deswind
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
- Total Posts : 952
- Joined: 2003/11/23 14:07:13
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/15 14:05:24
(permalink)
Me too. I really wish they would support each version for at least 2 years with bug fixes and such. Again, no money in that so just pay for our new version with new bugs.
Mike
Yes - that has been the case. However, I do think they could charge for updates and if they resolve problems, add GUI features, like choosing colors, I would gladly pay for them.
|
brconflict
Max Output Level: -56.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1891
- Joined: 2012/10/05 21:28:30
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/15 14:25:25
(permalink)
Someone mentioned about "framework"-ing Sonar. I think that would be grand idea. Allow us to customize what features/functions are important to each of us, so we can either a) purchase only the options we want, leaving the ones we don't want out, or b) be able to uninstall or disable the features/functions we don't want to make Sonar scream when we need to. I would think that modularizing the code could, in a sense, aid in troubleshooting. If one feature is broken, many others can be removed/disabled and eliminated as a culprit. Of course, decent syslogging would be a start. As for "a" above, this is what the market wants (ala iPhone apps). If you make the features/modules cheap, then everybody will buy them, just because they're cool and cheap. Better sales. For example, for an Essential user that only wants to add Pro-Channel and nothing else, can pay $39 for ProChannel ($19 on Sale). If you're like me and don't find ProChannel useful, you can still get all the other features you want from Producer, and discount PC (discount $29). I may decide to buy it later at $39. We all keep shopping after we buy. Why not have some additions to offer to those of us who would purchase things like PC if we own Essentials, but can't afford $200+ to upgrade to Producer. Cakewalk has Essentials users out there. Why not grab some extra cash and sell them PC? Producer has other features that make it worth it (well, at least it can).
Brian Sonar Platinum, Steinberg Wavelab Pro 9, MOTU 24CoreIO w/ low-slew OP-AMP mods and BLA external clock, True P8, Audient ASP008, API 512c, Chandler Germ500, Summit 2ba-221, GAP Pre-73, Peluso 22251, Peluso 2247LE, Mackie HR824, Polk Audio SRS-SDA 2.3tl w/upgraded Soniccraft crossovers and Goertz cables, powered by Pass-X350. All wiring Star-Quad XLR or Monster Cable. Power by Monster Power Signature AVS2000 voltage stabilizer and Signature Pro Power 5100 PowerCenter on a 20A isolation shielded circuit.
|
Bajan Blue
Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2029
- Joined: 2005/09/15 20:54:56
- Location: Barbados & Cape Town
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/15 15:09:41
(permalink)
I upgraded to X2 but some of the features / bugs? in the initial release I had an issue with - Lanes for example - Kennis favorite gripe and I feel a very genuine gripe. I went back to X1 which for me is very stable. I did download and install the X2 patch release but it didn't seem to change much for me, so I am still using X1 and still waiting the next patch release. I am not sure what I would do if they don't fix some of the issues in X2 and went straight to another paid upgrade - I would think very long and hard about this. I changed initially (Sonar 4 I think) from Cubase (whatever version at the time), and the thought of changing again does not fill me with glee. But if they don't fix X2 before moving to another version, this would make me consider where I go next. Let's hope they don't go that route. Nigel
|
ampfixer
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5508
- Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
- Location: Ontario
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/15 15:29:10
(permalink)
In my mind there's really nothing left to add in terms of features. I'm expecting something big for X3 but most of it will be in the background. It seems like a new audio engine is what's needed. It would make everything more stable and probably has to be done if vari-speed and other things are to work properly. I'm using the lull in X development to try the competition and buy some new gear. None of it from Cakewalk.
Regards, John I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps. WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig, Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6
|
Paul P
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2685
- Joined: 2012/12/08 17:15:47
- Location: Montreal
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/15 16:00:40
(permalink)
brconflict : "We all keep shopping after we buy" Not me. I bought X1/X2 Producer figuring it would serve for years as is, like buying Office or similar. If it has bugs, and it does, I expect them to be fixed. I see no need or reason to buy X3 since X2 already does way more than I need, or will need for the foreseable future. I can't imagine that it could already be time for X3 anyway. X2 has only been out for a few months.
Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
|
brconflict
Max Output Level: -56.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1891
- Joined: 2012/10/05 21:28:30
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/15 16:43:49
(permalink)
Paul P brconflict : "We all keep shopping after we buy" Not me. I bought X1/X2 Producer figuring it would serve for years as is, like buying Office or similar. If it has bugs, and it does, I expect them to be fixed. I see no need or reason to buy X3 since X2 already does way more than I need, or will need for the foreseable future. I can't imagine that it could already be time for X3 anyway. X2 has only been out for a few months. My point is, that, when you sign up for email updates from Sonar, most people open them and check out new offerings. But unless you're running an old version or are looking for plug-ins, most of their emails aren't very useful. I use Waves as an example here, which was super-successful to get my business. If you bought Sonar the was you can shop for a computer on Dell's website, and check-box the options you want, then you see a price. Obviously, the more you buy, the better your discount in this case, which would equal to what you pay for today for Producer. Then, over time, you can watch for deals on modules and options, like Waves offers plug-ins discounts monthly. But let's say, for example, you buy Sonar with ProChannel, Console Emulation, and a few plug-ins, but not the EQ, BREVERB, or Compressor (whichever one you don't want). You also decide to hold off on the MIDI options. You can get Sonar for cheaper, say $199. Once you get it under control and you feel you're ready for MIDI, you can not only choose to add the MIDI option later at, say $39, but when you receive a Sonar monthly email, you might see it on sale for $29. Waves does this all the time and gets so many hits from that. In fact, you're more likely to buy it simply because of the sale, and you're more likely to jump on the Sonar bandwagon because the starting price was $199. My point is that, if you could buy Sonar for $199, then buy only the options you want, you're more likely to go that route vs. buy DP at full price which contains features you may never ever use. And if you buy the $199 Sonar vs DP 8, you're less likely to jump ship. Here's another example of how this could win some hearts: Don't like Take Lanes? Guess what! You can buy either Lanes or Layers at $9 each and you can use either, both, or neither! Many people would buy both at $9. Cakewalk can offer different user-interfaces and sell them each for $5. The idea is piecemeal, but it REALLY works in the Smart-phone market, among other industries. It's harder to make a choice when the price for full versions start at $399. I just think rather than sell three different versions, change to a frame-work and allow "us" to decide what features it contains.
Brian Sonar Platinum, Steinberg Wavelab Pro 9, MOTU 24CoreIO w/ low-slew OP-AMP mods and BLA external clock, True P8, Audient ASP008, API 512c, Chandler Germ500, Summit 2ba-221, GAP Pre-73, Peluso 22251, Peluso 2247LE, Mackie HR824, Polk Audio SRS-SDA 2.3tl w/upgraded Soniccraft crossovers and Goertz cables, powered by Pass-X350. All wiring Star-Quad XLR or Monster Cable. Power by Monster Power Signature AVS2000 voltage stabilizer and Signature Pro Power 5100 PowerCenter on a 20A isolation shielded circuit.
|
Bajan Blue
Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2029
- Joined: 2005/09/15 20:54:56
- Location: Barbados & Cape Town
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/16 06:38:46
(permalink)
Not me. I bought X1/X2 Producer figuring it would serve for years as is, like buying Office or similar. If it has bugs, and it does, I expect them to be fixed. I agree - before any new / paid upgrade, X2 must be sorted - I have to say that I do feel Cakewalk have taken far too long this time to resolve the X2 issues - I purchased X2 September last year - it is now May and I am still not confident enough in the product (X2) to swap full time from X1. This cannot be right. Nigel
|
synkrotron
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5263
- Joined: 2006/04/28 16:21:21
- Location: Warrington, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/16 07:56:41
(permalink)
It's been so damn quiet though, hasn't it? I'm lucky, for what I do, X2a is working fine, although I've not got it working fully on Windows 8 just yet cos I'm still registering all my VST's and stuff, but I'm sure it will be fine. I'd probably get X3, if it was ever released, but I would also happily use X2 until I pop me cloggs.
http://www.synkrotron.co.uk/Intel Core™i7-3820QM Quad Core Mobile Processor 2.70GHz 8MB cache | Intel HM77 Express Chipset | 16GB SAMSUNG 1600MHz SODIMM DDR3 RAM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M - 2.0GB DDR5 Video RAM | 500GB Samsung 850 Pro SSD | 1TB Samsung 850 Pro SSD | Windows 10 Pro | Roland OCTA-CAPTURE | SONAR Platinum ∞ FFS| Too many VSTi's to list here | KRK KNS-8400 Headphones | Roland JP-8000 | Oberheim OB12 | Novation Nova | Gibson SG Special | PRS Studio
|
icontakt
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4266
- Joined: 2012/03/04 08:18:02
- Location: Tokyo
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/16 09:10:01
(permalink)
Paul P I bought X1/X2 Producer figuring it would serve for years as is, like buying Office or similar. I used Sonar 2 for about 10 years.  (ok, maybe that was a mistake  ) I can't imagine that it could already be time for X3 anyway. Agreed.
