Creating instrumental, then mixing vocals for it... using a new, separate project?

Author
vaultwit
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 543
  • Joined: 2011/08/02 20:53:49
  • Status: offline
2012/10/22 00:39:36 (permalink)

Creating instrumental, then mixing vocals for it... using a new, separate project?

Do most of you (and mixers in the industry, for those that may know) record and mix vocals in the same project that you use to create the instrumental? Or do you create the instrumental, import the raw instrumental into a new project, then record/mix your vocals in there?

Until now, I've always believed that it is more "correct" to do everything in one single project, since this way you can mix individual instruments with the vocals as you do your mixing. But I'm starting to wonder if it's more common to do the alternative method, for various reasons: 
 
1) Organization. Instrumentals themselves can require many tracks, many busses, a lot of automation and lots of effects. If you record vocals in the same project, you are adding several more tracks (if you do vocals with harmonization, background, real doubling or chorus as opposed to plugins), more busses, and several more effects. And you are bound to get confused with the massive amounts of effect plugins and tracks and busses and prochannel modules and whatnot. 

2) CPU. Instrumentals already take up a lot of CPU, especially for me since I almost use softsynths exclusively instead of recording instruments. And adding vocals+effects to that can take a pretty big toll on the CPU.

I have a feeling the answer will be the first method... mixing everything in one project, but I just figured I'd ask. Thanks for your input!


Sonar X1 Producer Expanded 64-bit
Computer: Intel Core i7-3770 3.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Windows 8 
Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
#1

11 Replies Related Threads

    soundtweaker
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1036
    • Joined: 2003/11/12 12:25:59
    • Location: San Francisco
    • Status: offline
    Re:Creating instrumental, then mixing vocals for it... using a new, separate project? 2012/10/22 01:22:41 (permalink)
    Everything in one project if your CPU can handle it. Use track folders to help organize.
    #2
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Creating instrumental, then mixing vocals for it... using a new, separate project? 2012/10/22 04:28:31 (permalink)
    Your system should be able to easily cope by having it all in the same project.

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #3
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:Creating instrumental, then mixing vocals for it... using a new, separate project? 2012/10/22 04:33:27 (permalink)
    Adding audio tracks to a MIDI project that uses soft synths wont burden the CPU. If CPU does become an issue turn the MIDI into audio.  Really what the real CPU users are are plugins not MIDI or audio. Soft synths are plugins too. 

    Best
    John
    #4
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    Re:Creating instrumental, then mixing vocals for it... using a new, separate project? 2012/10/22 05:49:41 (permalink)
    Always in the same project. Folders organize everything. If your CPU is on its limit then just freeze your synths.

    However, when I need to do vocals in a different studio, I just record them over a single stereo mix that I bounce out of Sonar. When the recording is done I bring the recordings into the Sonar project.

    NEVER, unless you have to for some reason, mix the vocals in over a "finished" mix of the instruments. You can't fit vocals into a mix after it's done, they have to be a part of the mix so make sure you always mix everything together.

    (Sonar Platinum - Win10 x64) - iMac and 13" MacBook - Logic Pro X ++ - UA Apollo Twin DUO - NI Maschine MKII - NI Komplete Kontrol S61 - Novation Nocturne - KRK Rokit 6
    Soundcloud
    Negative Vibe Records
    #5
    tbosco
    Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 903
    • Joined: 2011/01/06 20:42:22
    • Location: Chattanooga, TN
    • Status: offline
    Re:Creating instrumental, then mixing vocals for it... using a new, separate project? 2012/10/22 08:36:10 (permalink)
    I agree with everything said up there ^.  :-)

    Cheers!

    Tony

    SONAR Platinum
    JNCS Computer with Asus X99 Motherboard (i7)
    Win10 Pro 64bit, 32GB RAM
    Motif XF7, Komplete 11, Ozone 7, 
    Komplete Kontrol 88 keys,
    Softube Console 1,
    PreSonus Faderport 8,
    Focusrite ISA 430 Mk 2 Mic Pre,
    Yamaha HS8s and Sub
    Drawmer 3.1 Monitor Controller
    Fractal Axe FX 2 XL Guitar Processor
    Lots-o-Guitars
    #6
    vaultwit
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 543
    • Joined: 2011/08/02 20:53:49
    • Status: offline
    Re:Creating instrumental, then mixing vocals for it... using a new, separate project? 2012/10/22 08:44:40 (permalink)
    Thanks everyone for your response! Just to clarify, I do understand that audio files and midi files themselves are not what drains CPU, but rather the plugins that they use. Even for vocal audio, I've got tons of compression, reverb, delay, saturation plugins just for vocals, even after consolidating them via busses. Not to mention v-vocal, melodyne, etc. This is also in addition to all my soft synth plugins and effects plugins used for these soft synths.

