Octa-Capture or RME Babyface?

Author
Fabio Rubato
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 500
  • Joined: 2006/09/01 21:51:29
  • Location: Australia
  • Status: offline
2013/10/14 03:34:35 (permalink)

Octa-Capture or RME Babyface?

I've had a Creative X-Fi Elite Pro soundcard for around 10 years now. It's served me pretty well over a number of Sonar incarnations, however, I've been plagued by blue screens time and time again. I've had a couple of different computers, which I've put together and am now running an i7 quad core, 16gs of ram, raid Raptor hard driver. It's a pretty grunty system and along with Win7 64bit, it's been my most reliable and powerful system for Sonar - now X3.
 
Back to the blue screens, after submitting crash dumps, getting help from tech support etc, the cause remains elusive, but most likely related to X-fi.
 
So after some research, budget considerations, flexibility, low latency need etc, I'm looking at either a octa or BabyFace. Both seem pretty good. I mostly work with soft synths, Maschine Mk2, A-800 Pro midi keyboard and do a bit of vocal recording via a Joe Meek Twin Q, digitally configured in the Elite.
 
Are there any owners who might give me some feedback on these cards? I've seen some other similar posts, but I'm also hoping for someone to tell me if either card is going to provide better sound recording quality over the Elite?
 
Appreciate any thoughts here.
 
 
#1

10 Replies Related Threads

    anotherzen
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 20
    • Joined: 2011/06/30 17:42:40
    • Status: offline
    Re: Octa-Capture or RME Babyface? 2013/10/14 04:37:10 (permalink)
    I have been using the Babyface for some time now and i must say i am very happy.
    RME is always early out with drivers and always have rock solid drivers.
     
    The only problem i have with the Babyface is that the headphone output is not the
    most powerfull, so if you are using some headphones that require some umf! to get
    loud, it will only give you reasonable volume. I'm using the AKG Q701, and tho it does
    give me somewhat enough volume when i turn it up to max, i would have liked just a bit more :)
     
    I do not however have any experience in recording live stuff, never used the line-in/gitar/mic stuff.
     
    #2
    mudgel
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12010
    • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
    • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
    • Status: offline
    Re: Octa-Capture or RME Babyface? 2013/10/14 07:27:22 (permalink)
    Sorry to say but Creative.cards may be acceptable for basic home use, but not for quality recording.and mixing. No doubt youve had great service from your card but it is really night and day compared to what you are looking at now.
    Once you get to hear the sound out of a Babyface or the Octa youll be amazed.

    The choice comes down to.the number inputs and outputs you want simultaneously. I would take the Babyface as i know from experience how good RMEs hardware and drivers are.

    Mike V. (MUDGEL)

    STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
    PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
    Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
    Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
    Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
    Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
    Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
    #3
    musicroom
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2421
    • Joined: 2004/04/26 22:31:02
    • Status: offline
    Re: Octa-Capture or RME Babyface? 2013/10/14 07:34:06 (permalink)
    Those are two fine interfaces with lots of users here. You should hear from some of the Roland users here today as well. 

     
    Dave
    Songs
    ___________________________________
    Desktop: Platinum / RME Multiface II / Purrfect Audio DAW  I7-3770 / 16 GB RAM / Win 10 Pro / Remote Laptop i7 6500U / 12GB RAM /  RME Babyface



     
     
    #4
    MarioD
    Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 901
    • Joined: 2006/04/15 15:59:50
    • Status: offline
    Re: Octa-Capture or RME Babyface? 2013/10/14 09:24:59 (permalink)
    Hi Alan,
     
    You have a PM.

    The reason people say the vinyl sounds better is because the music was better.
     
    Sonar Platinum, Intel i7 –2600 CPU @ 3.2 GHz, 16 GB ram, 2x2TB internal drives and 1 1TB internal drive, Radeon HD 5570 video card, HP 25" monitor,
    Roland Octa Capture, MOTU Midi Express 128, Win 10 Pro

     
    www.soundcloud.com/Mario_Guitar
    #5
    bz2838
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 366
    • Joined: 2010/10/16 14:44:50
    • Status: offline
    Re: Octa-Capture or RME Babyface? 2013/10/14 10:29:17 (permalink)
    go with RME for their drivers.........

    Purrrfect Audio:  Intel i7 7700k (Kabylake), 32Gig DDR4/2133, Windows 10x64 Pro, USB RME Babyface, Sonar Platinum Current
    #6
    Milamber
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 148
    • Joined: 2008/10/08 10:21:48
    • Location: Dallas
    • Status: offline
    Re: Octa-Capture or RME Babyface? 2013/10/14 10:55:22 (permalink)
    I have been using an RME Fireface 800 for about 4 years now and can attest to the quality of their A/D, D/A converters.  I have never had any trouble with drivers and have updated them on several occasions.  RME has always been early to provide drivers for the operating systems they support.  In terms of capturing external audio RME is very good.
    #7
    Guitarpima
    Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4125
    • Joined: 2005/11/19 23:53:59
    • Location: Terra 3
    • Status: offline
    Re: Octa-Capture or RME Babyface? 2013/10/14 11:44:06 (permalink)
    Either the Octa-Capture or the RME is a great choice. I have had great success with my OC and would recommend it highly. From what I've read, RME comes highly recommended as well.

    Notation, the original DAW. Everything else is just rote. We are who we are and no more than another. Humans, you people are crazy.
     
     Win 7 x64  X2  Intel DX58SO, Intel i7 920 2.66ghz 12gb DDR3  ASUS ATI EAH5750  650w PSU 4x WD HDs 320gb  DVD, DVD RW Eleven Rack, KRK Rokit 8s and 10s sub
    #8
    wizard71
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 836
    • Joined: 2012/02/12 05:45:05
    • Location: UK
    • Status: offline
    Re: Octa-Capture or RME Babyface? 2013/10/14 12:29:51 (permalink)
    +1 for octa but you won't go wrong with either, both fantastic units.

    http://www.youtube.com/SpaceTimeAces
    https://soundcloud.com/space-time-aces
    Sonar Platinum - Win 8.1 x64 - Haswell 4770k - ASrock Z87 pro3 - 32gb ram - Fractal design R4 case - 3x HDD 1 USB 2.0 external 1x cr M4 ssd for samples - Octa-capture - Sontronics Aria - Sontronics STC-1s - BX8 monitors - ARC 2 system - Kawai CA63 piano - Kawai MP6 Stage piano - Fender custom Telecaster FMT - Yamaha LL6 - Fender P bass


    #9
    Sanderxpander
    Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3873
    • Joined: 2013/09/30 10:08:24
    • Status: offline
    Re: Octa-Capture or RME Babyface? 2013/10/14 14:00:30 (permalink)
    RME over Roland for sound quality and driver stability no question. Octacapture only if you need that amount of simultaneous analog I/O (which would require an ADAT converter on the Babyface).
    #10
    Fabio Rubato
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 500
    • Joined: 2006/09/01 21:51:29
    • Location: Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: Octa-Capture or RME Babyface? 2013/10/14 21:53:47 (permalink)
    Hey guys, thanks for your advice. It would seem that both cards feature quite well, with the RME coming off a little better in terms of sound and driver stability...and in the end, it's the sound quality/stability I'm chasing. I'm not needing to record a great amount of things simutaneously at this point.
     
    Very helpful and thanks again.
     
     
    #11
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1