Helpful ReplyGlyn John Mic Test

Author
Mooch4056
Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7494
  • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
  • Location: Chicago
  • Status: offline
2013/04/29 13:56:33 (permalink)

Glyn John Mic Test



https://soundcloud.com/mooch4056/glyn-john-test

Miked using THe Glyn John Method. This is unprocessced EXCEPT... I put BOOST on the drum Bus for glue 


I know this method  been around forever But I just learned about it. It's new to me. SO I set up my drums and tried it. 

Last fall when Working on miking a drum set I got poor results tyrying to put a mic on everything.  This is much better, I am impressed.  

I used an mxl 990 on the overhead 40 inches about the center of the snare. I used an mxl v 67 40 inches from the right side of the snare as the second over head. 

I used the Kick mic that comes with the cad pro 7 pack on the kick 

and I used the snare Mike that comes with  cad pro  pack 



Glyn says he hardly  ever puts a mic on the snare. I did anyway. It works pretty well. 

I still have a little work to do on getting my toms a better sound but I think I am going to try this on some songs. 

Pleas comment on your thoughts and experience and what things i can do to my toms or anything else  such as padding or tape ect.. to get them to sound better 

 


Same test but I converted audio in snare and kick to midi and used the sounds in superior drums .. kick and snare are now doubled with country Kit  and I added reverb and elephant compression https://soundcloud.com/mooch4056/replace-kick-and-snare 


post edited by Mooch4056 - 2013/04/29 18:29:02

From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
 
Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




#1
Mooch4056
Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7494
  • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
  • Location: Chicago
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/29 14:21:08 (permalink)


PS... I am not a drummer ... never mind the "performance" it was a sound check 

Good Lord! 

From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
 
Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




#2
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/29 16:37:11 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
Hi Paul,

This isn't bad sounding at all. However, due to this mic tenchique, you're stuck with what (no offense brother) I call a decent sounding garage kit. When you don't use mics on individual drums, it makes them distant and the room comes too much into the scheme of things. Me personally, I no longer like much room in my drums. You don't have the control over them when they are roomy. They sound distant, mid rangey, and sort of...welll, in a sense, disconnected from the mix in my opinion.

All these guys that come up with these mic techniques where they cut out mics....or use mid-side stereo stuff....are all missing the boat in my opinion. I just don't like those sounds and think that though they sound natural, music in today's times is distinct and has an up front sound that will NOT be achieved by using less mic's or mid-side techniques.

Now, if you're not in the "today" camp of instrument mic'ing where things are more up front and controllable, I can't talk to you the way I've been talking to you. Keep in mind that I'm doing up close and personal type drums which allow us way more control. If I want more room to my drums, I can add more room either with my room mics or heck, a good old impulse.

See that's the cool thing about mic'ing each drum and getting an up close sound instead of a room sound. The up close and personal sound gives you so many options. The slightly distant sound pins you up against a wall because you will NEVER control the room ambience without removing more of the room. The more you remove the room, the more the drums sound bad because they don't have any mic's right on them to drive them. We can always add room to an up close and personal recording whether it be our room mics or an impulse. Impulses today are soo good in my opinion, I really can't tell the difference between them and a real room.

The way we process room sounds (even with impulses) makes them sound so realistic, it's almost crazy to allow a real room or a slightly distant mic technique to possibly ruin a drum recording. And let me tell you, the roomy stuff will do just that. I always go for up close and personal on the drums. I mic every drum at all times and even my ride cymbal because I like control over the bell.

I use a top and a bottom for my snare and 3 on my kick drum. One inside, one outside on an angle to get a little air-throw, one near the pedal to get a little beater attack on the outside. A mic on each tom. (either a 57 or a 421) Two over-heads, two distant over-heads and I call it a day.

Ok, now listening to your drum kit several times as I was typing this...the good thing here is, I think the drums themselves sound pretty good with the worst offenders being the cymbals. They just sort of lack good cymbal sound. Acceptable, most definitely. But they seem to have that inexpensive type tone.

Kick sounds healthy, snare would probably be cool if you cracked it a little harder with a little rim shot. It would sound better with a top and bottom rig too in my opinion so you have the best of both worlds. Toms are pretty cool. You could moon gel them a little to tighten them up.
 
