davdud101
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1058
- Joined: 2010/07/15 13:30:44
- Location: Detroit, MI
- Status: offline
Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
So I have two questions. I know that every connection in the signal chain add a little bit of noise to the signal... But I've heard that longer cables tend to [do something malevolent that don't remember and am not quite sure of]. So with that in mind, is it better to use longer cables (in the case that they're needed, for space and stuff) with fewer splits in the chain, or... what? Second question: Why are my preamps so noisy? I mean, I know my SingStar USB-Audio Converter is a toy, so I'm sure that plays into it, but I've been reading up and I don't really understand; what difference does a preamp make? Why are some preferred over others (mostly in high-end pres)? I know that last question is pretty stupid, but I've never worked with preamps or even real audio interfaces, so I'm still learning and waiting for cash to upgrade and SEE the difference. Thanks!
Mics: MXL 990, MXL R80, 2 x MXL Tempo XLRs, Cobalt Co9, SM48, iSK Starlight Cans: Hifiman HE4XX, AKG M220 Gear: Cakewalk BBL - PreSonus Firepod - Alesis Elevate 3 - Axiom 49 DAW: Win10, AMD FX-8300, 16GB DDR3
|
spacealf
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2133
- Joined: 2010/11/18 17:44:34
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/05 14:58:21
(permalink)
If the cables are balanced then I fail to see any noise increase over shorter lengths, maybe live where cable runs are much longer in aspects. In pre-amps you usually get what you pay for, and in the electronics hooking it up all together. In the end the EIN is the lowest noise you can have over a bandwidth of frequencies, so it is all relative on how you end up learning your equipment and finding how it works and the best you can set it to. The more you pay for equipment, the usually better it will be - simple fact is "Let the Consumer Beware". But there is a point where the more you pay you are paying for preceived differences no one may actually hear. A relatively good cable is about the best you can get unless you go and pay quite a big hike in price more, which most people would shrug off as marketing hype. If the equipment is made good at any price point and if you use the equipment the best it can be used, then the only difference between better equipment and cheaper equipment, will be what you perceive you hear and the difference that actually is. The only way usually to tell is to hear it and the reasons why the better equipment is better - more variance in input and output so home equipment to me is still only home consumer equipment whether it states it is pro or not, but if you are going to build a studio and spend hundreds of thousands of dollars then yes, that is going to make a difference then a few thousands spent for home consumer so-called pro equipment. People still pick out what they can afford and what they hear with the equipment and the rest I guess is left to those who have a track record or so-called golden ear to hear some of the difference. Without the equipment in the signal chain to keep it all great equipment or just the norm equipment then price jump for the equipment may just keep you getting what you can for your budget. And spending money on equipment usually was not done first by being in music, but working at something else like being a business leader or engineer or one of the pro professions. But even then good enough equipment can be bought by a good working person also nowadays if you have time left to spend on it. Well, in all fairness I am not sure what you meant by your questions and to me home consumer equipment although it can be good will never equal a adequate set-up professional studio. The professional studio has more equipment in the end it can pull out to make a recording with and quite expensive equipment and although the home consumer equipment can reach there in a sense, it usually has been the same for many a many years ever since sound recording came about being. Well, like usually usual, I plan to make no sense in trying to explain it, experience and reading will give yourself a better answer then ever I can give you. It is not the age, it is the mileage! You can not be a jack of trades with everyone with even the Beatles or the Rolling Stones, they may listen and still it will be the same as anything else - some will like it, some will not, and some and probably a lot will not even care. Yet there will be serious people and funny people playing music and those who you may never consider that do a night club act in various places like Las Vegas or Branson MI, or any of the other places or around the world. I am not sure what I am talking about anymore, so I take my leave.
post edited by spacealf - 2014/01/05 15:06:07
|
spacealf
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2133
- Joined: 2010/11/18 17:44:34
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/05 15:27:43
(permalink)
For sure the vocals she recorded will use a better microphone than I ever will buy and I am sure no one who did this was concerned about cable length when recording on their equipment, although usually she is the only one who did the singing and backup parts also. https://soundcloud.com/imogen-heapBut that was a while back now (years ago) so I don't think she is even thinking about it anymore. I did it much later for the yucks of it I guess. And that will be that. It still is in my signature for some dumb reason, because I have other work to do and I guess I just am not doing that much right now. Her vocal tracks and beat track are still there on the bottom if you wish to download and have at it.
