Reposting 'reversing reverb?' with actual audio (fuzzy vs brighter cello)

Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
cksh.simon
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 41
  • Joined: 2011/03/09 18:35:37
  • Status: offline
2013/11/15 17:45:36 (permalink)

Reposting 'reversing reverb?' with actual audio (fuzzy vs brighter cello)

https://www.dropbox.com/s/kkv5h7gggncrm1j/fuzzy%20vs%20bright%20cello.wav
In my earlier post I asked about how to make a cello sound brighter
and here is the link for audio comparison (WAV file in a dropbox link nothing dangerous)
 
The first sound is the fuzzy cello
The second cello sounds brighter
 
I was hoping to know how to get from the first sound to the second
Can somebody who have experience in mixing give a little bit of an advice?
#1

5 Replies Related Threads
    maximumpower
    Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 731
    • Joined: 2011/05/13 19:14:34
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re: Reposting 'reversing reverb?' with actual audio (fuzzy vs brighter cello) 2013/11/15 18:14:21 (permalink)
    Is that in your public folder? I can't get to it. I get an error when I click the link.
     
    In case you don't know... move it to your public folder in the dropbox. Right click the file (if using Windows explorer) and select "copy public link".

    Win 10 (64 bit), i7-2600k 3.4GHz , 8 GB RAM, SATA III (500GB SSD - System, 2TB WD Black - Data), Sonar Platinum x64, m-audio Profire 610

    #2
    cksh.simon
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41
    • Joined: 2011/03/09 18:35:37
    • Status: offline
    Re: Reposting 'reversing reverb?' with actual audio (fuzzy vs brighter cello) 2013/11/15 18:26:15 (permalink)
    Is there anyone having any issue with downloading? The link should work. I have tried on other devices. From what I know dropbox lets you share a file with a link whether it's in a sharing folder or not.
     
    #3
    maximumpower
    Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 731
    • Joined: 2011/05/13 19:14:34
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re: Reposting 'reversing reverb?' with actual audio (fuzzy vs brighter cello) 2013/11/15 20:16:30 (permalink)
    It is working now. Earlier I kept getting an error.

    Win 10 (64 bit), i7-2600k 3.4GHz , 8 GB RAM, SATA III (500GB SSD - System, 2TB WD Black - Data), Sonar Platinum x64, m-audio Profire 610

    #4
    konradh
    Max Output Level: -42 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3325
    • Joined: 2006/01/16 16:07:06
    • Status: offline
    Re: Reposting 'reversing reverb?' with actual audio (fuzzy vs brighter cello) 2013/11/15 22:20:52 (permalink)
    What is the source of the cello sound?  It goes by pretty quickly, but seems to sound good.

    Konrad
    Current album and more: http://www.themightykonrad.com/

    Sonar X1d Producer. V-Studio 700. PC: Intel i7 CPU 3.07GHz, 12 GB RAM. Win 7 64-bit. RealGuitar, RealStrat, RealLPC, Ivory II, Vienna Symphonic, Hollywood Strings, Electr6ity, Acoustic Legends, FabFour, Scarbee Rick/J-Bass/P-Bass, Kontakt 5. NI Session Guitar. Boldersounds, Noisefirm. EZ Drummer 2. EZ Mix. Melodyne Assist. Guitar Rig 4. Tyros 2, JV-1080, Kurzweil PC2R, TC Helicon VoiceWorks+. Rode NT2a, EV RE20. Presonus Eureka.  Rokit 6s. 
    #5
    cksh.simon
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41
    • Joined: 2011/03/09 18:35:37
    • Status: offline
    Re: Reposting 'reversing reverb?' with actual audio (fuzzy vs brighter cello) 2013/11/16 09:14:12 (permalink)
    The first cello is eastwest symphonic orchestra with a lot of EQ. Their strings sound very good except for the huge exception of cellos..
     
    The second cello is LASS. they sound realistic but are tricky to work with..
    #6
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1