Can Cakewalk at least think of resurrecting Project 5?

Author
CTStump
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 409
  • Joined: 2011/02/15 11:43:02
  • Location: Dona Ana, New Mexico in the U.S. of A.
  • Status: offline
2012/12/02 15:42:03 (permalink)

Can Cakewalk at least think of resurrecting Project 5?

Been asked before I know, I like that at least some of Project5 lives on in Sonar so that's great that it lives on in a way.

Still a separate program similar or even better would be most welcome at least to me. Heck you could repackage the old code and release it and I'm sure it would create a marketable demand(even though it didn't make a splash before).

I know by the look's of this sub forum that interest is close to little or none but that is because the software has been discontinued.

Part of success is risk taking.

Just the rambling's of a Die Hard Fan and continual User.

Any comments welcome.

Sonar 8.5PE
Project 5.2
Self Built 2.6Ghz dual core AMD 5200+
8 Gb DDR Ram
Windows Vista 64
Emu 1616 pci
Various collection of old musical toys

#1

10 Replies Related Threads

    cryophonik
    Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4724
    • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
    • Location: Elk Grove, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Can Cakewalk at least think of resurrecting Project 5? 2012/12/02 21:56:23 (permalink)
    I'd buy into an updated P5...and so would some KVR members.  


    I'd love to see it borrow a few features from Sonar, esp., the step sequencer and Groove Matrix.  With all the attention that Bitwig has been getting by Live users looking for an alternative, I'm thinking that an updated P5 could be a real contender...again.

    cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

    Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
    Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

    #2
    CTStump
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 409
    • Joined: 2011/02/15 11:43:02
    • Location: Dona Ana, New Mexico in the U.S. of A.
    • Status: offline
    Re:Can Cakewalk at least think of resurrecting Project 5? 2012/12/03 00:45:05 (permalink)
    Yeah I agree if they roll it out again I know the Buzz will be a lot better than the last time. No knock against Sonar, still a great program but I think with all the power some people would go for a Soft Synth doodling program like Project 5 again.

    I hope this thread gains some life and doesn't whither away like others here have.

    Sonar 8.5PE
    Project 5.2
    Self Built 2.6Ghz dual core AMD 5200+
    8 Gb DDR Ram
    Windows Vista 64
    Emu 1616 pci
    Various collection of old musical toys

    #3
    backwoods
    Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2571
    • Joined: 2011/03/23 17:24:50
    • Location: South Pacific
    • Status: offline
    Re:Can Cakewalk at least think of resurrecting Project 5? 2012/12/03 02:40:44 (permalink)
    i'm not certain of the timeline but wasn't p5 abandoned after roland took over? the track zoom is still smoother than sonar and one can even implement a third party editor from within p5. bring back p5!

     
    #4
    techead
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4353
    • Joined: 2004/01/24 08:40:20
    • Location: Macomb, IL, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Can Cakewalk at least think of resurrecting Project 5? 2012/12/03 21:53:41 (permalink)
    I like P5's work flow and ease of creating/manipulating synth tracks. 
    #5
    mumpcake
    Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1609
    • Joined: 2004/06/16 16:27:42
    • Status: offline
    Re:Can Cakewalk at least think of resurrecting Project 5? 2012/12/05 00:56:56 (permalink)
    A lot of the KVR crowd has been having wet dreams over Bitwig Studio. When I saw it, I thought it looked like P5, with X1's media browser and a few plugins with GUIs stolen from Reaktor. P5 could definitely be a contender.
    #6
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:Can Cakewalk at least think of resurrecting Project 5? 2012/12/07 02:09:00 (permalink)
    "I could have been a contender" - ain't that Brando?

    P5 was most elegant and easy to grok.  For electronic music, it was (is) a wet dream.  I can understand why they dropped it, just wish they hadn't.


    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #7
    backwoods
    Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2571
    • Joined: 2011/03/23 17:24:50
    • Location: South Pacific
    • Status: offline
    Re:Can Cakewalk at least think of resurrecting Project 5? 2012/12/07 02:26:05 (permalink)
    Maybe Roland looked at the cakewalk product line and told them to simplify or something similiar. It's a shame.

     
    #8
    xylyx
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2505
    • Joined: 2003/11/23 12:23:25
    • Location: England
    • Status: offline
    Re:Can Cakewalk at least think of resurrecting Project 5? 2012/12/09 07:32:25 (permalink)
    Well, Tracktion looked dead in the water too but recent posts on KvR by it's original coder suggest that it could be about to make a comeback...which I guess could give a little room for hope. Of course, the likelihood of the original driving force (Jesse Jost?) getting involved in a resurrection of P5 is tiny and I don't think anyone else in the Cakewalk clan really care about it to be interested in bringing it back...
    #9
    CTStump
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 409
    • Joined: 2011/02/15 11:43:02
    • Location: Dona Ana, New Mexico in the U.S. of A.
    • Status: offline
    Re:Can Cakewalk at least think of resurrecting Project 5? 2012/12/10 12:09:40 (permalink)
    I was working in Studio One this morning with some Macro's I created for Pattern building and it will never be as good as Project 5 but it's new. At some point though I will have to go to my old "Goto" Project 5, be nice if it was new and as improved as Sonar.

    I can dream can't I?

    Sonar 8.5PE
    Project 5.2
    Self Built 2.6Ghz dual core AMD 5200+
    8 Gb DDR Ram
    Windows Vista 64
    Emu 1616 pci
    Various collection of old musical toys

    #10
    Chris in Indy
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 484
    • Joined: 2004/03/24 16:15:34
    • Location: Indianpolis, Indiana
    • Status: offline
    Re:Can Cakewalk at least think of resurrecting Project 5? 2012/12/17 19:43:45 (permalink)
    P5 will never see the light of day again, as far as Cake is concerned. I'd buy back in if it ever did. It was so quick and simple. Not knocking X1, because I love it, but it is like killing a fly with a cannon. I still use P5 at my every chance. It is my scratch pad. If I like what is developing then I will port it over to X1. Cake better think real hard before this Bitwig thing hits the streets, because they will never win back there loyal base after that. I can still be had Cake/Roland, I'm so easy.

    Chris in Indy ............... 
    Tascam US 2000, Behringer Power Pro 8, Akai MPD 18, Yamaha MG 82cx, Mackie MCU Pro, Mackie MR 8's, M Audio BX-5's, M Audio 61 es, Yamaha MM6, Roland SH-201, KRK-KMS 8400's, Shure SRH 1840's, Audio Technica AT 2020's, Windows 8.1 64 bit, Sonar Platinum, SoundForge 10, East/West Libraries, GPO, Real Guitar, Project 5v2, FM-7, 
    #11
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1