Tak T. Primary Laptop: Core i7-4710MQ CPU, 16GB RAM, 7200RPM HDD, Windows 7 Home Premium OS (Japanese) x64 SP1Secondary Laptop: Core2 Duo CPU, 8GB RAM, 7200RPM HDD, Windows 7 Professional OS (Japanese) x64 SP1Audio Interface: iD14 (ASIO)Keyboard Controller/MIDI Interface: A-800PRODAW: SONAR Platinum x64 (latest update installed)
|
amiller
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 876
- Joined: 2006/01/28 19:54:49
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/16 11:26:09
(permalink)
The lack of Cakewalk input here is deafening. It reminds me of the experience I had when dealing with Roland and the VS2480...Roland = absent.
RAWK!!! . SONAR Platinum: 2017.10 System specs: Purrrfect Audio: http://www.studiocat.com/open_cart/ • Case Silent Mid Tower • Power-Supply 600w quiet • Haswell CPU 4790k @ 4.4GHz • RAM 32GB DDR3/1600 • OS drive 1TB HD • Audio drive 2TB HD • Samples drive 1 3TB HD • Burner 24x DVD/RW • Video HD4600 • Add TI chipset Firewire For all others • Operating System Windows 10 x64 Home Edition . MOTU 828 mkII . Lucid 9624 A/D . Millennia HV-3b pre . Dual 24" Widescreen Monitors
|
Crg
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7719
- Joined: 2007/11/15 07:59:17
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/16 17:39:30
(permalink)
ubuntu Roland are the worst, they simply never respond to emails. There is pay for technical assistance available from Roland. How many have tried that? It's not in my budget but I'm just an artist working with these high end tools of the trade. Cakewalk has been assimilated by Roland, All the familiar support faces and names we knew are not so accessible now. We are all in a holding pattern, waiting to see what will land out of the fog.
|
pbognar
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
- Total Posts : 720
- Joined: 2005/10/03 16:22:03
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/16 22:40:25
(permalink)
Crg ubuntu Roland are the worst, they simply never respond to emails. There is pay for technical assistance available from Roland. How many have tried that? It's not in my budget but I'm just an artist working with these high end tools of the trade. Cakewalk has been assimilated by Roland, All the familiar support faces and names we knew are not so accessible now. We are all in a holding pattern, waiting to see what will land out of the fog. Really? Is Roland going all Avid on us? Is this pay for support for Sonar, or just Roland products?
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/16 22:47:51
(permalink)
Paul P I can't imagine that it could already be time for X3 anyway. X2 has only been out for a few months. almost 9 months now.
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/16 22:53:37
(permalink)
Yeah, it won't be long before we find out if Cakewalk is back on the their annual release cycle
post edited by scook - 2013/05/16 23:03:42
|
PTheory
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 116
- Joined: 2012/04/29 15:15:00
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/17 08:07:58
(permalink)
I'm pretty much giving up on sonar these days. With all my frustrations with the product I dabbled with Ableton 9 and was simply amazed at it's audio engine and algorithms compared to sonar. CW talk about improved workflow, thats a bit of a joke in comparison to Ableton 9 which is instant. As a creation engine it is second to non. Still use Sonar at the moment for vocal tracking but that is purely because I new to Ableton and haven't yet worked out all the comping features etc but I'm fairly sure as soon as I do it will be bye bye Sonar for good
|
icontakt
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4266
- Joined: 2012/03/04 08:18:02
- Location: Tokyo
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/17 09:14:46
(permalink)
ubuntu Roland are the worst, they simply never respond to emails. Sorry to hear that. Roland's tech support here is top-notch. They're actually the best from my experience. Very responsive, very accurate, and very polite. I sometimes receive their reply on the very day I submitted my inquiry.
