TraceyStudios
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 603
- Joined: 2005/10/13 12:40:33
- Location: Chandler, AZ
- Status: offline
less is more? maybe, maybe not...
I have been struggling with mixing. I spent tons of time trying to learn how to properly compress, eq, limit and automate etc. My mixes were horrible. sometime I would get lucky and get a good one, but I couldn't figure out what made this one better than others. Spent tons of time watching vids and reading books. Finally, I just gave up and decided to hire someone to mix. so lately I haven't been attempting mixing, just working on tracking. So when a finish the tracking, I use just a very few plugs to do a quick mix to send the singer or guitarist. and the funny thing is, they sound better than anything i had spent hours and hours on. go figure! So is that the trick? Less is more? LOL!!!!!
AMD FX-6100 six-core processor 3.3GHz 8 Gig RAM SONAR X3 Producer Tascam FW1884 Mackie Blackbird Presonus Digimax Avalon U5 BFD2 SL Trigger Alesis DM8 Pro drums KRK Rokit 8s KRK 10s ARC2 Folgers Dark Roast, a bit of crazy :) & lots of help from the forums! http://www.reverbnation.com/blakkmire
|
geetsifly
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 192
- Joined: 2008/10/17 23:33:53
- Location: an undisclosed location outside Chicago
- Status: offline
Re:less is more? maybe, maybe not...
2013/02/26 15:03:37
(permalink)
I think so... I have found the same. The more I have tred to muscle the mix the more dead it sounds. Lately I have taken to a more subtle less heavy handed approach with much better results. Also the source material has a huge influence on the mix. Cluttered song/track/recording yields a cluttered mix no matter what. just my 2 cents
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re:less is more? maybe, maybe not...
2013/02/26 15:04:54
(permalink)
Not necessarily, the lesson here is that it is very easy to make a dry mix worse by using plugs incorrectly or unmusically. So less is more if you're not very good at mixing, I suppose. But that "more" in the hands of a professional mixer is likely to make that dry mix sound better. Sometimes I'll spend all night trying to make a mix better, and the next day I'll play it back and it sounds like crap. So I strip all of that hard work away and realize that it sounded better when I first started it. Just part of being an amateur I suppose. Sometimes we beaver away for hours in totally the wrong direction
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
BlixYZ
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 805
- Joined: 2010/12/31 16:45:54
- Location: Barrington, NJ
- Status: offline
Re:less is more? maybe, maybe not...
2013/02/26 15:10:51
(permalink)
Whenever you spend a long time slaving over a mix, you begin to lose all objectivity. You can just get "lost" in the mix. When this happens, you need to take a break from it- maybe even delete a bunch of plugins and start again. It doesn't help when you keep trying things and experimenting with particular elements without taking the "whole" into consideration. In any event, whether or not "less is more" depends on the style of music and the artistic aim of the production. When tracking is done well and the performances are great, sometimes very little mixing is needed. The one thing that is certainly true is: More mixing is NOT NECESSARILY better. We've all had the experience of mixing something to death. aint pretty.
|
TraceyStudios
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 603
- Joined: 2005/10/13 12:40:33
- Location: Chandler, AZ
- Status: offline
Re:less is more? maybe, maybe not...
2013/02/26 15:11:20
(permalink)
I guess I feel like I have all of these tools and I have to use them, and I feel stupid now that I realize just cuz I have them doesn't mean they have to be used. my challenge now will be to determine when to use them and which ones. I didn't really mean that we all should "use less because it's more", was more of a commentary about my approach thus far. I found it funny that I struggled and slaved and the frustration. then when I do minimul stuff, it sounds fantastic. Just a reality check for me that I thought I would share.
AMD FX-6100 six-core processor 3.3GHz 8 Gig RAM SONAR X3 Producer Tascam FW1884 Mackie Blackbird Presonus Digimax Avalon U5 BFD2 SL Trigger Alesis DM8 Pro drums KRK Rokit 8s KRK 10s ARC2 Folgers Dark Roast, a bit of crazy :) & lots of help from the forums! http://www.reverbnation.com/blakkmire
|
redbarchetta
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 534
- Joined: 2013/02/16 21:01:12
- Location: Portland Oregon
- Status: offline
Re:less is more? maybe, maybe not...
2013/02/26 15:31:17
(permalink)
TraceyStudios I guess I feel like I have all of these tools and I have to use them, and I feel stupid now that I realize just cuz I have them doesn't mean they have to be used. my challenge now will be to determine when to use them and which ones. Which is why i'm starting to think it's a very good idea for me to hold off on buying any 3rd party plugs.
|
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24398
- Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
- Location: NC
- Status: offline
Re:less is more? maybe, maybe not...
2013/02/26 15:38:32
(permalink)
Less can be more..... but the reverse is also true. The key is knowing what to do, where and when, and by how much.
My website & music: www.herbhartley.com MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface BMI/NSAI "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer "
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:less is more? maybe, maybe not...
2013/02/26 16:43:27
(permalink)
I have through the years used as few plugins as I can for mixing. I look at plugins as way to fix a problem. If I hear no problem than no plugin.
|
vlab
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 239
- Joined: 2003/11/14 14:18:24
- Location: Montreal, Canada
- Status: offline
Re:less is more? maybe, maybe not...
