394 driver that causes SONAR lose connection with the UFX ASIO driver occasionally. Live monitoring: Routing possibilities are about as good as they can be - any input channel can be routed to any output. EQ and compressor in every output channel is also very useful for live monitoring.
-Happy RME UFX user
|
bbdude
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 248
- Joined: 2004/04/15 11:34:07
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/09/15 14:39:57
(permalink)
Thanks 7-string_guy and panup. Glad to hear you are getting good performance out of your UFX Panup. I have also been looking with great interest at the new RME HDSPe MADI FX. I like the idea of a high throughput PCIe interface with integral Digital Mixer with FX, separate from the front-end AtoD & DtoA. The only problem is this also requires an additional ADAT to MADI converter, which seems way over-priced.
Bob the bbdude RME FF-UFX , RME FF800 DAW PC built by ADK , Core i7 3770 IVB Sonar X3e Producer, Win 7-Pro 64-bit
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/09/15 18:42:02
(permalink)
I have the Fireface UFX. Never owned an RME product before but the sound quality is a marked improvement over my Tascam FW-1884. That unit is now relegated to a control surface (and lightpiped 8 inputs into the Fireface). I'm an RME convert for life.
|
7-string_guy
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 430
- Joined: 2008/04/18 20:05:58
- Location: Earth, I think
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/09/15 22:00:26
(permalink)
about that 1394 plug..and win 7.....i read before hand that you should buy a pci firewire card that has a Texas Instruments Chipset. the pc motherboard firewire jacks are not good enough. so i did, never had a stability issue yet.
I7 2600k 3.4g on a ASUS MB with 16 gb of ram FireFace 400 AI / Sonar 8.5 Producer / ToonTrack Superior Drummer 2 Alesis M1 Active MKII / Ibanez 7 string / Fender Super-Sonic Schecter studio 5 bass / Boss Dr. Rhythm 880 , also Yamaha DTX full rack drum pad trigger system
|
panup
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2538
- Joined: 2006/05/23 09:34:35
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/09/16 07:23:21
(permalink)
I have PCI card with TI chipset... Vendor : (104C) Texas Instruments Chipset: (8025) TSB82AA2B/TSB83AA22A/TSB83AA23 Revision: 02 Max 1394 Speed Capability: S800 Support: Compatible, no known issues. Troubleshooting tools at Presonus forum: http://forums.presonus.com/posts/list/11348.page
post edited by panup - 2012/09/16 07:27:21
|
Gaffpro
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 792
- Joined: 2004/05/10 03:42:07
- Location: Palm City, FL. / Nashville, TN.
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/09/16 16:07:07
(permalink)
I have a UCX and absolultely think that RME is the best in it's class for the $
Dell Studio XPS intel i7860, 8 gigs dual ram, Sonar X2 (x64), Windows 7 RME UCX Yamaha NS10, Equator D5, JBL LSR 2325 monitors Vintech X73i, Great River ME-1NV, Joe Meek VC3Q preamps RNC 1773, DBX 163x, Joe Meek VC3Q compressors DBX 263x deesser Neumann U87, TLM 103, AKG 214, CAD E100s Peluso 2247SE AT4050 and 4051 Shure KSM27, SM7, SM57, and UnidyneIII (from the 60's) Other assorted mikes
|
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9871
- Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/09/18 06:49:29
(permalink)
Hi Bob, You won't be disappointed with the FF-UFX It's a fantastic unit... To clarify: For maximum performance, I'd recommend connecting to a USB2 controller that's integrated into the chipset. If connecting via Firewire, use a quality TI chipset Firewire controller.
post edited by Jim Roseberry - 2012/09/26 08:14:25
|
bbdude
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 248
- Joined: 2004/04/15 11:34:07
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/09/18 22:55:28
(permalink)
Thanks for the comments Gaffpro and Jim. ... So, Jim, do you recommend using the Firewire interface on the UFX vs. the USB ?
Bob the bbdude RME FF-UFX , RME FF800 DAW PC built by ADK , Core i7 3770 IVB Sonar X3e Producer, Win 7-Pro 64-bit
|
rumleymusic
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1533
- Joined: 2006/08/23 18:03:05
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/09/18 23:29:18
(permalink)
I use my UFX via USB and have had no problems whatsoever even with high channel counts at low latency. RME drivers are the best in the biz. I record orchestras on location and the stability of the interface with the added USB port in front for a backup is a dream come true. I have used Mackie, ECHO, Motu, Steinberg, E-MU, Tascam, M-Audio, and Avid (Digi) interfaces and the UFX is definitely the top of the litter. Don't think twice about it, get one if you can.
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/09/24 22:35:13
(permalink)
rumleymusic I use my UFX via USB and have had no problems whatsoever +1
|
DeeringAmps
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2614
- Joined: 2005/10/03 10:29:25
- Location: Seattle area
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/09/25 22:55:40
(permalink)
RME recommends using USB for lowest latency. I think there is a 32 sample hidden buffer when using FW. I think I have that right. Love mine by the way... T
Tom Deering Tascam FW-1884 User Resources Page Firewire "Legacy" Tutorial, Service Manual, Schematic, and Service Bulletins Win10x64 StudioCat Pro Studio Coffee Lake 8086k 32gb RAM RME UFX (Audio) Tascam FW-1884 (Control) in Win 10x64 Pro
|
DPete
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 27
- Joined: 2011/10/02 21:59:38
- Location: Minnesota
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/10/01 14:23:43
(permalink)
I also have my RME UFX connected via USB. Been using it for the past 6 months and it's ROCK SOLID. As far as the OP's question about performance with high channel count, I can't comment...yet. I'm in process of building my home studio so haven't given it a thorough test, but with its limited use it's much more dependable and versatile than my previous interface (E-MU 1820m). TotalMix workflow is great for live monitoring. And the clarity of the sound is amazing. The 1820m converters were good, but this takes it to a new level. Another satisfied UFX customer!
DPete Sonar Platinum / Win10 Pro / RME Fireface UFX / RME Octamic II / Focal CMS65 / PCR-800 / ASUS Sabertooth Z97 Mark 1 / Intel Core i7-4790 / 32GB G.SKILL Ripjaws
|
spacealf
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2133
- Joined: 2010/11/18 17:44:34
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/10/01 17:38:26
(permalink)
All I have is the RME Babyface, and it has been working via USB2.0 for over a year fine.
|
bbdude
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 248
- Joined: 2004/04/15 11:34:07
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Status: offline
Re:RME FF UFX Owner Reviews?
2012/10/02 09:09:10
(permalink)
Ok thanks for your comments Daniel, Bapu, Tom, DPete, and spacealf. I'm getting close to pulling the trigger on a UFX. You've helped me make the decision.
Bob the bbdude RME FF-UFX , RME FF800 DAW PC built by ADK , Core i7 3770 IVB Sonar X3e Producer, Win 7-Pro 64-bit
|