Touchscreen, worth it?

Author
guitz
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 232
  • Joined: 2004/12/26 18:29:42
  • Status: offline
2013/03/09 03:53:04 (permalink)

Touchscreen, worth it?

Seems like it actually takes more effort or at least arm movement to use a touchscreen vs. a mouse or input controller...as a guitar player who writes/creates by repeatedly looping/recording takes and sections at a time, I wonder if a touchscreen would be beneficial or not? One thing I KNOW I want, is small foot controller to control the transport to keep my hands on the guitar ...I think I found that...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/221198636733?ssPageName=STRK:MESINDXX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1436.l2649
 
 
#1

5 Replies Related Threads

    joeb1cannoli
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 199
    • Joined: 2012/09/22 20:07:26
    • Status: offline
    Re:Touchscreen, worth it? 2013/03/09 08:08:23 (permalink)
     I have a touchscreen as a second screen and mounted it as if it were a surface controller. It's awesome, Everything on the Control Bar works with touch. You can drag the time line with your finger and touch the set loop button.The transport works with touch. Arm Record,solo,mute,it all works.
       If it were your only screen mounted vertically and you had to reach over your keyboard to use it, it would probably suck.
       If I don't want to record sitting right next to the desk my Frontier Design Transport is working fine on Windows 8x64 using Windows 7 compatibility mode. If all I need to do is hit record or rewind when I clam a take and need to start over, I just use a wireless keyboard .

    http://soundcloud.com/joe-b-10
    Windows 10 Pro x64, 6 core, Core i7 , 16GB ram
    Sonar Platinum , Komplete 8, Ozone 8  
    Presonus Studio 192 and DP88 ,uad-2 solo
    #2
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:Touchscreen, worth it? 2013/03/09 08:50:31 (permalink)
    Right Joe, I think if you place it in a traditional way it could be tiring. Placed as Joe describes would work much better. 

    Best
    John
    #3
    guitz
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 232
    • Joined: 2004/12/26 18:29:42
    • Status: offline
    Re:Touchscreen, worth it? 2013/03/09 17:28:53 (permalink)
    joeb1cannoli


     I have a touchscreen as a second screen and mounted it as if it were a surface controller. It's awesome, Everything on the Control Bar works with touch. You can drag the time line with your finger and touch the set loop button.The transport works with touch. Arm Record,solo,mute,it all works.
     If it were your only screen mounted vertically and you had to reach over your keyboard to use it, it would probably suck.
     If I don't want to record sitting right next to the desk my Frontier Design Transport is working fine on Windows 8x64 using Windows 7 compatibility mode. If all I need to do is hit record or rewind when I clam a take and need to start over, I just use a wireless keyboard .

    Hey that sounds interesting....what size touch monitor do you use?...Never thought of that, ....do you have any pics of your setup? ...Trying to figure out how to keep everything in arms reach,etc...
     
    #4
    joeb1cannoli
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 199
    • Joined: 2012/09/22 20:07:26
    • Status: offline
    Re:Touchscreen, worth it? 2013/03/09 19:10:48 (permalink)
    I use two 23" Acers. The bottom one is the touchscreen. The upper one is standard.

    http://soundcloud.com/joe-b-10
    Windows 10 Pro x64, 6 core, Core i7 , 16GB ram
    Sonar Platinum , Komplete 8, Ozone 8  
    Presonus Studio 192 and DP88 ,uad-2 solo
    #5
    guitz
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 232
    • Joined: 2004/12/26 18:29:42
    • Status: offline
    Re:Touchscreen, worth it? 2013/03/10 05:12:48 (permalink)
    joeb1cannoli


    I use two 23" Acers. The bottom one is the touchscreen. The upper one is standard.
    very nice!...putting one flat like that is a brilliant idea, thanks for the inspiration!

    #6
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1