AnsweredGetting more and more frustrated with Sonar

Author
James P
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 51
  • Joined: 2012/10/15 16:37:14
  • Status: offline
2013/10/30 12:38:41 (permalink)

Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar

The more I work with Sonar, the more buggy I'm finding it

Say I'm working on a simple small looped section of a track with just a Stylus RMX loop and a midi piano riff, the timing seems to drift occasionally so they're not in sync with each other.

There's no massive sample libraries here, just a simple looped section with a couple of tracks. The loops are perfectly programmed (in terms of timing) and sometimes they play OK, just randomly drifting. This is Sonar X1 Producer on a new PC that was custom built by a specialist audio PC builder late last year. I upgraded from Sonar 3 to X1 and despite the jump in features, it seems buggier than it ever was before and more of a PITA to work with.  I seem to spend huge amounts of time troubleshooting when I just want to be writing music...

I haven't really read up on X3 but have seem some positive feedback - has the audio engine been rebuilt? Is it more stable generally? I just don't know whether it's worth upgrading again or to just call it a day with Sonar and switch to a platform that might be more stable.

Grrr :(
 
 
#1
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 13:58:24 (permalink)
more info here man.
are you saying your using sonar x1 ?
if so have you installed the patches, they go all the way up to x1D
and they take care of a lot of problems,
 
what are your specs there ?
soundcard ?

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#2
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 13:59:42 (permalink)
ps- sonar x1 has become solid, with those 4 patches it was very solid indeed.
so have some faith. no worrys.

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#3
mettelus
Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5321
  • Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
  • Location: Maryland, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 14:07:20 (permalink)
+1
 
http://www.cakewalk.com/Support/product.aspx/SONAR-X1
Definitely get all the patches to X1d if you do not already have them.
 
As for X3, I think the general consensus has been a very stable release for SONAR.

ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
#4
James P
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 51
  • Joined: 2012/10/15 16:37:14
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 14:14:14 (permalink)
Hi Charlie,

Yep, I installed all the patches as the first thing I did, so I'm all the way up to X1D Expanded. Soundcard is a Focusrite 8i6 with all latest drivers. PC is an Intel i7 3.50 GHz, 8GB ram, 64 bit Win 7.

An upgrade to X3 is another £160 (about $250) and I paid £200 about a year ago to go from Sonar 3 to X1. It was a big jump forward in terms of extra features but feels like a step back in terms of stability and workflow. So I don't know if it's worth sticking with Sonar - it just doesn't feel stable to me to warrant throwing more money at it.

Guess I'm just having a rant really but feel a bit let down with Cakewalk.

James 
#5
MachineClaw
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1116
  • Joined: 2012/10/08 00:15:28
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 14:38:24 (permalink)
You might have more luck getting help if you put in the title trouble with X1 Pro and Stylus RMX timing.
 
How many outs are you using in Stylus RMX (each loop /channel in RMX takes ram loading samples). 
 
Do you have the latest eversion of RMX installed?
 
Do you have sync tempo checked in RMX?
 
understand your frustrated but what is "drifting"???  Latency issue?  randomized notes?
 
hard to help someone when most of their post is a rant about how much frustration they have using a product and aren't considering upgrading to newest version - without detailing the original problem more.
 
X1d Pro was very stable for me.  Rock solid, no trouble with my Saffire 24 Pro interface or Stylus RMX.   X3b has been faster and even MORE stable for me.
#6
karma1959
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 515
  • Joined: 2008/10/31 10:56:29
  • Location: Brooklyn, NY
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 14:56:29 (permalink)
As others have said, X1d is generally quite stable.  Can you provide more detail about your configuration?  What are your MIDI buffers set to, etc?