post edited by spacealf - 2014/01/05 15:29:24
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/05 16:46:15
(permalink)
Get the appropriate legnth balanced cables you required. I don't know if your soundcard mic in is balanced, probably not. But every connection is a chance for something to go wrong (cables seldom break in the studio before connections). You are discovering why people pay good money for good stuff, though. Your best bet is for online cables, guitar center and such put a premium on "last minute" items, when you need something for a show or finish recording. So get 2 - one as a backup. Good preamps cost money too. Many (not all) professional preamps use transformers at $100 a pop. So it adds up. There are professional transfomerless preamps, and most interface preamps don't have preamps. But they are good, fully spec'ed preamps. I doubt the soundcard preamp is up to any musical standard. Even if you get a good signal out of it, it will be fuzzy, indistinct. A better preamp is easier to set. Has more gain. And simply sounds better, more like what was in the room. Even those on a garden variety music interface. Unless you know what you are listening for, the better preamps don't sound that much better, even w/ the "sound" of transfomers. That is the last 5 or 10% people talk about. But plenty of good acoustics have been captured with interface preamps. @
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/05 18:32:26
(permalink)
With regards to cables and length: Transmission over high impedance connections degrade very quickly with length. Not only do they lower in level and SNR as the resistance increases with length but they also alter in frequency response as the capacitance in the cable increases with length. High impedance connections are common with home stereo gear, consumer grade keyboard outputs, and guitar gear. This gear works best with short cable runs. A great lesson is to compare a very long guitar cable and a very short guitar cable with a high impedance guitar amp input. You will see that the guitar cable forms part of the tone circuit. Transmission over low impedance connections degrade much less and can maintain quality over very long lengths. Furthermore most low impedance music equipment uses balanced wiring so that any noise that accumulates on the long cable runs is negated by the balancing cancellation. The important point I'd like to make for you is that when some one says "balanced" cables, the pertinence with regards to your question about length is that the balanced cables are also part of a "low impedance" rather than high impedance connection. __________________ With regards to "splits in the chain": All electro-mechanical connection points increase resistance and that degrades the signal a tiny little bit so less connectors or adapters etc. is better than more connectors. __________________ With regards to preamp noise: That's a subject that you can spend years and years learning about. To simplify, there are numerous places for noise to enter the system in a preamp circuit and many of the solutions are well known but involve expense that many people do not appreciate so as an end user you are presented with gear that fits all budgets and grades. Many of the techniques used to minimize noise also provide subtle characteristics to the audio content and so even after the noise issue is minimized there are characteristics to the sound quality that are directly related to the issue of noise avoidance or suppression. Designers have choices about the use of transformer or transformerless audio coupling, linear or non linear power supplies, discreet or monolithic topology, etc. etc. etc. etc. Great questions... keep thinking about this stuff and the ideas will slowly start coinciding with what you hear when you work with the gear. best regards, mike edit spelling
post edited by mike_mccue - 2014/01/07 09:06:19
|
spacealf
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2133
- Joined: 2010/11/18 17:44:34
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/05 20:06:31
(permalink)
Yes, I was mainly typing about low impedence connections. High impedence (guitars and cords) are another subject. Then you get into Sound System Engineering - like football stadiums and such and line voltages and other factors to consider or with extra-large concerts and places like Carnegie Hall and other sound system venues. All different and engineered with respect to that.
|
rumleymusic
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1533
- Joined: 2006/08/23 18:03:05
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/05 23:28:59
(permalink)
No worry on balanced cables. At 1000ft the capacitance of a standard mic cable will decrease the amplitude .2db at 20kHz. Rather insignificant. I run hundreds of feet of cable regularly with no discernible noise or degradation to the signal.
Why are preamps noisy? Because they amplify the signal thousands of times, and the noise floor of the electronics will be amplified as well. (at 80dB of gain the signal multiplication factor is over 10,000!) If you are using a cheap USB preamp it will not have enough power to achieve a low noise floor. In terms of audio, more power, and more wasteful consumption of power equals better performance, faster attacks, and lower noise. Good preamps will cost $500-$1000 per channel and will be "gas" guzzlers. Worth it if you need to amplify something above 50dB.
|
The Band19
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2795
- Joined: 2012/05/29 19:21:32
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/06 00:10:34
(permalink)
I have short balanced cables and nice pre-amps :-) A UA LA-610 and an Avalon 737 VT (Love them both like my children)
Sittin downtown in a railway station one toke over the line.
