Flashart
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 23
- Joined: 2010/10/24 04:26:39
- Status: offline
Building a PC for Sonar?
Okay, I've started this new thread now I've decided that getting a laptop was a bad idea. (I guess I was seduced by thoughts of being able to sit in a tree or whatever, and write midi!) A friend can build me a PC but I need to know what to tell him to put in. Budget wise if you aim for about $700 (I'm in the UK, so around £500), I don't need a monitor or a mouse or keyboard. What type of hard drive? How much RAM? What kind of soundcard? Anything else you can think of?
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 09:23:20
(permalink)
I use Sonar on my laptop at times. It can work. I usually have to disable the battery and stuff like that, but I make it work. I always use a laptop when recording in bars or at friends houses. I do have a desktop. It has computer parts in it ;-) I don't have a sound card. I use an interface that is external to the PC. I have 16 GB of RAM. I don't believe I need that much, but the 4 I have in my laptop is insufficient. My video card is fanless. Fans make noise. If the computer is going to be in the same room as the source you are recording, it helps if the computer makes as little noise as possible. There are some things that can get in the way of smooth recording, but it helps to know what those things are for you. No point ordering a tweaked PC if you are going to promptly untweak it. :-) Personally, I'm interested in one of those slates... maybe something like this... http://www.dell.com/us/p/dell-venue-11-pro/pd?refid=dell-venue-11-pro&baynote_bnrank=0&baynote_irrank=0&~ck=baynoteSearch&isredir=trueThat I could put on a music stand at the show and mix the band from the stage.
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|
robert_e_bone
Moderator
- Total Posts : 8968
- Joined: 2007/12/26 22:09:28
- Location: Palatine, IL
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 10:51:47
(permalink)
I build PC's for folks all the time, here in the USA. You need: CasePower SupplyMotherboardCPUMemoryHard DriveOptical DriveMouseKeyboardOSApplication SoftwareVideo capability There are considerations: 1. Intel or AMD CPU, and specifically, which model from either brand? The one you choose will affect which motherboards you can look at, due to the socket type the CPU is (different CPUS's have different mechanisms for plugging into the motherboards, so you have to be careful to make sure they are compatible. In addition, as far as I am still aware, an Intel chip is generally considered a bit faster than an AMD CPU, but they are not that far apart (from last time I checked). BOTH Intel and AMD routinely have 'sales' where you can save $40-$50 if you buy a 'bundle' where you get a CPU and one of a few selected motherboards to go with it. Intel is generally a bit faster, but AMD-based machines are quite capable of performing well with running Sonar. An example of this - I was just at a local superstore for computers and computer parts, called Micro Center, and they had an AMD bundle with a 3.9 Ghz Dual-Core CPU that came with a FREE motherboard. I looked at that bundle, but declined to get it because the motherboard had no USB 3 support, and also only had SATA II support, rather than SATA III. This meant it had some performance bottlenecks not conducive to the audio streaming requirements that Sonar needs to do. Point above is that while the deals are GREAT, you need to make sure you know what you are getting. The better bundle choice motherboard for that particular CPU was about $30 more, and had both USB 3 and SATA III support. The combination of that CPU and a much better motherboard STILL cost only $92 together. I will toss out approximate costs for the various components, and you can adjust any one of them upward or downward, to meet your needs and budget: $30-$50 midi-tower case - look for front-panel USB 3 ports and ability to add fans (or already there) $25-$90 500 watt power supply, I generally get one in the $35 range. Quieter is good (CPU and motherboard will be discussed further below) $70-$330 depending on choice $70 for 2x4GB, $140 for 4x4GB, $160 2x8GB $330 for 4x8GB (I suggest starting with 16 GB of memory, configured as 2x8GB strips, where the motherboard can support 2 more 8GB strips at a later time, if desired, bringing you eventually up to 32 GB of memory, if needed. You may find that 16 GB is plenty, and never upgrade, but if you DO want to upgrade, having the 16 GB only needing 2 slots means you don't have to get rid of memory to upgrade, just add 2 new strips) $65 - $225 or more for Hard Drive(s). For a new machine, a 240GB SSD would be great for the primary disk drive - to contain the OS and applications. These are currently running around $100-$150. This is what I run. I have a 2nd drive that is a regular 7,200 RPM SATA III 2 TB drive, and that runs just under $100, and is both reliable and plenty fast enough. I hold Sample libraries, additional Cakewalk content, and documents and pictures and all of that on this drive. I happen to have an additional drive, also a regular 7,200 rpm SATA III 2 TB drive, and I keep all of my Sonar projects on this drive. There is NO NEED to have this many drives - I do it this way because I ended up with an extra 2 TB drive from a computer I bought to part out from a guy, so I went ahead and used it. Many folks combine Sonar Project data and sample libraries and such onto a single drive, with one other drive for their OS and applications. I ran like that for a long time, and had no performance bottlenecks. Having the 3rd drive is gravy to me. I WILL say that using an SSD for the primary drive is a nicety, also not needed, but since a 240 GB costs around the same as a 2 TB