For those thinking the ProTools grass is greener, read this tidbit of stooooopid.

Author
guitardood
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 413
  • Joined: 2004/08/02 21:12:50
  • Status: offline
2013/02/10 22:56:39 (permalink)

For those thinking the ProTools grass is greener, read this tidbit of stooooopid.

I don't think Cakewalk would ever pull this kind of nastiness.
    http://www.pro-tools-expe...removed-from-sale.html


Best,
guitardood

#1

1 Reply Related Threads

    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:For those thinking the ProTools grass is greener, read this tidbit of stooooopid. 2013/02/11 10:48:52 (permalink)
    That's funny. Who else charges third-party developers for the privilege of creating plugins for their DAW? (I can think of only one other example: Native Instruments collecting fees for libraries that run under the free Kontakt player. But at least you get a free player.) TransVST would have potentially cut Avid out from that source of revenue.

    Ever wonder why the Pro Tools versions of plugins are so much more expensive than the generic native versions? 


    EDIT: a related link: http://www.protoolerblog.com/2012/12/07/the-real-reason-transvst-got-pulled/


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #2
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1