Sonar Platinum x64 on Win10 64, Dell T7400 w/ 8 Xeon cores, 8 Gbyte RAM, 3 hard drives, RME Fireface UFX, UAD-1, Mackie Control, Adam A7X
#7
scook
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 24146
  • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
  • Location: TX
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 15:02:56 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby James P 2013/10/30 19:45:16
Could this be another case of needing to run the metronome to prevent MIDI drifting out of sync?
#8
DavePoole
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1
  • Joined: 2013/10/25 11:04:52
  • Location: Essex, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 15:10:32 (permalink)
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the same problem I had, but from what you say it sounds like it might be:
 
I noticed a similar problem when using Isotope iDrum, but only when using multiple outputs.  The drums seemed to gain a beat or two after each loop iteration.  I didn't get a great deal of help from Cakewalk at the time, but through trial and error discovered that it was, or seemed to be, due to not using the separate outputs contiguously.By that I mean using, say, outputs 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 rather than 1-5. Using a single output, or consecutive additional outs cured the problem. I thought it was a problem with the VST at first, but have seen a couple of similar posts since so think it may be Sonar after all.
 
I'd be very interested to find out if this works for you or not
 
Cheers,
Dave
 
#9
James P
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 51
  • Joined: 2012/10/15 16:37:14
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 17:13:00 (permalink)
OK, I appreciate all the help - I'll try and clarify it more but to be honest, this particular problem is just one of loads of little issues I get with Sonar, which is why I didn't give every last detail. Even if I can fix this, there are still so many things that slow down my workflow and mean I'm trying to work around software issues rather than composing.

On this particular issue, I'll give the simplest example:

First, everything is patched to its latest version - all soundcard drivers are most recent, all updates to Sonar applied, all Win 7 updates applied, all updates to Stylus applied. I even have new shoes on.


Let's say I have a simple 2 bar loop which contains 1 track of midi piano (say Truepianos, but it's not specific to that VSTi) playing a simple repetition of 8 quarter notes (quantized exactly on the beat). Then on another track I have a 2 bar loop of a generic Stylus RMX loop (again, it's not particular to any loop). I set the loop region to those 2 bars and start playback. For the first few times it plays the loop around, the 2 parts will be perfectly in sync, but slowly on successive cycles the timing starts to drift so they're no longer in time with each other. The Stylus loop will now be out of time with the piano loop (maybe a few split seconds behind) and it gets progressively worse.

* this example is with one midi channel being routed to one stereo audio output in Stylus
* tempo sync is checked in Stylus
* tried various midi playback buffer sizes including 100/250/500/1000 milliseconds

scook - thanks, I tried your suggestion of switching on the metronome and if I do that, they do seem to stay in time with each other. Strange but not really something I can (or should have to) do in a real world example. 

Yet another issue this reminds me of, looping is rarely seamless - I'll often hear pops at the start/end of a looped region. Even if there are no effects/reverb tails to cause it and the audio (or midi) has perfectly trimmed loop points. Sometimes it will loop without clicks, other times it won't, using the exact same source.

All these 'sometimes', 'ifs' and 'buts' are frustrating just make it a complete pain to work with. I just want something solid to work with so I can get on with my job of composing :(  


#10
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 17:21:45 (permalink)
You've probably checked this, but when looping, your clips MUST be an exact length in measures.
 
A tick or 2 off in either direction will mess with the timing

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#11
James P
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 51
  • Joined: 2012/10/15 16:37:14
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 17:42:28 (permalink)
Yep, looped exactly on the dot. 
#12
Silicon Audio
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 346
  • Joined: 2012/03/06 04:33:19
  • Location: Northland, New Zealand
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 17:48:15 (permalink)
Is your timing master in your audio settings the same pair you are using for your main outs?  I have had some funky issues when it's set to another output pair.

"One of the great and beautiful things about music and recordings in general is that legacies live on" - Billy Arnell - April 15 2012
#13
James P
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 51
  • Joined: 2012/10/15 16:37:14
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 17:59:40 (permalink)
Silicon Audio
Is your timing master in your audio settings the same pair you are using for your main outs?  I have had some funky issues when it's set to another output pair.




