TomHelvey
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 537
- Joined: 2013/02/26 20:23:54
- Status: offline
Control Surfaces?
I've been craving a great control surface for using X3. I had a Mackie Control for a while but my house got broken into and it was the only thing they took (the alarm thwarted them, they could have gotten a couple Les Pauls, go figure). I've been using a FaderPort but the recent firmware updater rendered it read only and useless. All of the other ones are way out of my price range or only work with AVID, the Behringer units look like garbage.
I'm really tempted to go out and get another Mackie, but with the Gibson merger I'm thinking of holding off in anticipation of a TASCAM controller.
All I really need is a few motorized faders, a couple knobs, and transport controls. I don't really need another audio interface, my MOTU works just fine.
Is there anything in the works or should I just grab another Mackie?
P.S. It would be wonderful if Sonar had an option to exclude the control surface MIDI interface for MIDI channels. Nice to have, but not necessary if you're careful.
System: i7-6900, 64Gb, AMI X99 Carbon Pro Gaming, AMD Radeon HD 7700, Win 10 Pro PCIe: UAD Octo USB: MOTU midi express 128, OB-6 Module, Akai MPK-249, Moog SUB 37, Antelope Orion 32 HD, Softube Console 1, iLok, eLicenser DAW: Cubase Pro, Ableton Live, Sonar Platinum Plugins: Waves, UAD, Xfer, Lennar Digital, u-he, Reveal Sound, Spectrasonics, SoundToys, VPS, Blue Cat, iZotope, NI, Valhalla, Lexicon, etc. https://soundcloud.com/thomas-helvey
|
RajahP
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 98
- Joined: 2010/05/12 06:38:58
- Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces?
2013/10/13 05:04:18
(permalink)
How about Touch screen monitors?
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces?
2013/10/13 05:10:11
(permalink)
the Behringer units look like garbage. If you are referring to the BCF 2000 you couldn't be further from the mark. They are of course not as good as an MCU but for the money there is IMHO no better value control surface out there. I say that as a current MCU + XT user that came from a BCF. Cons - There's no scrub wheel, a few of the more minor functions are missing as there's no M2- M4 key, no LCD display although there is a virtual one that works exactly the same as the "real" thing, more functions require more than one key at a time but you soon get used to it, faders aren't touch sensitive (for automation control) and it has a smaller footprint (which may be a Pro) Pros - It's less than 10% of the price, it'll do 90% of what an MCU can, smaller footprint, can be used as an ACT (or other) controller if not used in Mackie mode. Suberb value. Mine is now used as an ACT controller.
|
TomHelvey
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 537
- Joined: 2013/02/26 20:23:54
- Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces?
2013/10/13 05:10:59
(permalink)
Grin. :) I like to keep them a bit farther away and fingerprints are annoying. OCD I know... RajahP
How about Touch screen monitors?
System: i7-6900, 64Gb, AMI X99 Carbon Pro Gaming, AMD Radeon HD 7700, Win 10 Pro PCIe: UAD Octo USB: MOTU midi express 128, OB-6 Module, Akai MPK-249, Moog SUB 37, Antelope Orion 32 HD, Softube Console 1, iLok, eLicenser DAW: Cubase Pro, Ableton Live, Sonar Platinum Plugins: Waves, UAD, Xfer, Lennar Digital, u-he, Reveal Sound, Spectrasonics, SoundToys, VPS, Blue Cat, iZotope, NI, Valhalla, Lexicon, etc. https://soundcloud.com/thomas-helvey
|
toledoo1
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 28
- Joined: 2012/11/08 09:15:05
- Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces?
2013/10/13 06:42:43
(permalink)
VS-700C = best choice I have ever made for a controller with Sonar. However, I can't recommend it because there is no assurance they will continue to support it.
I hope they do, great piece of hardware that i can't work with Sonar without.
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces?
2013/10/13 07:23:21
(permalink)
So this isn't what your looking for, but someone is selling an old Alpha Track for $60 USD. Not sure if he still has it. I'll see if I can figure out who it was if you're interested.
I still like and use mine. It's handy if one fader will do. I have a touch screen and don't use mine too often, but I'm not prepared to part with it either.
The alpha track is a lot less jumpy than the touch screen for fine work.
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|
Blades
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3246
- Joined: 2003/11/06 08:22:52
- Location: Georgia
- Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces?
2013/10/13 17:14:04
(permalink)
Following up on what fast biker boy said. Checkout the video on my website going over the bcf2000 in sonar. Look under the specific topics on http://blades85.com.hope that helps.
|
SuperG
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1371
- Joined: 2012/10/19 16:09:18
- Location: Edgewood, NM
- Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces?
2013/10/13 19:18:39
(permalink)
I've used both the AlphaTrack and FaderPort - both are reasonable choices if you're looking for a simple 1-fader plus transport type of control. I suppose I prefer the FaderPort, although on paper the AlphaTrack looked more deluxe - I like the tactility on the FaderPort better. Just sold the AplhaTrack on eBay the other day... don't need 'em both.
|
Leadfoot
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2817
- Joined: 2011/04/26 11:08:38
- Location: Indiana
- Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces?
2013/10/13 19:28:09
(permalink)
Tom, I'm curious about your problems with Faderport. I'm running X3, and my Faderport is working perfectly. Have you tried reinstalling the drivers for it?
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces?
2013/10/13 19:28:28
(permalink)
I like my Mackie Control.
|
SuperG
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1371
- Joined: 2012/10/19 16:09:18
- Location: Edgewood, NM
- Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces?
2013/10/13 21:54:56
(permalink)
Leadfoot
Tom, I'm curious about your problems with Faderport. I'm running X3, and my Faderport is working perfectly. Have you tried reinstalling the drivers for it?
I'm running the latest firmware - no problems. Faderport can go 'readonly' if the outport setting in the surface controls settings dialog isn't set to FaderPort. This can happen once in a blue moon if the FaderPort is not connected when you start Sonar, or for some reason the USB driver got corrupted in memory for some reason. It just requires setting it correctly again. 
|
vladasyn
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1092
- Joined: 2005/02/05 00:33:23
- Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces?
2013/10/13 21:59:31
(permalink)
|
Photo_G
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 124
- Joined: 2010/04/12 09:40:22
- Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces?
2013/10/13 22:28:00
(permalink)
SONAR Platinum (FOREVER!), 64-bit Windows 8.1 Pro, AMD FX-8320 CPU, 32GB RAM, M-Audio USB interface, Yamaha KX8 keyboard
|