Helpful ReplyLockedFired up Sonar X2 after using Cubase 7 for 3 months.

Author
vintagevibe
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2446
  • Joined: 2003/12/15 21:45:06
  • Location: Atlanta, Ga
  • Status: offline
2013/08/05 19:57:06 (permalink)

Fired up Sonar X2 after using Cubase 7 for 3 months.

Cubase 7 has crashed once in 3 months of continual use.  I opened one old project on Sonar X2.   The playback line kept disappearing, the smart tool didn't work as per the manual (i already knew that) and then it crashed.  The Cubase board is full of back and forth communication with the moderators....and Cakewalk remains silent.
 
...just saying.
#1
icontakt
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4266
  • Joined: 2012/03/04 08:18:02
  • Location: Tokyo
  • Status: offline
Re: Fired up Sonar X2 after using Cubase 7 for 3 months. 2013/08/05 20:24:18 (permalink)
Good for you. Bye.

Tak T.
 
Primary Laptop: Core i7-4710MQ CPU, 16GB RAM, 7200RPM HDD, Windows 7 Home Premium OS (Japanese) x64 SP1
Secondary Laptop: Core2 Duo CPU, 8GB RAM, 7200RPM HDD, Windows 7 Professional OS (Japanese) x64 SP1
Audio Interface: iD14 (ASIO)
Keyboard Controller/MIDI Interface: A-800PRO
DAW: SONAR Platinum x64 (latest update installed)
#2
vintagevibe
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2446
  • Joined: 2003/12/15 21:45:06
  • Location: Atlanta, Ga
  • Status: offline
Re: Fired up Sonar X2 after using Cubase 7 for 3 months. 2013/08/05 21:01:59 (permalink)
Jlien X
Good for you. Bye.



 
And it starts...
#3
stevee9c6
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 464
  • Joined: 2005/06/22 15:45:14
  • Location: Far NW Houston-Cypress
  • Status: offline
Re: Fired up Sonar X2 after using Cubase 7 for 3 months. 2013/08/05 22:15:08 (permalink)
Oh for heavens sake! Do not stir up the shee.... er, natives.  No actual indication of possible problems or suggestion of a more stable platform is welcome here.  As seriously as I've bought into Cake for the last 10 plus years, I should be the biggest cheerleader. Sonar is a tool... nothing more, nothing less.  It is a flawed tool, but then I am aware of no perfect DAW. If something works for you, then that is the best choice.  I have learned one very valuable (and expensive) lesson here.  I was a very early adopter of the V-Studio 700 system, spending over $4k to get on board. I will never again buy a expensive product that is tied to one software product.  The Cakewalk company that existed when I bought into the "baker lore" is long gone, a victim of time, circumstances, corporate buyouts, and bottom line financial goals.
 Long gone are the days when friendly banter and friendship with code writers thrived on this forum.
 Cakewalk (cake/roland) grew up and evolved into a corporate environment, with little room for the free spirits who were the virtual life blood of its existence.  Is this bad?  I guess this depends on your perspective.
,
Any forum you go to will show folks complaining about issues.  It is the nature of a forum.  The human element of this place with regard to the bakers is gone. If that is a criteria for a successful DAW, it won't be here.  I use Sonar X2A every single day. I also have PT10, and Cubase. I use cake because I know it and it has a logical work flow. It crashes. I know this. That is why I save.  There is no perfect DAW.

Steve 
www.stevestallingsmusic.com
#4
robert_e_bone
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 8968
  • Joined: 2007/12/26 22:09:28
  • Location: Palatine, IL
  • Status: offline
Re: Fired up Sonar X2 after using Cubase 7 for 3 months. 2013/08/06 07:44:44 (permalink)
@vintagevibe - your thread is a completely annoying post.
 
And it starts?  Really?  You expected some different kind of response?
 
If you want your X2 (X2a?) issues fixed, then please post each such issue as a separate thread with details, and they may be able to be fixed/worked around/mitigated.
 
If your post is instead meant to simply bash Sonar and toss an advert for Cubase, then just dry up and go away.
 
Lots of folks use multiple sets of recording software.  No problem - there are differing strengths in each.  These are tools, and lots of folks in the forum have recording software from multiple vendors.  They post here, indicate they have such a setup, and that's fine - no issue with that.
 
When, however, you do a 'drive by' to just bash Sonar and tout a competitive product, with NO attempt to seek assistance for your issues, you are crossing a line, in deliberately being negatively provocative in favor of a competitive product.
 
It is up to others to determine whether or not your thread violates the terms of service.
 
In any case, it is certainly at the least bad form.
 
If you are happy with Cubase, go have a field day.  Just go.
 
Bob Bone
 

Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!"
 
Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) 
Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22
Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64
Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others
MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es
Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms  
#5
Royal Yaksman
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 361
  • Joined: 2013/06/06 00:52:02
  • Status: offline
Re: Fired up Sonar X2 after using Cubase 7 for 3 months. 2013/08/06 10:09:14 (permalink)
+1 what Stevee and Robert said! And I suppose the 486 topics in the issues section of Cubase 7's forum means it runs flawlessly?
 
For the record I own Cubase 7 as well and haven't had any problems with it. But at the same time, I haven't had any problems with Sonar X2 either. A few years back I had Pro Tools 8 crashing every half hour tops, with glitches galore like edits and automation not saving. A quick check of the forum told me that a small percentage of users were suffering the same but the vast majority were not. Software developers can only test their product on a limited amount of configurations and if one's not working for you? Go with what is! Most studios don't just have multiple DAWs purely for compatibility with clients. They also have multiple platforms as a back up, in case one falls over.
 
And on the topic of configurations, the one thing that developers cannot account for is people who may think they know what they're doing (but don't) or perhaps do know what they're doing but make a mistake messing with their registry, running non-standard run time scripts or macros, using cracked software or even having the "infamous" mate of a mate's mate set up stuff for them. Not to mention all the often undetected viruses that tend to find their way onto people's systems who illegally download music/movies. Cakewalk can't possibly account for every variable!
 
I'm out.
#6
Ryan Munnis [Cakewalk]
Administrator
  • Total Posts : 1067
  • Joined: 2009/11/01 10:28:44
  • Status: offline
Re: Fired up Sonar X2 after using Cubase 7 for 3 months. 2013/08/06 10:25:08 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby DaddyV 2013/08/06 22:24:14
Let's not do this again. If you're wondering why I'm locking this thread, it's because it has not only been reported by other members already (thus bringing me here this fine Tuesday morning) but also because I'm not going to repeat myself for the fifteenth time about threads of this nature.
 
See here: http://forum.cakewalk.com/Ryan-one-word-m2864637.aspx

Ryan Munnis
Cakewalk
#7
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1