Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
sharp9
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 15
  • Joined: 2009/03/25 00:08:57
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/01/31 02:31:52 (permalink)


Jlien X wrote:

That's why I requested this "Legato and Overlap Correction" feature (available in Studio One v2.5) in another thread:  

These are the two things I miss most since I had to leave Logic when they got bought by Apple ($4000 for a computer...I don't think so, thanks)   

So I'm not an idiot, they really aren't anywhere to be found in Sonar...I used to use them ALL the time in Logic - especially writing string or woodwind lines....you could select, say 25 notes....Shift + L and Shift +O  ba da Boom done....keep expecting to see them pop up in an update 
  


#31
lowdown
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 300
  • Joined: 2004/04/14 16:07:38
  • Location: Essex - UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/01/31 05:32:23 (permalink)

Please, Please Roland save Sibelius from AVID and link it to Sonar :-)
Avid and Sibleius is one matter, and on the other hand, I believe Steinberg hired the UK [ex] Sibelius team for their research & developement team in London just before christmas, or maybe i just misread that.

Garry



http://soundcloud.com/garrycribb



Sonar X2B x64, W7 x64  
Cubase 7.5 x64

Intel i7/4790K 24 Gig Ram
Roland Quad Capture
#32
Combo
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 187
  • Joined: 2010/09/08 09:48:52
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/01/31 05:59:14 (permalink)
CakeAlexS


> PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE understand how CRITICAL it is for a large number of folks here!
 
 
Surely you would go and get third party notation software if it was that critical... 
 
Maybe they should replace it with the forums software..(OK now I'm in trouble)...

I know you're half -serious but once again this shows a basic misunderstanding of what a lot of (most?) SV users want that crops up a lot on here.  I used to use SV a helluva lot until X1 made it a chore.  I don't want something that will produce printed notation like Sibelius etc - I'd be more than happy to see that side of SV done away with or replaced with interfacing to those products  - I want it for input and editing and as an internal record of the musical content for reference.  It seems quite a few others feel the same.
 
 

SONAR Platinum rolling updates:  Intel i7 2600k on Gigabyte P67A UD 7: 16GB RAM:  W7 x64 Home Premium.
#33
slartabartfast
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5289
  • Joined: 2005/10/30 01:38:34
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/01/31 15:08:34 (permalink)
If I want to work with midi I’ll enter the data freehand in the event list.



I am guessing you do not work with midi all that much. You could record audio by manually writing in each sample value too, but I am assuming you probably prefer to have that process computer-automated to improve your workflow. I could live without the ability to record sound into Sonar at all, but I am not proposing that capability be dropped.


I came to Cakewalk software from early versions of CSound, and I have abandoned the flexibility and power of that program for the convenience of using a DAW. For whatever reason, Cakewalk does not seem to be interested in making it easy for people who want an efficient way to convert notation into midi. I suspect such people are a very small minority of users compared to those who want to string together snippets of other people's songs or repeat inane musical phrases ad nauseum.


Development decisions at Cakewalk are not going to be much influenced by a small number of people venting their frustration on this or any other forum. 


#34
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/01/31 15:11:09 (permalink)
slartabartfast
repeat inane musical phrases ad nauseum. 
You've heard some of my collabs then?


#35
pbognar
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 720
  • Joined: 2005/10/03 16:22:03
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/01/31 16:00:09 (permalink)
slartabartfast



If I want to work with midi I’ll enter the data freehand in the event list.



I am guessing you do not work with midi all that much. You could record audio by manually writing in each sample value too, but I am assuming you probably prefer to have that process computer-automated to improve your workflow. I could live without the ability to record sound into Sonar at all, but I am not proposing that capability be dropped.


I came to Cakewalk software from early versions of CSound, and I have abandoned the flexibility and power of that program for the convenience of using a DAW. For whatever reason, Cakewalk does not seem to be interested in making it easy for people who want an efficient way to convert notation into midi. I suspect such people are a very small minority of users compared to those who want to string together snippets of other people's songs or repeat inane musical phrases ad nauseum.


Development decisions at Cakewalk are not going to be much influenced by a small number of people venting their frustration on this or any other forum. 

I don't want to poop on how anyone makes music.
 
I'm cool with traditional audio, MIDI, step entry, looped audio & MIDI, REX, samples, interactive matrix composition & performance, chord / melody generation, and piano roll / drum editor / event list / score based composition and editing.  Flexibility is key and the end result is what matters.
 