The right compression and eq will definitely make this kit better. Over-all, the kit sounds good...just a bit too roomy for my personal taste. It sort of has that classic rock sound which is cool...it just sort of dates you when you use a drum tone like that. I just personally like snappier, tighter drums that sustain a bit, yet don't ring too much. There's a difference between ring and sustain as you'll find the more you do this.

But with some compression, maybe some gates controlling the ring, maybe a little verb on select instruments and a good eq curve, those drums might be presentable. But they still don't quite have that pro sound from the shells. They seem a little loose...this is where the more up close mic technique can help. It depends though Paul...everyone will have a different opinion on what a good drum sound is. I like when the drum kit fits the style of music. It's hard for me to judge anything when there is no music behind a kit...so depending on what you use those drums are would dictate what my true feelings would be. At any rate, good job man. :)

-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#3
Mooch4056
Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7494
  • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
  • Location: Chicago
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/29 17:43:48 (permalink)
Danny Danzi


Hi Paul,

This isn't bad sounding at all. However, due to this mic tenchique, you're stuck with what (no offense brother) I call a decent sounding garage kit. When you don't use mics on individual drums, it makes them distant and the room comes too much into the scheme of things. Me personally, I no longer like much room in my drums. You don't have the control over them when they are roomy. They sound distant, mid rangey, and sort of...welll, in a sense, disconnected from the mix in my opinion.

All these guys that come up with these mic techniques where they cut out mics....or use mid-side stereo stuff....are all missing the boat in my opinion. I just don't like those sounds and think that though they sound natural, music in today's times is distinct and has an up front sound that will NOT be achieved by using less mic's or mid-side techniques.

Now, if you're not in the "today" camp of instrument mic'ing where things are more up front and controllable, I can't talk to you the way I've been talking to you. Keep in mind that I'm doing up close and personal type drums which allow us way more control. If I want more room to my drums, I can add more room either with my room mics or heck, a good old impulse.

See that's the cool thing about mic'ing each drum and getting an up close sound instead of a room sound. The up close and personal sound gives you so many options. The slightly distant sound pins you up against a wall because you will NEVER control the room ambience without removing more of the room. The more you remove the room, the more the drums sound bad because they don't have any mic's right on them to drive them. We can always add room to an up close and personal recording whether it be our room mics or an impulse. Impulses today are soo good in my opinion, I really can't tell the difference between them and a real room.

The way we process room sounds (even with impulses) makes them sound so realistic, it's almost crazy to allow a real room or a slightly distant mic technique to possibly ruin a drum recording. And let me tell you, the roomy stuff will do just that. I always go for up close and personal on the drums. I mic every drum at all times and even my ride cymbal because I like control over the bell.

I use a top and a bottom for my snare and 3 on my kick drum. One inside, one outside on an angle to get a little air-throw, one near the pedal to get a little beater attack on the outside. A mic on each tom. (either a 57 or a 421) Two over-heads, two distant over-heads and I call it a day.

Ok, now listening to your drum kit several times as I was typing this...the good thing here is, I think the drums themselves sound pretty good with the worst offenders being the cymbals. They just sort of lack good cymbal sound. Acceptable, most definitely. But they seem to have that inexpensive type tone.

Kick sounds healthy, snare would probably be cool if you cracked it a little harder with a little rim shot. It would sound better with a top and bottom rig too in my opinion so you have the best of both worlds. Toms are pretty cool. You could moon gel them a little to tighten them up.
 
The right compression and eq will definitely make this kit better. Over-all, the kit sounds good...just a bit too roomy for my personal taste. It sort of has that classic rock sound which is cool...it just sort of dates you when you use a drum tone like that. I just personally like snappier, tighter drums that sustain a bit, yet don't ring too much. There's a difference between ring and sustain as you'll find the more you do this.

But with some compression, maybe some gates controlling the ring, maybe a little verb on select instruments and a good eq curve, those drums might be presentable. But they still don't quite have that pro sound from the shells. They seem a little loose...this is where the more up close mic technique can help. It depends though Paul...everyone will have a different opinion on what a good drum sound is. I like when the drum kit fits the style of music. It's hard for me to judge anything when there is no music behind a kit...so depending on what you use those drums are would dictate what my true feelings would be. At any rate, good job man. :)

-Danny

I agree with you 100 percent about using close mics on all the drums rather than room mics and the control you get.  When and if I ever get clients I would encourage them to play my Midi V drums triggered through Superior Drummer or BFD..... OR if I had a good room with the Senn 421 (? tom mics)  and those mics I cant afford right I am all for close mics on all the drums. 


