Routing effect sends to a Subgroup Stereo Bus

Author
Dilaco1
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 150
  • Joined: 2007/07/23 22:00:39
  • Location: Australia
  • Status: offline
2013/06/13 20:50:28 (permalink)

Routing effect sends to a Subgroup Stereo Bus

These days I find it helpful to route a group of instruments to a Subgroup stereo bus for automation. But I noticed that when I turned the subgroup fader down my reverb sends sounded wetter. Then I realised that the subgroup fader doesn't affect the reverb/plugin sends on the individual tracks - the effect sends go directly to the Master bus.
 
My question is, how do I route my effect sends along with the tracks I am outputing to the Subgroup stereo bus?
 
 

Cakewalk by Bandlab; RME Fireface 800 audio interface; Windows 7 (64bit);
#1

6 Replies Related Threads

    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: Routing effect sends to a Subgroup Stereo Bus 2013/06/13 22:09:20 (permalink)
    You can route your reverb bus back to the dry bus si that the dry bus volume control affects both equally, maintaining a consistent wet/dry ratio as you automate the levels.


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #2
    Dilaco1
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 150
    • Joined: 2007/07/23 22:00:39
    • Location: Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: Routing effect sends to a Subgroup Stereo Bus 2013/06/17 05:23:15 (permalink)
    Thanks for reply Bitflipper. Apologies for my late response.
     
    Got a bit confused with the "dry bus si" - I thought si must have been some acronym like "signal in" or something, then I realized it was just a typo (so).
     
    Now I get it, I tried it and it works! I just route the output of the bus, where my plugin is sitting, to the same bus where I have routed my chosen group of instruments. Before I was trying to figure out a way that I could route the actual sends in the instrument tracks. It means having a separate instance of the reverb plugin feeding the sends in the tracks I am routing to the bus, but that shouldn't clutter things too much.
     
    Thanks so much for pointing me in the right direction.

    Cakewalk by Bandlab; RME Fireface 800 audio interface; Windows 7 (64bit);
    #3
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: Routing effect sends to a Subgroup Stereo Bus 2013/06/17 10:14:41 (permalink)
    I haven't gotten the hang of typing on my smartphone yet.


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #4
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re: Routing effect sends to a Subgroup Stereo Bus 2013/06/21 14:19:26 (permalink)
    Or you could just insert the reverb plug into the Fx bin of your bus........

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #5
    lawajava
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2040
    • Joined: 2012/05/31 23:23:55
    • Location: Seattle
    • Status: offline
    Re: Routing effect sends to a Subgroup Stereo Bus 2013/06/22 22:32:48 (permalink)
    Dilaco1 - your system specs look pretty robust so you have options.
     
    1. (not number 1, but mentioned first) is to not send your effects to one or more effects busses, and instead put them on the tracks.  Route your tracks to your sub busses for grouping.  Levels of your effects will correspond to what you assign on the tracks.
     
    2. as Bristol_Jonesy suggested, put all of your effects on your sub busses.  The downside of this is that you'll lose any individual level control for the effects for the individual tracks using that bus.
     
    3. grit your teeth and bear the problem that you described as "good enough", or, possibly go the extra mile (number 4)
     
    4. I've been trying to use the following method quite a bit, but I'm not saying it's a model for others.  I have a sub bus for Drums, one for Elec Guitars, one for Acous Guitars, one for Keys, one for Vox, etc. Each of those are routed to the Master bus.  I send the output of the tracks for those categories to these sub busses. 
     
    I also have an FX sub bus also for each of those.  Drums FX, E Guit FX, A Guit FX, Keys FX, Vox FX. 
     
    I route the output of these FX sub busses to their corresponding overall bus (i.e., the Drums FX to the Drums bus).  I use the Grouping feature to group the volume between the pairings. That way if I lower the volume say of the Vox bus, the Vox FX bus lowers with it. 
     
    Where it gets weird is I've been also setting up sub busses for the "most commonly used" effects for each category, especially reverb.   I have other effects sub busses for some of the categories such as Delay, Long Delay, and Compression (for New York Compression).  So for Guit Verb and Guit Delay and Guit Long Delay (three sub busses), they all route outputs to Guit FX.
     
    From the individual track, let's say a guitar track, I route the track output to the Guit Bus, and I can have say 3 sends, one send going to the Guit Verb, with it's own individual and suitable send level and pan for that particular track, and another send going to the Guit Delay, and another send going to the Guit Long Delay. 
     
    I can get it all right for that one track when it's just playing by itself, and then when I do any sub group level changes (where I change the relative volumes between Guit, Drums, Vox, Keys, etc.) the effects all stay with appropriate levels per track.
     
    Having the different reverbs per category also allows me to use different reverbs.  I might use Breverb on Verb A Guit, and perhaps Valhalla Vintage Verb on the Verb E Guit sub busses.
     
    Sounds like a pain, but since I have it set up in a template file there's no set up when I open a new file, it's already routed that way.
     
    Just a suggestion.  I may be wacko and off the deep end.  But it's been working for me, and Sonar can handle all the busses without losing track of anything.  (As long as you have a machine that's not underpowered).
     
     
     
     
     
    post edited by lawajava - 2013/06/22 22:40:36

    Two internal 2TB SSDs laptop stuffed with Larry's deals and awesome tools. Studio One is the cat's meow as a DAW now that I've migrated off of Sonar. Using BandLab Cakewalk just to grab old files when migrating songs.
    #6
    Dilaco1
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 150
    • Joined: 2007/07/23 22:00:39
    • Location: Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: Routing effect sends to a Subgroup Stereo Bus 2013/06/23 22:35:10 (permalink)
    Thanks Bristol, but as Iawajava states, this would mean that no individual adjustment of levels, etc. would be possible for each track going over to the bus. (For example if I were to group the drums I would want less reverb - if any - on the kick.)
     
    Your tips much appreciated, Iawajava. The one I singled out as most useful for my general approach to things is the one about using the Group function for automation.

    Cakewalk by Bandlab; RME Fireface 800 audio interface; Windows 7 (64bit);
    #7
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1