What I don't want to see is any of this funtionality get worse with successive releases.
 
** cough cough ** s t  a ff v  iew ** cough cough **
 
Sonar is so close to having it all.
#36
riojazz
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1337
  • Joined: 2004/02/26 13:23:02
  • Location: Mid-Hudson Valley, NY
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/01/31 16:31:21 (permalink)
Quote from Combo: 
"I know you're half -serious but once again this shows a basic misunderstanding of what a lot of (most?) SV users want that crops up a lot on here. I used to use SV a helluva lot until X1 made it a chore. I don't want something that will produce printed notation like Sibelius etc - I'd be more than happy to see that side of SV done away with or replaced with interfacing to those products - I want it for input and editing and as an internal record of the musical content for reference. It seems quite a few others feel the same."

Yes, this is exactly what I am looking for in Staff View as well. I already have Sibelius and a few other notation programs, but I want to be able to remain in SONAR to enter, edit and review MIDI using the staff view.

Software: Cakewalk by Bandlab; Adobe Audition; Band-in-A-Box audiophile; Izotope Ozone; Encore; Melodyne; Win 10 Pro, 64-bit.

Hardware: Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 2nd; Roland Integra-7; TCE Finalizer; Presonus Central Station, Behringer X-Touch.  Home built i7 with 16 GB RAM, SSDs.
#37
Jimbo 88
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1828
  • Joined: 2007/03/19 12:27:17
  • Location: Elmhurst, Illinois USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/01/31 16:50:29 (permalink)
adding my 2 cents for the umpteenth time....

1)  I like to create a lead sheet in Sonar when composing a song.  And Sonar works fine for that until...You change keys and you can't transpose the chords.  How simple and silly is that?

2) Composing a piece with lots of instruments (jazz band, Orch, etc..) is hard to do if you can't see the notes.  Like playing chess and not seeing the whole board.

3)  Exporting a song From Sonar into any notation app is very, very labor intensive.  It should be a simple process, we are dealing with computers that do labor way better than humans.

just saying... 

Cakewalk By Bandlab
Cubase 9.5 Pro
Windows 7 64 Bit   Core i7-8700   32 Gig Ram 3.20ghz  
RME Fireface 400 Audio Card
Behringer FCA 1616
Sweetwater Creation Station
 
#38
Guitarpima
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4125
  • Joined: 2005/11/19 23:53:59
  • Location: Terra 3
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/01/31 21:15:19 (permalink)
All I can say it, I hope they finally give us usable SV.

I don't want to have to have multiple programs to enter notation.

Notation, the original DAW. Everything else is just rote. We are who we are and no more than another. Humans, you people are crazy.
 
 Win 7 x64  X2  Intel DX58SO, Intel i7 920 2.66ghz 12gb DDR3  ASUS ATI EAH5750  650w PSU 4x WD HDs 320gb  DVD, DVD RW Eleven Rack, KRK Rokit 8s and 10s sub
#39
rabeach
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2703
  • Joined: 2004/01/26 14:56:13
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/01/31 21:41:41 (permalink)
slartabartfast



If I want to work with midi I’ll enter the data freehand in the event list.



I am guessing you do not work with midi all that much. You could record audio by manually writing in each sample value too, but I am assuming you probably prefer to have that process computer-automated to improve your workflow. I could live without the ability to record sound into Sonar at all, but I am not proposing that capability be dropped.


I came to Cakewalk software from early versions of CSound, and I have abandoned the flexibility and power of that program for the convenience of using a DAW. For whatever reason, Cakewalk does not seem to be interested in making it easy for people who want an efficient way to convert notation into midi. I suspect such people are a very small minority of users compared to those who want to string together snippets of other people's songs or repeat inane musical phrases ad nauseum.


Development decisions at Cakewalk are not going to be much influenced by a small number of people venting their frustration on this or any other forum. 

the event list comment was just a joke. i would like to use SV but don't and end up using final.
#40
Paul P
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2685
  • Joined: 2012/12/08 17:15:47
  • Location: Montreal
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/01/31 23:21:29 (permalink)
Would it be possible to create a generic VST notation plugin ? I've seen the idea mentioned several times on the net but it's never developed further. One could be written that would work in any daw. If I was retired that's the sort of thing I would enjoy looking into.
#41
noynekker
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1235
  • Joined: 2012/01/12 01:09:45
  • Location: POCO, by the river, Canada
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/01/31 23:41:12 (permalink)
slartabartfast



If I want to work with midi I’ll enter the data freehand in the event list.



