I have re read the OP clearly and most of the posts here have strayed away from the real issue mentioned in the OP. It is not about mixing in mono which I was referring to and it is certainly not about converting mono tracks into stereo either.
What he was really asking is it best to record stereo tracks onto two mono tracks instead of one stereo interleaved track. I briefly mentioned it in some of my posts as did
Mike too. I think a good answer to this is that there are advantages to doing this such as the ability to pan the L and R sides of the stereo image in anyway you want which is good. It also allows for different processing on L and R sides should you need it.
There are some disadvantages to it as well. Takes up two tracks instead of one. Sending to a bus is a good thing to do but then you need an extra buss just for this purpose. It is possible to get the two halves of the stereo image out of sync.
But the good news is that a plugin such as Channel Tools from Cakewalk is very handy for dealing with these things and can achieve nearly everything that the double track concept can. You can totally pan the L and R sides of the image anywhere, you can polarity invert either side and you can even add precise amounts of delay to either side if you want to as well. You can adjust levels of of L and R sides individually too.
So once upon a time two mono tracks would have been the way to go but now we have some pretty useful plugs to handle it. Even Pro Tools has gone interleaved as they had the Split File concept for years so they must think it is OK as well.
post edited by Jeff Evans - 2013/10/08 16:58:11