Channel EQ Not Easy to Use

Author
dlesaux
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1034
  • Joined: 2009/09/13 09:25:18
  • Status: offline
2015/03/23 21:47:43 (permalink)

Channel EQ Not Easy to Use

I'm a Sonar Platinum and Music Creator user (Sonar in my studio and Music Creator on my tablet for when I'm on the road).  I just spent five hours using MC 7 and had a great time.  I do wish however the GUI on the Channel EQ was more like the gloss EQ in Sonar.  The MC EQ is so tiny with very few choices for curves.  Bakers, please help!

Peace!
Daniel

Sonar Platinum - 2017.10 and PreSonus Studio One 3.5.5
Windows 10 64 bit
Studiocat Skylake Desktop PC with Intel i7 6700k processor @ 4.20 GHz / 16G RAM 
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface and Cakewalk UM-2G Midi Interface

Check out my website
#1

7 Replies Related Threads

    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re: Channel EQ Not Easy to Use 2015/03/24 12:37:31 (permalink)
    I agree.  IMO it's really almost unusable since you can't dial in specific frequencies and can only guess where you are in the visual band.
     
    I'd recommend using a 3rd party EQ like something from Voxengo or some other inexpensive or free EQ.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #2
    savageopera
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 625
    • Joined: 2008/04/01 23:26:15
    • Status: offline
    Re: Channel EQ Not Easy to Use 2015/03/25 17:39:04 (permalink)
    I was hoping MC7 would at least include a simple 3 or 4 band parametric eq.......... Oh well.

    Sonar Artist, HP Laptop, AMD A8700 , 1T+250g, M-Audio Fast Track Ultra ,Roland 88 Hammer action, Roland AX-1, M-audio 88es, Arturia minilabII......When I was young I wanted to become a mad scientist. I achieved everything except the "scientist" part....http://www.soundclick.com/savageopera
    #3
    scook
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 24146
    • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    Re: Channel EQ Not Easy to Use 2015/03/25 17:41:26 (permalink)
    The MFreeEffectsBundle is a decent free addon for MC.
    post edited by scook - 2015/03/26 11:26:23
    #4
    Lance Riley [Cakewalk]
    Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 337
    • Joined: 2011/05/17 17:18:01
    • Status: offline
    Re: Channel EQ Not Easy to Use 2015/03/26 11:09:23 (permalink)
    savageopera
    I was hoping MC7 would at least include a simple 3 or 4 band parametric eq.......... Oh well.



    Hi Ron,
     
    We do still include Sonitus EQ if you are in need of an EQ with more bands, specific Q or frequency settings.
     

    Lance Riley
    Product Manager
    #5
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re: Channel EQ Not Easy to Use 2015/03/26 11:14:49 (permalink)
    The sonitus EQ is an excellent tool.  that's what I'd use if I had MC7 only.  it's even better than a lot of the 3rd party freebies.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #6
    dlesaux
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1034
    • Joined: 2009/09/13 09:25:18
    • Status: offline
    Re: Channel EQ Not Easy to Use 2015/03/26 12:51:05 (permalink)
    Thanks for your replies! Yes, I've been using 3rd party solutions but it's frustrating to see that little EQ sitting in the track, knowing what it can do in Sonar and not be able to do much with it in Music Creator.
     
    Maybe Cakewalk could meet us halfway and provide just one EQ type and at least some better control over the bands (frequency, Q and level). Making the graph a wee bit bigger too?  Throwing in the HPF and LPF at fixed frequencies (e.g. 100Hz and 10,000 Hz) could also be another compromise.

    Peace!
    Daniel

    Sonar Platinum - 2017.10 and PreSonus Studio One 3.5.5
    Windows 10 64 bit
    Studiocat Skylake Desktop PC with Intel i7 6700k processor @ 4.20 GHz / 16G RAM 
    Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface and Cakewalk UM-2G Midi Interface

    Check out my website
    #7
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re: Channel EQ Not Easy to Use 2015/03/29 18:31:35 (permalink)
    dlesaux
    Thanks for your replies! Yes, I've been using 3rd party solutions but it's frustrating to see that little EQ sitting in the track, knowing what it can do in Sonar and not be able to do much with it in Music Creator.
     
    Maybe Cakewalk could meet us halfway and provide just one EQ type and at least some better control over the bands (frequency, Q and level). Making the graph a wee bit bigger too?  Throwing in the HPF and LPF at fixed frequencies (e.g. 100Hz and 10,000 Hz) could also be another compromise.


    That's what Lance is saying that they DO provide an EQ with better controls than the Channel EQ.  you have to insert it from the FX bin, tho.  go to the FX bin, right click, then choose:  INSERT AUDIO FX>DIRECTX>SONITUSFX>EQUALIZER.
     
    sonitus EQ is a VERY good transparent EQ with 6 bands and EQ types including peak/dip; low & high shelf; and low and high pass.  it also includes a gain slider, you can set the frequencies either directly by typing them in, or by clicking and dragging the points on the graph.  it's an excellent EQ.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #8
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1