Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel

Author
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
2014/12/05 11:42:39 (permalink)
5 (13)

Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel

It's often useful to have more than one EQ on a track. For example, one before a compressor and one after.
 
Obviously, it's easy enough to achieve this with other EQ VSTs in the FX bin or an FX Chain module, but you know, the Quad Curve is really good and simple and flexible, and it would be nice to be able to use it in those cases.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
#1

21 Replies Related Threads

    stevec
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11546
    • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
    • Location: Parkesburg, PA
    • Status: offline
    Re: Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel 2014/12/05 12:00:40 (permalink)
    +7 (7)
    +1
     
    Even a "Quad Curve Junior" with just HP and LP would work OK, at least the majority of the time (for me).
     

    SteveC
    https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
    http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
     
    SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
    Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
    Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
     
    #2
    John T
    Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6783
    • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
    • Status: offline
    Re: Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel 2014/12/05 12:30:31 (permalink)
    +5 (5)
    For my purposes, I'd usually need the full thing. But actually, a simple filter module would be a good Pro Channel addition in itself.
     

    http://johntatlockaudio.com/
    Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
    #3
    FastBikerBoy
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 11326
    • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
    • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re: Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel 2014/12/06 03:25:45 (permalink)
    +2 (2)
    Yeah I like this idea. TBH it's strange we can't already given that we can with just about every other PC module.
    #4
    azslow3
    Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3297
    • Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
    • Location: Germany
    • Status: offline
    Re: Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel 2014/12/06 06:24:48 (permalink)
    0
    FastBikerBoy
    I fail to see what's wrong with the current set up. The PC is there for those who want to use it, and the FX bin is there for those that want that. Or a combination of both of course.

    (from http://forum.cakewalk.com/FindPost/3123977 )
     
    ProChannel in its current definition is the "next version" of "Effects", so has one EQ and one Compressor. You disagree with an idea to call in FX bin, but support an idea to make it FX bin
     

    Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro
    GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB
    RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc.
    www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
    #5
    Splat
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8672
    • Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
    • Location: Mars.
    • Status: offline
    Re: Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel 2014/12/15 21:53:49 (permalink)
    +5 (5)
    I would also add that I would like to be able to remove the quadcurve from the channel if I'm not using it.

    Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed.
    @48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38.

    Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
    #6
    FastBikerBoy
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 11326
    • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
    • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re: Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel 2014/12/16 12:50:35 (permalink)
    0
    azslow3
    FastBikerBoy
    I fail to see what's wrong with the current set up. The PC is there for those who want to use it, and the FX bin is there for those that want that. Or a combination of both of course.

    (from http://forum.cakewalk.com/FindPost/3123977 )
     
    ProChannel in its current definition is the "next version" of "Effects", so has one EQ and one Compressor. You disagree with an idea to call in FX bin, but support an idea to make it FX bin
     




     
    Eh? What has adding more than one PC EQ to the PC got to do with the FX bin? In addition my earlier post on FX bin wasn't a "disagree"  I can't see what is wrong with having both. That is still valid. Either are there to use as a user sees fit. I use both although the PC is my first preference. 
     
    I'd like to add a second EQ module to it though.
    #7
    azslow3
    Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3297
    • Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
    • Location: Germany
    • Status: offline
    Re: Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel 2014/12/16 15:02:37 (permalink)
    0
    FastBikerBoy
    Eh? What has adding more than one PC EQ to the PC got to do with the FX bin?
    ...
    I'd like to add a second EQ module to it though.

    There is always one (and only one) PC EQ because PC is not FX bin (yet) but old "effect" bin (by definition of the last one). In case EQ can be removed or duplicated, PC will be technically speaking FX bin with extra GUI support.
     
    What I want to say is that either we ask for full freedom in PC (the same way it is in FX now) or we ask to keep things as they are (PC is effect, FX bin is different). These approaches are (logically) mutually exclusive...

    Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro
    GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB
    RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc.
    www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
    #8
    FastBikerBoy
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 11326
    • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
    • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re: Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel 2014/12/16 15:11:06 (permalink)
    +1 (1)
    Yes but my point is - so what if there are two FX bins one of which has a different GUI?
     
    A user can ignore either or both or use either or both. Both can be hidden if they are not needed. Removing one just takes away a choice and undoubtedly a preferred workflow for someone.
     
    I'll have no problem with the FX bin being removed, I prefer using the PC because its focus stays with the current track. I just don't see the need to do that. What would it achieve? What bothers you so much about both being there? 
    #9
    azslow3
    Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3297
    • Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
    • Location: Germany
    • Status: offline
    Re: Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel 2014/12/16 16:47:58 (permalink)
    -1 (1)
    I do not bother at all... I have just got an idea that there is a small step to merge them to get the best from two worlds.
     
    2 FX bins, apart from confusion and endless "(why) are you (not) using PC?" discussions, only create artificial difference, preventing smooth transfer from one to another. Difficulties in combining both and long standing bugs in ProChannel related Control Surface API are 2 additional reasons why I prefer to see just one "Insert bin".

    Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro
    GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB
    RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc.
    www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
    #10
    sharke
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 13933
    • Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
    • Location: NYC
    • Status: offline
    Re: Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel 2014/12/16 17:23:12 (permalink)
    +2 (2)
    CakeAlexS
    I would also add that I would like to be able to remove the quadcurve from the channel if I'm not using it.


    I would like that as well, at least you can collapse it though.

    James
    Windows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
    #11
    mudgel
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12010
    • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
    • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
    • Status: offline
    Re: Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel 2014/12/17 04:47:05 (permalink)
    0 (2)
    Like any fx, we should be able to use multiple Pro Channel modules in any sequence we want.