Tak T. Primary Laptop: Core i7-4710MQ CPU, 16GB RAM, 7200RPM HDD, Windows 7 Home Premium OS (Japanese) x64 SP1Secondary Laptop: Core2 Duo CPU, 8GB RAM, 7200RPM HDD, Windows 7 Professional OS (Japanese) x64 SP1Audio Interface: iD14 (ASIO)Keyboard Controller/MIDI Interface: A-800PRODAW: SONAR Platinum x64 (latest update installed)
|
DW_Mike
Max Output Level: -6 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6907
- Joined: 2006/11/29 18:06:40
- Location: The arm-pit of the good 'ol US...New Jersey
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/17 17:33:03
(permalink)
brconflict Paul P brconflict : "We all keep shopping after we buy" Not me. I bought X1/X2 Producer figuring it would serve for years as is, like buying Office or similar. If it has bugs, and it does, I expect them to be fixed. I see no need or reason to buy X3 since X2 already does way more than I need, or will need for the foreseable future. I can't imagine that it could already be time for X3 anyway. X2 has only been out for a few months. My point is, that, when you sign up for email updates from Sonar, most people open them and check out new offerings. But unless you're running an old version or are looking for plug-ins, most of their emails aren't very useful. I use Waves as an example here, which was super-successful to get my business. If you bought Sonar the was you can shop for a computer on Dell's website, and check-box the options you want, then you see a price. Obviously, the more you buy, the better your discount in this case, which would equal to what you pay for today for Producer. Then, over time, you can watch for deals on modules and options, like Waves offers plug-ins discounts monthly. But let's say, for example, you buy Sonar with ProChannel, Console Emulation, and a few plug-ins, but not the EQ, BREVERB, or Compressor (whichever one you don't want). You also decide to hold off on the MIDI options. You can get Sonar for cheaper, say $199. Once you get it under control and you feel you're ready for MIDI, you can not only choose to add the MIDI option later at, say $39, but when you receive a Sonar monthly email, you might see it on sale for $29. Waves does this all the time and gets so many hits from that. In fact, you're more likely to buy it simply because of the sale, and you're more likely to jump on the Sonar bandwagon because the starting price was $199. My point is that, if you could buy Sonar for $199, then buy only the options you want, you're more likely to go that route vs. buy DP at full price which contains features you may never ever use. And if you buy the $199 Sonar vs DP 8, you're less likely to jump ship. Here's another example of how this could win some hearts: Don't like Take Lanes? Guess what! You can buy either Lanes or Layers at $9 each and you can use either, both, or neither! Many people would buy both at $9. Cakewalk can offer different user-interfaces and sell them each for $5. The idea is piecemeal, but it REALLY works in the Smart-phone market, among other industries. It's harder to make a choice when the price for full versions start at $399. I just think rather than sell three different versions, change to a frame-work and allow "us" to decide what features it contains. Yes, yes and yes. Now that would be awesome for us end users and profitable for Rolawalk. It's a win, win. Mike
Sonar X3 ~ Scarlett 18i6 ~ Home Build DAW GA-Z77X-UD5H Intel i7 3770k 4.2GHz 32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite (4x8) 2x Samsung 250GB SSD 1TB WD Black HDD @ 7200RPM 6Gb/s 64MB Corsair H80i Liquid cooler Noctua Silent Fans ~ 3x120mm ~ 1x140mm Seasonic Platinum 760w PSU Windows 7 Pro 64Bit.
|
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11546
- Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
- Location: Parkesburg, PA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/17 18:40:11
(permalink)
Now that would be awesome for us end users and profitable for Rolawalk. As a consumer I'm thinking yeah, that might be cool. As someone who's worked for a fairly large software company for 15+ years, I'm thinking it sounds like a nightmare from a development/QA/support perspective. Especially for something like the Track Lanes/Layers aspect which (I assume) is two entirely different sets of code. That kind of thing could result in so many permutations of an already large set of features, which in turn would likely result in less resources to actually develop and test said features. And I'd imagine Roland/CW has limited resources all around these days... who doesn't. Maybe if it was a matter of your license simply enabling or disabling *existing* features, sort of like the Essentials/Studio/Producer concept, it could be feasible (development-wise). Though it still might be unweildy from a support and customer service angle - "so you have SONAR X4 and you can't see Track Lanes. Did you purchase that option? Yes, it's part of the comping module but not the extended viewing options package. Oh, you're not sure which one you have....? ".