Yep :)
#14
scook
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 24146
  • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
  • Location: TX
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 18:40:08 (permalink)
James P
 
scook - thanks, I tried your suggestion of switching on the metronome and if I do that, they do seem to stay in time with each other. Strange but not really something I can (or should have to) do in a real world example.

If it solves the problem why not use it? Mute the metronome bus if you do not want to hear it.
#15
James P
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 51
  • Joined: 2012/10/15 16:37:14
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 19:12:52 (permalink)
scook
If it solves the problem why not use it? Mute the metronome bus if you do not want to hear it.



You're right of course. Don't know why, I just didn't think of muting the metronome bus. I will do that and thanks for the heads up (how did you find that out BTW???)

But this is typical of the sort of bugs I keep coming across that I have to stop and ask for help on. It's stupid that I should have to enable the metronome but then mute its bus in order to fix a timing bug. Do you know if this been fixed in X3?
#16
scook
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 24146
  • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
  • Location: TX
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 19:26:16 (permalink) ☼ Best Answerby James P 2013/10/30 19:44:56
The subject comes up every now and then (sometimes twice in the same day http://forum.cakewalk.com/FindPost/2921460) and the solution has been around just as long. Now that you know, it is a simple matter to never turn the metronome off, just mute it. 
 
I have not installed X3 so have no first hand experience with it but the link above reported a similar issue in X3b. Not sure if I would have tested looping with the metronome off since muting the metronome is part of my workflow.
post edited by scook - 2013/10/30 19:33:25
#17
James P
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 51
  • Joined: 2012/10/15 16:37:14
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 19:44:42 (permalink)
scook
The subject comes up every now and then (sometimes twice in the same day http://forum.cakewalk.com/FindPost/2921460) ...


That's funny - it is the exact same issue and from the look of that post, it is still happening in X3. Anyway, will make sure I make it part of my workflow too from now on. Thanks again - good catch!

Incidentally if anyone's interested, I've just noticed that this also helps with a related problem I was having where some 32 bit VSTi's cause a click when playing back a looped section. You have to install jbridge (as opposed to bitbridge) and then do the enable & mute metronome and the clicking in the looped section disappears. So obvious really ;) 
#18
brundlefly
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14250
  • Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
  • Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 20:20:07 (permalink)
Yes it's been reported against X3 by a few people already, but it makes me crazy seeing all these complaints about it because I have never been able to reproduce it in any meaningful way. The "best" I could do was a sync error of 40 milliseconds after 180 iterations (!). And I could not get it to happen with loop boundaries on beats. Also it went away when I switched to 44.1kHz from my usual  48kHz.
 
Some others have reported it went away when they switched from WDM to ASIO driver mode, so that's worth trying. I checked out WDM driver mode with my first couple interfaces that also supported ASIO, and WDM exhibited sync issues when restarting playback in the middle of a project, so I went with ASIO and never looked back.
 
Bitbridge's adding an extra empty buffer of audio is another issue, but it shouldn't be an issue in this case since Stylus is available as 64-bit native plugin.

SONAR Platinum x64, 2x MOTU 2408/PCIe-424  (24-bit, 48kHz)
Win10, I7-6700K @ 4.0GHz, 24GB DDR4, 2TB HDD, 32GB SSD Cache, GeForce GTX 750Ti, 2x 24" 16:10 IPS Monitors
#19
James P
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 51
  • Joined: 2012/10/15 16:37:14
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 20:38:02 (permalink)
brundlefly
Also it went away when I switched to 44.1kHz from my usual  48kHz.
 
Some others have reported it went away when they switched from WDM to ASIO driver mode, so that's worth trying. 
 
Bitbridge's adding an extra empty buffer of audio is another issue, but it shouldn't be an issue in this case since Stylus is available as 64-bit native plugin.


Before trying scook's solution I tried just about everything and it made no difference to me - 44.1/48khz as well as WDM/ASIO. The metronome solution definitely fixes the drifting for me - hope the bakers make a note of that as it does seem to affect others as well.

