X3 and the MCU protocol?

Author
bitSync
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 357
  • Joined: 2004/01/03 14:36:36
  • Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
  • Status: offline
2013/10/08 12:26:05 (permalink)

X3 and the MCU protocol?

Any news from X3 users about the interoperability of X3 and the MCU or with protocol-compliant MCU emulators?

Win7 Pro x64 SP1 / SONAR Platinum x64 (latest) / Mackie d8b + D8Bridge x32 v1.1 = MCU DAW Controller / Frontier TranzPort DAW Controller / Studiocat 3.20 GHz Intel i7 950, 24 GB DDR3 1600 RAM, Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R 2.0 Mainboard, 2TB SATA3 SSD / NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT v341.95 / RME HDSP9652 PCI (ASIO) / RME ADI-8 QS / 24 bit at 44.1 / New Belgium 1554 / My Stuff

#1

6 Replies Related Threads

    smallstonefan
    Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2724
    • Joined: 2003/11/20 11:41:35
    • Location: Papillion, Nebraska
    • Status: offline
    Re: X3 and the MCU protocol? 2013/10/08 12:37:50 (permalink)
    I've not spent more than a few hours in X3, but my MCU pro so far has worked flawlessly and I've had no crashes. That's a GREAT sign and a very different experience from X2...
    #2
    BlixYZ
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 805
    • Joined: 2010/12/31 16:45:54
    • Location: Barrington, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re: X3 and the MCU protocol? 2013/10/08 16:58:41 (permalink)
    interesting, to me there is no difference in performance from x2 to x3. it works well, but some of the buttons don't do what they are supposed to do. it's been that way ever since I got it probably during 8 or 8.5. the c4 audio seems unchanged. I'm pretty happy, but occasionally when I get too frisky with the jog wheel, or too many buttons too fast, I get a crash. not often.
    #3
    Dave Modisette
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11050
    • Joined: 2003/11/13 22:12:55
    • Location: Brandon, Florida
    • Status: offline
    Re: X3 and the MCU protocol? 2013/10/08 21:28:17 (permalink)
    Same as it ever was.

    Dave Modisette ... rocks a Purrrfect Audio Studio Pro rig.

    http://www.gatortraks.com 
    My music.
    ... And of course, the Facebook page. 
    #4
    stevec
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11546
    • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
    • Location: Parkesburg, PA
    • Status: offline
    Re: X3 and the MCU protocol? 2013/10/09 00:06:22 (permalink)
    Mod Bod
    Same as it ever was.




    +1 with a Behringer BCF2000.
     

    SteveC
    https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
    http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
     
    SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
    Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
    Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
     
    #5
    Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
    Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2819
    • Joined: 2011/02/03 04:31:35
    • Location: Sound-Rehab, Austria
    • Status: offline
    Re: X3 and the MCU protocol? 2013/10/09 01:07:14 (permalink)
    there were no changes made to MCU for X3 - Noel said that in another thread

    GOOD TUNES LAST FOREVER
      +++   Visit the Rehab   +++
     
    DAW: Platinum/X3e, win10 64 bit, i7-3930K (6x3.2GHz), Asus Sabertooth X79, 32 GB DDR3 1600MHz, ATI HD 5450, 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility3, 2x 1TB WD HDD SATA 600
    Audio-Interface: 2x MOTU 1248 AVB, Focusrite OctoPre, (Roland Octa-Capture)   Control-Surface: VS-700C 
    VSTi: WAVES, NI K10u, FabFilter, IK, ... (too many really) 
    #6
    BlixYZ
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 805
    • Joined: 2010/12/31 16:45:54
    • Location: Barrington, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re: X3 and the MCU protocol? 2013/10/09 06:41:29 (permalink)
    I remember reading somewhere that some people from the forum have modified their mcu to correct mislabeled buttons. Anyone know anything about that? it would also be great if the pro channel modules could be seen by the mcu or the c4. I realize that touch will be the cs moving forward, and for plugins that does make sense. but the motorized fade rs and transport controls on mcu and the like are essential.
    #7
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1