Helpful ReplyQuestions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer

Author
CrusherKodiak
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4
  • Joined: 2013/03/07 17:11:25
  • Status: offline
2013/03/07 18:38:30 (permalink)

Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer

Hello All,
 
    This is my first post as a new member on the Cakewalk forums, so please be gentle. (haha?)
 
    My biggest concern involves the hardware I presently own, and whether or not I will need any other components to complete my setup. This is my hypothetical situation; I will be running SONAR X2 producer, and as far as Hardware, I PLAN to use a POD HD500 as the interface for all my guitars and a ZOOM R16 for anything else (mics, drums, w/e). Both connect to my PC with USB 2.0. As you can probably tell, I have no experience with any DAW so this is all virgin territory for me, so my question is thus:
 
    With the aforementioned devices, is it reasonably practicable to assume that I can start learning SONAR and expect to have everything I need/get a decent performance out of the equipement/software and not suffer any severe latency or other issues on my PC (assuming said PC is exceeding opertaing requirements)? I am aware that there are certain processes and tools within SONAR or any other DAW that will induce latency regardless.
 
    If that is insufficient equipment for a bare-bones set up, then what TYPES of devices am i looking at to complete it? Any advice on the subject is most welcome.
 
                    Looking forward to being a part of the Cakewalk community,
                                                                                                        
                                                                            Blaine
#1
VariousArtist
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1397
  • Joined: 2003/11/07 15:03:09
  • Location: London, UK & California, USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/07 18:44:50 (permalink)
Welcome Blaine...

Am I right in understanding that your proposed setup will not be using a "regular" sound card?  I think you might be able to use the other hardware items as long as they provide an audio input to your PC that Sonar recognizes.

For example, I own a Roland VG-99 guitar amp/FX modeler pedal, and it offers a USB input to my PC which Sonar can use to record audio from the unit.  Is that kind of like what you are planning on doing?  If so, I think it should work.

However I never use this route, opting instead to put a regular sound card between my instruments and my PC.  I do make use of the SPDIF output from the VG-99 so that I go directly digital from the unit right into my sound-card, which frees up its analog inputs.

The other benefit of using a real sound card is that you can use other instruments that might not offer audio over their USB connections.  Maybe I am misunderstanding your request?
#2
CrusherKodiak
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4
  • Joined: 2013/03/07 17:11:25
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/07 18:57:03 (permalink)
The plan is definitely to include a sound card,
 
I apologize for any peculiar use of the terminology I am using! as it says in the post, this is all new to me.
 
I see what you are saying in regard to the sound card. I think it would fall on me at this point to inform myself as to how the processes in the proagram and the sound card relate to one another. my biggest setback at this point, to be embarassingly honest, is that I havent the faintest clue what I'm doing, I just want to know whether or not my gear is gonna work for or against me...
 
Thank you very much for taking the time to respond!
 
#3
pbognar
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 720
  • Joined: 2005/10/03 16:22:03
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/07 18:59:49 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
CrusherKodiak


Hello All,
 
    This is my first post as a new member on the Cakewalk forums, so please be gentle. (haha?)
 
    My biggest concern involves the hardware I presently own, and whether or not I will need any other components to complete my setup. This is my hypothetical situation; I will be running SONAR X2 producer, and as far as Hardware, I PLAN to use a POD HD500 as the interface for all my guitars and a ZOOM R16 for anything else (mics, drums, w/e). Both connect to my PC with USB 2.0. As you can probably tell, I have no experience with any DAW so this is all virgin territory for me, so my question is thus:
 
    With the aforementioned devices, is it reasonably practicable to assume that I can start learning SONAR and expect to have everything I need/get a decent performance out of the equipement/software and not suffer any severe latency or other issues on my PC (assuming said PC is exceeding opertaing requirements)? I am aware that there are certain processes and tools within SONAR or any other DAW that will induce latency regardless.
 
    If that is insufficient equipment for a bare-bones set up, then what TYPES of devices am i looking at to complete it? Any advice on the subject is most welcome.
 
                    Looking forward to being a part of the Cakewalk community,
                                                                                                        
                                                                            Blaine
I seem to recall that the R-16 can be used as a mixer / USB2 audio interface, but there might be some limitations.
 
Plop this into google:  zoom r16 as audio interface
 
At the time I was considering this, I think there may have been one person on either this or another forum who was using an R-24.
In the google result set, someone from the home recording link said
 
"I have been using the R16 in interface mode for a couple if years now. It was a pain in the ass to get set up and finally I resorted to using the ASIO4All drivers. Since then, zero problems. I also use it as a control surface for Sonar 8. I really like that feature.
Yeah, the pres arent stellar, but they are certainly usable.
I also have Reaper installed on a netbook...the R16 works well with it too. "
 
 
#4
jb101
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2946
  • Joined: 2011/12/04 05:26:10
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/07 19:00:05 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
I don't know the POD HD500, or the Zoom R16, so I can't offer much advice.
 
