Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/05 17:28:23
(permalink)
There has been a little mention of samplers doing analog type sounds. Firstly this is not the domain only of analog hardware synths at all. Both Kurzweil and EMU samplers feature amazing analog patches. And there is a serious amount of editing, movement and expression that can be put into them too. Kurzweil can add VAST and a host of other things to an analog patch. The pitch waveforms transpose very well. If they were used in a piece of electronic music alongside other synths there is no way in the world you would be able to identify them. I am working with a nice hardware synth right now and that is the Roland JD800. It is laid out controls wise like a full blown analog synth but all the oscillators and waveforms are digital representations of all the classic analog waveforms (and much more of course). This includes pulse width waves too. I have owned many real Roland analog synths and this must one of the best sounding instruments I have ever heard form the Roland line. It is so fat and amazing I cannot believe it yet it is a fully digital device. It can emulate massive analog polyphonic sounding devices with up to 4 oscillators per key. But of course it can go into very complex icy sounding digital soundscapes too at the drop of a hat. It has got a lovely effects processor too. Dave have you had any thoughts about expanding your Kurzweil. You do still have it don't you? Hey if you do, turn it on and play it for while and revel in how good it actually sounds. I have fallen for mine again recently! I will copy all my Kurzweil CD ROMS and send them to you if that is any enticement. It will get you started! All you have to do is get yourself a CDROM drive on that machine of yours. Some sample memory and an internal drive so you can store sounds and recall them very fast while working on projects.
post edited by Jeff Evans - 2012/10/05 17:34:36
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
Fog
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12302
- Joined: 2008/02/27 21:53:35
- Location: UK
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/05 19:59:27
(permalink)
synkrotron I've been into "synthesisers" since I could afford my first ever which was a weird plasticy affair called a Wasp. I remember going to pick something up from ebay unrelated to synth , and the bloke was a synth head who had a wasp.. "dahornet" is a good vst freebie version of that.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/05 21:53:48
(permalink)
Jeff, you're right...the Kurzweil has been sitting idle for too long, displaced by more recent computer-based acquisitions. It's about time I dusted it off and got re-acquainted. It was my workhorse for many years and still holds a lot of tonal goodies for which I have no software equivalents. And speaking of sampler/synth hybrids, I've also made a conscious decision to dig deeper into Omnisphere. Last night I spent a few hours creating fresh patches with it and exploring some of its more arcane features. But dagnabit, I still struggle to find ways to squeeze Omnisphere into my productions - it sounds so beautiful on its own but really doesn't like to play well with others! Meanwhile, I'm downloading synth demos like a desperate speed-dater. Diva ate my CPU and then smugly issued an unlady-like belch. Tassman held my interest for awhile, showing itself to be a very deep and versatile instrument. (Still making up my mind about that one. It hasn't seen a major update since 2004.) Synthmaster didn't work right, so I scratched that one. Helix sounded great but may have been abandoned by its developer. Next up: Chromophone. Not a general-purpose synth, I know, but the audio demos feature a lot of sounds that I can picture using. Anyway, you can't have too many ways to make a bongo!
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Zo
Max Output Level: -25 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5036
- Joined: 2008/01/25 20:49:55
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/05 22:03:01
(permalink)
Bit in diva put the accuracy mode to drift not high !! lol about the bongo !! If you want a wrokhorse get the new expander from roland based on the Jupiter and all srx expansions !! integra 7 http://www.rolandconnect.com/product.php?p=integra-7 if your mobility isn't an issue ...