But I was thinking the other day which got me to researching too. and I was thinking....


what if I had to record drums in my current state with the equipment I have all ready. I have pretty lousy mics. A fair drum kit with a set of 5 cymbals that cost $150 all together... hence your right on the cymbals being the weak link here. 


So I was watching video of people miking Gyn Johns way and I was impressed. So I gave  it a shot today and I was pretty surprised. 


You know I have a cad 7 pro kit .. 2 shure 58's .. An mxl 990 and an mlx V 67 

A blue spark Microphone - and A Blue Baby Bottle Mic .. the best mic I have it probably the Blue baby bottle

a few tech audios laying around too  

I also have a garage -- and a 24 channel snake and sonar x2 with a tascam us 1641 14 analog input with four out 

that's what I have to work with -- it'll never sound as good as what you could do or what any other pro like your self  could do for that matter -- So I Figured for now -- This may be it.. .. for now .. not forever 


For the yucks of it I pulled superior drummer - and converted the kick and snare drum that was on my "test" track to the nashville kit - snare and kick -- and are doubled now on that Glyn Johns Test you heard - The result was this .. https://soundcloud.com/mooch4056/replace-kick-and-snare

still needs work -- but I guess better - 


Hey ..  when Bob lays down my drum work and if were using a live set and you want my toms miked as well - no problem - just tell me what mike I have to put where and I'll record it. But I just might also have Glyn Johns way set up in addition to everything and we can  work on the mix together like we talked about - I am all for learning thats why I Emailed you - 

but .. I hope you get why I am exploring it I hope .. one - I don't know a lot about this method so I need to do it to learn it 

and two -- seems logical to give it a go being my budget and equipment is where it is at ...  and lets  not forget  an epic fail last fall trying to mic  a whole kit 


Paul 
 




From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
 
Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




#4
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/29 18:31:09 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
What Glyn Johns neglected to mention is that he records drums in million-dollar purpose-built rooms that even a child's plastic tambourine would sound good in. For the rest of us, the less room in the mix the better.



All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
#5
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/29 18:31:24 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
Well, the entire industry is hybridding, so use that method if/when you have to. The toughest thing about talking people into using V-Drums is the feel and it depends what pads you have. The mesh heads are a little easier to swallow for drummers. But, nothing beats a goodl old fashioned kit to some guys. Me, I could care less really. I enjoy the V-Drums and think they feel great. I don't use the sounds in the brain at all, it's just my pad to midi interface really.

Here's a few things to keep in mind Paul...

If you are going to use these drums for blues, jazz and older country, that kit will work just as it is. See man, drum kits for those styles of music don't usually get processed to the point of where the room within the drums is controlled. Then again, in the case of SRV....his later stuff had some killer modern drum sounds that did NOT sound like that loose "drums in a room" sound. So for some things, you can get away with that kit just the way it is.

For pop, modern rock,metal, current modern country, some of the more fusion type things, this kit will not cut it without some processing or at least a different snare drum with processing. That distant type sound is what makes it lack. If you listen to any pro kit...heck go back to like the Doobie Bros if you want...you'll notice the kit is processed in a way to where it doesn't sound like a drum set in a room. They all have this pro *tight* sound, if you will...even the more classic rock kits. As much as I'm no longer down with the classic rock type sound, they have this thing that doesn't sound like that "cheap drums in a room" deal unless we go back into the 60's and listen to some of those kits.

So before you get too hard on yourself with this stuff, take a look at what type of kit you are trying to get. I think you got a good 60's type kit with the drums the way they are. With a little tightening and more mic's, you have the 70's nailed. You wouldn't want the 80's as that era (as much as it pains me since that was my favorite time...but for guitar sounds only lol) used too many unrealistic samples with loads of verb.

I think the late 90's to today are the best drum sounds for all styles of music to be honest. They just got it right in my opinion. Sure some of this is due to samples being used at the same time or whatever...but to me it's still a great drum sound and to me it doesn't matter how you get there...as long as you get there.