SteveC https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163 SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors; Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO); Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/17 20:03:17
(permalink)
PTheory I'm pretty much giving up on sonar these days. With all my frustrations with the product I dabbled with Ableton 9 and was simply amazed at it's audio engine and algorithms compared to sonar. CW talk about improved workflow, thats a bit of a joke in comparison to Ableton 9 which is instant. As a creation engine it is second to non. Still use Sonar at the moment for vocal tracking but that is purely because I new to Ableton and haven't yet worked out all the comping features etc but I'm fairly sure as soon as I do it will be bye bye Sonar for good ableton doesn't cut it for me. more of a live application in my eyes anyway,tried it out, lost interest, the engine ? yes pretty smooth but theres a trade off on features im not ready to cahs in for.
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
vintagevibe
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2446
- Joined: 2003/12/15 21:45:06
- Location: Atlanta, Ga
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/17 21:24:59
(permalink)
stevec Now that would be awesome for us end users and profitable for Rolawalk. As a consumer I'm thinking yeah, that might be cool. As someone who's worked for a fairly large software company for 15+ years, I'm thinking it sounds like a nightmare from a development/QA/support perspective. Especially for something like the Track Lanes/Layers aspect which (I assume) is two entirely different sets of code. That kind of thing could result in so many permutations of an already large set of features, which in turn would likely result in less resources to actually develop and test said features. And I'd imagine Roland/CW has limited resources all around these days... who doesn't. Maybe if it was a matter of your license simply enabling or disabling *existing* features, sort of like the Essentials/Studio/Producer concept, it could be feasible (development-wise). Though it still might be unweildy from a support and customer service angle - "so you have SONAR X4 and you can't see Track Lanes. Did you purchase that option? Yes, it's part of the comping module but not the extended viewing options package. Oh, you're not sure which one you have....? ". Yes it would be a technical nightmare and I think they would lose serious amount of money. I can't see it ever happening and I wouldn't want such a system.
|
Crg
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7719
- Joined: 2007/11/15 07:59:17
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/17 21:50:52
(permalink)
Quite often, in the development of conceptual products, new avenues-algorithms- methods- logic- permutations-... arise. Placing them into a code that works in digital is the science we are seeing. The magnetic universe that has been and is, music, is a part of this process. Technical nightmare.
|
DW_Mike
Max Output Level: -6 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6907
- Joined: 2006/11/29 18:06:40
- Location: The arm-pit of the good 'ol US...New Jersey
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/17 23:52:15
(permalink)
stevec Now that would be awesome for us end users and profitable for Rolawalk. As a consumer I'm thinking yeah, that might be cool. As someone who's worked for a fairly large software company for 15+ years, I'm thinking it sounds like a nightmare from a development/QA/support perspective. Especially for something like the Track Lanes/Layers aspect which (I assume) is two entirely different sets of code. That kind of thing could result in so many permutations of an already large set of features, which in turn would likely result in less resources to actually develop and test said features. And I'd imagine Roland/CW has limited resources all around these days... who doesn't. Maybe if it was a matter of your license simply enabling or disabling *existing* features, sort of like the Essentials/Studio/Producer concept, it could be feasible (development-wise). Though it still might be unweildy from a support and customer service angle - "so you have SONAR X4 and you can't see Track Lanes. Did you purchase that option? Yes, it's part of the comping module but not the extended viewing options package. Oh, you're not sure which one you have....? ". I hadn't considered that side before Steve. I can see your point. There has to be some sort of happy medium I would think, no? Mike
Sonar X3 ~ Scarlett 18i6 ~ Home Build DAW GA-Z77X-UD5H Intel i7 3770k 4.2GHz 32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite (4x8) 2x Samsung 250GB SSD 1TB WD Black HDD @ 7200RPM 6Gb/s 64MB Corsair H80i Liquid cooler Noctua Silent Fans ~ 3x120mm ~ 1x140mm Seasonic Platinum 760w PSU Windows 7 Pro 64Bit.
|
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11546
- Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
- Location: Parkesburg, PA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/18 12:02:56
(permalink)
I hadn't considered that side before Steve. I can see your point. There has to be some sort of happy medium I would think, no? Yeah... When you've experienced a software development environment from the inside things do tend to take a different spin. Honestly, I rather enjoy the "outside" view I have with SONAR vs. my work, but unfortunately I can't help but inject personal experience. I think the happy medium at this point *is* the Essentials/Studio/Producer breakdown. When CW introduced Expanded for X1, that alone caused so much confusion that I can't image what a piecemeal version of SONAR would actually look like. OK, maybe I actually *can* imagine it, and I think it would be nice to select the modules you want to use/license. But my personal vote is for CW to keeping squashing bugs/glitches, and to keep enhancing the product - Track Lane tweaks, PC features, maybe a little SV love, etc. I would take those type of things over anything else. And since X2a is very stable for me at this point, I'm not against an X2.5 or X3 or whatever the next version might be called. I know not everyone is in the same boat though...