post edited by Zo - 2012/10/05 22:06:55
For sale (PM me) : transfert ilok includedEventide Ultrachannel make offersSoftube Summit EQIK Neve 1081 , Neve precision Comp/LimEastWest GoshtwriterSoundforge Pro 12
|
cecelius2
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1494
- Joined: 2009/11/06 16:12:11
- Location: Pacific Northwest
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/05 23:35:16
(permalink)
Zo Bit in diva put the accuracy mode to drift not high !! lol about the bongo !! If you want a wrokhorse get the new expander from roland based on the Jupiter and all srx expansions !! integra 7 http://www.rolandconnect.com/product.php?p=integra-7 if your mobility isn't an issue ... Bitflipper: Zo has a good point here. There is an "accuracy" setting near the bottom center of DIVA. Within it there are four settings: draft, fast, great and divine. These range from total CPU hog (Divine) to light load (draft). I played with them last night and found that on fast and great the sound was still very good, but it was not CPU demanding. You should at least try it on the "fast" and the "great" and even on the "draft" to see if you machine can handle it. One other suggestion that might have already been suggested earlier in this thread I don't remember but have you looked at the Arturia's V collection recently ( http://www.arturia.com/evolution/en/products/minimoogv/intro.html)? I just got a email from audiodeluxe for the Arturia V-Collection with it on sale for $279. http://audiodeluxe.com/products/arturia-v-collection-3 I remembered that earlier this year Arturia gave away a minimoog for free for one day. Their minimoog was very respectible, and for some patches I liked it more than Minimonsta. " The V-Collection 3 contains the highly awarded Mini V, Moog Modular V, CS-80V, ARP2600 V, Prophet V, the Prophet VS, the Jupiter 8-V, Analog Laboratory, SEM V, Wurlitzer, and Vintage Drum Machines." I was impressed enough with their freebie to make a note of this collection. Again, it might have already been discussed, and you might already have these, but they look respectable and the freebie they gave away that one day sounds great. Here is Arturia's page on the V Collection: http://www.arturia.com/evolution/en/products/v-collection/intro.html . Anyway, take another look at DIVA in "fast" or "great" or even "draft" accuracy modes. Your computer might well work with her shen she isn't in here "divine" mode or "mood".
post edited by cecelius2 - 2012/10/05 23:40:35
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/06 01:43:31
(permalink)
I will check out Diva's quality modes. I'd read about that but somehow assumed that it would come up in a medium-quality mode by default. I demo'd Chromaphone. Pretty cool synth, that one. A lot of the presets sounded familiar, though, and I realized that the AAS String Studio synth (which I already have) was capable of many of the same types of sounds. String Studio appears to have been Chromophone's prototype. The biggest improvement over String Studio is a versatile noise generator than can either be the primary sound source or layered underneath something else to add great realism to drum and percussion sounds. This in turn got me to revisit String Studio, which has pretty much languished since I got it, and to experiment with layering synth sounds under it. My problem with SS was that it was dull-sounding, lacking the movement that a string emulator should have. But if you put a moving pad behind it with a long attack, you can build up something that sounds plucked up front but fades into a more complex texture. This whole synth-shopping exercise has already paid off in unexpected inspiration, and I haven't spent a cent!
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
paulo
Max Output Level: -13 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6218
- Joined: 2007/01/30 05:06:57
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/06 06:07:50
(permalink)
bitflipper This whole synth-shopping exercise has already paid off in unexpected inspiration, and I haven't spent a cent! Yeah, it's great when that happens - I think there are many who don't even really use what they already have. I'm as guilty as anyone - usually taking a preset, tweaking it slighty and that's it, when there are so many more creative possibilities. As you say, it's amazing how you can make something very ordinary sound so much better by just layering something else behind it.
|
synkrotron
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5263
- Joined: 2006/04/28 16:21:21
- Location: Warrington, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/06 08:36:08
(permalink)
paulo As you say, it's amazing how you can make something very ordinary sound so much better by just layering something else behind it. Or even routing it through Guitar Rig or something like that...
http://www.synkrotron.co.uk/Intel Core™i7-3820QM Quad Core Mobile Processor 2.70GHz 8MB cache | Intel HM77 Express Chipset | 16GB SAMSUNG 1600MHz SODIMM DDR3 RAM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M - 2.0GB DDR5 Video RAM | 500GB Samsung 850 Pro SSD | 1TB Samsung 850 Pro SSD | Windows 10 Pro | Roland OCTA-CAPTURE | SONAR Platinum ∞ FFS| Too many VSTi's to list here | KRK KNS-8400 Headphones | Roland JP-8000 | Oberheim OB12 | Novation Nova | Gibson SG Special | PRS Studio
|
SmokeyJ628
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 809
- Joined: 2004/12/08 13:17:59
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/06 09:00:47
(permalink)
Bitflipper, two of my favorite non-EDM oriented synths are U-he's A.C.E. and Fabfilter's Twin 2. A.C.E. is astoundingly inexpensive and you get an incredible sound. The CPU hit is higher than average, but it's not as hungry as DIVA. There are a number of great possibilities for sound design, and it has a great old-style analog sound. Fabfilter's Twin 2 is perhaps my favorite synth to use. You can modulate pretty much anything you want with virtually any modulator or control or envelope you want. In particular, with every patch, you only see the controls for that particular patch. No extra ones are visible so it's really easy to use. The factory bank certainly has a decent set of EDM patches, but there are also a lot of more classic synth sounds. Look for Daniel Mauer's presets (DM) in the factory set. They have a great classic sound, and he uses Twin 2 like no one else! He uses lots of crazy modulation options. Twin 2 has only a delay so you'll have to put some effects in your signal chain if you want them.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/06 10:31:10
(permalink)
Thanks, Smokey. I hadn't even considered Twin 2, despite being a FabFilter fan. FF says I can have it for $88, which would make it one of the least-expensive of the products I've considered so far. (Didn't think I'd ever use "least expensive" and "FabFilter" in the same paragraph.) Time to watch another Dan Worrall video...
