.

Author
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
2013/05/29 07:16:30 (permalink)

.

.
post edited by The Maillard Reaction - 2019/01/09 16:48:45


#1

10 Replies Related Threads

    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re:Windows Memory Diagnostic "extended" test? 2013/05/29 08:12:23 (permalink)
    Hi Mike,

    Test the RAM outside of the OS.
    Use Memtest   

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #2
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    . 2013/05/29 08:20:39 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by The Maillard Reaction - 2019/01/09 16:48:51


    #3
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    . 2013/05/29 09:05:35 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by The Maillard Reaction - 2019/01/09 16:48:59


    #4
    jcschild
    Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3409
    • Joined: 2003/11/08 00:20:10
    • Location: Kentucky y'all
    • Status: offline
    Re:Windows Memory Diagnostic "extended" test? 2013/05/29 11:12:23 (permalink)
    make sure you run memtest 2 full runs minimum
    even them sometimes a "weak" stick can make it thru.

    Scott
    ADK
    Home of the Kentucky Fried DAW!
    #5
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    . 2013/05/29 11:16:22 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by The Maillard Reaction - 2019/01/09 16:49:07


    #6
    noldar12
    Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1075
    • Joined: 2006/07/07 20:30:16
    • Status: offline
    Re:Windows Memory Diagnostic "extended" test? 2013/05/29 12:16:39 (permalink)
    Depending on how much RAM you have, it can take several hours to thoroughly test it using Memtest.

    As Jim and Scott have already said, you will need to run the test multiple times (3x is strongly suggested).

    When I've needed to use it, for my situation it takes 6+ hours.  It is an outstanding program for testing for faulty memory.

    Jim
    #7
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    . 2013/05/29 14:56:07 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by The Maillard Reaction - 2019/01/09 16:49:16


    #8
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    . 2013/05/30 07:07:49 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by The Maillard Reaction - 2019/01/09 16:49:26


    #9
    slartabartfast
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5289
    • Joined: 2005/10/30 01:38:34
    • Status: offline
    Re:Windows Memory Diagnostic "extended" test? 2013/05/30 15:18:20 (permalink)
    Do not over-think this issue. The odds are that your sticks are good. It is common enough to have soft errors in memory, and if one occurs during the run of a memory test, you should not condemn the chip. Ideally what you would like to see in a bad stick is the same error at the same location on each repetition of the test. That would clearly indicate a hard error in that portion of the module. Unless your computer is controlling a nuclear plant upwind of my house, I would not hesitate to recommend that you stop testing now, and just use the sticks.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_error

    #10
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    . 2013/05/30 16:30:02 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by The Maillard Reaction - 2019/01/09 16:49:35


    #11
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1