I am guessing you do not work with midi all that much. You could record audio by manually writing in each sample value too, but I am assuming you probably prefer to have that process computer-automated to improve your workflow. I could live without the ability to record sound into Sonar at all, but I am not proposing that capability be dropped.


I came to Cakewalk software from early versions of CSound, and I have abandoned the flexibility and power of that program for the convenience of using a DAW. For whatever reason, Cakewalk does not seem to be interested in making it easy for people who want an efficient way to convert notation into midi. I suspect such people are a very small minority of users compared to those who want to string together snippets of other people's songs or repeat inane musical phrases ad nauseum.


Development decisions at Cakewalk are not going to be much influenced by a small number of people venting their frustration on this or any other forum. 

I want Staff View improvements, and I don't think it's a "small" number of users who use the Staff view, since there have been many lively threads about all this. I think a lot of folks on this Forum base some of their purchasing decisions on what they read here on the Forums . . . so wouldn't it make sense for Cakewalk developers to pay some attention to the opinions on the Forum ?

Cakewalk by Bandlab, Cubase, RME Babyface Pro, Intel i7 3770K @3.5Ghz, Asus P8Z77-VPro/Thunderbolt, 32GB DDR3 RAM, GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 250 GB OS SSD, 2TB HDD samples, Win 10 Pro 64 bit, backed up by Macrium Reflect, Novation Impulse 61 Midi Key Controller, Tannoy Active Near Field Monitors, Guitars by Vantage, Gibson, Yamaki and Ovation.

 
#42
rabeach
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2703
  • Joined: 2004/01/26 14:56:13
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/02/01 00:59:33 (permalink)
noynekker


slartabartfast



If I want to work with midi I’ll enter the data freehand in the event list.



I am guessing you do not work with midi all that much. You could record audio by manually writing in each sample value too, but I am assuming you probably prefer to have that process computer-automated to improve your workflow. I could live without the ability to record sound into Sonar at all, but I am not proposing that capability be dropped.


I came to Cakewalk software from early versions of CSound, and I have abandoned the flexibility and power of that program for the convenience of using a DAW. For whatever reason, Cakewalk does not seem to be interested in making it easy for people who want an efficient way to convert notation into midi. I suspect such people are a very small minority of users compared to those who want to string together snippets of other people's songs or repeat inane musical phrases ad nauseum.


Development decisions at Cakewalk are not going to be much influenced by a small number of people venting their frustration on this or any other forum. 

I want Staff View improvements, and I don't think it's a "small" number of users who use the Staff view, since there have been many lively threads about all this. I think a lot of folks on this Forum base some of their purchasing decisions on what they read here on the Forums . . . so wouldn't it make sense for Cakewalk developers to pay some attention to the opinions on the Forum ?
IMHO if cakewalk could update the Staff View they would have, they have not addressed any issues that I'm aware of but a print issue since sonar 1. 

post edited by rabeach - 2013/02/01 01:21:04
#43
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3617
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/02/01 01:29:33 (permalink)
I use PRV ="Piano Roll View"  all the time. How would I move and edit my midi data? Event list? Event list is good on other things keep that too thank you! 


-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
#44
Susan G
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12016
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
  • Location: Putnam County, NY
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/02/01 01:40:09 (permalink)
Hi-

Alex Westner said years ago that CW was going to update the Staff View. In SONAR 6 they:
Added a track list view pane to the staff view, similar to the one in the PRV. Lets you view any number of tracks and set a track active or set its MSR state.



That was pretty much the last significant update, AFAIK. We still have the same well-documented problems with triplets, rests, yada-yada.



I really believe development of the SV has been abandoned at this point. I hope I'm pleasantly surprised some time in the future.


-Susan

2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAM
Windows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.
SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
#45
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/02/01 03:22:13 (permalink)
Hello Susan G; Haven't seen you around these parts for what seems like such a long time. G'day.

Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#46
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3617
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/02/01 08:38:49 (permalink)
mudgel


Hello Susan G; Haven't seen you around these parts for what seems like such a long time. G'day.


