SONAR live with tracks and lights

Author
Kimmie
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3
  • Joined: 2015/04/19 21:52:26
  • Status: offline
2015/04/19 22:05:09 (permalink)

SONAR live with tracks and lights

Hi, I'm thinking of using SONAR live to run some backing tracks, run a click to the drummer, control lights, and maybe even play some videos eventually. Anyone doing this successfully that could offer some advice/warnings/tips/etc.?
Thanks!
Kimmie
 
SONAR X3 Prod (x64)
I'll be getting a new laptop for the above described use.
#1

18 Replies Related Threads

    Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
    Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2819
    • Joined: 2011/02/03 04:31:35
    • Location: Sound-Rehab, Austria
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 01:41:20 (permalink)
    Hi. We do this (and many others meanwhile) ... click track, several playback tracks & changing mixer scenes and FX via Sonar ... no video (yet) ...
     
    A few tips:
    1. you need a digital mixer that can handle the audio output in a rock solid manner (don't use a regular audio interface)
    2. create a Sonar template that fits your exact needs (might be an iterative process)
    3. one song = one Sonar project (not all songs in one project)
    4. check out the playlist feature in Sonar - that's the key to a flexible setlist (drag and drop to change song order)
    5. test, test, test, test, test, test, test, test, test, test, test, test, test, test, test ... because there are pitfalls that may be very specific to your setup (e.g. we had a hidden MIDI loop problem that crashed the mixer .... it appeared all the sudden and took ages to figure out ... real nightmare)
    Have fun :-)

    GOOD TUNES LAST FOREVER
      +++   Visit the Rehab   +++
     
    DAW: Platinum/X3e, win10 64 bit, i7-3930K (6x3.2GHz), Asus Sabertooth X79, 32 GB DDR3 1600MHz, ATI HD 5450, 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility3, 2x 1TB WD HDD SATA 600
    Audio-Interface: 2x MOTU 1248 AVB, Focusrite OctoPre, (Roland Octa-Capture)   Control-Surface: VS-700C 
    VSTi: WAVES, NI K10u, FabFilter, IK, ... (too many really) 
    #2
    czyky
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 193
    • Joined: 2003/11/26 19:22:17
    • Location: libertyville, illinois
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 10:08:53 (permalink)
    Works for us, running backup tracks, midi outs to hardware synths and processors, and live computer animation cues. (On adventurous days, we plug into the board and actually record performances at the same time, for evaluation later. Just simple stereo.) Everything FFB says above. Also, when you load each project for testing, size it so that it's a bit shorter than the width of the display (size to window and then scrunch it in a bit), so that Sonar doesn't do a hop-scroll just a few bars from the end of the song. We tried Sonar playlist, meh, have better results with a list of projects sorted into a File Explorer window and just down arrow to the next and press enter for each song. When using the laptop in performances, we kill everything on the machine that's not needed, including services like network, Bluetooth, virus, etc. ONLY Sonar and that one file explorer window! We get by with a pretty simple usb audio (an Edirol works fine), because we're generally only playing back. Make sure you have all the song sections markered, just for peace of mind when you glance over at the machine.

    "I can't think of a single example of where a big company buying a small company has ultimately been good for consumers." --bitflipper
    www.reverbnation.com/markadamczyk
    www.adamczyk.com
    #3
    Cactus Music
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8424
    • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 10:14:13 (permalink)
    I'm thinking of trying to use Sonar and the Playlist for my solo act.
    It would be cool if different people who are doing this could add their advice and compare notes. 
     
    I use stereo tracks played from Win Amp but I miss the old day's of midi playback which also controlled my effects. Lights would be cool too, never did it but I understand how it works. 
     