non-SSD drive, and both have way more room than is needed for the OS and applications, why not go ahead and get the SSD? $15-$20 Optical Drive (CD/DVD)$5-$20 Mouse$5-$30 Keyboard$ whatever market price is OS, either Windows 7 or Windows 8/8.1 - Please note that Microsoft allows transfer from your old computer to your new one, so you may not have to buy a new copy of Windows. $ Sonar X3 and any synths/effects and other Application Software, or transfer existing Sonar version to new computer, so you may not need to buy a new version of Sonar, unless you want to, of course. Video capability - Some CPU/Motherboards have on-board graphics, if not, you can either move an existing video card from your old computer to the new one, or you can lok at picking up a new one, from around $50 on up to as much as you want to spend. PLEASE NOTE - lost of folks freak out on buying the baddest kick butt graphics cards they can squeeze into their computer chassis. I used to do that as well, until I finally just went back to using LITERALLY the on-board graphics on my most powerful i7-based computer, and I run 1 VGA connection to one monitor, and 1 HDMI connection to a 2nd monitor. This works just fine for me, so as far as I am concerned, save your money for a better interface, or East West Strings, or pay some bills. :) There are lots and lots of choices, and I hope I have given some idea of some the things you need to decide and balance. Here is a link to the AMD 'bundles' page for Micro Center, where if you pick up an AMD CPU, you get a nice discount on a bundled motherboard to go with it. SUPER deals, really: http://www.microcenter.com/site/products/amd_bundles.aspx And the Intel 'Bundles' page also at Micro Center: http://www.microcenter.com/site/brands/intel-processor-bundles.aspx Just make sure to look at ALL the specs for both a given CPU and an associated motherboard. (USB 3, SATA III, number of cores, processor speed, etc. I believe AMD would be a MUCH better bang for the buck. Not quite as fast as an Intel i7, but still PLENTY fast and powerful enough to run Sonar. I hope some of the above is of any assistance. Please also note that I left monitors out of the discussion, assuming you would be using an existing monitor with the new chassis. For reference purposes, a 32" HDTV makes a wonderful display monitor, and runs somewhere at or less than $200. Bob Bone
Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!" Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22 Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64 Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms
|
AGBFunkyBassman
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 32
- Joined: 2014/05/08 02:46:36
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 11:57:52
(permalink)
My PC will be 4 years old in august and part of the reason I dont put my system spec in a footer is that I'll get depressed when comparing it with everyone elses !, that and the fact I dont think it really matters what you get. I bet that's got a few people bristling ! ..... I have a quad core Intel I5 with 4MB of ram and can honestly say that I've never maxed out my CPU when I used to use Cubase.... got to about 60% with some projects once all FX inserted, admittedly once all the midi was converted to audio I would 'Freeze' any Soft Synths samplers to free up CPU. Sonar seems to compare well although I expect its not been taxed too much as my biggest project so far is a 30 audio track, 5 Buses, 30 inserted FX, & 2 softsyths piece that has all 4 cores showing under 25% . I'm sure the experts will give you what's technically the best spec, and there will be multiple opinions on what to prioritise the funds on, however at the end of the day your machine will be able to record far more tracks than the beatles had in abbey road !!! On a personal note I allways figure that upgrading every 5 years or so means your new machine has much more CPU power than its predecessor so even If I have a bad choice Im still going to be in a better position the before
|
robert_e_bone
Moderator
- Total Posts : 8968
- Joined: 2007/12/26 22:09:28
- Location: Palatine, IL
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 13:00:19
(permalink)
My current high-performance computer is 3 1/2 years old - works great. You do not NEED the most insane machine made to run Sonar quite comfortably. You do want to use 7,200 rpm SATA III disks or SSD, but either one is fine, and I would save that while 4 GB will run things, I would recommend starting with 8 GB with an ability to add additional memory as needed, up to either 16 GB or 32 GB. An AMD quad-core, or even a dual-core running near 4 Ghz, or an Intel i3 or better, with at least 4 GB of memory, and 2 hard drives (one for OS and programs, and the other for sample libraries and Sonar projects), and you should be OK for most projects. If you end up running into performance problems, adding memory should clear things up, and of course if disk I/O is the issue, then perhaps adding an additional disk and further splitting samples from projects would help. The above should suffice for folks for starting out, and as noted, you can always improve performance as needed. Make sure you have a drive dedicated to backups, and that you DO take periodic backups as appropriate for your needs. Bob Bone
Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!" Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22 Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64 Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms
|
Flashart
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 23
- Joined: 2010/10/24 04:26:39
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 13:06:49
(permalink)
I've already got a 1TB external hard disc, can I use that for anything?