SteveC https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163 SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors; Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO); Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
|
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11546
- Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
- Location: Parkesburg, PA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/18 12:05:08
(permalink)
Edit: duplicate post courtesy of a recent IE9 upgrade.
SteveC https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163 SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors; Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO); Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
|
brconflict
Max Output Level: -56.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1891
- Joined: 2012/10/05 21:28:30
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/18 12:22:31
(permalink)
The support issue is easy. Snapshot configs. "Please generate a configuration file. Under Tools => Support => Generate config file. Email that file to me. that will tell me how your system is set up. From there, I can duplicate your settings on my machine and see if I see the same issue." (One email later...) "Ok, it looks like you purchased the Take Lanes option, but didn't enable it. Go under Tools => Support => License, and select to enable that option. then restart Sonar. You should see them then. If not, I can walk you through it or jump on your system to check it out there." This also generates more development jobs. Yes, it's more code, but it's better than a team of developers trying to sift through tons of outdated code, because it's all one big glob vs. a more modular, frame approach. Plus, and here is the smart bit, if one module or part of the code needs repair (i.e. bugs squashed), it doesn't require a fully loaded patch (X2a, X2b, X2c, etc.), it only requires a much smaller dll replacement patch, perhaps. It sounds tedious, but c'mon guys, this IS the more modern way to do this. Microsoft uses Auto-Updates. So do many others (Apple, Adobe, FireFox, etc.) This is not a new idea, and it works. Suspect a bad update, Revert the update. The previous dll is saved in an archived directory. It can easily be restored. Well, these are my wishes, anyway.
Brian Sonar Platinum, Steinberg Wavelab Pro 9, MOTU 24CoreIO w/ low-slew OP-AMP mods and BLA external clock, True P8, Audient ASP008, API 512c, Chandler Germ500, Summit 2ba-221, GAP Pre-73, Peluso 22251, Peluso 2247LE, Mackie HR824, Polk Audio SRS-SDA 2.3tl w/upgraded Soniccraft crossovers and Goertz cables, powered by Pass-X350. All wiring Star-Quad XLR or Monster Cable. Power by Monster Power Signature AVS2000 voltage stabilizer and Signature Pro Power 5100 PowerCenter on a 20A isolation shielded circuit.
|
KyRo
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 543
- Joined: 2010/09/22 23:45:29
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/19 05:35:13
(permalink)
Sonar seems in some respects comparable to the Millennium Falcon... It's a great ship, you love it, it's got a lot of special features and nifty gadgets, but in some areas it's still a "bucket of bolts" that just can't seem to make the jump to lightspeed. And even some upgrades at Cloud City don't quite push it out of that oh so persistent danger zone... not until a noble little mechanic gets in there and FINALLY gets the hyperdrive good and truly running. From that point on, it may still be a little rough around the edges, but boy, it sure does handle like a dream...
/nerdalogy
|
KyRo
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 543
- Joined: 2010/09/22 23:45:29
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/19 05:39:29
(permalink)
(PS: I too hope for a really solid X2b that helps a lot of people out here before the marketing dept starts pushing X3 at all!)
|
jimusic
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1325
- Joined: 2008/05/21 18:59:52
- Location: Near Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2b?
2013/05/19 18:05:08
(permalink)
If it were me, I'd do 2 things: 1) I'd be reading these forums, particularly about this very issue to see just how the existing customer base thinks & feels; 2) I'd announce that X2b [or whatever it would be called] is being worked on with a tentative release date to inspire hope, confidence & to keep the customer base hangin' in here. Especially since they know just how well one of their competitors in particular has grown quite popular very quickly. You can bet that's what's being done 'over there'. That's were the 'smart money' is - and it's been working terrific for them!
|