If you've ever heard the first Stone Temple Pilots album....great drum sound there. Living Color's first album...anything by Rush from Moving Pictures on....just about anything with Mike Portnoy former drummer of Dream Theater. The new Maragold album has a really nice, tight drum sound as well with one of the best female singers of all time...whew...if this chic isn't a legend in a few years, I give up! Check this out..

http://www.youtube.com/user/maragoldband?feature=watch

Best female voice alive right now in rock..so much so, I proposed to her. LOL! Told her if I can do a cover of this song (which I did lol I just haven't shared it with her yet) and impress her, she has to marry me. Hahaha! I did some work with the guitar player Greg Howe so I had the connection to talk to her. :)

Anyway...sorry, Meghan just blows my doors off and I get all exicted. LOL! But the drums in that are nice and tight and along the lines of the kits I mic up here and what others are using today. I'm also really liking some of the modern country stuff which of course is pretty much melodic rock these days with nice fat processed drum kits. So it depends what type of sound you are going for brother. There are definite uses for that kit just as it is and you're getting a sound that is nothing to be embarrassed about for sure. With a little more work you'll get it even tighter. At least the drums themselves have a pretty good sound. The cymbals...yeah, a bit weak there but hey, at least you have a drum kit and the cymbals don't sound too bad. You just low pass them to keep them from being harsh and then sculpt up the middle to add or take away the mids if you see fit. High pass them nice and tight and you'll make them work.

That's another cool thing Paul...and that is, this kit is making you work and experiment. That to me is the best way to learn this stuff. You can go to a school and use their gear and their mics...it means nothing when you are in the field with your own stuff or someone elses. You will learn so much this way...when you get a new kit or whatever some day, you'll laugh when you see how easy it is to get a good sound out of it. But...what you're doing now will pave the way to what you do then.

I have a set of hihats here that sound like absolute dog crap. Some dude gave them to me. I took them rather than throwing them out as you never know when you may need something in this business. Well, they sounded so bad, I was going to throw them out. But one day I needed them for something....and the unexplainable happened. I don't know how or why or what the deal is, but these freakin' things come to life when you mic them. As God is my witness Paull, they barely even sound like hats when you listen to them in real life. But mic'd up...they literally sound like a high end hat. I started using them just to see how I'd do with them. I can't tell you how many compliments I got on the hats. Most people say "ah, sounds like a hat" where others really listen and comment. When you mic something right, eq it right and do all the right things...you can just about make anything sound acceptable really. The problem with this method is you often times spend too much time making something sound good where if you had a good piece of gear, it doesn't take that amount of time.

Anyway...keep at it...it's definitely an acceptable drum sound in my opinion, the genres is which you use the drums on may be the only issue. :)

-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#6
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/29 18:33:33 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
bitflipper


What Glyn Johns neglected to mention is that he records drums in million-dollar purpose-built rooms that even a child's plastic tambourine would sound good in. For the rest of us, the less room in the mix the better.

+1000 and another reason why I never buy into techniques, lessons or books by said individuals. They are never in a position to live like common folks to give us the right information that would benefit us. Thus, why I started teaching recording lessons via video to teach people on the gear that they use.
 
-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#7
UbiquitousBubba
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8912
  • Joined: 2008/07/09 16:55:12
  • Location: Everywhere Else
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/29 18:42:56 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
A while back a friend of mine pulled a metal snare drum with no brand name out of a garbage can on the street.  He brought it to me and asked if it was any good.  I put new heads on it and I was amazed at the sound.  It was fantastic.  It had this sharp crack, full tone and just a hint of ring.  It could cut through the mix like a hot knife through butter.  For quite some time, it was my favorite snare drum.

You just never know until you try.
#8
Mooch4056
Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7494
  • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
  • Location: Chicago
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/29 19:15:38 (permalink)
I am the only one who likes my Glyn Johns set up.  (I am crying)


I just learned about it yesterday. Didn't even know that it existed. This is the first time I ever recorded drums and it sounded "decent" You can understand my excitement in that context. 