    Not sure post in #2 what you meant by not using an audio interface? Seems that good solid ASIO drivers would be the ticket. Do you mean not running the vocals through an audio interface? I would agree with that. 
    My plan would be 4 audio tracks out from my Tascam us1641 and the midi from the us1641 driving a few devices like my Lexicon effects unit. 
    post edited by Cactus Music - 2015/04/20 11:10:46

    Johnny V  
    Cakelab  
    Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
    3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
     http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
     
     
    #4
    Kimmie
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3
    • Joined: 2015/04/19 21:52:26
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 11:53:57 (permalink)
    Thanks everyone. I think I'll give it a shot. One thing I forgot about is that I only have a chromebook, so guess I'll have to get a laptop since I'm assuming there's no way to get the Chromebook to run SONAR. Correct? Thanks!
    #5
    kicksville
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 273
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 14:45:41
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 13:20:05 (permalink)
    Kicksville's live show is completely built around Sonar. I can go into more details if you want, but basically, all the technical elements you see in this video are driven by Sonar: lights, video, MTC feeds, patch changes for the remote computers (we have 8 onstage), and console automation. The mix you hear is actually the 2-track mix we send to FOH, recorded directly back into Sonar during the show, with no post-processing beyond a limiter to bring the levels up for the video.
     
    https://youtu.be/omElhthKQIQ
     
    A lot of folks do this, but we've taken it far beyond most.... 70 inputs, 10 stereo monitor mixes, extensive dynamic automation (meaning we don't just change scenes on the console - we're directly controlling things like FX sends, channel EQ, etc.), and a lot more.
     
    Some things to keep in mind as you try and implement this kind of thing into your show:
    - We have everything laid out in one large Sonar project, so there's no loading files during the show. Some folks use the playlist feature or call up separate files for each song, but for us, one file was a better solution considering lighting changes and video cues happen between songs.
    - Don't stress the main computer. The less load you put on a machine, the less likely it is to crash. We have separate machines for each person's rig, running softsynths, VST effects, etc., so the master machine doesn't have to do the heavy lifting.
    - Test, test, test, and test again.
    - Take the time to carefully prep any playback tracks. Match RMS levels from song to song, and make sure things aren't going to surprise you at the gig. For example, that 808 bass drum that sounds awesome at home may have so much 40Hz that when you play it back on a full PA, you rattle the trusses out of the grid ;-)
    - Did I mention testing?
     
    I'd be happy to go into more detail about the technical details if you'd like, but it's pretty complicated and involves lots of eye-wateringly dense Excel spreadsheets I can say this though: in 7 years of doing this show, we've never had a single problem with Sonar. Not once. So, there you have it.
     
    cheers!
    #6
    Sir William
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 166
    • Joined: 2015/01/15 02:56:50
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 13:45:14 (permalink)
    Yo!! Kicksville - great show dude and a brilliant use of Sonar.

    Sonar - Platinum (always up to date)
    PC - Dell XPS 13 7th Gen Intel i7, 500GB SSD, 16GB RAM, 2 x 27" HD monitors, connected via a D3100 DOCKING STATION.
    OS - Windows 10 x64
    Interface - Focusrite Scarlett 8i6, Yamaha MG12XU

    Rack FX - TC Helicon Voiceworks Plus, TC Electronics M300
    MIDI - M AUDIO Keystation PRO 88, Focusrite Scarlett 8i6, Roland UM-ONE Mk 2, Yamaha MU100R
     
    Microphones - sE X1, AT 2035, Neumann TLM102
    Monitors - Yamaha NS7, ATH-M50 'Phones
    #7
    Sir William
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 166
    • Joined: 2015/01/15 02:56:50
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 13:45:27 (permalink)
    Yo!! Kicksville - great show dude and a brilliant use of Sonar.

    Sonar - Platinum (always up to date)
    PC - Dell XPS 13 7th Gen Intel i7, 500GB SSD, 16GB RAM, 2 x 27" HD monitors, connected via a D3100 DOCKING STATION.
    OS - Windows 10 x64
    Interface - Focusrite Scarlett 8i6, Yamaha MG12XU

    Rack FX - TC Helicon Voiceworks Plus, TC Electronics M300
    MIDI - M AUDIO Keystation PRO 88, Focusrite Scarlett 8i6, Roland UM-ONE Mk 2, Yamaha MU100R
     
    Microphones - sE X1, AT 2035, Neumann TLM102
    Monitors - Yamaha NS7, ATH-M50 'Phones
    #8
    Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
    Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2819
    • Joined: 2011/02/03 04:31:35
    • Location: Sound-Rehab, Austria
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 13:50:35 (permalink)
    Cactus Music
    I'm thinking of trying to use Sonar and the Playlist for my solo act.
    It would be cool if different people who are doing this could add their advice and compare notes. 
     