    Mike V. (MUDGEL)

    STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
    PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
    Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
    Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
    Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
    Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
    Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
    #12
    Steve Lum
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 51
    • Joined: 2003/11/10 15:24:07
    • Location: Kirkland, WA
    • Status: offline
    Re: Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel 2015/01/26 01:02:55 (permalink)
    0
    Yeah, this just came up for me, exactly as mentioned above, wanting a quadcurve before AND after a compressor.  As I sat looking at ways to solve it and what EQ I would choose, I suddenly got confused about why there are two paradigms - an effects stack in the primary channel strip and then the add-on prochannel that you have to pop before or after the effect stack.  Then we have the work-around thing with the FX Chain, to let us weave non-prochannel plugs into the prochannel.  I am starting to feel like it really is a user interface design mess.
     
    In any case, I agree that we should be able to have more than one quadcurve in the PC.  I guess what I really wish for is a single container, perhaps designed visually like the prochannel, that could host any of the PC plugs as well "non-prochannel" plugs, without having to hide the non-PC plugs in a container.

    Steve Lum
    Asus Sabertooth X79 Intel Core i7-4820K 32GB Focusrite Saffire Pro 40
    #13
    ralf
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 205
    • Joined: 2010/11/27 05:36:43
    • Status: offline
    Re: Allow more than one Quadcurve EQ in the ProChannel 2015/01/28 18:36:27 (permalink)
    0
    All restrictions on the Pro Channel should be removed. Not only to use any number of instances of quad-EQ (including none). Also, the default bus and channel compressors exclude each other and are limited to a single instance. Tube saturaton is also limited to a single instance.
     
    I don't think there are any technical reasons for these limitations. It's just the idea of the Pro channel rebuilding a real console, where this kind of limitations would hold.
    #14
    Rasure
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 584
    • Joined: 2007/02/06 06:26:21
    • Location: UK
    • Status: offline
    Multiple instances of PC EQ 2016/06/08 03:28:12 (permalink)
    +5 (3)
    Multiple instances of PC EQ and/or at least a second striped down version for low/high cut or shelving.
     


    [ASUS Z97-K 3.30 gigahertz Intel Core i5-4590]
    [16 Gig Ram]
    [NVIDIA GeForce GTX1050 Ti 1920 X 1080]
    [Windows 10 Pro x64]
    [Sonar Platinum x64 Lifetime]
    [Studio One 4 Pro]
    [Notion 6]
    [Waves Mercury + Abbey Road & SSL Collection V10]
    [Mackie Onyx 400f]
     
    YouTube | 10% Off Waves | Rasuresphere II Omnisphere Library & Midi Stems
    #15
    tzzsmk
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 103
    • Joined: 2016/03/22 08:32:35
    • Status: offline
    Re: Multiple instances of PC EQ 2016/06/08 04:43:51 (permalink)
    +2 (2)
    actually I would really welcome if it was possible to "pin" the expanded view of the EQ, and be able to MOVE it around, so that way I could open multiple track EQs :)

    Core i7-5820K, ASUS X99-S, Kingston 32GB DDR4, EVGA GTX980Ti Classified, Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
    RME HDSPe AIO, RME Fireface 802, RME Octamic D, Seaboard RISE49, Presonus Eris E8, AKG K240 MKII, DELL U2713HM
    #16
    KyRo
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 543
    • Joined: 2010/09/22 23:45:29
    • Status: offline
    Re: Multiple instances of PC EQ 2016/06/09 19:38:56 (permalink)
    +1 (1)
    The ability to stack multiple ProChannel compressors would be nice, too!
    #17
    scook
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 24146
    • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    Re: Multiple instances of PC EQ 2016/06/09 19:50:10 (permalink)
    0
    It is possible except for the PC76 U-type and PC4K S-type bus compressor. They were written before the modular PC when there was only one slot for a compressor. All the other PC compressors do not have the original PC restrictions.
    #18
    KyRo
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 543
    • Joined: 2010/09/22 23:45:29
    • Status: offline
    Re: Multiple instances of PC EQ 2016/06/09 20:10:06 (permalink)
    0
    scook
    It is possible except for the PC76 U-type and PC4K S-type bus compressor. They were written before the modular PC when there was only one slot for a compressor. All the other PC compressors do not have the original PC restrictions.


    Sorry, scook, that's what I meant - multiple instances of the stock 76 and/or 4K compressors.
    #19
    jpetersen
    Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1499
    • Joined: 2015/07/11 20:22:53
    • Status: offline
    Re: Multiple instances of PC EQ 2016/06/11 10:15:31 (permalink)
    0
    Strange is that starting a blank project and adding a track will result in a totally empty PC. No QuadCurve, nothing.
     
    So a PC without the QC EQ is technically possible.
     
    But if you then add the QuadCurve, you cannot ever remove it again.
    #20
    Base 57
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 249
    • Joined: 2014/12/26 16:30:14
    • Status: offline
    Re: Multiple instances of PC EQ 2016/06/15 15:02:44 (permalink)
    0
    jpetersen
    Strange is that starting a blank project and adding a track will result in a totally empty PC. No QuadCurve, nothing.
     
    So a PC without the QC EQ is technically possible.
     
    But if you then add the QuadCurve, you cannot ever remove it again.


    I'm curious how you managed that. When I add an audio track to a blank project it always has default PC modules.
    #21
    ampfixer
    Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5508
    • Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
    • Location: Ontario
    • Status: offline
    Re: Multiple instances of PC EQ 2016/06/15 18:49:58 (permalink)
    0
    I have not seen a completely empty PC since X1 expanded. It was buggy back then but works like a watch now. No idea what Mr. Peterson is seeing or why.

    Regards, John 
     I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps.
    WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig,  Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6 
    #22
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1