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
dmbaer
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2585
- Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
- Location: Concord CA
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/06 18:08:18
(permalink)
bitflipper Meanwhile, I'm downloading synth demos like a desperate speed-dater. Diva ate my CPU and then smugly issued an unlady-like belch. What was said regarding the quality settings is absolutely true. You'd have to have a pretty ancient POS for DIVA to swamp your CPU at the lowest setting. Yes, you can hear a difference between Draft and the second from the top setting (don't recall it's name), but I could hear no difference between the top two. As long as you're in synth-audition mode, don't overlook u-he's other masterpiece, Zebra 2. That one is on a lot of folk's top five list, including my own.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/06 23:17:36
(permalink)
I like Zebra a lot. I have Zebralette, the trimmed-down teaser version. I've done entire songs with it, and they sound good - in a 1970's JM Jarre sort of way. But that isn't really my style. I'm more likely to use synths in such a way that you might not even notice they're in there unless you're listening closely. Kinda hard to hide Zebra. I did hear a lot of potential in Diva, and intend to re-install the demo for another go, now that I know about the quality setting.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Kenneth
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 314
- Joined: 2012/08/25 02:25:07
- Location: Denmark
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/07 02:14:17
(permalink)
I feel your pain Bitflipper, if I hear another synth demo or programming tutorial of an incredibly complex synth engine, and then demonstrating how to do "wobble" sounds I'm going to scream.
i7 Sandy Bridge K2600 16Gb RAM 3x240GB Intel SSD | Samsung 40" LED Monitor | Win7 Pro 64bit | Saffire Pro 24 | Powercore MKII | Yamaha KX8 88 weighted keys| 2 x Behringer BCR2000 | Octapad SPD30 | Yamaha NS10, Focal Solo 6 BE | Bryston 4B Yamaha p2200 Amps| Sonar X2+Quickfix | EWQLSO Gold | Stormdrum2 | 8DIO Almost everything | Omnisphere | Zebra2 | Prominy V-Metal, SC Guitar, SR5 Bass | VIR2 Electri6ty | Shreddage X | Amplitude 3 | BOME MIDI Translator, Autohotkey
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/07 09:23:16
(permalink)
What a rediculous question. Every synth I've seen recommended here I've heard used in an EDM context. Cryo made a good point about a synth being bred for EDM and it also being very versatile regardless, but I can't for the life of me think of a 'non-EDM' synth. You choose a synth on the basis you can get the sounds you want from it surely. I'm gonna go for a non-Jazz trumpet next or maybe a rock-less guitar. Non-EDM synth....lol. No wonder the kids cringe at us old farts. Seems more like an image based question from someone who wants to come across as a 'seat of the pants' bush pilot rather than a more seemingly sissy airline captain to me. In which case, forget Chromaphone and get Tassman from the same company. It's the nearest ITB thing to a modular synth setup and covers pretty much all the ground you can get from a rake of different VST's, you could probably earn a degree by learning how to tame the beast but it's all there. It is a monster and will give you the real 'seat of the pants' experience. Spend some time with it and get past the ubiquitous super-saw presets that sell most synths these days and you'll get pretty much anything you want out of it. You'll get real 'Man' points for mastering that one and probably any sound you can get from Chromaphone as well into the bargain. Man, it probably even burns diesel and leaks oil when it's running too. How cool is that?