So sure for now Ill keep experimenting. But I know me. I'll start swapping out the bad tom sounds and changing the audio to midi from my sounds in Superior Drummer  Someone is going to here  to help me with the patient part of finding the right mic placement and Eq'ing and compressing the right ratios, attacks, thresholds ect ... 
post edited by Mooch4056 - 2013/04/29 22:11:37

From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
 
Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




#9
alexoosthoek
Max Output Level: -23 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5238
  • Joined: 2008/11/12 11:20:51
  • Location: A'gus
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/29 19:27:59 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
Don't swap right away Paul, try to get the acoustic to sound the way you want it first :)

The CHB
Some Live Demo's


Various ADK computers   and some thingy's
Have fun!
#10
tfbattag
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 422
  • Joined: 2006/02/16 13:22:03
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/29 21:09:16 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
Danny and Bit (Dave) are two of the guy I respect the most, and I generally agree with them. Personally, I record close mic'd too, but it's really a function of the genres/material more than anything. The sound you shared would be great for the right type of music. The way to think about it is imaging the Ringo sound sitting in a Metallica song-- probably wouldn't carry the weight it needs for the music. On the contrary, imaging Lars pounding in a Beatles song-- probably wouldn't have sold all those records. So IMHO, there's a time and a place for all types of sounds. 

One thing about micing drums is that, although you may be able to successfully capture a kit with this method or just room/overheads, you wouldn't be able to add to it. If you throw close mics on, you could alway pull them out if it was the thing to do.

Back to my voyeuristic mode. Good luck.

Thomas Battaglia
:wq!
-----------------------------------------------------------
Intel DP35DP, Q6600, 6GB RAM, Win7Pro x64; RME HDSPe RayDAT; RME ADI8-DS x2, RME ADI-2.
#11
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/30 04:36:21 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
alexoosthoek


Don't swap right away Paul, try to get the acoustic to sound the way you want it first :)

+1
 
Thing is if you are using Glyn Johns or a stereo OH configuration get the kit sounding nice and balanced in that main pair before you do anything else!  If you can't get the space sounding too great then make sure you are using cardoid pattern mics and move in closer if need be but keep that all-round balance right.
 
Don't add further mics until you can get it right at that stage, then your close mics are giving you further options, if you haven't got that basic sound right in the first place close mics are just adding confusion and you wont get repeatable results.
 
This sounds much better than anything that I've heard off that kit so far, so you are on the right lines.  I'd say you've got far too much hat in relation to everything else so some movement of the snare mic further from the hat or work a bit more on the balance from the main overheads.  Do you see the point I'm making from that?  I can't tell whether the hi-hat overdose is coming from the OH's or the close mic on the snare already.
 
Keep trying with that OH pair placement until everything sounds balanced and nothing is too dominant.  Close micing is a cinch from that point onwards.
 
There's some not nice resonance going on there too I'm not sure if it's the kick itself causing it or whether it's causing some sympathetic resonance off the other drums, whatever it's something to listen for when you are tuning up, sometimes nastiness can't be avoided and you have to get a little judicious in the use of some gaffer tape, not for all out damping but just to kill of a little of the tonal resonances that might clash with the music.
 
But yes just like you have observed this IS actually getting somewhere.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2013/04/30 04:40:55

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
#12
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/30 06:59:26 (permalink) ☄ Helpful


I like the Glynn Johns sound.

I like Mooches drum sound.

I could use it in a mix.

I'm afraid of being called a dinosaur.






I pointed my snare mic at the shell yesterday because it sounded crisp... after 15 minutes I thought "it doesn't sound as full and woody" as it did in the other position.

I no longer expect to be satisfied. :-)




#13
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/30 13:53:47 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
Jonbouy


alexoosthoek


Don't swap right away Paul, try to get the acoustic to sound the way you want it first :)

+1
 
Thing is if you are using Glyn Johns or a stereo OH configuration get the kit sounding nice and balanced in that main pair before you do anything else!  If you can't get the space sounding too great then make sure you are using cardoid pattern mics and move in closer if need be but keep that all-round balance right.
 
Don't add further mics until you can get it right at that stage, then your close mics are giving you further options, if you haven't got that basic sound right in the first place close mics are just adding confusion and you wont get repeatable results.
 
This sounds much better than anything that I've heard off that kit so far, so you are on the right lines.  I'd say you've got far too much hat in relation to everything else so some movement of the snare mic further from the hat or work a bit more on the balance from the main overheads.  Do you see the point I'm making from that?  I can't tell whether the hi-hat overdose is coming from the OH's or the close mic on the snare already.
 