|
Starise
Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7563
- Joined: 2007/04/07 17:23:02
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/06 11:08:36
(permalink)
Second question first- Why are preamps so noisy? If you could get something like a Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 for around 100 bucks you would be ahead. Heck, maybe get used for a lot less. There is a chance you got a dud. For anyone half serious about recording the Sing Star probably won't cut it entirely, even if it works ok right now. Some other things that tend to cause head aches in the small studio are poorly or incorrectly grounded electrical outlets and cheap microphones .If the ground lug isn't to the panel you can pick up 60 cycle hum or if you live in the UK it is 50 cycles. This seems to be even more noticed on less quality equipment because it isn't well shielded. Gain staging is a big thing too. If I plug a passive bass into a mediocre pre amp I'll need to turn it up pretty high to hear the bass which will introduce hiss at the higher ranges of the pre- amp.There is a threshold where you can see the hiss on an oscilliscope. The sweet spot on the pre- amp can usually be heard. If you hear hiss, turn it down slightly until the hiss is almost gone. Pre-amps like the ones in the Scarlett are pretty good. You can drive them up there to a decent level. On a cheaper pre amp you won't hear that bass guitar until the hiss is really loud. Gain staging can help. If you run the bass into a bass amp and then take the output from the back into your interface, you won't need to drive your pre amp as hard because you have "staged" the inputs. You can further work with that staging inside of Sonar with the software gain controls and the software controls that come with some interfaces . This is the way to do things "on the cheap" . The guys with the expensive well built gear don't have many problems with this because they are using top notch well designed pre amps that can be driven until you go deaf before you hear any hiss. But you don't need to spend that kind of money as there are lots of decent audio interfaces out there for not a lot of money. Question 1- Is cable length important? Yes and no. If you are in a bedroom studio, then the lengths you are dealing with are not likely to be a concern, Anything 20' and under isn't a concern as long as you keep the cables away from sources of electrical noise. Balanced Mike cables can go for long distances. Since most home studio cables are not longer than 20' and they are balanced ( XLR connections) AND they are usually shielded there isn't usually any issue with noise related to the cables.Providing your microphones and cables are ok as in grounded. The high impedance cables CAN pick up noise and length is important. The shorter the better and the further away from electrical interference the better.These are the cables coming from keyboards and guitar effects, usually using a 1/4" phono connector. These are shielded too but they are more susceptible to noise and interference.These kinds of connectors on microphones mean you have a really cheap mic. I would throw that sucker right out the window. Anything called an "electeret" microphone is a waste of good plastic.
Intel 5820K O.C. 4.4ghz, ASRock Extreme 4 LGA 2011-v3, 16 gig DDR4, , 3 x Samsung SATA III 500gb SSD, 2X 1 Samsung 1tb 7200rpm outboard, Win 10 64bit, Laptop HP Omen i7 16gb 2/sdd with Focusrite interface. CbB, Studio One 4 Pro, Mixcraft 8, Ableton Live 10 www.soundcloud.com/starise Twitter @Rodein
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/06 12:03:28
(permalink)
quality preamps and quality cables makes good sense for investment if you are serious about recording. everytime you improve either, or both, you make better sonic choices. don't use cables any longer than you need. i have mine custom made to order. they are cheaper than off the wall cables.
|
wst3
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1979
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:28:11
- Location: Pottstown, PA 19464
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/06 13:50:36
(permalink)
spacealf Then you get into Sound System Engineering - like football stadiums and such and line voltages and other factors to consider or with extra-large concerts and places like Carnegie Hall and other sound system venues. All different and engineered with respect to that. Hmmm... not at all actually! The fundamentals for a proper sound system design change very little from critical listening system to small club to large arena. 1) Clean power and a cleaner ground system 2) Proper interconnection - and at the risk of being run out of town, there is only one proper interconnection scheme - a balanced source (does not have to be symmetrical) driving a balanced input, with the shield properly terminated on both ends. 3) Quality cable - not esoteric cable, quality cable, meaning sized properly, and without a drain wire. There are debates about Reussen vs braided shields, but both work well. 4) Proper gain structure - as pointed out earlier, 60 dB of gain is not uncommon in a microphone preamplifier. That's a 1000:1 ratio, so every little noise is going to be boosted 1000 times - that's a challenge! Proper equipment design plays a large role, but even the best design can be brought to its knees if gain is not applied well. It really is that simple... but of course the devil is in the details. Specific Answers: davdud101I know that every connection in the signal chain add a little bit of noise to the signal... That's mostly an old wives tale - passive components do not have a noise figure, and do not add noise to a system. Really bad interconnections, however, can do all sorts of bad things, from adding noise to rectifying the signal. Use good connectors and this is a non-issue. davdud101But I've heard that longer cables tend to [do something malevolent that don't remember and am not quite sure of Another old wives tale - sorta! For a high Z source, especially driving a high Z input, cable capacitance can be a factor. For modern, voltage transfer designs you have a source Z of very nearly zero, driving an input impedance of no more than 20 times that. Long cables are not a problem. davdud101 So with that in mind, is it better to use longer cables (in the case that they're needed, for space and stuff) with fewer splits in the chain, or... what? It depends! There is no right answer. davdud101Why are my preamps so noisy? Can't answer that. Some preamplifiers, even well thought of models, can be noisy. davdud101what difference does a preamp make? Noise, distortion, timbre, you name it. No two preamplifier designs will sound identical. davdud101Why are some preferred over others (mostly in high-end pres)? A lot of it, ok, well to be fair some of it is pure snobbishness. The truth is, an API preamplifier sounds different than a Neve, or a Urei or a Millenia Media or a Grace or a Hardy or a Great River or a... It is largely a matter of taste, and experience. In general, I think I can hear the difference between a low cost preamplifier and one that commands a higher price. Real world differences do exist, chief amongst them are headroom, quality of the power supply, and of course topology. davdud101I know that last question is pretty stupid Geez I am such a buzz-kill... but again, no, there are really no stupid questions! All that said - it is quite possible to make a really good recording with modest gear. It is all about learning to use what you have to the best of its capabilities. And you learn that by asking (dumb??) questions here.