The jbridge/bitbridge thing wasn't actually Stylus-related (which as you say is 64bit) but a different 32bit VSTi - I only mentioned it because I noticed it was also fixed by the metronome (in conjunction with using jbridge).   
#20
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 20:46:48 (permalink)
Not to be too rose-colored glasses here, but the more you dig into any piece of software the more likely you'll find quirks. Or in some cases, pilot error...at the risk of public embarrassment, one thing that really screwed me up when cutting and pasting pieces of audio with the intention of creating repeating audio was that the lengths never seemed to be quite right. Then when fooling around in preferences I saw that snap defaults to snapping to audio zero crossings. Once I unchecked that, the lengths were spot on.
 
As to the slippage issue, I too have not been able to reproduce regardless of the metronome setting but I couldn't tell you why I don't experience it any more than I could tell you why you do!

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#21
James P
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 51
  • Joined: 2012/10/15 16:37:14
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 20:55:45 (permalink)
Yeah, I'm not expecting perfection, I just don't want to keep getting bogged down with technical issues when it's hard enough dealing with musical composition! But ever since I upgraded to X1 it feels like whatever I do, I find something new and annoying that slows me down. And I've been using Sonar for over a decade now! I guess everyone has different ways of working and a lot of the things that irritate me may not even be noticeable to others.
 
And I remember doing the same thing as you years ago with regards cutting at snapped audio zero crossings!
#22
Paul P
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2685
  • Joined: 2012/12/08 17:15:47
  • Location: Montreal
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 23:08:19 (permalink)
brundlefly
Yes it's been reported against X3 by a few people already, but it makes me crazy seeing all these complaints about it because I have never been able to reproduce it in any meaningful way.



How many copies of Sonar are sold compared to the number of members here ?  How are those others going to figure this kludge out, by divine revelation ?
 
At least one aspect of the bug isn't hard to reproduce.  Just throw together a few midi notes in the PRV and then define a short loop somewhere over them.  With the metronome off, every few iterations a note will drop out until there's nothing left.
 
That's the problem with at least X2.  A newbie like me gets all excited and tries out a new trick and immediately hits a bug, wastes hours wondering what the heck is going on, come on here and finds out the bug has been around for years.
 
I'm beginning to sound like Beepster maybe it's because I see his point.
 

Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
#23
brundlefly
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14250
  • Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
  • Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 23:31:02 (permalink)
Paul P
At least one aspect of the bug isn't hard to reproduce.  Just throw together a few midi notes in the PRV and then define a short loop somewhere over them.  With the metronome off, every few iterations a note will drop out until there's nothing left.
 



Sorry Paul, but this simply isn't true. For me, and I believe for the vast majority of users, this issue is not reproducible.

SONAR Platinum x64, 2x MOTU 2408/PCIe-424  (24-bit, 48kHz)
Win10, I7-6700K @ 4.0GHz, 24GB DDR4, 2TB HDD, 32GB SSD Cache, GeForce GTX 750Ti, 2x 24" 16:10 IPS Monitors
#24
Paul P
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2685
  • Joined: 2012/12/08 17:15:47
  • Location: Montreal
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 23:51:11 (permalink)
brundlefly
Sorry Paul, but this simply isn't true. For me, and I believe for the vast majority of users, this issue is not reproducible.




I guess I must have received a special copy of X2  :-)

Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
#25
brundlefly
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14250
  • Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
  • Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
  • Status: offline
Re: Getting more and more frustrated with Sonar 2013/10/30 23:57:56 (permalink)
I think it's pretty clear that it's the environments that differ, not the application.

SONAR Platinum x64, 2x MOTU 2408/PCIe-424  (24-bit, 48kHz)
Win10, I7-6700K @ 4.0GHz, 24GB DDR4, 2TB HDD, 32GB SSD Cache, GeForce GTX 750Ti, 2x 24" 16:10 IPS Monitors
#26
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1