foxwolfen
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8256
- Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
- Status: offline
A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything. Composers Forum
|
quantumeffect
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2771
- Joined: 2007/07/22 21:29:42
- Location: Minnesota
- Status: offline
Re:Recent photos
2013/05/25 22:53:18
(permalink)
Playing with the butt ends of the sticks?!?! … and what’s with the bicycle horn, are you doing a vaudeville act?
Dave 8.5 PE 64, i7 Studio Cat, Delta 1010, GMS and Ludwig Drums, Paiste Cymbals "Everyone knows rock n' roll attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact." H. Simpson "His chops are too righteous." Plankton during Sponge Bob's guitar solo
|
foxwolfen
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8256
- Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
- Status: offline
Re:Recent photos
2013/05/25 23:06:39
(permalink)
Well, you know... its hard to do two things at once. I mean... I have to hit the beat... then throw the sticks in the air, jump up, grab the camera, click the shutter, be back in the seat and catch the sticks before the next beat and before the shutter finishes clicking. Its not as easy as it looks you know. So I caught the sticks backward. I still hit the beat and got the shot. The horn is for hecklers.
A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything. Composers Forum
|
Rimshot
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4625
- Joined: 2010/12/09 12:51:08
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:Recent photos
2013/05/25 23:09:01
(permalink)
I hope that horn is LOUD! Got to keep them hecklers at bay! What if they throw things?
Rimshot Sonar Platinum 64 (Lifer), Studio One V3.5, Notion 6, Steinberg UR44, Zoom R24, Purrrfect Audio Pro Studio DAW (Case: Silent Mid Tower, Power Supply: 600w quiet, Haswell CPU: i7 4790k @ 4.4GHz (8 threads), RAM: 16GB DDR3/1600 , OS drive: 1TB HD, Audio drive: 1TB HD), Windows 10 x64 Anniversary, Equator D5 monitors, Faderport, FP8, Akai MPK261
|
foxwolfen
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8256
- Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
- Status: offline
Re:Recent photos
2013/05/25 23:13:59
(permalink)
In all seriousness, I am the photographer, not the drummer. Why he holds his sticks the way he does, I do not know. You can ask him yourself. He was however very good, and was flawless the entire set.
A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything. Composers Forum
|
foxwolfen
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8256
- Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
- Status: offline
Re:Recent photos
2013/05/25 23:17:22
(permalink)
It was OK Rim, there was only the one person in the audience and he was in a straight jacket.
A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything. Composers Forum
|
Rimshot
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4625
- Joined: 2010/12/09 12:51:08
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:Recent photos
2013/05/25 23:20:07
(permalink)
foxwolfen It was OK Rim, there was only the one person in the audience and he was in a straight jacket.
That was funny!
Rimshot Sonar Platinum 64 (Lifer), Studio One V3.5, Notion 6, Steinberg UR44, Zoom R24, Purrrfect Audio Pro Studio DAW (Case: Silent Mid Tower, Power Supply: 600w quiet, Haswell CPU: i7 4790k @ 4.4GHz (8 threads), RAM: 16GB DDR3/1600 , OS drive: 1TB HD, Audio drive: 1TB HD), Windows 10 x64 Anniversary, Equator D5 monitors, Faderport, FP8, Akai MPK261
|
foxwolfen
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8256
- Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
- Status: offline
Re:Recent photos
2013/05/27 01:04:25
(permalink)
hhrrrmpphh... I was being serious.
A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything. Composers Forum
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Recent photos
2013/05/27 09:23:14
(permalink)
Those photos are really, really good. Some details about the camera and lenses would be interesting to us would-be photographers.
