mp3 render settings.

Author
elijahlucian
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 445
  • Joined: 2010/01/09 20:17:21
  • Status: offline
2012/12/05 11:26:43 (permalink)

mp3 render settings.

hey all I was just rendering a song today and i had a question that has been confusing me for some time

When you pick the quality


there is 0 ---- 5 

and on the left is better

and the right is faster

if it was a slider for quality wouldn't the higher number mean better quality? this is super confusing....

p.s. I know i could just render both and see the difference,, but at 256kbps i dont think i could hear any difference, my question is one of technicality. I like knowing how things work (or at least are supposed to work)


Running X2a 64bit - RME Fireface UFX - Win 7 64 - i7 3770k - 32gb ram

Me http://www.elijahlucian.ca
#1

10 Replies Related Threads

    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:mp3 render settings. 2012/12/05 11:29:45 (permalink)
    If left is better then set it at 0 and forget about it

    It's not a "slider for quality" - the slider is a "trade-off slider" between quality & speed.

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #2
    elijahlucian
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 445
    • Joined: 2010/01/09 20:17:21
    • Status: offline
    Re:mp3 render settings. 2012/12/05 11:31:01 (permalink)
    haha. well as i mentioned... I can't just forget about it... I have no idea what is actually better. I am just trying to figure out what they meant by 0 quality being better than 5.... makes no sense to me. 

    I have "forgotten about it" for years now. Just asking now 


    Running X2a 64bit - RME Fireface UFX - Win 7 64 - i7 3770k - 32gb ram

    Me http://www.elijahlucian.ca
    #3
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:mp3 render settings. 2012/12/05 11:32:15 (permalink)
    Well try both extremes, making a note of how long each render takes, then compare audio quality afterwards.

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #4
    elijahlucian
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 445
    • Joined: 2010/01/09 20:17:21
    • Status: offline
    Re:mp3 render settings. 2012/12/05 11:33:35 (permalink)
    lol. didn't you read my original post? this is purely a technical question, for curiosity's sake...

    meaning, while my ears may make some judgement, I would still like to know HOW IT WORKS


    Running X2a 64bit - RME Fireface UFX - Win 7 64 - i7 3770k - 32gb ram

    Me http://www.elijahlucian.ca
    #5
    elijahlucian
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 445
    • Joined: 2010/01/09 20:17:21
    • Status: offline
    Re:mp3 render settings. 2012/12/05 11:36:41 (permalink)

    its like having teachers that were like "don't worry about the ANSWER, just do what FEELS right." 

    "but teacher... I want to know the actual answer pls... "

    and then he's still like "no, don't be stupid, why on earth would you need an answer?" 

    student retorts... "well obviously you don't know the answer"

    and gets sent to the office. 


    Running X2a 64bit - RME Fireface UFX - Win 7 64 - i7 3770k - 32gb ram

    Me http://www.elijahlucian.ca
    #6
    scook
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 24146
    • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:mp3 render settings. 2012/12/05 11:39:45 (permalink)
    It corresponds to the lame -q parameter allowing you to specify the internal algorithm for analyzing and compressing the data (although not as flexible as the command line LAME encoder). A slower algorithm produces a better sounding file.
    #7
    elijahlucian
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 445
    • Joined: 2010/01/09 20:17:21
    • Status: offline
    Re:mp3 render settings. 2012/12/05 11:40:33 (permalink)
    so instead of "quality" it should say "compression?"


    Running X2a 64bit - RME Fireface UFX - Win 7 64 - i7 3770k - 32gb ram

    Me http://www.elijahlucian.ca
    #8
    scook
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 24146
    • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:mp3 render settings. 2012/12/05 11:43:59 (permalink)
    The sound quality is better at 0, the faster compression at 5.
    post edited by scook - 2012/12/05 11:51:48
    #9
    elijahlucian
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 445
    • Joined: 2010/01/09 20:17:21
    • Status: offline
    Re:mp3 render settings. 2012/12/05 11:46:21 (permalink)
    thanks for clearing it up. 

    but the label on the slider should still say "encoding speed" or something more intuitive. 


    Running X2a 64bit - RME Fireface UFX - Win 7 64 - i7 3770k - 32gb ram

    Me http://www.elijahlucian.ca
    #10
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:mp3 render settings. 2012/12/05 16:11:13 (permalink)
    Best place to research those options is via the LAME reference page.


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #11
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1