The only thing I could suggest is checking what the drivers are like for those devices.  If they have ASIO drivers, they might be okay.
 
One of my students uses a zoom, so I'll ask him about it tomorrow.

 Sonar Platinum
#5
VariousArtist
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1397
  • Joined: 2003/11/07 15:03:09
  • Location: London, UK & California, USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/07 19:06:08 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
No problem, it was all new to me too.  Sometimes it still feels like it is, hehe.

Typically people get a decent sound card that they use between the PC/Sonar and your instruments.  I'd be surprised if anyone tried to operate without one because it's the way you get external sound (audio) or optionally MIDI into the computer.  And it's also the way you'd listen back to your music as it plays within Sonar.

I mention the Roland VG-99 because it allows you to circumvent the norm of using a sound card by providing an audio stream straight from the pedals.  But I think this is more rare and even I don't bother to use it that way (although there's no real reason not to).

You might want to look into some sound cards and see what they might offer you and what price range you're willing to pay.  Companies like Roland, MOTU, M-Audio, etc. all make good sound cards, most of which you can plug into your PC via a USB cable.  You would then plug your instruments into that sound card and headphones to listen to playback or to directly hear your instruments.

Here are a few cards by name as a starting point for research:  
- Roland DuoCapture / QuadCapture / OctaCapture
- MOTU 896 MKIII
- M-Audio Delta / Fast Track

You could conceivably use the sound card built into your PC (typically in the motherboard) but I would't recommend this.  They are less stable, less capable and lower quality when it comes to recording and playback...
#6
CrusherKodiak
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4
  • Joined: 2013/03/07 17:11:25
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/07 19:06:17 (permalink)
Thanks, I will see what I can find! As far as the Zoom R16 is concerned, there is some propaganda on their site as far as it functionality with any DAW, but I would like to find out if that accurate or not...
 
any advice is always appreciated :)
 
                Thanks again
#7
pbognar
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 720
  • Joined: 2005/10/03 16:22:03
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/07 19:21:34 (permalink)
CrusherKodiak


Thanks, I will see what I can find! As far as the Zoom R16 is concerned, there is some propaganda on their site as far as it functionality with any DAW, but I would like to find out if that accurate or not...
 
any advice is always appreciated :)
 
                Thanks again

Hey - as long as you already own it, you might as well see if you can get some mileage out of it.
 
Let us know how it works for you.
#8
DCMonkey
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7
  • Joined: 2007/04/20 04:11:31
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/07 19:34:32 (permalink)
It looks like the Zoom R16 is a full on 8 in 2 out 24-bit/96Khz USB 2.0 audio interface (aka sound card) with ASIO drivers. Personally I'd just use the R16 as my interface and route the POD audio through it as swapping interfaces (and monitor outs etc) every time you want to record different instruments sounds to me like more hassle than it's worth.
#9
DW_Mike
Max Output Level: -6 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6907
  • Joined: 2006/11/29 18:06:40
  • Location: The arm-pit of the good 'ol US...New Jersey
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/07 19:39:05 (permalink)
From what I just read on the Zoom R16 it appears that it will be just fine as an audio interface.
At first I was thinking that it might only offer a stereo pair (basically the Main Outs) as it's PC connection.

But it does offer 8 inputs through USB which is nice.

Like Pbognar said, you already own it so use it and let us know how the driver support is.
If it has decent drivers and works well then you're in good shape.
If not then you know to start shopping for something else.

Welcome.
Mike

Sonar X3 ~ Scarlett 18i6 ~ Home Build DAW  
GA-Z77X-UD5H
Intel i7 3770k 4.2GHz
32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite (4x8) 
2x Samsung 250GB SSD 
1TB WD Black HDD @ 7200RPM 6Gb/s 64MB 
Corsair H80i Liquid cooler 
Noctua Silent Fans ~ 3x120mm ~ 1x140mm 
Seasonic Platinum 760w PSU 
Windows 7 Pro 64Bit.
#10
CrusherKodiak
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4
  • Joined: 2013/03/07 17:11:25
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/07 19:40:47 (permalink)
Will do, I just wanted some clarification as to whether or not it was even enough to get started with. The next plan is to use and abuse the setup to see how far I get along! I will do my best to keep everyone updated.
 
            Cheers! 
#11
slartabartfast
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5289
  • Joined: 2005/10/30 01:38:34
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/07 19:50:31 (permalink)
The plan is definitely to include a sound card,



I do not know the zoom either, but I do have some experience reading manuals.