-- Bill Audio Enterprise KB3KJF
|
spacealf
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2133
- Joined: 2010/11/18 17:44:34
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/06 14:05:00
(permalink)
"Then you get into Sound System Engineering - like football stadiums and such and line voltages and other factors to consider or with extra-large concerts and places like Carnegie Hall and other sound system venues.All different and engineered with respect to that.Hmmm... not at all actually! The fundamentals for a proper sound system design change very little from critical listening system to small club to large arena." Well, yes it does in a football stadium and arena type stadium. There are books on Sound System Engineering, and college courses to become a Sound Engineer and measurements in places like Carnegie Hall and other places like that. They just do not hire the hook up a band in a night club people, they hire Professionals in those places. And they do not use balanced cables, they use line-voltage cables with 26,400 whatever watts to run it all plus anything else they need. I do have a book on it, and even the formulas used are quite extensive. http://www2.jblpro.com/products/installed/http://www2.jblpro.com/index.html http://www2.jblpro.com/catalog/general/Installations/Default.aspx Now in your local small type church you may get by with it, but if they want it done like some people want it done, they pay, pay, and pay for professionals to figure it all out before giving them a price and doing the work. Lest you be 40 feet up hooking up those speakers to cover an area in a church or any place like that. But nowadays I suppose a lot of people think they are a recording engineer (except only in their own brain and those they can convince). Will it be done by people like that, well yes, but still the person is going to have to know something about any of it. (and still convince others to spend the bucks on it).
post edited by spacealf - 2014/01/06 14:12:46
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/06 14:42:57
(permalink)
Bill made a real good point. When I was speaking of "low impedance" connections I forgot that it is 2014, and as Bill explained, impedance bridging rather than impedance matching has become the norm. That means my explanation about "low impedance" is dated and not really an explanation of what you are most likely to encounter now a days. I got schooled again. Happy to have it happen! Thanks for being gentle. :-) edit grammar
post edited by mike_mccue - 2014/01/06 15:12:59
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/06 14:54:33
(permalink)
Hi Spacealf, It seems as if you are speaking about constant voltage sound systems. That's a technology for playing back or presenting sound through arrays of loud speakers spaced throughout a facility. Large venues routinely use balanced interconnections for low level signal communications. I work in football stadiums and on golf courses as a sound technician frequently. At golf tournaments we lay down many miles of line level balanced cable so that the microphones strewn around the course can be pott'd up when the director cuts the camera shots to the various locations. Football stadiums are similar. Some permanent installations have adopted digital interconnection over stuff like Cat5 cables too. best regards, mike
|
wst3
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1979
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:28:11
- Location: Pottstown, PA 19464
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/06 15:04:48
(permalink)
what Mike said - Constant Voltage (High Impedance) loudspeaker systems are used to minimize the I*R losses in the loudspeaker wiring. you wrote: And they do not use balanced cables, they use line-voltage cables with 26,400 whatever watts to run it all plus anything else they need. I do have a book on it, and even the formulas used are quite extensive. The wattage is determined by the transformer taps and the voice coil impedance, the current is a function of the system resistance and the impressed voltage, and the nominal impressed voltage is 70V. Please re-read the JBL documents, I am very familiar with them, and they do not say what you quoted. 70V lines can be balanced or single ended. AND, you would NEVER want to use a 70V loudspeaker in a critical listening environment - the transformers cause all sorts of problems! (I did install 70V sub-woofers in a very high end hotel ballroom. It sounded a lot better than I expected, but the size, weight, and cost of those subs was ridiculous, still don't know why they did that.) That said, I have designed some very large systems (one is the largest CobraNet system in the USA), and more than a couple recording studios, a handful of broadcast facilities, and even a couple houses of worship and nightclubs. The fundamental principles I mentioned above apply to ALL of these projects. And sticking to these basics saved my bacon on several occasions! Sometimes they do hire the "hook up the band" guy for medium sized projects - this often works to their disadvantage<G>! For the bigger projects they do hire guys with degrees and 30 years experience, not because the fundamentals are different, but because the complexity is mind blowing. Especially when the loudspeaker count reaches into five digits... I haven't tackled anything like that yet, but it would be fun. My point, which clearly I did not make, is that all you need to do is learn the basics, and then you can apply them to any audio system. You might stumble around in the dark for a bit on a larger design (heaven knows I did), but you'll get there!
