SonarX1: Problem with allocating memory (SonarX1 with EWQL)

Author
rock117
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4
  • Joined: 2013/12/23 11:46:56
  • Status: offline
2014/01/08 01:04:31 (permalink)

SonarX1: Problem with allocating memory (SonarX1 with EWQL)

Hi guys,
    I  ran into problem when I used VST - EWQL in 4-5 tracks. There was error message:                .
 
...and then I cannot insert any more soft synths. I was wondering if I did sth wrong. Actually as I work, I always go to soft synth and choose to insert "EWQL instrument" in everytime I created a new track - it is right to do this ?.  
I'm a beginner for SonarX1 and it's first time to use VST plug in. I have no idea what I should do. Help me please
 
Thanks  
post edited by rock117 - 2014/01/08 02:55:32
#1
Bajan Blue
Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2029
  • Joined: 2005/09/15 20:54:56
  • Location: Barbados & Cape Town
  • Status: offline
Re: SonarX1: Problem with allocating memory (SonarX1 with EWQL) 2014/01/08 04:22:39 (permalink)
Before anyone can help we would need to know full machine specifications - ie 32 or 64 bit, processor, ram, soundcard etc.
Cheers
Nigel
 
 

Nigel
Check out the first single from our new Album, On Top of the World
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTLVCOeTcTc
 
Check out our latest videos on
http://www.youtube.com/user/DevineLie/videos
 
Check out our website
www.devinelie.com
 
#2
dcumpian
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4124
  • Joined: 2005/11/03 15:50:51
  • Status: offline
Re: SonarX1: Problem with allocating memory (SonarX1 with EWQL) 2014/01/08 08:25:04 (permalink)
While specs would certainly help, I can say that EWQL uses the Play engine and supports multiple Midi channels. Most soft synths do. So you only need to add a single instance to the Synth Rack and then map your instruments to the proper Midi channel and connect a Midi track to that channel. Adding a synth per track will certainly run you out of memory. You can even have Sonar create the Midi tracks for you at the same time, though I don't ever do that myself.
 
Regards,
Dan
 

Mixing is all about control.
 
My music:
http://dancumpian.bandcamp.com/ or https://soundcloud.com/dcumpian Studiocat Advanced Studio DAW (Intel i5 3550 @ 3.7GHz, Z77 motherboard, 16GB Ram, lots of HDDs), Sonar Plat, Mackie 1604, PreSonus Audiobox 44VSL, ESI 4x4 Midi Interface, Ibanez Bass, Custom Fender Mexi-Strat, NI S88, Roland JV-2080 & MDB-1, Komplete, Omnisphere, Lots o' plugins.    
#3
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
Re: SonarX1: Problem with allocating memory (SonarX1 with EWQL) 2014/01/08 10:30:44 (permalink)
The message is self-explanatory: there wasn't enough RAM available to load the sample library.
 
This can happen on any system, regardless of specs, if the library's big enough. When it happens, there are usually ways to either reduce the memory footprint of the sample library or to reduce the amount of memory SONAR's using.
 
For example, an orchestral library may consist of multiple layers of samples, e.g. mid and far microphones. Using only the mid mics cuts RAM usage in half. Sometimes you have a choice of how many round-robins or velocity layers to use. Sometimes you can adjust the ratio of buffered versus streamed data. Sometimes you can purge unused samples. I'm not an EWQL user (dongle alergy) so I can't offer specifics.
 
If you're trying to use a single EWQL instance for an entire orchestra, you may have to split it into individual sections or instruments with a separate instance of EWQL for each. That will allow you to freeze individual sections/instruments upon completion, freeing the memory they were using.
 
But if you absolutely need all the instruments to be "live" because you're composing in MIDI, consider using a less-capable sample library for composing and then substitute the better library later for rendering. The TTS-1 is very lightweight so you can have as many instances as needed for composing. If external hardware modules are an option, that's even better (my own preferred solution).
 
Some heavyweight orchestral composers go as far as running sample libraries on separate computers. You can even create a "farm" of multiple computers and have an unlimited real-time instruments. If you're Hans Zimmer or Danny Elfman you can afford to do that. We mortals have to be more imaginative.


All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
#4
MachineClaw
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1116
  • Joined: 2012/10/08 00:15:28
  • Status: offline
Re: SonarX1: Problem with allocating memory (SonarX1 with EWQL) 2014/01/08 12:58:48 (permalink)
Picture shows a Kontakt 5 error message.
 
which Kontakt 5 plugin are you using?  I think there are 3 plugins l/r out, 8 out, 16 out.
 
I don't know what EWQL is but unless it's a old EastWest product, which there were Kontakt versions of then all the updated or newer EW products are PLAY Engine only.
#5
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
Re: SonarX1: Problem with allocating memory (SonarX1 with EWQL) 2014/01/09 16:19:48 (permalink)
Picture shows a Kontakt 5 error message.

 LOL, I didn't pick up on that!
 


All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
#6
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1