post edited by Jonbouy - 2012/10/07 09:52:51
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/07 13:33:07
(permalink)
Well, if I was after "man points" then the synth for me would have to be FabFilter's Twin 2. The depth of that synth is scary. The only thing I see that's missing is the ability to import samples as an alternative to standard oscillator waveshapes. It may indeed by a "rediculous" premise. Of course, any synth is capable of broader applications than its online demos and factory presets might suggest. However, features and ergonomics will be skewed toward a particular market segment. Recreate Tomita's "Snowflakes are Dancing" with any of the synths featured in KVR's one-synth-challenge series and I'll consider that proof I'm wrong.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/07 15:09:57
(permalink)
I get what you are saying to a degree I guess they are all pitched at the market that is likely to produce the biggest return for the vendor regardless of the underlying capabilities of the synth. Listen to some of Wookiees music he gets some great vintage vibes out of the stuff he uses and he's got a great talent for getting different sounds working together to make a whole. He's got a good example up in the Songs forum just now. I'm pretty sure he uses some of the Arturia stuff. I do find though the more time you spend understanding a few synths well the easier it becomes to unravel the challenges of getting that right sound and moreover looking for the actual capabilities you are after starts to make more sense. I still stand by the recommendation of Tassman especially if it is still going for the $99 it was offered for awhile back.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2012/10/07 15:14:55
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
yorolpal
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13829
- Joined: 2003/11/20 11:50:37
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/07 15:50:14
(permalink)
For me Chromaphone was one of those instruments whose demo sounded way better than actually trying to work with the thing. I'm sure you can get very good sound from it. But it sure sounds tinky up close and personal. Agree about "Snowflakes..." what an accomplishment. And to think of when it was done and what Tomita had to work with. Just flabbergasting. I still have my t-shirt that came with my album. It, of course, doesn't come close to fitting me now tho;-)
|
synkrotron
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5263
- Joined: 2006/04/28 16:21:21
- Location: Warrington, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/07 16:12:50
(permalink)
Snowflakes was entirely Moog, apart from a few effects and stuff. My first venture into Isao Tomita music was Firebird. It was Isao that turned me on to Debussy, Mussorgsky and Stravinsky. Up until then I would only listen to Planet Suite and I only picked up on that when I went to the London Planetarium in 1971 (I was eleven) with school. My classical tastes are still a bit limited though. I'm sorry you don't rate Chromophone. I'm having a ball with it. I've been experimenting with automating some of the many parameters, which sounds great, to my ears. And I generally turn off all of the synths internal effects and apply my own reverbs, delays and stuff. One thing I like about all of the A|A|S stuff is that they utilise physical modelling and I think is it that that makes their synths that little bit different. As for ditching Chromophone and just using Tassman, I'd rather not. I agree, that Tassman is the father of all the A|A|S synths and can do everything the other synths of theirs can do. But I'd rather stick to Chromophone and Ultra Analog knowing that the interfaces and sound options are simplified to deliver what one expects, if you know what I mean. I just don't want to spend the time building modules and what have you in Tassman. I have the whole gamut of A|A|S synths by the way...
http://www.synkrotron.co.uk/Intel Core™i7-3820QM Quad Core Mobile Processor 2.70GHz 8MB cache | Intel HM77 Express Chipset | 16GB SAMSUNG 1600MHz SODIMM DDR3 RAM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M - 2.0GB DDR5 Video RAM | 500GB Samsung 850 Pro SSD | 1TB Samsung 850 Pro SSD | Windows 10 Pro | Roland OCTA-CAPTURE | SONAR Platinum ∞ FFS| Too many VSTi's to list here | KRK KNS-8400 Headphones | Roland JP-8000 | Oberheim OB12 | Novation Nova | Gibson SG Special | PRS Studio
|
MachineClaw
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1116
- Joined: 2012/10/08 00:15:28
- Status: offline
Re:Non-EDM Synthesizers
2012/10/08 00:33:03
(permalink)
I got Komplete 8 when I got Sonar X1 and I kinda agree that the synths on the surface seem more geared toward techno stuff. I've had to dig really deep into FM8, Reaktor, etc to get some normalish sounds out of them. I recently got Omnisphere since so many here keep mentioning it. So far it has been the best synth to play with and the sounds are so great. purtting the sounds into the mix seems key, burying the sounds or layering things on top really helps. I recently bought Alchemy. 1st day I wasn't impressed with the sound patches, but using Alchemy and playing with all the settings really changed things up. it's a tweaker toy less a patch player, though it does that well too. really have to turn the knobs and play to it going. which is fun but so far not my go to synth. I got Rapture and Zeta 2 and Dimension Pro which have some use but so far they are okay. So far Omnisphere has just been fun to play with and the sounds are so well done, layering and playing really makes some interesting sounds. I haven't gotten bored playing with Omni, just jam for hours playing and tweaking. after reading all the posts I don't really se what your hunting exactly for. you have some of the best toys on the block. what are you trying to hunt down that your not finding?
|