|
perfectprint
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 862
- Joined: 2010/01/02 02:21:12
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 13:32:27
(permalink)
|
robert_e_bone
Moderator
- Total Posts : 8968
- Joined: 2007/12/26 22:09:28
- Location: Palatine, IL
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 13:38:14
(permalink)
Is it a USB 2, or USB 3, SATA II, or SATA III? Also, what is the spin rate (7,200 rpm?) For sure it could function as a backup drive, but it might instead be able to be used to hold samples or projects, if it can transfer data quickly enough. I use a USB 3.0 external drive (2 TB), for backups, and I also happen to have a hot-bay in the computer's case, that allows me to simply plug a regular SATA III disk straight into the external bay, giving me a super-fast extra data drive, essentially giving me endless storage capacity, as long as I have additional drives to plug in to that bay and swap out when they get full. It's pretty sweet, and transfers just as fast as my internal SATA III drives. (I also use this drive bay when I scrub other folks's hard drives for malware and viruses). Bob Bone
Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!" Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22 Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64 Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms
|
rsinger
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 387
- Joined: 2007/08/25 14:34:57
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 14:50:20
(permalink)
If your friend isn't familiar with building DAWs and you use an intel chip have them disable C1e in the BIOS.
Sonar Platinum, 64 bit, win 7 pro - 64 bit Core i7 3770k 3.5 Ghz, 16 Gb Ram, 480Gb + 256Gb SSDs, 1 Tb Velociraptor, Echo AudioFire4
|
Flashart
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 23
- Joined: 2010/10/24 04:26:39
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 15:16:33
(permalink)
rsinger If your friend isn't familiar with building DAWs and you use an intel chip have them disable C1e in the BIOS.
What does that do?
|
Paul P
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2685
- Joined: 2012/12/08 17:15:47
- Location: Montreal
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 15:59:52
(permalink)
rsinger If your friend isn't familiar with building DAWs and you use an intel chip have them disable C1e in the BIOS.
My bios just says "C states" that can be enabled/disabled/autoed. Disable Speedstep as well (should be nearby C states), that made quite a difference on my system latency-wise. Both are power saving features that are useful, so maybe leave them enabled until you notice a problem.
Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
|
rsinger
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 387
- Joined: 2007/08/25 14:34:57
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 16:00:25
(permalink)
C1e is an enhanced C1 state. C1 is an idle state - if the cpu isn't doing anything it will go idle, which is fine, but when it's enhanced the voltage is also lowered and when the chip wakes up it takes some time for the voltage to rise. If you have an audio driver monitoring an incoming signal or you're recording a signal that may not keep the cpu from going idle and if C1e is enabled you'll get pops, crackles, etc if you try to run quicker than the idle state voltage. I have an i7 3.5 gHz cpu in my DAW and the default setup has C1e enabled, watching the behavior of the chip with ASUS utilities even while I was monitoring an audio signal the cpu would throttle down to 1.4 gHz or something. This was with the microsoft power management stuff set with the min and max values to something like 80% & 100%. I disabled the C1e state and kept the MS power managment stuff set - that way it can throttle back to cool off, but not nearly as much as it was. Just setting the microsoft PM range without disabling C1e did not work on my ASUS mobo. The microsoft performance tools don't give you an accurate reading of the cpu, if you don't have utilities from your mobo manufacturer you need something like the intel power gadget. Start Sonar, enable an audio track so you're monitoring it and then watch the cpu and see how far it throttles back.
Sonar Platinum, 64 bit, win 7 pro - 64 bit Core i7 3770k 3.5 Ghz, 16 Gb Ram, 480Gb + 256Gb SSDs, 1 Tb Velociraptor, Echo AudioFire4
|
rsinger
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 387
- Joined: 2007/08/25 14:34:57
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 16:12:22
(permalink)
Paul P My bios just says "C states" that can be enabled/disabled/autoed. Disable Speedstep as well (should be nearby C states), that made quite a difference on my system latency-wise. Both are power saving features that are useful, so maybe leave them enabled until you notice a problem.
