Helpful ReplyUSB 2.0 vs 3.0

Author
charles kasler
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 192
  • Joined: 2004/11/19 20:08:43
  • Status: offline
2013/10/05 18:04:23 (permalink)

USB 2.0 vs 3.0

Any thoughts? I just switched my audio interface USB input from the USB 3.0 port to the 2.0 port to see what happens. I've heard there are issues with 3.0...Windows 7 backup will only work on 2.0 on my system. Thanks.
post edited by charles kasler - 2013/10/05 18:16:24

Paresh
Dell Inspiron 5775, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U @2 GHz, Win 10, 16Gb ram,Sonar Platinum, 1 TB SSD
#1
Sanderxpander
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3873
  • Joined: 2013/09/30 10:08:24
  • Status: offline
Re: USB 2.0 vs 3.0 2013/10/05 18:08:05 (permalink)
Switched with what?
#2
charles kasler
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 192
  • Joined: 2004/11/19 20:08:43
  • Status: offline
Re: USB 2.0 vs 3.0 2013/10/05 18:14:43 (permalink)
I switched my audio interface USB input from the USB 3.0 port to the 2.0 port.

Paresh
Dell Inspiron 5775, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U @2 GHz, Win 10, 16Gb ram,Sonar Platinum, 1 TB SSD
#3
dke
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 724
  • Joined: 2007/07/07 15:17:51
  • Status: offline
Re: USB 2.0 vs 3.0 2013/10/05 18:29:11 (permalink)
I haven't heard of any real problems with it, but outside of external HDD"s there isn't much supporting it yet.
 
Dan

Sonar Platinum ( x64),  Windows 10 x64, HP Envy i5 2.9GHZ, 8GB, Tascam 4x4 USB, BX5a Monitors.
#4
charles kasler
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 192
  • Joined: 2004/11/19 20:08:43
  • Status: offline
Re: USB 2.0 vs 3.0 2013/10/05 18:32:22 (permalink)
OK thanks

Paresh
Dell Inspiron 5775, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U @2 GHz, Win 10, 16Gb ram,Sonar Platinum, 1 TB SSD
#5
garrigus
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8599
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 17:23:21
  • Location: www.garrigus.com
  • Status: offline
Re: USB 2.0 vs 3.0 2013/10/05 18:38:49 (permalink)
Some audio interfaces work, some don't. If yours was working, then it should be fine. If you were getting dropouts or having problems, then of course, switch it to the USB 2 port.
 
Scott

--
Scott R. Garrigus - http://garrigus.com - SONAR X2 Power! - http://garrigus.com/?SonarX2Power
* Author of the Cakewalk Sonar and Sony Sound Forge Power book series: http://garrigus.com/?PowerBooks
* Author of the Cakewalk Sonar ProAudioTutor video tutorial series: http://garrigus.com/?ProAudioTutor
* Publisher of the DigiFreq free music technology newsletter: http://digifreq.com/?DigiFreq
* Publisher of the NewTechReview free consumer technology newsletter: http://newtechreview.com/?NewTechReview
#6
charles kasler
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 192
  • Joined: 2004/11/19 20:08:43
  • Status: offline
Re: USB 2.0 vs 3.0 2013/10/05 18:45:31 (permalink)
Thanks Scott!

Paresh
Dell Inspiron 5775, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U @2 GHz, Win 10, 16Gb ram,Sonar Platinum, 1 TB SSD
#7
Sycraft
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 871
  • Joined: 2012/05/04 21:06:10
  • Status: offline
Re: USB 2.0 vs 3.0 2013/10/05 19:40:48 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby TheSteven 2013/10/05 19:49:49
In general, USB2 stuff works no issues on USB3 ports. Of course since I said "in general" you can guess there are some "in specific" cases where it doesn't :). If you have Windows 8 and an Intel chipset that is a 7 or 8 (or newer) series then USB3 should Just Work(tm). It'll be on your Southbridge chipset, just like USB2, and you shouldn't have to care about what port is what. If not, there are two potential issues I know of:
 
1) Windows 7 doesn't come with USB3 support. This means you have to install a driver to make it work. This also means that upon install if your mouse and keyboard are on 3 ports, they won't work.
 
2) There are two kinds of USB 3: NEC and Intel. Older boards, 6 series or earlier, didn't have integrated USB 3 so there was an NEC chip (also called Renesas) that added it. This had additional issues. You couldn't install from those ports, and sometimes BIOSes didn't support them properly. Also for video interfaces, they could have speed issues. This can be true even in Windows 8.
 
Now on your listed system, the USB3 ports are Intel ones, they are integrated in to the southbridge. So no issues there. Since Intel provides proper 7 drivers, you aren't likely to see any issues at all. Of course as Scott noted, if there's a problem try a 2 port, but your only issue is likely to be that you need to install drivers before Windows can use them. Should you choose to upgrade to 8/8.1 then that'll no longer be needed.
 
USB is actually fully backward compatible, when you plug in an older device it just steps down to the older standard (and in the case of 3->2 actually uses different pins). The main reason there were issues with 3 in the early days was the NEC chips, since they were actually separate, not integrated. With new hardware, that is gone, and with Win 8 and up, there aren't going to be any software issues either, 3 ports will just be like 2 ports, but faster if something happens to use it.
post edited by Sycraft - 2013/10/06 04:20:10
#8
charles kasler
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 192
  • Joined: 2004/11/19 20:08:43
  • Status: offline
Re: USB 2.0 vs 3.0 2013/10/05 20:18:00 (permalink)
OK man - thanks a lot.

Paresh
Dell Inspiron 5775, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U @2 GHz, Win 10, 16Gb ram,Sonar Platinum, 1 TB SSD
#9
slartabartfast
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5289
  • Joined: 2005/10/30 01:38:34
  • Status: offline
Re: USB 2.0 vs 3.0 2013/10/06 12:28:08 (permalink)
If your interface is USB 2, you gain no improvement in performance by connecting it to a USB 3 port, It is still communicating at USB 2 speed.
#10
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1