Keep trying with that OH pair placement until everything sounds balanced and nothing is too dominant.  Close micing is a cinch from that point onwards.
 
There's some not nice resonance going on there too I'm not sure if it's the kick itself causing it or whether it's causing some sympathetic resonance off the other drums, whatever it's something to listen for when you are tuning up, sometimes nastiness can't be avoided and you have to get a little judicious in the use of some gaffer tape, not for all out damping but just to kill of a little of the tonal resonances that might clash with the music.
 
But yes just like you have observed this IS actually getting somewhere.

+1 to the above. I just want to add one more thing to this, Paul. Everything Jon is telling you here sounds perfect to me. Even down to the artifacts he's mentioning. However, you don't really know for sure until you mix this kit in with a song.
 
One of the main things in recording that I have learned is, nothing is as it seems when solo'd up. You can have the greatest sound known to man. That doesn't promise you it will work good in a mix with other instruments. Sometimes instruments actually sound sort of bad when by themselves but low and behold, something magical happens when you mix the stuff together.
 
I can give several instances of this. One being Bohemian Rhapsody. Forgive me for not bowing down to that piece of history other than when the hair on my arms stands up when I solo Freddie's tracks. These instruments by themselves do not sound very good at all. As a matter of fact, I would be ashamed of myself for pumping out sounds like this. May's guitar intonation is either off or there was some bad fretting going on...the drums didn't impress me, the bass was so so.....HOWEVER...... 
 
Put that stuff in a mix, tighten up the eq and get the right recipe and it's easy to see/hear how it made history. My point isn't to bash on the performances or the actual prints. My point is, "nothing is as it seems" until you mix it in with other instruments.
 
So though Jon, me or anyone else can tell you what we may change in this kit while hearing it solo'd up, if you mix it with a song and adjust the kit to fit the mix, we may not comment in the same way. From here, that's what you should do next man. Record the kit using your present techniques into a song. Do something short about 30 seconds to a minute and let's hear how these get along with others. :)
 
-Danny
post edited by Danny Danzi - 2013/04/30 13:56:06

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#14
Mooch4056
Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7494
  • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
  • Location: Chicago
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/30 20:59:43 (permalink)
Do something short about 30 seconds to a minute and let's hear how these get along with others. :)
 
-Danny



I will record something fun ... For the sake of fun..... And then you'll hear it with music too. 


I'll do one as it is set up now... And one as it is now.....but with close mics on the toms ...




So I'll record it with two different mic set ups ....


Aight? 


Oh Kay!




:) 

From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
 
Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




#15
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/30 21:48:04 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
Hahaha yeah, that sounds like a plan Paul. At least we'll be able to see what these bad boys can do. :) Try to mix the drums in as good as you can when you do the actual mix...this way you really hear if things work. :) Looking forward to hearing this.

-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#16
IK Obi
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1549
  • Joined: 2011/02/22 20:25:48
  • Location: Salt Lake City, UT
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/04/30 23:52:48 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
Good job. IMO there is always room for improvement, but for the first time trying a new micing technique I'm impressed.
#17
Mooch4056
Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7494
  • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
  • Location: Chicago
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/05/01 00:18:35 (permalink)



Thanks IK

From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
 
Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




#18
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/05/01 07:00:20 (permalink)


I often time see people say things like "I can't tell if I like it until I hear it in a mix", and that seems very reasonable.


But, consider another perspective. Let's say I have a bass in my hands and you are playing drums and we have a rough mix in the head phones.

Something about that drum playing has to appeal to me to get my bass juices flowing.

So, right here at the moment of inception, I have to either hear "it" and play along so as to make a "mix", or I can stall out and wait for nothing to happen.

My point is, drums are usually the back bone of a song... you can't "wait to hear it in the mix" before you decide it sounds groovy. You are well served to listen to the drums and play something that sounds real good with them.

That is one of the mysteries of drum tuning. Many people deny there is any chromatic information in a trap kit... but we have all experienced hearing a bass player lock onto a drum groove and instinctively hit the notes and song key that really gels with the drum kit's tonality. That happens in jam bands all the time.

