Sonar 8.5 Studio vs X3 (w/o Studio)?

Author
johnlewisgrant
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 109
  • Joined: 2010/10/31 17:42:01
  • Status: offline
2014/04/03 12:08:02 (permalink)

Sonar 8.5 Studio vs X3 (w/o Studio)?

I can do this upgrade for $49...but as usual it isn't all that obvious whether for a guy like me, who only uses one piano sample with Sonar, plus a lot of audio and midi effects, whether x3 would be any faster, or "better" in some other way.
 
Workflow has always been a little cumbersome in Sonar 8.5: for example, loading a piano sample and effects every time I load a midi file is quite a few keystrokes.
 
Also, I NEVER did find "PERFECT SPACE" convolution in 8.5!!!   Not that there aren't plenty of free convolution packages out there (Like SIR).   Still, I have to wonder (after numerous re-installs and searches in various subdirectories for the .dll file) WHERE "Perfect Space" is hiding!
 
And would it be included in Sonar X3... the non-"studio" edition???
#1

8 Replies Related Threads

    scook
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 24146
    • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    Re: Sonar 8.5 Studio vs X3 (w/o Studio)? 2014/04/03 12:11:57 (permalink)
    Try the trial version to see if the workflow agrees with you. Here is a list of features for all versions of X3. Perfect Space is not part of the basic version of X3. The SONAR 8.5 advanced install option provides a way to install individual plug-ins.  If Perfect Space was bundled with SONAR 8.5 Studio, it should be in the advanced install plug-in list.
    post edited by scook - 2014/04/03 12:18:38
    #2
    johnlewisgrant
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 109
    • Joined: 2010/10/31 17:42:01
    • Status: offline
    Re: Sonar 8.5 Studio vs X3 (w/o Studio)? 2014/04/03 13:52:11 (permalink)
    If Perfect Space was bundled with SONAR 8.5 Studio, it should be in the advanced install plug-in list.
     
    That's what I can't get the answer to: was it part of the plug-in list?   I THOUGHT it was.  But can't find it.
     
    Those "trials":  oddly enough Basic trial actually downloads "Producer"!!!???
     
    JG
    #3
    scook
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 24146
    • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    Re: Sonar 8.5 Studio vs X3 (w/o Studio)? 2014/04/03 14:04:05 (permalink)
    I did find an article which indicates Perfect Space was a Producer exclusive ( http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/09/15/cakewalk-sonar-8-5-producer-sonar-8-5-studio-now-available/ ). Run the advanced install option, the list of installable plug-in is shown. I would imagine Perfect Space will not be listed. As best I can tell Perfect Space was a Producer exclusive through X2. Here is the a feature comparison of MC6 and the X2 series http://www.cakewalk.com/Documentation/default.aspx?Doc=Music%20Creator%206%20Touch&Lang=EN&Req=Comparison.html.
     
    Even though the trial version is the "Producer" version, ignoring the Prochannel the work flow is the same as the basic X3.
    post edited by scook - 2014/04/03 14:13:32
    #4
    lawp
    Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1154
    • Joined: 2012/06/28 13:27:41
    • Status: offline
    Re: Sonar 8.5 Studio vs X3 (w/o Studio)? 2014/04/03 14:14:01 (permalink)
    Definitely try the demo, the GUI is the biggest difference

    sstteerreeoo ffllllaanngge
    #5
    Grem
    Max Output Level: -19.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5562
    • Joined: 2005/06/28 09:26:32
    • Location: Baton Rouge Area
    • Status: offline
    Re: Sonar 8.5 Studio vs X3 (w/o Studio)? 2014/04/03 14:17:15 (permalink)
    scook
     
    Even though the trial version is the "Producer" version, ignoring the Prochannel the work flow is the same as the basic X3.



    I don't want to sound like I'm dogging CW, bur ain't it a great idea to only offer Producer as the trial demo?

    I mean, who's not gonna try all the features? I know I would!!

    And once you taste excess, everything else is just bland!!

    Grem

    Michael
     
    Music PC
    i7 2600K; 64gb Ram; 3 256gb SSD, System, Samples, Audio; 1TB & 2TB Project Storage; 2TB system BkUp; RME FireFace 400; Win 10 Pro 64; CWbBL 64, 
    Home PC
    AMD FX 6300; 8gb Ram; 256 SSD sys; 2TB audio/samples; Realtek WASAPI; Win 10 Home 64; CWbBL 64 
    Surface Pro 3
    Win 10  i7 8gb RAM; CWbBL 64
    #6
    johnlewisgrant
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 109
    • Joined: 2010/10/31 17:42:01
    • Status: offline
    Re: Sonar 8.5 Studio vs X3 (w/o Studio)? 2014/04/03 15:04:49 (permalink)
    Grem
    scook
     
    Even though the trial version is the "Producer" version, ignoring the Prochannel the work flow is the same as the basic X3.



    I don't want to sound like I'm dogging CW, bur ain't it a great idea to only offer Producer as the trial demo?

    I mean, who's not gonna try all the features? I know I would!!

    And once you taste excess, everything else is just bland!!

    Marketing.... Sigh...
    #7
    johnlewisgrant
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 109
    • Joined: 2010/10/31 17:42:01
    • Status: offline
    Re: Sonar 8.5 Studio vs X3 (w/o Studio)? 2014/04/03 15:16:12 (permalink)
    I did a quick search of all my .dll files and nothing shows up under "perfect" or anything close to it.   So "advanced install" just means that you can pick your own plugs.   Which I do anyway.   And perfect space doesn't show up on any list in 8.5 Studio.   Probably Producer.  Apparently it's not true stereo, anyhow (but can you hear the difference?)  
     
    Then again, I've heard some stuff on the net verbed with Bricasti m7--the hardware that is--and I think it's kinda totally spoiled me.   Not sure ANY soft verb compares.... but I'm happy to be proved wrong.
    #8
    johnlewisgrant
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 109
    • Joined: 2010/10/31 17:42:01
    • Status: offline
    Re: Sonar 8.5 Studio vs X3 (w/o Studio)? 2014/04/03 15:52:51 (permalink)
    Downloading the trial version as I write.  Delivered special to my mailbox, "use in 48 hours or it dies", they say.
     
    Something tells me that I did this a couple of years ago: so I don't think they're giving me extra time (beyond the 30 days it sat on my computer, while I was doing other stuff and never got to it).
     
    Convolution software I divide into 2 categories: the one's designed to run real time, if at all possible, and the ones that are post recording effects, where IR file size is pretty much irrelevant.  
     
    Wouldn't it be great to have both.... maybe then the software could really compete with the high-end hardward verbs (Bricasti, etc.)
    #9
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1