Helpful ReplyPlug-in Format

Author
MorganT
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 252
  • Joined: 2011/03/17 11:33:16
  • Status: offline
2013/08/01 08:37:50 (permalink)

Plug-in Format

I just bought a couple of the Blue Cat Audio plug-ins Cakewalk is promo-ing.  They are available as DirectX, VST, and AAX for Win-64 (what I'm using.)  The Blue Cat website recommends Direct X for Cakewalk platforms -- but don't I want to use the VST format?

________________________
Sonar Platinum / Sweetwater Creation Station i5 @ 3.33 Ghz / 12 GB RAM / 64-bit / Fosusrite Scarlett 18i8 interface
#1
scook
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 24146
  • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
  • Location: TX
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 08:44:35 (permalink)
SONAR should work equally well with both DX and VST. If it were my choice, I would use VST.
#2
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 08:47:51 (permalink)
Cakewalk introduced VST capability by buying FXpansion's wrapper technology to make VST look like DX.
 
SONAR may have something new going on but I guess Blue Cat's recommendation is based on the notion that you can bypass the wrapping and get straight to the code.
 
 
best regards,
mike
 
 
 
 


#3
MorganT
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 252
  • Joined: 2011/03/17 11:33:16
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 09:09:18 (permalink)
That makes sense, thanks.  If it makes no difference I think I'll stick with VST for consistency in what I'm doing.

________________________
Sonar Platinum / Sweetwater Creation Station i5 @ 3.33 Ghz / 12 GB RAM / 64-bit / Fosusrite Scarlett 18i8 interface
#4
lfm
Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2216
  • Joined: 2005/01/24 05:35:33
  • Location: Sweden
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 09:46:09 (permalink)
I consider the plugins my actuall tools - daws I can shift.
 
I would go VST - since in my experience is that DX is not so well implemented in other daws. Sudden freezes and such and format is pretty much abandoned.
 
Hopefully you can install any format - buying, or I would stay away. That you don't buy a particular format of the products from Blue Cat Audio, I mean.
#5
robert_e_bone
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 8968
  • Joined: 2007/12/26 22:09:28
  • Location: Palatine, IL
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 10:03:13 (permalink)
I was under the thought that DXi did not work in 64-bit Sonar.
 
Bob Bone
 

Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!"
 
Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) 
Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22
Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64
Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others
MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es
Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms  
#6
lfm
Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2216
  • Joined: 2005/01/24 05:35:33
  • Location: Sweden
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 10:32:29 (permalink)
robert_e_bone
I was under the thought that DXi did not work in 64-bit Sonar.
 
Bob Bone
 




I ran Dimension Pro as x64 DX in Sonar and had no real problems.
But in Reaper there were sudden freezes and such.
Finding the VST x64 version(a bit of a hassle) it runs fine anywhere.
#7
Glyn Barnes
Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7564
  • Joined: 2009/06/10 05:12:31
  • Location: A Stone's Throw from the Line
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 10:57:09 (permalink)
robert_e_bone
I was under the thought that DXi did not work in 64-bit Sonar.
 
Bob Bone
 


64 Bit DXi runs fine, 32 Bit DXi will not run unless you use a wrapper. There are some posts on how to do this but I have never tried it.
mike_mccue
 
Cakewalk introduced VST capability by buying FXpansion's wrapper technology to make VST look like DX.

SONAR may have something new going on but I guess Blue Cat's recommendation is based on the notion that you can bypass the wrapping and get straight to the code.

 
As I understand it Sonar has had native VST support for a long time now. The wrapper is no longer required.

Intel i7 3770K @4.4GHz, 32GB RAM, 240GB SSD System disk, 2 x 2TB and 1 x 1TB (with SSD Cache) HDD. Windows 10,  Sonar Platinum. Roland Quad Capture. 
Music - Switchwater on Soundclick
Music - Goldry Bluszco on Soundcloud
#8
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
  • Total Posts : 6475
  • Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
  • Location: Boston, MA, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 10:57:47 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby Jlien X 2013/08/02 05:09:54
Some misinformation here. SONAR using a DX wrapper is ancient history.. We did use FXpansions wrapper way back because it was the easiest way at the time to get VST support quickly. That was changed about 7 years ago when we rearchitected the code to use a plugin abstraction layer. 
 
There seems to be pretty large misunderstandings of what the the term wrapper is to many users so I'll try and clarify what it is. In essence a wrapper is an adapter that converts from one protocol to another. Similar to getting an adapter to plug a 3 pin US plug into a European outlet. A wrapper doesn't make anything less efficient necessarily. To get more technical, like most other DAW's, SONAR has its own internal "abstration layer" protocol for communicating with plugins that is neither VST nor DX. We rewrote out abstraction layer back in 2003 to allow us to support more general plugin formats. That actually makes it easier for us to add new protocols as they come along, since the entire application doesn't need to change when a new protocol is added, just the lower level implementation. For example the code that inserts a plugin has no idea that the plugin is a VST or a DX plugin. Anything required that is specific to the VST protocol is handled via custom interfaces so there is no loss of custom functionality by using a generic abstraction layer.
 