-- Bill Audio Enterprise KB3KJF
|
davdud101
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1058
- Joined: 2010/07/15 13:30:44
- Location: Detroit, MI
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/06 15:25:37
(permalink)
Dang. this is some dense information... The way I understand it, impedance is the amount of power needed to raise the signal to line level? If not, could someone explain that? And MY GOODNESS, I see it. The preamps found in my BOSS BR-532 are very clean, enough that I cannot hear noise when monitoring thru them! I mean in comparison to the toy, it's like night and day! And I still get a nice signal, not too quiet. This proves the degree to which I need to purchase a USB interface REALLY soon...
Mics: MXL 990, MXL R80, 2 x MXL Tempo XLRs, Cobalt Co9, SM48, iSK Starlight Cans: Hifiman HE4XX, AKG M220 Gear: Cakewalk BBL - PreSonus Firepod - Alesis Elevate 3 - Axiom 49 DAW: Win10, AMD FX-8300, 16GB DDR3
|
wst3
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1979
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:28:11
- Location: Pottstown, PA 19464
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/06 15:47:30
(permalink)
davdud101 Dang. this is some dense information... The way I understand it, impedance is the amount of power needed to raise the signal to line level? If not, could someone explain that? Impedance is the opposition to alternating current flow (measured in ohms and frequency dependent) Resistance is the opposition to direct current flow (measured in ohms) Voltage is the potential difference between two points (e.g. in a circuit, across a battery), measured in volts Current is the flow of electrical charge through a circuit, measured in Amperes (columbs/second) Power is the rate of doing work, measured in Watts (Joules/second) Energy is the ability to do work, measured in Joules You can, to a degree, ignore Energy and Charge, but it is a good idea to get a grasp of power, voltage, current, and resistance/impedance... and especially the relationships between them: Voltage = Current * Resistance (or impedance) Power = Voltage * Current Have fun!
-- Bill Audio Enterprise KB3KJF
|
spacealf
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2133
- Joined: 2010/11/18 17:44:34
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/06 16:12:01
(permalink)
Well, its been years since that book and I took something else but had taken calculus and such in college way back. It's way beyond usually what is perhaps the usual home setup. And yes speaker connections and mic hookups yes are different or can be even down to the gauge of wire used to hook up your speaker system at home depending. I think a lot of home studios are usually at the low end of the totem pole so to speak with equipment that can be used to make a recording or anything else in the recording field, unless one has thousands of dollars to put into it, then it probably would not be used for home personal recording use, but have to be a business. Things will change that is for sure. It's not like I going to have this type of studio anytime soon or ever. Sardines in a can. (a little humor). (and where is the cello at). Well, that studio has been brought up before here. It will never happen for me. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exQRfHbSwn0
post edited by spacealf - 2014/01/06 16:14:22
|
rumleymusic
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1533
- Joined: 2006/08/23 18:03:05
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/06 16:20:13
(permalink)
Yeah impedance is just another name for resistance in most cases. The difference between line levels and mic levels is really just voltage and the impedance standards for each allow the current to flow reliably from interface to interface. Bridged connections mean the receiving end has a resistance of ideally 10x the source. 220ohm to 2200ohm for mic level and 1000ohm to 10khm for line level. This is to maximize the voltage which is what modern transistors rely on. Matched impedance with the same input and output resistance are for maximizing power (watt) transfer for devices like radio transmitters or older tube electronics.
|
rumleymusic
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1533
- Joined: 2006/08/23 18:03:05
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re: Noisy Preamps and Lengthy Cables
2014/01/07 13:27:47
(permalink)
And yes I just realized last night I quoted instrument cable instead of line level impedance, which usually has an output impedance of 100 to 440+ ohms and an input impedance of around 10,000 ohms in some cases.
|