Unsung Oscar Winners, "What The Hell Do Sound Mixers Do?"

Author
MandolinPicker
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 720
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 18:51:51
  • Location: Oxford, AL
  • Status: offline
2015/02/18 12:10:21 (permalink)

Unsung Oscar Winners, "What The Hell Do Sound Mixers Do?"

Found this interesting article over at Digg (http://digg.com/2015/what-is-sound-mixing). They are looking at the teams that record and mix the sound for the movies, the challenges they face, and how they are so often overlooked (which actually means they did a really good job).
 
I notice that there are lots of discussion here and elsewhere on mixing forums that when recording music there has been a trend to keep using more and more compression until the dynamics are completely gone. Yet in the movie business, dynamics are apparently everything:
 
"Semanick aims to produce sound mixes that are dynamic and "symphonic," featuring lulls and crescendos that play off one another, driving the story forward. For "movies that are roller-coaster rides," the sound mix should reflect that, using quiet stretches to emphasize the loud scenes — that is, dynamics —  so that the scenes that are supposed to be noisy and exciting don’t have to injure anyone’s eardrums to make their point."
 
It use to be that music, especially folk music, was for story telling. Maybe that is one of the things that is lacking in today's music. No story, no need for dynamics, and stuff begins to sound the same. Tell a story and suddenly you have a need for dynamics, and now stuff doesn't sound the same anymore.
 
Anyway, interesting view of another form of sound mixing we tend not to have around here. Worth the time to read.

The Mandolin Picker
"Bless your hearts... and all your vital organs" - John Duffy
 
"Got time to breath, got time for music!"- Briscoe Darling, Jr.
 
Windows 8.1, Sonar Platinum (64-bit), AMD FX 6120 Six-Core, 10GB RAM
#1

1 Reply Related Threads

    Rain
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9736
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
    • Location: Las Vegas
    • Status: offline
    Re: Unsung Oscar Winners, "What The Hell Do Sound Mixers Do?" 2015/02/18 13:47:45 (permalink)
    MandolinPicker
     
    I notice that there are lots of discussion here and elsewhere on mixing forums that when recording music there has been a trend to keep using more and more compression until the dynamics are completely gone. Yet in the movie business, dynamics are apparently everything:
     
    "Semanick aims to produce sound mixes that are dynamic and "symphonic," featuring lulls and crescendos that play off one another, driving the story forward. For "movies that are roller-coaster rides," the sound mix should reflect that, using quiet stretches to emphasize the loud scenes — that is, dynamics —  so that the scenes that are supposed to be noisy and exciting don’t have to injure anyone’s eardrums to make their point."



    I find it to be very unfortunate and totally backwards, though maybe it happens more often on TV than on the big screen. Some directors seem to thrive on having their actors whisper and pull their voices so low in the mix that they're barely audible - a few episodes of Breaking Bad come to mind. Then comes the big explosion - which doesn't have to injure one's eardrum to be too loud as far as I'm concerned.
     
    From a story telling point, I find it as ridiculous as if you'd print a book where barely readable tiny little fonts alternate with ones that take an entire page per letter. 
     
    Having to constantly rewind to hear what was said or to ride the volume button on the remote actually interferes with the experience.
     
    At the very least, I think that they should offer a moderately compressed version.
     
    Whereas pop music could do with more dynamics, as, most of the time, the dynamic range is pretty stable by comparison.
     
    We have it all backwards, imho.

    TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
    #2
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1