Adapters are an extremely common technique that all modern software developers use. You can read an overview of it if you are interested here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapter_pattern Adapters are used everywhere in software engineering. For example in SONAR we have one way to communicate with audio drivers and several implementations of the same - ASIO, WDM, MME. It would be pretty foolish and wasteful to implement multiple protocols all over the application each time something new comes along. Pretty much every plugin vendors follows the same technique as well. They have an internal plugin protocol and several implementation of the same for each format, AAX, VST, AU, etc. FWIW some years ago I spoke to one of the Steinberg developers and he was candid enough to say that they have their own abstraction layer on top of VST - so go figure<g>
 
Anyway to answer the OP's question, choosing a format to use is really a choice of how well implemented and tested that format is. In your case I would probably pick VST since its more likely that the vendor has extensively tested that. Also both DX and VST formats will work in both X64 and X86. In VST mode we have a 32 to 64 bit adapter but not for DX. This is why some 32 bit only DX plugins do not work in X64.

Noel Borthwick
Senior Manager Audio Core, BandLab
My Blog, Twitter, BandLab Profile
#9
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10654
  • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
  • Location: TeXaS
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 11:14:19 (permalink)
Thanks Noel.  I thought that was right.
 
To the OP, stick w/ VST since that seems to be the current standard.  Blue cat is probably copying and pasting old text w/o updating it.  You find help and manuals w/ all kinds of passe info in them.
 
@

https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
 
there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
#10
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11546
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
  • Location: Parkesburg, PA
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 12:42:19 (permalink)
AT
....Blue cat is probably copying and pasting old text w/o updating it.  You find help and manuals w/ all kinds of passe info in them.
 


That's what I was thinking too.   Blue Cat has been around for years, and has had a fairly close connection with SONAR via the DX format going way back.   They'll probably work just fine using DX in SONAR, but that's primarily because SONAR has always had a solid DX implementation - most other DAWs do not, if they even support it at all.
 

SteveC
https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
 
SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
 
#11
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 12:56:10 (permalink)
 
I think I missed the pretty large misunderstanding.
 
:-)


#12
MorganT
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 252
  • Joined: 2011/03/17 11:33:16
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 13:42:37 (permalink)
Thanks Noel - I find it really helpful to understand a little more of the inner workings.  My guess is AT is right, it was an old page that got copied over.  It confused me as everything I used to use was DX but most of my plugins now are VST.
 
Thanks again.

________________________
Sonar Platinum / Sweetwater Creation Station i5 @ 3.33 Ghz / 12 GB RAM / 64-bit / Fosusrite Scarlett 18i8 interface
#13
konradh
Max Output Level: -42 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3325
  • Joined: 2006/01/16 16:07:06
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 16:09:41 (permalink)
I believe DXi for Sonar went away a while back.

Konrad
Current album and more: http://www.themightykonrad.com/

Sonar X1d Producer. V-Studio 700. PC: Intel i7 CPU 3.07GHz, 12 GB RAM. Win 7 64-bit. RealGuitar, RealStrat, RealLPC, Ivory II, Vienna Symphonic, Hollywood Strings, Electr6ity, Acoustic Legends, FabFour, Scarbee Rick/J-Bass/P-Bass, Kontakt 5. NI Session Guitar. Boldersounds, Noisefirm. EZ Drummer 2. EZ Mix. Melodyne Assist. Guitar Rig 4. Tyros 2, JV-1080, Kurzweil PC2R, TC Helicon VoiceWorks+. Rode NT2a, EV RE20. Presonus Eureka.  Rokit 6s. 
#14
Leadfoot
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2817
  • Joined: 2011/04/26 11:08:38
  • Location: Indiana
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/01 17:10:50 (permalink)
Stupid forum software
post edited by Leadfoot - 2013/08/01 21:03:24
#15
TraceyStudios
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 603
  • Joined: 2005/10/13 12:40:33
  • Location: Chandler, AZ
  • Status: offline
Re: Plug-in Format 2013/08/06 23:02:14 (permalink)
i purchased and trying to install. Got a key and a serial number. while installing I am being prompted to a username and a key....what or where do I get a username? I did recieve 2 emails, on said to use the key below...well there was no key below. and the other was the order confirmation which had a "key" in it. I was able to find the serial number in the cakewalk store. I cannot find any install instructions that mention this username and key.  Did you get prompted for this?

AMD FX-6100 six-core processor 3.3GHz
8 Gig RAM
SONAR X3 Producer
Tascam FW1884
Mackie Blackbird
Presonus Digimax
Avalon U5
BFD2
SL Trigger
Alesis DM8 Pro drums
KRK Rokit 8s
KRK 10s
ARC2

Folgers Dark Roast, a bit of crazy :)
& lots of help from the forums!
 
http://www.reverbnation.com/blakkmire
#16
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1