    I use stereo tracks played from Win Amp but I miss the old day's of midi playback which also controlled my effects. Lights would be cool too, never did it but I understand how it works. 
     
    Not sure post in #2 what you meant by not using an audio interface? Seems that good solid ASIO drivers would be the ticket. Do you mean not running the vocals through an audio interface? I would agree with that. 
    My plan would be 4 audio tracks out from my Tascam us1641 and the midi from the us1641 driving a few devices like my Lexicon effects unit. 




    I recommended using a digi mixer instead of a studio audio interface straight away because a fairly similar post recently started a pretty similar discussion (taking sonar to the stage and routing vox and guitars thru it as well) ... mixers are made for the road, audio interfaces probably not ... and once you start mixing vocals and the rest of the band you're out of options with an standard interfaces really quickly ... latency, FX, and other issues come into play and you're definitely better off with just a digi mixer than an audio interface that feeds a mixer ...
     
    We first used a single Sonar project, but then switched to "one song = one Sonar project + using Sonar playlist" because the single project approach required too many manual interactions on stage (start, stop, jump to marker ... all achieveable but still a little "too stressful") ... and since our sets change from gig to gig the playlist allows to rearrange on the fly ... it's not perfect but good enough - and we quite like the option that you can select between wait between songs and auto-start after x seconds ... this allows us to do blocks of songs without any interaction with Sonar i.e. we start, play 5 songs, then have Sonar wait for a key press, and then go through the next block of songs ...
     
    The Kicksville setup is very impressive - we can all learn a lot from them !!!
     
    BTW - did I mention you need to test, test, test and test again ... and you need at least one backup DAW ... remember Murphy's law, dont you???

    GOOD TUNES LAST FOREVER
      +++   Visit the Rehab   +++
     
    DAW: Platinum/X3e, win10 64 bit, i7-3930K (6x3.2GHz), Asus Sabertooth X79, 32 GB DDR3 1600MHz, ATI HD 5450, 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility3, 2x 1TB WD HDD SATA 600
    Audio-Interface: 2x MOTU 1248 AVB, Focusrite OctoPre, (Roland Octa-Capture)   Control-Surface: VS-700C 
    VSTi: WAVES, NI K10u, FabFilter, IK, ... (too many really) 
    #9
    kicksville
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 273
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 14:45:41
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 14:01:51 (permalink)
    Sir William
    Yo!! Kicksville - great show dude and a brilliant use of Sonar.



    Thanks, man!
    #10
    kicksville
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 273
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 14:45:41
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 14:30:32 (permalink)
    FreeFlyBertl
    I recommended using a digi mixer instead of a studio audio interface straight away because a fairly similar post recently started a pretty similar discussion (taking sonar to the stage and routing vox and guitars thru it as well) ... mixers are made for the road, audio interfaces probably not ... and once you start mixing vocals and the rest of the band you're out of options with an standard interfaces really quickly ... latency, FX, and other issues come into play and you're definitely better off with just a digi mixer than an audio interface that feeds a mixer ...

    Yes, a mixer gives you much more flexibility than most straight-up audio interfaces, but it really comes down to what the OP needs. If the gig only calls for 2 tracks of playback and a click to the drummer, with everything else patched into the PA system, an interface would be fine. Either way though, the device's driver stability is the key (and of course, its road-worthiness).
     
    FreeFlyBertl
    We first used a single Sonar project, but then switched to "one song = one Sonar project + using Sonar playlist" because the single project approach required too many manual interactions on stage (start, stop, jump to marker ... all achieveable but still a little "too stressful") ... and since our sets change from gig to gig the playlist allows to rearrange on the fly.....

    The disadvantage of using a single project like we do in Kicksville is that rearranging the set is a pain. I really really REALLY wish Sonar had ripple editing.... We have two versions of our show we can do: one is the full show, which is a continuous run from start to finish, using one project file. The other is for festival/opening type gigs when the setup time is reduced, we're not doing onstage audio/lighting/video, and the song order needs to change. For that, I have a stripped-down version of the master Sonar file that only has 2 tracks of playback and a click, and I just manually jump to the songs as we need. It's kind of sad when the stripped-down version of our show still has 32 inputs, but whattaya gonna do
     
    FreeFlyBertl
    The Kicksville setup is very impressive - we can all learn a lot from them !!!