+1


-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
#47
garrigus
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8599
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 17:23:21
  • Location: www.garrigus.com
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/02/01 10:04:40 (permalink)
Hey Susan,

How've you been? Did you jump on the SONAR X1 or X2 bandwagon?

Scott

--
Scott R. Garrigus - http://garrigus.com - SONAR X2 Power! - http://garrigus.com/?SonarX2Power
* Author of the Cakewalk Sonar and Sony Sound Forge Power book series: http://garrigus.com/?PowerBooks
* Author of the Cakewalk Sonar ProAudioTutor video tutorial series: http://garrigus.com/?ProAudioTutor
* Publisher of the DigiFreq free music technology newsletter: http://digifreq.com/?DigiFreq
* Publisher of the NewTechReview free consumer technology newsletter: http://newtechreview.com/?NewTechReview

#48
Jimbo 88
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1828
  • Joined: 2007/03/19 12:27:17
  • Location: Elmhurst, Illinois USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/02/01 14:14:40 (permalink)
Paul P


Would it be possible to create a generic VST notation plugin ? I've seen the idea mentioned several times on the net but it's never developed further. One could be written that would work in any daw. If I was retired that's the sort of thing I would enjoy looking into.

You can Rewire any notation software into Sonar with this:
 
http://www.energy-xt.com/index.php?id=0115
 
The problem is...it only works with one midi track at a time.  So you'd have to have say,...16 instances of a notation software loaded at a time to do 16 instruments and then you don't have a score.

Cakewalk By Bandlab
Cubase 9.5 Pro
Windows 7 64 Bit   Core i7-8700   32 Gig Ram 3.20ghz  
RME Fireface 400 Audio Card
Behringer FCA 1616
Sweetwater Creation Station
 
#49
Susan G
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12016
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
  • Location: Putnam County, NY
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/02/01 17:50:49 (permalink)
Thanks guys :).

@Scott: No, I haven't upgraded, since my system wasn't really up to it. I might consider it now that I have more HP, but I've been happy with another DAW in the meantime.

-Susan

2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAM
Windows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.
SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
#50
garrigus
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8599
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 17:23:21
  • Location: www.garrigus.com
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/02/01 18:31:21 (permalink)
Susan G

Thanks guys :).

@Scott: No, I haven't upgraded, since my system wasn't really up to it. I might consider it now that I have more HP, but I've been happy with another DAW in the meantime. 
Which one? Just curious... don't want to start any wars.


Scott

--
Scott R. Garrigus - http://garrigus.com - SONAR X2 Power! - http://garrigus.com/?SonarX2Power
* Author of the Cakewalk Sonar and Sony Sound Forge Power book series: http://garrigus.com/?PowerBooks
* Author of the Cakewalk Sonar ProAudioTutor video tutorial series: http://garrigus.com/?ProAudioTutor
* Publisher of the DigiFreq free music technology newsletter: http://digifreq.com/?DigiFreq
* Publisher of the NewTechReview free consumer technology newsletter: http://newtechreview.com/?NewTechReview

#51
Susan G
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12016
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
  • Location: Putnam County, NY
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/02/01 19:02:47 (permalink)
garrigus
Which one? Just curious... don't want to start any wars.  


Scott

That would be the "R" one ;).


-Susan




2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAM
Windows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.
SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
#52
garrigus
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8599
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 17:23:21
  • Location: www.garrigus.com
  • Status: offline
Re:Please Cakewalk. Drop notation and PRV altogether 2013/02/01 20:05:33 (permalink)
Susan G

garrigus
Which one? Just curious... don't want to start any wars.  

Scott 
That would be the "R" one ;). 

-Susan
Reason? Just kidding... I know what you mean.


Scott

--
Scott R. Garrigus - http://garrigus.com - SONAR X2 Power! - http://garrigus.com/?SonarX2Power
* Author of the Cakewalk Sonar and Sony Sound Forge Power book series: http://garrigus.com/?PowerBooks
* Author of the Cakewalk Sonar ProAudioTutor video tutorial series: http://garrigus.com/?ProAudioTutor
* Publisher of the DigiFreq free music technology newsletter: http://digifreq.com/?DigiFreq
* Publisher of the NewTechReview free consumer technology newsletter: http://newtechreview.com/?NewTechReview


#53
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1