The sound of the drums inspire certain chromatic ideas and discourages others.

You can't just wait to hear it in the final mix.

Well, you can.



The quotes used above are universal... I'm not calling anyone out. 

These are just some random thoughts of mine.

What this means is that Paul's drumming might be ready for a mix... but we just don't know what the song is yet.

If you start with some other instrument then you might have to fit the drums onto it. That can be difficult.

There's no better or worse way I suppose, but I do find that I like songs that evolved from a strong relationship between the bass and drums so that work flow is probably a good one.

 


best regards,
mike

post edited by mike_mccue - 2013/05/01 07:01:33


#19
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/05/01 16:06:53 (permalink)
Mike, as you know a recorded production is often a totally different thing to a live capture and it will usually require a different approach.
 
Of course there is a lot of chromatic stuff going in with a drum kit you only have to notice different drums will have more sympathetic resonance when different notes are played by other instruments.  I have always endeavoured to aim for tonal neutrality as much as I can in trying get an overall 'sound' though in order not to step on something elses harmonic content as it normally (again not always) sounds bad.  Having said that I will always aim for the overall kit to resonate as a nice balanced 'whole' with itself.
 
The mixing aspect I agree with Danny on, I've arrived at some fantastic kit sounds only to find they don't work in the context of a particular recording, and yes drums traditionally have often been recorded first but if a drummer has plenty of studio experience he/she will have of course by a process of iterative experience gained some idea of what is likely to work and what won't.
 
Simply put the more often you do it the better you get....hopefully.

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
#20
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/05/01 18:30:19 (permalink)
Mike
I often time see people say things like "I can't tell if I like it until I hear it in a mix", and that seems very reasonable. But, consider another perspective. Let's say I have a bass in my hands and you are playing drums and we have a rough mix in the head phones. Something about that drum playing has to appeal to me to get my bass juices flowing. So, right here at the moment of inception, I have to either hear "it" and play along so as to make a "mix", or I can stall out and wait for nothing to happen.

 
In my opinion, you seem to be confusing "drum playing" from "drum sound". You mention "playing" above. This is a totally different animal. You're also over-thinking it. Paul wouldn't have recorded the drum sound you hear if it sounded horrible. The question isn't whether or not it's a good drum sound. The question remains, what will it sound like in a mix of instruments? See, going into something as a solo instrument, you never know what the outcome will be when it joins the others. This is when you find out what a good drum sound is or whether or not something may need to be re-tracked.
 
Mike
My point is, drums are usually the back bone of a song... you can't "wait to hear it in the mix" before you decide it sounds groovy. You are well served to listen to the drums and play something that sounds real good with them.

 
What you're missing is, Paul isn't a guru at this. He's going through the paces to learn. With learning comes experimenting. This experimenting or lab work if you will, is what teaches you when a drum sound will work and when it may not. Right off the bat, I would say Jon's initial reaction and comments on this kit were spot on. BUT....with the right instrumentation and Paul literally mixing the kit within a song, the game changes drastically. He just recorded these drums and let us hear them. He didn't try to adjust hats being too loud, over-all eq, compression, kit piece leveling. He gave us a mic'd kit to show us what he was getting. Without any processing, it sounds like drums in a room....mic'd quite decent I must say. But as to how decent, we won't know until we hear it in with a mix. What if he gets a killer guitar and bass sound that sounds larger and more professional than the drums? Right...you guessed it...you don't sit there and polish the turd of a kit, you reset a few mics and you track it again.
 
Mike
That is one of the mysteries of drum tuning. Many people deny there is any chromatic information in a trap kit... but we have all experienced hearing a bass player lock onto a drum groove and instinctively hit the notes and song key that really gels with the drum kit's tonality. That happens in jam bands all the time. The sound of the drums inspire certain chromatic ideas and discourages others. You can't just wait to hear it in the final mix. Well, you can.

 
Very true, but most people get to that point of having the pieces gel and inspire because they know what they are doing. That's not a shot at Paul, but he only just got this kit and has only tried to mic them a few times. They didn't even have new heads and have some lower end cymbals. So he has quite a bit against him, but he still seems to be delivering the goods. Other than the cymbals not sounding good enough quality wise and the snare sounding a bit distant, this kit should work with a wide variety of material. But in some situations, it definitely will not because it's simply not tight enough. Maybe Paul can process it to make it tighter, maybe he won't have the desire and will settle for a good classic rock kit. It all depends what he records with this drum kit and what his vision may be. Until he can come to grips with that while recognizing what is and what may not be a good drum sound, you definitely have to experiment and put the kit into a song scenario.
 
