Buss Glue vs. Track Compression

Author
Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4062
  • Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
  • Status: offline
2013/01/07 23:39:10 (permalink)

Buss Glue vs. Track Compression

Dealing a lot with vocals and vibes that lash out everywhere at times ... I've pondered on applying more buss glue (comp and tape) to allow instruments and beatz to 'react' better.

Listening to recent pop mixes ... I've noticed some ... where haughty vox vibes are deliberately glued-back to allow other instruments more fan-fare.  E.g., The emo-girl's raspy lashings are subdued and her coherency seriously smeared ... for no-more in-your-face vocals.  Her vibe still rules, but she drowns (artistically) within the mix ... almost like an alien.

I realize there will always be a 'conflict' between instruments and vocs ... where everything competes for loudness.  So there's probably no right or wrong answer ... just art preference.

Any thoughts or preferences at all on buss glue ... while considering your vibes, timbres, beatz, or such.

Thanks in advance for all thoughts great or small.


Philip  
(Isa 5:12 And the harp, and the viol, the tabret, and pipe, and wine, are in their feasts: but they regard not the work of the LORD)

Raised-Again 3http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=12307501
#1

13 Replies Related Threads

    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Buss Glue vs. Track Compression 2013/01/07 23:46:58 (permalink)

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #2
    Linear Phase
    Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2201
    • Joined: 2012/04/15 02:21:15
    • Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Buss Glue vs. Track Compression 2013/01/07 23:54:04 (permalink)
    In this book here..  One of my favs on the subject of music production...   They make it clear that they, "never used to put compression on vocals."

    "Used to," is the operative phrase, because I specifically remember one of the interviewed producers saying, "nowadays, these singers are so loud, I can't help but limit them on the way in!"

    So I would imagine that a lot of, "major label vocals," are getting, "printed," on their way into the studios DAW, with some sort of analog, or digital hardware limiter.

    After that, "i doubt they get compressed again," although, "nowadays," if somebody said, "you are so wrong, they get compressed again," I'd just be like, "ok."  Wow...  sucky!!

    Edit = forgot book link

    http://www.amazon.com/Beh...oftcover/dp/0879306149

    too many lasers...






    Sonar = audio editing ninja of a music software!

    #3
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:Buss Glue vs. Track Compression 2013/01/08 00:59:10 (permalink)
    Lots of people used to use compression on vocals in the analog days.  The UA 1176 and LA2A combo started in those days.

    It is just that now w/ virtual comps you can string too many on a voice.  I (and others I know) shave a few dBs off gently when recording.  That way you don't have to slam the track compressor(s) and the bus compressors but continue to shave the peaks so you don't loose the weaker words and phrases and the loud stuff doesn't pop and mask everything.  Serial compression a few dBs at a time most often sounds more natural than slamming infinity.  Too much compression makes even the sweetest voice sound harsh, hard and sibilent.
     
    @

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #4
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Buss Glue vs. Track Compression 2013/01/08 02:57:53 (permalink)
    I highly recommend both of those books. There are two editions as well. 'Behind the Glass' and 'Behind the Glass II'.

    They are almost a course in sound engineering, they are amazing. I have missed trains that have come in and gone from the platform, I have missed stops to get off. Not many books can do that.

    The front sections are interesting but they are mainly a series of great interviews and the engineers give a lot away that is for sure.

    Back OT I have heard that the Cytomic Glue is one very serious buss compressor. Very transparent. I think it is modelled on the SSL Buss compressor or the Smart C2 which is one very nice hardware compressor I have used especially in glue mode and it does a wonderful job. If you read the comments about it from various famous people around you will see it is very well liked. You can trial it too for two weeks. (in 2 one week blocks if you want and they don't have to be consecutive weeks either)

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #5
    michaelhanson
    Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3529
    • Joined: 2008/10/31 15:19:56
    • Location: Mesquite, Texas
    • Status: offline
    Re:Buss Glue vs. Track Compression 2013/01/08 07:06:47 (permalink)
    I read some where, that back "in those days" analogue tape also had a lot of natural compression; much like a tube guitar amp naturally compresses a signal.  The build up of tracks that were being naturally compressed gave an ovreall similar, glue type compression. 

    Also read in the same articles that tape naturally cut some of the highs, especially as the tape was used over and over and aged. 

    I have only hands on recorded to tape once in my life...eons ago, so maybe you old pro's can speak better to that than I can.  Just something I have read.

    Mike

    https://soundcloud.com/michaeljhanson
    https://www.facebook.com/michaeljhanson.music
    iTunes:
    https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/scandalous-grace/id1180730765
     
    Platinum Lifetime, Focusrite 8i6 & 2i4, Gibson LP, ES335, Fender Strat, 4003 Rickenbacker
    BMI
    #6
    Guitarhacker
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 24398
    • Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
    • Location: NC
    • Status: offline
    Re:Buss Glue vs. Track Compression 2013/01/08 08:03:09 (permalink)
    MakeShift


    I read some where, that back "in those days" analogue tape also had a lot of natural compression; much like a tube guitar amp naturally compresses a signal.  The build up of tracks that were being naturally compressed gave an ovreall similar, glue type compression. 