I'm pretty sure I just disabled C1e in the BIOS and kept speedstep enabled - I think with the AUS mobo I have when speedstep is enable you can control the range (min max) with the microsoft power management feature. I'm a little overclocked, it will turbo up to 4.2, so I want it to be able to throttle back a little since I built it in a quiet case with just one case fan.
Sonar Platinum, 64 bit, win 7 pro - 64 bit Core i7 3770k 3.5 Ghz, 16 Gb Ram, 480Gb + 256Gb SSDs, 1 Tb Velociraptor, Echo AudioFire4
|
Paul P
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2685
- Joined: 2012/12/08 17:15:47
- Location: Montreal
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 16:20:51
(permalink)
rsinger I'm pretty sure I just disabled C1e in the BIOS and kept speedstep enabled - I think with the AUS mobo I have when speedstep is enable you can control the range (min max) with the microsoft power management feature.
That sounds useful and I'll give it a try. I can't say I like the idea of running my CPU full blast all the time, when I'm idling more often than not. Going in and out of the bios is a bit of a pain.
Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
|
robert_e_bone
Moderator
- Total Posts : 8968
- Joined: 2007/12/26 22:09:28
- Location: Palatine, IL
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 17:25:00
(permalink)
My PC has been at 100% for about 3 years now, and if it dies I will get a faster CPU and do the same with that one too. I do have it liquid cooled, but it will still likely die prematurely, due to running at full blast. I try to balance it all out by driving only about 7,000 miles a year, and raking the leaves , rather than burning. Bob Bone
Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!" Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22 Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64 Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms
|
slartabartfast
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5289
- Joined: 2005/10/30 01:38:34
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/15 23:43:09
(permalink)
I am pretty much on board with BBone except I see no reason to use an SSD, and since 7200 rpm hard drives are fast enough for audio, there is no need for SATA 3. You are unlikely to find a contemporary board that does not have SATA 3 in any case, but you will not see any improvement with that connection unless you are running a fast SSD. USB 3 is handy if you are running an external drive (eSATA is functionally equivalent) for anything but backup, but you are better off putting the drive inside the case anyway unless you are using it for backup. The money you save by not using an SSD will give you enough to buy three good sized hard drives, which may possibly give you a meaningful performance advantage that you will not see from an SSD.
|
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8424
- Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/16 00:45:08
(permalink)
If your friend actually knows what they are doing and is up to date with the latest configurations. The few things they need to get right is the 7200 RPM hard drive NOT green either. go for quiet components when possible. Careful with Video cards with fans, Some processor fans are small and loud,, Big slow moving fans are the ticket or better yet water cooling. The rest they can make their own decisions based on your budget. Sonar will run just fine on anything new that is built right. Shop in the middle ground. And once it's going run the DPCLAT test and optimize it for audio. Not a big deal most of the time.
|
robert_e_bone
Moderator
- Total Posts : 8968
- Joined: 2007/12/26 22:09:28
- Location: Palatine, IL
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/16 00:54:53
(permalink)
I only suggest an SSD for a primary drive, since many folks place only the OS and applications on that drive, so the cost of a 240 GB SSD is about the same as a 2 TB regular drive, and if that's all that will live on the drive the SSD drive is still plenty big enough. It's really not a big deal, either way - stay clear of green and split things across at least 2 drives and all should be well. Bob Bone
Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!" Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22 Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64 Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms
|
Mystic38
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1622
- Joined: 2010/08/30 17:40:34
- Location: Mystic, CT
- Status: offline
Re: Building a PC for Sonar?
2014/06/16 08:24:18
(permalink)
unless you know for sure your friend is a whiz.. go to ebay and get a higher end factory reconditioned PC .. the two computers in my studio were ~$700 each, but would have cost me closer to $900ea to build.
HPE-580T with i7-950, 8G, 1.5T, ATI6850, Win7/64, Motu 828 III Hybrid, Motu Midi Express, Sonar Platinum, Komplete 9, Ableton Live 9 & Push 2, Melodyne Editor and other stuff, KRK VXT8 Monitors Virus Ti2 Polar, Fantom G6, Yamaha S70XS, Novation Nova, Novation Nova II, Korg MS2000, Waldorf Micro Q, NI Maschine Studio, TC-VoiceLive Rack, 2012 Gibson Les Paul Standard, 2001 Gibson Les Paul DC, 1999 Fender Am Hardtail Strat, Fender Blues Jr, Orange TH30/PPC212, Tak EF360GF, one mic, no talent.
|