2013/02/26 16:53:06
(permalink)
I think that when you're composing a song, arranging it, producing it ... what lacks in the end, when you're at the mixing stage is: perspective ... It's not that you're able or not to mix it, only someone with fresh ears catches what the mix lacks instantly. and you probably are over-focusing on things that are not so important, and don't see what's obvious. (since you know those tracks so well, and become less sensitive about them). I think that finding a good mixing partner really is the best thing. you keep involved in the mix, but with a distance. so in the end, it sounds like you, only better. but hiring a "mixer" ... I would not for my usual gigs, but if I get enough budget, I'd consider someone who can take my music to the point I can't. Cheers ! V
Systems: Intel I7 970 hexacore, 24gbRAM, UAD2, TC powercoreFW, SSL duendeFW, MOTU 896HD, Dell Vostro 3750 (i7 quadcore), 16gbRAM, NI KA6. UAD2, SSL duende native, Merging/Benchmarks converters, Tannoy Ellipse 8, Yamaha HS50m, Novation remote SL49,
|
TraceyStudios
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 603
- Joined: 2005/10/13 12:40:33
- Location: Chandler, AZ
- Status: offline
Re:less is more? maybe, maybe not...
2013/02/26 17:09:18
(permalink)
I agree vlab. I hired a "mixer" because I don't know anyone locally that is into this as much as I am and uses Sonar. I would rather do it myself, however to get to the skill level I want, would require some school possibly, but certainly more learning. and time is a factor. I will continue to work on and learn more about mixing, however with this current recording project, easier and less stress to just hire a guy. He's a pro, and he is also helping me learn, and btw, he offered to show me some of his "tricks", which i thought was pretty nice of him. He knows I will never take any business away from him and that I have a desire to be better at my hobby. So its a win - win. I get to learn and he makes some money. I will continue to work at. Thinking about taking some classes, but its hard to fit that around my work scedule. we'll see. Thanks!
AMD FX-6100 six-core processor 3.3GHz 8 Gig RAM SONAR X3 Producer Tascam FW1884 Mackie Blackbird Presonus Digimax Avalon U5 BFD2 SL Trigger Alesis DM8 Pro drums KRK Rokit 8s KRK 10s ARC2 Folgers Dark Roast, a bit of crazy :) & lots of help from the forums! http://www.reverbnation.com/blakkmire
|
jb101
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2946
- Joined: 2011/12/04 05:26:10
- Status: offline
Re:less is more? maybe, maybe not...
2013/02/26 17:57:24
(permalink)
One book that really helped me here was Mike Senior's "Mixing Secrets". I highly recommend it (along with Roey Izhaki's "Mixing Audio"). I used to load up compressors everywhere, start mixing etc. He suggests getting a basic balance first (static fader), then look for the tracks that make you reach for the fader to bring them up or down as the track plays back. These are the ones that might be helped with compression, etc. If a track stays stable throughout the song, leave it alone. I am obviously simplifying his thoughts greatly. I listened back to some tracks I did in Sonar 6 recently, that were simple, static fader mixes with little or no compression or EQ, and they stood up quite well. They could obviously be improved greatly, but didn't sound so far off, considering the amount of time, effort and processing that my current tracks receive. Anyway, read Mike Senior's and Roey Izhaki's books, they have been invaluable to me.
|
cuitlahac
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 196
- Joined: 2011/07/24 20:09:52
- Location: Albuquerque, NM,USA
- Status: offline
Re:less is more? maybe, maybe not...
2013/02/26 20:04:10
(permalink)
I have shared the same experiences. It seems like the more I messed with it.....the worse it got. I recently attended Alan Parsons' MCTS Class and the major take-away that I had is to keep it simple. When you take the time to get it right in the tracking stage, the mixing and production becomes much easier and you have to make very few "fixes" and don't require any more than a few basic processors. To paraphrase what Alan taught us....... "take the time to get it right coming in". I think that this is a valuable piece of advice. On one of the recordings that we made during that class here's a summary of the processing that he used. Added some 10K (actually....a lot) to the snare channel, had the bass player compress his signal coming in to the mix, and he used a couple of Fairchilds on the lead and backup vocal tracks. That was it. He did however spend some time making sure that what he was getting to the board was what he wanted to hear before any tracking was actually done. Coley Read (the Pro Tools guy in the control room) basically did tracking, a few overdubs (by punching in and out), a few clip "fade-in/fade-outs", and a couple of very minor touch ups. He really didn't have to mess with things too much. I really expected to see tons of things being done and processed in the DAW, but it was used pretty much as the digital recorder. Admittedly, the studio musicians were awesome, the facility and equipment were second to none and that certainly adds a lot to the tracking process. I think that "getting it right coming in" though was the biggest contributor to a great mix. Anyone that gets a chance should attend one of these sessions. I thought that it was a real eye-opener. Keep Rockin'! Dave
Dave- SONAR Platinum, +Producer 5,7,8.5,X1PE, X2, X3e,Win7 Pro 64bit, SoundForge 10, CD Architect, Izotope 7 Advanced & Insight Metering, RAIN ION rack PC, (Nehalem) Xeon(R) CPU @ 3.06Ghz, 6GB DDR3 Ram, 2 WD640GB SATA II 7200rpm HDD's, LaCie 300GB HDD , ATI Radeon 4650 graphics (1GB) running Dual Monitors, Antelope Orion 32 + MP32 Pre's, SSL Matrix 2 Hybrid Console, M-Audio Bx8a Monitors w/ Energy 90w-12" sub, Roland A-800 PRO, BOSS BR-1600 DRS, Shure KSMs, 85s, 57s, 58s, Shure PSM Monitor, Gibson guitars, Fender P Bass.
|
qlne
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 58
- Joined: 2012/03/01 10:27:44
- Status: offline
Re:less is more? maybe, maybe not...
2013/02/26 21:20:21
(permalink)
Lots, and I mean like every soft synth/ sampler out there has presets which are already processed with compression, reverb, you name it. Adding additional processing to these can lead to gaseous explosions, so either remove the processing on the soft synths, or mix them to a separate bus and concentrate on the dry stuff to achieve a coherent blend. Or just turn it off and take a walk.
|