    Also read in the same articles that tape naturally cut some of the highs, especially as the tape was used over and over and aged. 

    I have only hands on recorded to tape once in my life...eons ago, so maybe you old pro's can speak better to that than I can.  Just something I have read.

    The "natural" tape compression came from the fact that the tape's magnetic particles could only hold so much of the magnetic charge/field and as a result, the louder passages could not impart a greater charge than the particles could hold..... hence the "natural" compression of tape.  Once that saturation point was reached, no more audio information could be stored in the magnetic field....and as it approached that point of saturation, the compression effect of the tape became more pronounced. 


     Of course, the scientific explanation is more detailed. 

    My website & music: www.herbhartley.com

    MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW   
    Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface


    BMI/NSAI

    "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer 
    #7
    michaelhanson
    Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3529
    • Joined: 2008/10/31 15:19:56
    • Location: Mesquite, Texas
    • Status: offline
    Re:Buss Glue vs. Track Compression 2013/01/08 09:13:40 (permalink)
    Herb, not bad for a non-scientist!

    Yep, that is kind of what I read, you explained it well in laymans terms.  As a result, they said when the old timers say they used a lot less compression, they did from a hardware sense, but they got a lot of "natural" compression out of the tape.  That was the jist of the article, along with less highs being present in the older material. 

    Mike

    https://soundcloud.com/michaeljhanson
    https://www.facebook.com/michaeljhanson.music
    iTunes:
    https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/scandalous-grace/id1180730765
     
    Platinum Lifetime, Focusrite 8i6 & 2i4, Gibson LP, ES335, Fender Strat, 4003 Rickenbacker
    BMI
    #8
    Danny Danzi
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 5810
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
    • Location: DanziLand, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re:Buss Glue vs. Track Compression 2013/01/08 09:14:04 (permalink)
    Philip


    Dealing a lot with vocals and vibes that lash out everywhere at times ... I've pondered on applying more buss glue (comp and tape) to allow instruments and beatz to 'react' better.

    Listening to recent pop mixes ... I've noticed some ... where haughty vox vibes are deliberately glued-back to allow other instruments more fan-fare.  E.g., The emo-girl's raspy lashings are subdued and her coherency seriously smeared ... for no-more in-your-face vocals.  Her vibe still rules, but she drowns (artistically) within the mix ... almost like an alien.

    I realize there will always be a 'conflict' between instruments and vocs ... where everything competes for loudness.  So there's probably no right or wrong answer ... just art preference.

    Any thoughts or preferences at all on buss glue ... while considering your vibes, timbres, beatz, or such.

    Thanks in advance for all thoughts great or small.

    I don't know Philip, I've never heard anything by you that I felt needed any glue. You mention smearing in your post....this to me usually isn't something you get when using "glue". Smearing comes from limiting that literally smears/narrows the stereo field. It can be used as an effect, but it's definitely not "glue" you are hearing. Glue is just a subtle compressor on your master bus as you mix. The best results come from a hardware compressor with color or a flavor so to speak. The closest we can get to that without buying hardware would be to use something like the Fatso Jr starting with the EL Bus Glue preset. You put it on the master bus before you mix...and see how you fair. That plug has coloration and a little bit of tape type saturation. It's the only plug I've ever been successful with in that situation.
     
    Now if you are dealing with stack of vocals, there's nothing wrong with sending them to a vocal bus with a compressor on the bus to glue the entire stack together a bit more. You should also compress the tracks individually....but once you get that sorted, you can send to a bus and use one of your UAD plugs or even the Sonar bus comp...which works incredibly well if you have X1 or X2.
     
    Up front and in your face usually comes from lack of verb and a tight eq. When things go a bit more to the back, a light verb with some pre-delay, automation and a narrowing or widening of the stereo field with eq on the effects can work wonders and will yield nearly the same thing as compressing the heck out of a vocal. I sincerely don't think you need to go here bro....your mixes are always pristine and everything is audible in my opinion. :) Never hurts to experiment though. Just don't lose that classic "Philip" sound we're used to. :)
     
    -Danny

    My Site
    Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
    #9
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Buss Glue vs. Track Compression 2013/01/08 10:16:12 (permalink)
    I hate the term "glue" although I went through a period when I tried to glue everything. First, know that "glue" will not fix bad timing, poorly recorded, poorly EQ'd or bad sounding reverbs and delays on a track. Unfortunately, many people try "gluing" to dress a pig in jewels. In fact, I would not recommend any approach where you run the final tracks through a single stage of compression to make it sound better. Abandon this idea because it rarely works unless in some vibey, artsy, sort of effort in which the sound is meant to be trashed. It has its place in this case and Danny outlined how it should be used above.