    Thanks! I'm always more than happy to share anything we've learned from using Sonar - everything Kicksville has ever recorded or done live has been done in Sonar (or Pro Audio back in the day), so we've certainly put it through its paces. I'm also the chief sound monkey at one of the largest performing arts centers in the US, so I'm lucky to be able to pull things I learn in that context into the Kicksville show and tech.
     
    cheers
    #11
    JCody
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 227
    • Joined: 2013/10/25 12:43:40
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 16:32:40 (permalink)
    Sonar Platinum is the heart of our shows. We're currently doing an amazing version of Les Miserables. Sonar sends the time code to our lights and projections, and program changes to our digital mixing console. Sonar also hosts all the effect sends to our performers. It's pretty amazing to automate the verbs in a live setting. And yes we use the "Playlist" to do it.
    #12
    Cactus Music
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8424
    • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 20:43:29 (permalink)
    I recommended using a digi mixer instead of a studio audio interface straight away because a fairly similar post recently started a pretty similar discussion (taking sonar to the stage and routing vox and guitars thru it as well) ... mixers are made for the road, audio interfaces probably not .
     
    Well I sort of agree except even though I own a digital mixer, it's overkill for a solo act. I only use 3 channels so my 16 channel 01v is not appropriate. I use a Yamaha MG82cx or my new Mackie Mix 8. I have my eyes on the new smaller foot print digital mixer like the Xair XR 12 but they are slow in coming.  
    So as I said, I agree that using an interface as a mixer is not something I would do. I like my little analog mixers because I need the controls in easy reach. The audio interface is for Audio/ midi output only. 
     
    About the only advantage of a digital mixer would be that my effects are all in one place. But then you might still need a midi interface. It's not clear what the XR12 midi "out" port does. Hopefully it can drive a DMX box. 
    My future plans are to eliminate as many patch cables and devices as possible. So Digital mixers and powered speakers are in my plans. As well as a new LED lighting rig that can be controlled via MIDI or ? . 
     
    As i would not play any soft synths live it would be pure audio tracks with the MIDI tracks only for control of effects and lights. 
     
    For audio output I only need 4 tracks. 
     
    1/2 = Stereo mix drums and keyboards
    3= Bass goes to a Fender Rumble bass amp ( this rocks! highly recommended) 
    4= Audio track of organ synth to control my vocal harmony box. 
     
    I plan on creating a new special project for each of my 100 - 150 songs I play. 
    They all exist as standard projects already but I would  make new " live " versions with  all synths bounced to audio, the custom outputs and midi control tracks.
    I have a laptop I just re built that is for DAW use only. I added an SSD and more RAM. 
     
    Anyhow there must be a lot more folks who are using Sonar Live and it would be cool to hear form everyone. There's seems to be pro's and con's to the playlist. 
     
     
    post edited by Cactus Music - 2015/04/20 20:56:57

    Johnny V  
    Cakelab  
    Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
    3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
     http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
     
     
    #13
    Kimmie
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3
    • Joined: 2015/04/19 21:52:26
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 20:48:36 (permalink)
    Thanks again everyone, this is some good stuff for me to consider. I will definitely be starting with a much more basic setup than most of you. Something like this...
     
    Audio Tracks: SONAR on a laptop with an audio/Midi interface with maybe 8 analog outputs. All those outputs going into a snake on stage (just like any other signal from the stage). Then at the mixer simply mix the tracks from the laptop with the live instrument channels.
     
    Lights: I'm not so sure how this will work, but I'm assumed one track on SONAR will send Midi messages to the interface, then out to the light controller, no? I wasn't thinking any time code would be needed, but I may be wrong.
     
    Video: Not too sure of this exactly either, but my thought was a video track in SONAR will be sent to the external monitor output on the laptop, then to a projector or big screen of some type.
     
    Am I on the right path?
     
    Thanks!
    Kimmie
     
     
     
    #14
    Cactus Music
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8424
    • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 21:13:40 (permalink)
    Just a comment on your idea of 8 audio tracks. 
    This is OK if you have a good FOH person who knows your sound and then you turn the job over to them, fine. 
    But in my case I am mostly by myself so mixing is one more chore I don't need while performing. Also when I do play on bigger stages the sound people often screw up my balance even though I'm just 3 channels,,,, they get THAT wrong, so just think what they'd do with 8? 
     