    Another reason I asked this question is because I know with mainstream commercial music, often times the "producer" is a different person from the "recording engineer" who is different person from the "mix engineer" (who is different from the mastering engineer, but that's beyond the scope of this topic). So I just wondered if maybe the second approach is what that take. But I do agree with everyone here that its important to mix in the vocals with the instruments. Just a thought though!

    Sonar X1 Producer Expanded 64-bit
    Computer: Intel Core i7-3770 3.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Windows 8 
    Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
    #7
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Creating instrumental, then mixing vocals for it... using a new, separate project? 2012/10/22 08:50:25 (permalink)
    Just one example of why you should do it in the one project - but there are hundreds more.

    You might find that the guitars in your beautifully crafted instrumental simply drown the vocals and you need to drop them by at least 3dB

    What do you do if you've only got the stereo mix to work with? Everything you try will be a compromise at best.

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #8
    Guitarhacker
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 24398
    • Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
    • Location: NC
    • Status: offline
    Re:Creating instrumental, then mixing vocals for it... using a new, separate project? 2012/10/22 09:05:27 (permalink)
    All in the same project. I'm running what is now considered to be an older computer on XP32 and I have never had a problem running as many tracks and VST's and FX as I needed. 

    I try to emulate a band in the genre which means a 5 or 6 piece band. Most of the projects I do might have a dozen tracks in them since acoustic guitar is usually doubled and I might have 2 lead guitar tracks for convenience.  There is a good likelihood that there will be several vocal tracks as well. 

    12 tracks is about average for me. I do occasionally get up to the 20 track count and above.... but not too often. 

    My website & music: www.herbhartley.com

    MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW   
    Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface


    BMI/NSAI

    "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer 
    #9
    NW Smith
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 565
    • Joined: 2006/05/08 16:01:48
    • Location: Seattle, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Creating instrumental, then mixing vocals for it... using a new, separate project? 2012/10/22 09:33:57 (permalink)
    Always in the same project. The vocals are usually the most important part of a mix. It doesn't make practical sense to work on them separately from the song. After all, you have to dial in the vocal sound with the rest of the song elements.

    My Website:
    http://www.marwoodwilliams.com
    My Music on Bandcamp:
    http://marwoodwilliams.bandcamp.com

    Equipment: Intel Core i3, 3.2 GHz, Sonar Platinum, Ramsa WR-S4416 Mixer,  Focusrite  Scarlett 18i6
    #10
    garrigus
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8599
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 17:23:21
    • Location: www.garrigus.com
    • Status: offline
    Re:Creating instrumental, then mixing vocals for it... using a new, separate project? 2012/10/22 09:53:59 (permalink)
    vaultwit

    Another reason I asked this question is because I know with mainstream commercial music, often times the "producer" is a different person from the "recording engineer" who is different person from the "mix engineer" (who is different from the mastering engineer, but that's beyond the scope of this topic). So I just wondered if maybe the second approach is what that take. But I do agree with everyone here that its important to mix in the vocals with the instruments. Just a thought though!
    All of those people (except the mastering engineer) have access to all the tracks in the mix (in one project), so they can still adjust the individual instruments, fx, etc. Even remixers usually get access to the original tracks. Definitely use a single project.



    Scott

    --
    Scott R. Garrigus - http://garrigus.com
    * Author of the Cakewalk Sonar and Sony Sound Forge Power book series: http://garrigus.com/?PowerBooks
    * Author of the Cakewalk Sonar ProAudioTutor video tutorial series: http://garrigus.com/?ProAudioTutor
    * Publisher of the DigiFreq free music technology newsletter: http://digifreq.com/?DigiFreq
    * Publisher of the NewTechReview free consumer technology newsletter: http://newtechreview.com/?NewTechReview

    #11
    miguelito
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 391
    • Joined: 2009/12/19 09:18:15
    • Location: Bellingham, WA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Creating instrumental, then mixing vocals for it... using a new, separate project? 2012/10/22 10:22:49 (permalink)
    Everything in the same project for me.

    I think the alternative question would be: "What could be gained by using two projects?" I think you give up way more than you gain. The organizational tools available, hiding tracks, using folders, etc and so on can really assist in working a project to completion...at least in my opinion.

    Regards,

    Mike

    A Roseberry racer w/
    Win7 Pro (64) fully loaded
    RME UFX Fireface;
    Sonar X2;
    Guitars and amps. 
    Axon 100 MKII,
    M-Audio Keystation Pro 88,
    Komplete 
    All software latest revision
     
    #12
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1