It's like me with guitar tones. I've done them so many times, I know what will sound good and what will not before I hear it in a mix. The same with bass, vocals, piano, the more you work with these things, the less you have to experiment. You just know when something is right. I don't know what's right for Paul other than I know he likes classic rock. If he wants to use those drums for metal or hard rock, he's going to have to tweak them. If he wants to use them for jazz, he's going to have to make them snappier and tighter. Just because a kit seems to have all the right elements doesn't mean it will work all the time and this is what needs to be determined.
 
The other question is, how pro does Paul expect this kit to sound? See, there are quite a few variables that we DO know, and quite a few that we DON'T know. This is why some instruments will help us out a little. Maybe those cymbals will work fine once Paul eq's them to fit a mix. Maybe he'll lightly gate the toms to control the ring. Maybe he'll use a transient designer on the kick to give it a bit more beater attack. And the big question...when he hears the drums in with a mix, will he know to do the above things? This is what makes a good drum set sound great...knowing what to do as well as knowing how to and when to work a kit. And sometimes, the music inspires what you do with the sound of the drum kit. It all depends.
 
Mike
The quotes used above are universal... I'm not calling anyone out. These are just some random thoughts of mine. What this means is that Paul's drumming might be ready for a mix... but we just don't know what the song is yet. If you start with some other instrument then you might have to fit the drums onto it. That can be difficult. There's no better or worse way I suppose, but I do find that I like songs that evolved from a strong relationship between the bass and drums so that work flow is probably a good one.

 
That's a valid argument. The drums MAY be ready for a mix...it depends what mix/genre he chooses. See, what we hear all naked isn't what we'll hear when the drums are put to music. Sometimes a good kit sound may be a bear to tame. And you're right, you wouldn't want to conform a drum kit to an instrument. You usually conform the instruments to the drum kit when you can. The drums are your core along with the bass. These drums wouldn't work in a powerful song in my opinion....but you never know.
 
See here's another thing. When he goes to eq and process the kit, sometimes you hear artifacts. These artifacts come from bad mic positioning. He may want to put a little high end into something yet it brings on something else that just sounds bad. He may want more thud in the kick yet no matter what frequency he tries, it doesn't give him the right sound because the mic needed to be repositioned in order to have more of that sound. We're just hearing a naked kit. When you tweak it for a mix, it can really go against the grain.
 
You can't create something that isn't there from the beginning unless you add in samples. So in situations like this, you don't know until you work the kit in with a mix. Heck I re-recorded my last album 2 times due to not liking the drums. They were good both times, but when I compared them to the other instruments, we had way more power with everying else than we had on the drums. The third time we nailed it and did such a good job, the other instruments had to keep up with the drums...which is sort of what you want in a rock situation. But then again, it depends how "rock" you're shooting for. :)
 
-Danny
post edited by Danny Danzi - 2013/05/01 18:34:39

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#21
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/05/01 19:51:12 (permalink)
Jonbouy


Mike, as you know a recorded production is often a totally different thing to a live capture and it will usually require a different approach.
      

I think that some great recordings have been made after years of planning and instrument selection while other great recordings have been made while the band was actually writing and or discovering the song for the first time.


best regards,
mike










#22
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Glyn John Mic Test 2013/05/02 03:45:52 (permalink)
mike_mccue


Jonbouy


Mike, as you know a recorded production is often a totally different thing to a live capture and it will usually require a different approach.
    

I think that some great recordings have been made after years of planning and instrument selection while other great recordings have been made while the band was actually writing and or discovering the song for the first time.


best regards,
mike

Of course.
 
The key words I used there are 'often' and 'usually'.
 
You'll also find that many of those great 1st take or 'off the cuff'  recordings are done in a studio that has already worked out how to get the in house kit sounding killer.
 
I'd often use the in house kit out of preference to my own gear for that very reason, even if it meant they had to switch from a right hand setup to a LH one...

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
#23
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1