    As above, everyone is saying Test, test and test again. My mixes are perfect every night because I proof them over and over before I hit the stage. My newest trick of sending the bass to a bass amp is not because it needs separate control. It's because I'm finding having the Bass behind me like I'm used hearing it in a full band, makes me play better. It also eliminates me needing a Sub in most halls. 
     I also play in an acoustic duo so we use this trick and put the drum tracks in the monitors. The audience only hears the bass which is more appropriate for folk and bluegrass stuff. Because most of my bass tracks are actually me playing a real bass it is like cloning myself in the band. I'm using a left/ right split at this time as my playback is stereo wave files via Win Amp. There for the desire to advance to 4 tracks. 

    Johnny V  
    Cakelab  
    Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
    3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
     http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
     
     
    #15
    kicksville
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 273
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 14:45:41
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 21:41:06 (permalink)
    Kimmie
    Lights: I'm not so sure how this will work, but I'm assumed one track on SONAR will send Midi messages to the interface, then out to the light controller, no? I wasn't thinking any time code would be needed, but I may be wrong.

     
    That will depend on how you program the lights. With most lighting software and/or consoles, it's really your choice whether you want to trigger cues with a controller/NRPN, note event, or SMPTE/MTC.
     
    Kimmie
    Video: Not too sure of this exactly either, but my thought was a video track in SONAR will be sent to the external monitor output on the laptop, then to a projector or big screen of some type.
     



    My suggestion would be to have video playback hosted on a different computer, and triggered by MTC, SMPTE, or controller events. It's not that Sonar *can't* handle video playback, but I'd rather trust software designed for video: you'll have more control over the video output, and depending on which software you use, a lot more internal video capabilities. We use Vegas for video playback, but there are plenty of options out there (and some with way more fun live on-the-fly doodads, like Arkaos). Plus, as I mentioned in the earlier post, distributing the load means no one machine is working too hard.
     
    cheers
    #16
    kicksville
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 273
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 14:45:41
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 22:03:11 (permalink)
    Kimmie
    Audio Tracks: SONAR on a laptop with an audio/Midi interface with maybe 8 analog outputs. All those outputs going into a snake on stage (just like any other signal from the stage). Then at the mixer simply mix the tracks from the laptop with the live instrument channels.



    I wanted to address your audio question separately....  I guess the question you should ask yourself is, "Do I need 8 distinct channels of playback?" There may be good reasons why you do. You may also discover that a well-mixed 2-track submix might be fine.
     
    For example, when Kicksville does the full show, we have three stereo playback tracks (percussion, instrumental stuff, and vocals) plus a click/cue track. They're sent from the computer to our onstage LS9, which handles the bulk of the mixing before signals are sent to FOH. Those playback tracks are split like that for a few reasons: 1, monitoring (so I can hear more perc if I need to for example); 2, processing (drums obviously get treated differently than vocals); 3, routing (vocal playback gets routed to the same bus as the live vocals).
     
    For our smaller show, when we're playing without all the technical infrastructure, playback is just a stereo pair and a click. All the signals get patched into FOH, and it's off to the races. And yes, absolutely positively always bring your own engineer when working with playback combined with live instruments....
    #17
    swamptooth
    Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2229
    • Joined: 2012/04/16 15:44:21
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/20 22:46:43 (permalink)
    Hey Conrad, 
    I really appreciate your thoughtful responses to these posts.  A couple of years ago when I was asking similar questions a majority of the answers were along the lines of, "Sonar was never designed to do this - get another tool".  Usually the recommendation was ableton live and Forte. Frankly that left me a little frustrated with the not just the product, but what I saw at the time as a kind of unwillingness to experiment and really push such a great tool to its full potential.  I was really feeling down about asking what seemed to be a universally known fact that sonar cannot and should not be trusted in a live situation.  
    Your videos of Kicksville in action really showed me that it wasn't a dumb question to ask or impossible by any stretch of the imagination.  I had to be really creative though, because the limiting factors were: my system (only an athlon xII laptop @2.2 GHz - NO BACKUP), my gear (one controller keyboard - NO BACKUP), and frankly me.  
    I have had matrix view working to trigger sound fx and synth patterns (much of the shows were "improvised") as well as about 8 soft synths per project I could play live.  
    I'm doing more now thanks to folks like you who are doing it really reliably and in a BIG BIG way.  I'm integrating using arduino devices receiving midi data triggered via the matrix to control electronics and lights which is just total geek fun!  Video is typically handled on another machine running pure data and is also triggered via matrix.  
    It really is a joy. 
    I would agree with everybody else  - TEST TEST TEST.  At least once a day for a week before the show for at least as long as the show will last.  
    The other thing that clinched the deal and made me take what seemed to be a huge leap of faith with sonar was my partner, who basically said "how long will it take to restart your computer?" I said "about a minute".  He said "takes me longer to change a guitar string - let's do it". 
     