This one: http://www.samsontech.com/site_media/legacy_docs/R16ai.pdf


says: 
Audio interface
The various input and output jacks of the
R16 can be used as a Hi-Speed USB (USB
2.0) audio interface with support for 8 ins
and 2 outs and input and output quality up
to 24-bit/96kHz. Effects can also be used
when the sampling rate is 44.1 kHz, and
the unit can be powered by the computer’s
USB bus

So the Zoom is a "sound card" ie USB external audio interface. If it works with Sonar and has the inputs you need, you should not need another "sound card"

Finding the driver (software that will let your computer "see" the audio interface when it is plugged in to a USB socket is a bit of a hunt. But apparently the drivers you need are here:

http://www.zoom.co.jp/downloads/r16/software/


And are supposed to work up to Windows 7-- 32 bit and 64 bit versions available.

#12
digimidi
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 496
  • Joined: 2003/11/15 19:21:08
  • Location: Eastern part of the country
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/07 20:17:45 (permalink)
I would think when it is all said and done, you might want to look at a "proper" sound card such as those produced with multiple inputs like Focusrite, Presonus, Tascam, etc., since these are DESIGNED for the DAW market.  By all means, you should see if the Zoom and POD work, but In my mind, I'm guessing that ultimately you will prefer a dedicated audio/midi interface.  Just my thoughts...

Regards

I started out with nothing and I still have most of it left... 
http://daveowenmusic.com/
http://fabulous52s.com/
https://soundcloud.com/daveowenmusic

Sonar Platinum Edition/Cakewalk by BandLab: Dell 8700 XPS i7 16GB RAM, Cyberpower laptop w/8GB RAM/i7/2GB NVidia card/Tascam US1641/Focusrite 18i6/Melodyne Studio 4/Waves Plugs (a lot)/Garritan/EWQL Symphony Silver & Fab 4 and a bunch of other stuff. Studio One 3/Magix Samplitude Pro X3 Suite/Mixcraft 8 Pro/Reaper/Acid Pro 8
#13
SF_Green
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1403
  • Joined: 2005/09/13 20:37:55
  • Location: San Francisco
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/07 20:59:38 (permalink)
Welcome Blaine I have an HD500, but I use a Fireface 800 as my audio interface and bring audio from the HD500 in through that. However, you could use the HD500 as your audio interface if you need to. It has ASIO drivers, and can run at 16 or 24 bit, and 44.1 or 48 kHz. I set it up in Sonar and with the buffers set to the minimum of 128 samples got a round-trip latency of 17 ms. It has 2 audio inputs (Gtr and Aux), a mic input, balanced and unbalanced outputs, headphone out, effect send and returns and even MIDI in and out. With that said, although I'm not familiar with the Zoom, I would probably try that first. But I would also check the HD500. Line 6 writes pretty good drivers and the HD500 might give better results with your system. Cheers Bud

AMD FX-8370, Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3,  Win7x64 SP1, 16Gb CorsairDDR3-1600, GeForce GTX 950 (390.65), SSD 525Gb (OS), SATA 3 & 1.5Tb, MOTU microlite, RME FireFace 800 (D 3.124, fw 2.77), UAD-2Q, Adam A7X, A-800 PRO, CC121
Cubase Pro 10.0.5, SonarPt-2017.10 (x64), Reason10.2, Live 10.0.5 Suite, Wavelab Elements 9.5.40, Komplete10Ult, POD Farm2.5, Omnisphere2.5, BFD3, Alesis QS7.1, Arturia BeatStep Pro, POD HD500, Alesis ControlPad, ARP Omni, many things with strings. GrSltz My Studio
#14
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/08 04:05:06 (permalink)
And just to confuse you even further, I've got a POD Pro XT and I only have the audio side of this set up, totally ignoring the digital & Midi side of it.

I run all of my IO through a Focusrite Saffire PRO26 and just treat the POD signal like I would any other audio signal - straight into the Saffire & into Sonar.

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#15
Kalle Rantaaho
Max Output Level: -5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7005
  • Joined: 2006/01/09 13:07:59
  • Location: Finland
  • Status: offline
Re:Questions: realistic expectations with SONAR X2 producer 2013/03/08 07:42:46 (permalink)
Your PC-resources play a big role in getting the DAW work going. No soundcard helps you, if the CPU or RAM are insufficient. I assume your rig is up to the task. It's good to put your specs in the signature, because you need to tell themn every time you ask a question.

SONAR PE 8.5.3, Asus P5B, 2,4 Ghz Dual Core, 4 Gb RAM, GF 7300, EMU 1820, Bluetube Pre  -  Kontakt4, Ozone, Addictive Drums, PSP Mixpack2, Melda Creative Pack, Melodyne Plugin etc.
The benefit of being a middle aged amateur is the low number of years of frustration ahead of you.
#16
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1