    My opinion is to stay away from compressors on the two buss. Just a limiter. Mastering generally adds a compressor across the mix and if there is any "glue" to be added, this would be the place for that. Get your mix sounding as close to your vision and smooth from a transient perspective, balanced from an EQ perspective and placed advantageously in the stereo field. Work on clarity, performance, the foundation of kick, bass, and snare along with the primary vocal so that these 4 have impact. Then work on tone matching the vocal to the primary rhythm instrument. If the mix is not sounding good at this point, a glue approach is just going to cloud the sound.

    This does not preclude using parallel compression for vocals, drums or compressing individual tracks by the way. In a way, these should be used for fattening the sound or to focus in a specific frequency range. This is where the glue should happen anyway.

    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #10
    Philip
    Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4062
    • Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
    • Status: offline
    Re:Buss Glue vs. Track Compression 2013/01/08 22:30:58 (permalink)
    Middleman, AT, Danny, Mike, Herb, Jeff, and Linear Phase:

    Many of your thoughts merit re-reading, as you all truly have solid wisdom in these matters.

    I tried some vocal buss fx's using Ozone and Alloy (on the road) ... to hopefully better things ... but like you, especially Middleman, prophesied ... it flopped ... :):):):)

    And one of you, AT, also reminded us of the price of compression: 

    "Too much compression makes even the sweetest voice sound harsh, hard and sibilent"


    ...

    Philip  
    (Isa 5:12 And the harp, and the viol, the tabret, and pipe, and wine, are in their feasts: but they regard not the work of the LORD)

    Raised-Again 3http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=12307501
    #11
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Buss Glue vs. Track Compression 2013/01/08 22:58:04 (permalink)
    I thought we were talking about glue type compression on busses not the main stereo buss necessarily. You can be very subtle with it. And only over a buss here and there is sometimes all that is required. I like slow attack settings like 10 ms and even up to 30 ms. This ensures nice transients getting through. Release to slightly fit into the groove of the music nicely. Even quite fast can sound good eg 100 ms to 300 ms. Then quite a low ratio eg 1.5:1. Threshold so you are only seeing between -2dB and -3dB of gain reduction max. 

    When in this mode the compression becomes subtle and almost un-noticeable but if you switch it in and out you will find when the compressor is in, the overall sound on that buss just starts to take on a nicer level type sound that has a slight polish to it. It should be hard to describe but when it is off that buss should start to sound a little more jumpy etc..

    In mastering mode the compressor over a whole mix can be set that way too. I love the sound of the hardware Smart C2 in this mode, it is just killer. It is just soo polished when switched in it is ridiculous. I am still searching for the ultimate plug-in to do that. Danny tells me the Waves API 2500 can do it and perhaps with even more control too. I wish the hardware Smart C2 had a very slightly lower ratio at times.
    post edited by Jeff Evans - 2013/01/08 23:19:30

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #12
    batsbrew
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10037
    • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
    • Location: SL,UT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Buss Glue vs. Track Compression 2013/01/09 10:21:06 (permalink)
    i use both.

    actually, i use compression at 3 different levels:
    1. at tracking, with an external compressor (dbx 160)
    2. mixdown, at individual track level.
    3. mixdown, across 2-bus.

    now, i also use limiting, but that's another topic.

    i don't use any one level very hard, and what i'm looking for is an overall gentle effect, that is cumulative.


    i'll do the odd hard compression or limiting for effect...
    and i do limiting on ALL of my bass tracks, and a lot of times across the drum sub bus.


    i have, at times, put a waves L2 limiter across the master bus, set where the meters don't even move, and i STILL hear an effect to the signal.

    i'm still working this scenario out.

    takes a lot of experimenting, listening long after the fact, revisiting the approach, and it's constantly moving and progressing.

    it's hard to discuss specifics on any of this, because every song is unique (for me), and unless you are stuck in one specific genre with a specific sound that comes up over an over again, then you pretty much have to deal with it as you go along, song by song, and each song will require something different.




    rule of thumb:


    once you got things setup across the master bus, in terms of compressors and "GLUE", when you are almost finished with the mix:
    BYPASS everything.

    and see if it really still sounds better.



    i mix into a compressor on the 2-bus from the beginning, it took a LONG time to figure out where i wanted to be with the compressor settings before i could trust it.


    Bats Brew music Streaming
    Bats Brew albums:
    "Trouble"
    "Stay"
    "The Time is Magic"
    --
    Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
     
    #13
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Buss Glue vs. Track Compression 2013/01/09 11:44:38 (permalink)
    batsbrew

    it's hard to discuss specifics on any of this, because every song is unique


    So true, it's very genre specific. My approach is more clarity and natural I should have added. Think paper airplane by Alison Kruass. For Rock or Metal, totally different approach.

    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #14
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1