    To the OP, I stayed away from playlist because my partner would call next song on the fly so I had all the projects open then tabbed/window switched to the appropriate one. Figure out what you NEED and what you WANT.  Nail down what you need first and then build up.  Don't use very latent plugins.  If you have a backup daw get a usb switch so you don't have to unplug and re-plug the interface to the second machine.  Have a plan for things to go wrong.  We were doing dissonant electronica/industrial so we had a cd player with just screeching and squelching a'la nurse with wound to go if I needed to reset.    
     
    I can't think of much else, but I can tell you that when it went right I was really quite happy with the result, and maybe the most important this was I learned more about sonar than any other time I had used it to that point. 
     
     

     
    Arvid H. Peterson
    Sonar X3E Prod / X2A  / X1PE | Cubase 9.5.1 | Reason 9.5 | Sibelius7 | Pure Data
    Native-Instruments Komplete 10 Ultimate and a smattering of other plugins
    Home-brewed VSTs 
    Toshiba Satellite S855-S5378 (16GB RAM, modified with 2x 750GB HDDs, Windows 8.1 x64)  
    Samson Graphite 49, M-Audio Oxygen 49, Korg nanoPAD2, Webcam motion tracking programs 
    M-Audio Fast Track Ultra
    Member, ASCAP   


    #18
    Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
    Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2819
    • Joined: 2011/02/03 04:31:35
    • Location: Sound-Rehab, Austria
    • Status: offline
    Re: SONAR live with tracks and lights 2015/04/21 17:47:19 (permalink)
    Cactus Music

    About the only advantage of a digital mixer would be that my effects are all in one place. But then you might still need a midi interface. It's not clear what the XR12 midi "out" port does. Hopefully it can drive a DMX box.

    My future plans are to eliminate as many patch cables and devices as possible. So Digital mixers and powered speakers are in my plans. As well as a new LED lighting rig that can be controlled via MIDI or ? .

    As i would not play any soft synths live it would be pure audio tracks with the MIDI tracks only for control of effects and lights.
     


    Oh yes, when it comes to MIDI implementation that may not be the strongest point of digital mixers. The X32 has only rudimentary MIDI implementation i.e. you can sent prg chg and patch chg to control light and FX, but you cannot send MIDI notes. So while the X32 is a 32 IN/OUT audio interface plus mixer it still means audio tracks only ... which is not a problem if you bounce soft synths, but is a problem if you have MIDI expander modules that get data from the DAW ...


    Cactus Music

    ... the sound people often screw up my balance even though I'm just 3 channels,,,, they get THAT wrong, so just think what they'd do with 8?
     


    This is off topic, but can anyone explain why acoustic guitar always needs to be that loud??? No matter where you go to listen to singer/songwriter kind of music, the voice is always lower than the schrumm schrumm schrumm




    GOOD TUNES LAST FOREVER
      +++   Visit the Rehab   +++
     
    DAW: Platinum/X3e, win10 64 bit, i7-3930K (6x3.2GHz), Asus Sabertooth X79, 32 GB DDR3 1600MHz, ATI HD 5450, 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility3, 2x 1TB WD HDD SATA 600
    Audio-Interface: 2x MOTU 1248 AVB, Focusrite OctoPre, (Roland Octa-Capture)   Control-Surface: VS-700C 
    VSTi: WAVES, NI K10u, FabFilter, IK, ... (too many really) 
    #19
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1