Optimizing for the Picture Cache....???

Author
JTMusicVA
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 26
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 21:22:15
  • Status: offline
2013/03/07 22:08:13 (permalink)

Optimizing for the Picture Cache....???

I'm a crazy optimizer - if I can optimize something for not a lot of money, I'm there, dude!!
SOOO... my question is... well, a couple of questions.....
First, what exactly is the Picture Cache?
Second, would it be worth getting a SSD and dedicating it to the Picture Cache? Would that speed things up and help eliminate dropouts at all? 
If I were to dedicate a drive (HD or SSD) to the Picture Cache, does it need to be large?

Thanks for answers & advice....

JT
post edited by JTMusicVA - 2013/03/07 22:20:48

The Stuff: Sonar X2a Producer 64 AND 32-bit installed (!!!), jBridger, old-school analog VST synths, PC (AMD 4-core CPU @ 3.7GHz, 16GB RAM, SSD drive (32GB)), Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 x64, Lexicon Omega & EgoSys Waveterminal 192L audio interfaces, ART DI/O tube A/D/A converter-Tung Sol tube, Novation RemoteZero SL controller, Novation X-Synth, BOSS DR-660 drum mach., Mackie MR5 monitors, Focusrite VRM Box, AT M50 headphones... blah blah blah...
#1

4 Replies Related Threads

    garrigus
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8599
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 17:23:21
    • Location: www.garrigus.com
    • Status: offline
    Re:Optimizing for the Picture Cache....??? 2013/03/07 23:59:35 (permalink)
    Here's an article you might find useful...
    http://www.digifreq.com/digifreq/tip.asp?ID=13

    I recommend keeping the Picture Cache on the C drive with the SONAR software. Put your project files and audio on a second drive, and put your streaming sample libraries on a third drive. This will give you the best performance.

    I talked more about this in the current issue (#44) of the DigiFreq newsletter. You can find it at: http://www.digifreq.com/digifreq/issues.asp

    And you can subscribe for free at: http://www.digifreq.com/digifreq/subscribe.asp

    Scott

    --
    Scott R. Garrigus - http://garrigus.com - SONAR X2 Power! - http://garrigus.com/?SonarX2Power
    * Author of the Cakewalk Sonar and Sony Sound Forge Power book series: http://garrigus.com/?PowerBooks
    * Author of the Cakewalk Sonar ProAudioTutor video tutorial series: http://garrigus.com/?ProAudioTutor
    * Publisher of the DigiFreq free music technology newsletter: http://digifreq.com/?DigiFreq
    * Publisher of the NewTechReview free consumer technology newsletter: http://newtechreview.com/?NewTechReview

    #2
    Danny Danzi
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 5810
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
    • Location: DanziLand, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re:Optimizing for the Picture Cache....??? 2013/03/08 02:25:30 (permalink)
    JTMusicVA


    I'm a crazy optimizer - if I can optimize something for not a lot of money, I'm there, dude!!
    SOOO... my question is... well, a couple of questions.....
    First, what exactly is the Picture Cache?
    Second, would it be worth getting a SSD and dedicating it to the Picture Cache? Would that speed things up and help eliminate dropouts at all? 
    If I were to dedicate a drive (HD or SSD) to the Picture Cache, does it need to be large?

    Thanks for answers & advice....

    JT

    Hi JT,
     
    Here's my opinion for what it's worth.
     
    Answer to question 1: Picture cache is just a folder that stores the wave forms of all your projects. Ever see when you record, the wave file appears after a second or 2? It's caching what you see to that folder. For example, after a while, you can delete the contents of the picture cache. It won't harm a thing. However, if you have any projects on your system that have those files associated with them, when you load the project, it will need to re-draw all the wave forms before you can see them. Depending on how many waves you have as well as how long they are will determine how long it will take to redraw them. I dump my picture cache every 2 weeks or so or after huge projects that have been finished and are no longer on my machine.
     
    Answer to question 2: No, picture cache only holds wave form draws and only messes with your system for a second or two after a recorded wave file is done. It only becomes a bit of a processor to your hard drive when you dump the contents of the picture cache and then open a project on your system that had those files associated with it as it will need to redraw them all like I said above. You can even be selective in the files you delete from there as most times, they are labeled. For example..
     
    If you had a song on your machine called "Today", you would see a bunch of files in your picture cache that would also say "Today" on them. So if you were still working on that project and you wanted to delete picture cache files, you could remove all the ones that didn't say "Today" and you'd be ok. If you delete them, when you load up "Today" to work on it, the files will all redraw and you'll notice your hard drive working pretty hard to do that. But it will only be the first time you open the project (or any project in Sonar that say, someone sends to you.) and you'll never see that again unless you dump the picture cache files.
     
    Answer to question 3: No, I think it would be senseless myself. Do as Scott recommends and you'll be fine man, honest.
     
    C Drive for your programs, plugs and OS
     
    D Drive for all your audio projects as well as the drive Sonar will record into and store wave files into per your selections in Sonar options pointing it to your D Drive.
     
    E Drive for samples of say, Kontakt, drum modules and anything else that has huge libraries. This would be a great place to put an SSD drive, but the problem is, you'd need a big one because sample libraries are huge. To be honest, unless you can afford a huge SSD drive, you'll be fine with a good "made for recording" 7200 RPM drive. However, if you get a smaller SSD drive, it would be awesome as your audio (D Drive) as well, but you of course won't be able to store much on it. So you'll be playing an archiving game of copy and paste. I personally don't see the need. With a fast enough cpu, good hardware and enough ram, you shouldn't have any problems at all. Good luck and I hope this helps.
     
    -Danny

    My Site
    Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
    #3
    fooman
    Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1382
    • Joined: 2006/06/26 14:47:44
    • Location: Ontario, Canada
    • Status: offline
    Re:Optimizing for the Picture Cache....??? 2013/03/08 09:48:48 (permalink)
    Is there a setting somewhere for the picture cache, because I run sessions daily and if I go a week without opening a project and have been recording a lot of new things, the project has to redraw all of it's images.

    I assume I have some flag set somewhere because in older versions of Sonar/PCs I didn't see this often.
    #4
    JTMusicVA
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 26
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 21:22:15
    • Status: offline
    Re:Optimizing for the Picture Cache....??? 2013/03/08 09:53:02 (permalink)
    Yes, fooman -
    Go to Preferences, File - Audio Data -
    There is an option for Picture Cache.
    Have at it & good luck!!

    JT

    The Stuff: Sonar X2a Producer 64 AND 32-bit installed (!!!), jBridger, old-school analog VST synths, PC (AMD 4-core CPU @ 3.7GHz, 16GB RAM, SSD drive (32GB)), Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 x64, Lexicon Omega & EgoSys Waveterminal 192L audio interfaces, ART DI/O tube A/D/A converter-Tung Sol tube, Novation RemoteZero SL controller, Novation X-Synth, BOSS DR-660 drum mach., Mackie MR5 monitors, Focusrite VRM Box, AT M50 headphones... blah blah blah...
    #5
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1