 All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re:Recent photos
2013/05/27 11:42:53
(permalink)
bitflipper Those photos are really, really good. Some details about the camera and lenses would be interesting to us would-be photographers. I agree. They are technically very good Shad, especially the close-up stuff. You've got plenty of depth of field in there, did you up the ISO or use a tripod? Incidentally, I love close up/macro photography a lot, so I recently got myself a set of extension tubes and a ring flash to use on my EOS to get in really close. Haven't had much chance to use it all yet, but you may have inspired me
post edited by SteveStrummerUK - 2013/05/27 11:49:24
|
foxwolfen
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8256
- Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
- Status: offline
Re:Recent photos
2013/05/28 00:20:46
(permalink)
Bit these were shot with my Sony HD video camera. It does some things extremely well. Other things, like landscapes... not so good. Flesh can be really challenging because HD has such incredible detail you see every flaw. Most modern cameras can shoot both video and stills and many, like mine, can do both simultaniously. The overall technology is identical with the notable exception of the shutter, which on a still camera will most often be a diaphraghm(leaf) type, while on a video camera will be a rolling type (which can make for some really strange and cool effects). As mentioned, the camera does have Zeiss optics with an ok telemacro... (with optical stabalization, not digital which can be nasty) so it is pretty decent considering it is consumer level. I also just discovered that one of my favorite recent films (Crank) was partially shot on a nearly identical type camera made by Canon. And that was a big screen feature. So, the long and the short of it is, much like music, equipment is only part of the equation. I have being doing photography for 35 years. Built my first dark room when I was 13. So, really, I can do this with just about any camera. Steve - No, I lock my ISO to 100. I am old school. I use lighting instead (in this case nearly direct 2pm sunlight). That way the aperture can be cranked open, and a softer DOF focus with a nice bokeh achieved. Perhaps on higher end equipment ISO will not be so problematic, but so far (in the sub 2000 dollar range) I have found that as the ISO goes up, so does the noise, and its not good noise. With the old real film ISO, the image would be much more grainy at high ISO, but it was pleasant to view. Digital noise is not. I am pretty convinced that what camera manufactures call ISO, we musicians would simply call gain. And that is a sure fire way to add noise. The video camera I am saving to buy (Sony NEX VG900) has a full frame (35mm) Examor sensor that I hope will reduce that issue considerably, and of course having an interchangeable lens system on a 35mm sensor means it will properly focus real 35mm camera lenses (cine or still). Thanks for the kind words guys.
A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything. Composers Forum
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re:Recent photos
2013/05/28 08:34:59
(permalink)
foxwolfen Steve - No, I lock my ISO to 100. I am old school. I use lighting instead (in this case nearly direct 2pm sunlight). That way the aperture can be cranked open, and a softer DOF focus with a nice bokeh achieved. Same here with the 100 ISO mate. Good light gives you so many options, but even if it's too bright to achieve wide apertures, I've got into the habit of carrying a couple of ND filters just in case. Perhaps on higher end equipment ISO will not be so problematic, but so far (in the sub 2000 dollar range) I have found that as the ISO goes up, so does the noise, and its not good noise. With the old real film ISO, the image would be much more grainy at high ISO, but it was pleasant to view. Digital noise is not. I am pretty convinced that what camera manufactures call ISO, we musicians would simply call gain. And that is a sure fire way to add noise. I couldn't agree more Shad, and incidentally, I'm (sadly) old enough to have learnt photography when film speeds were measured in "ASA"! But unless you're after a certain effect, or it's just plain unavoidable, I was always advised to load up with slow film. I find that one of the unfortunate results of the move from film to digital cameras is that we no longer have the choice of choosing different film stock. I shot almost exclusively on colour slide film (as well as black and white print film) and to me, part of the enjoyment was choosing which particular film to load up with dependent on what you were going to shoot. For out and out quality, you simply couldn't beat Kodachrome 25 and 64, but I'd reserve those for landscape and architectural shots where setting up on a sturdy tripod was obligatory. I also liked Ektachrome 100 for general use - it always seemed a little warmer than Kodachrome, although I eventually switched from Ektachrome to Fujichrome Velvia fot its excellent saturation. The other film I liked (mainly for portraits and group shots) was Agfachrome 100, which to me anyway, always seemed to render skin tones accurately. I get the analogy you make with digital noise. However, to combat it, even at lower ISO settings, I've started shooting everything in RAW as this seems to give you the biggest latitude for "fixing things in the mix". I'm also currently using the Beta of Adobe's upcoming (and quite excellent) Lightroom 5 (get it HERE if you're interested). I've tried a few free RAW editors, as well as the version of Camera RAW in my Photoshop Elements 11, and the DPP software that came with my Canon, and I can honestly say that in my opinion, Lightroom is just about the best of all of them for manipulating RAW images (it can open and process other formats but it's when handling RAW that it really shines). Specifically with regard to digital noise, it has a really intuitive 'Detail' editor that allows you to balance sharpening and noise reduction: The video camera I am saving to buy (Sony NEX VG900) has a full frame (35mm) Examor sensor that I hope will reduce that issue considerably, and of course having an interchangeable lens system on a 35mm sensor means it will properly focus real 35mm camera lenses (cine or still). Cool! My next purchase is definitely going to be a full-frame Canon. I'm soooooooo tempted now to pull the trigger on the stunning new EOS 6D Thanks for the kind words guys. It's love discussing photography and sharing images Shad, and it's always nice to see some photos from someone who obviously has an 'eye' for it.
post edited by SteveStrummerUK - 2013/05/28 08:37:32
|
foxwolfen
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8256
- Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
- Status: offline
Re:Recent photos
2013/05/28 11:57:08
(permalink)
Filters are essential. I have a full set of Cokin that I originally purchased for my Pentax 35mm film camera some 25 years ago. Great thing about that system is it will never be obsolete!
A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything. Composers Forum
|