paulo
Max Output Level: -13 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6218
- Joined: 2007/01/30 05:06:57
- Status: offline
Re: why cakewalk sonar is not popular in award winner of sound engineers?
2015/04/25 15:35:30
(permalink)
Let me take a moment to consider the OP......
erm.... upon careful consideration I suspect........
|
SteveGriffiths
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 200
- Joined: 2004/10/10 10:59:36
- Status: offline
Re: why cakewalk sonar is not popular in award winner of sound engineers?
2015/04/25 18:30:39
(permalink)
theheliosequence
I also think I am the only musician/studio I know (in the Portland "indie" scene) that uses a PC. Everyone is on Mac. I have to always bring my Mac laptop to the studio for file transfers when working with other artists. The sessions are usually in Pro Tools, so I end up just working in Pro Tools more when collaborating/mixing/etc...
I'm in Portland - on PC running Sonar Platinum. I run Cakewalk / Sonar from about '92 - first product was Guitar tracks. Come say hi Cheers Grif http://grifbamaisin.com
post edited by SteveGriffiths - 2015/04/25 18:38:29
|
bitman
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4105
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:11:54
- Location: Keystone Colorado
- Status: offline
Re: why cakewalk sonar is not popular in award winner of sound engineers?
2015/04/25 18:33:42
(permalink)
GIM Productions
Hi, Sonar Platinum is the best pro Daw for me,but Cake have never done a right relationships with the third parts developers.
You can see,for instance,many hardware and controllers brands that advertise tested with,template of........but almost never i see Sonar....
I can't agree with the first part as I am a 3rd party dev and Cake has been great to me. So the later part, 3rd parties not developing to work w/ Sonar has to be for one of the other reasons sited by the OP in my opinion. ;-) What I think is that cakewalk was Greg's garage product and while successful, is a stigma that cake cant still shake. Like Sears will never be cool, - oh and now Microsoft too. No matter how many times they "break up the band" and reform..... no. We all love em anyways so who cares hu? :-)
post edited by bitman - 2015/04/25 18:43:57
|
konradh
Max Output Level: -42 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3325
- Joined: 2006/01/16 16:07:06
- Status: offline
Re: why cakewalk sonar is not popular in award winner of sound engineers?
2015/04/25 19:15:10
(permalink)
No one can tell which DAW was used to make a record. As far as workflow and features go, you can make a reasonable case for any of the major DAWS. Why do posts like this keep showing up unless they are from people with agendas?
Konrad Current album and more: http://www.themightykonrad.com/ Sonar X1d Producer. V-Studio 700. PC: Intel i7 CPU 3.07GHz, 12 GB RAM. Win 7 64-bit. RealGuitar, RealStrat, RealLPC, Ivory II, Vienna Symphonic, Hollywood Strings, Electr6ity, Acoustic Legends, FabFour, Scarbee Rick/J-Bass/P-Bass, Kontakt 5. NI Session Guitar. Boldersounds, Noisefirm. EZ Drummer 2. EZ Mix. Melodyne Assist. Guitar Rig 4. Tyros 2, JV-1080, Kurzweil PC2R, TC Helicon VoiceWorks+. Rode NT2a, EV RE20. Presonus Eureka. Rokit 6s.
|
Grem
Max Output Level: -19.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5562
- Joined: 2005/06/28 09:26:32
- Location: Baton Rouge Area
- Status: offline
Re: why cakewalk sonar is not popular in award winner of sound engineers?
2015/04/25 19:17:53
(permalink)
I have used CW DAWs for a long time. They do what I need them to do and more.
Don't care if they are the industry standard. Or if they are judged to be the best by a majority of the industry.
The fact remains I use what I want with no regard to what another uses.
Grem
Michael Music PC i7 2600K; 64gb Ram; 3 256gb SSD, System, Samples, Audio; 1TB & 2TB Project Storage; 2TB system BkUp; RME FireFace 400; Win 10 Pro 64; CWbBL 64, Home PCAMD FX 6300; 8gb Ram; 256 SSD sys; 2TB audio/samples; Realtek WASAPI; Win 10 Home 64; CWbBL 64 Surface Pro 3Win 10 i7 8gb RAM; CWbBL 64
|
Grem
Max Output Level: -19.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5562
- Joined: 2005/06/28 09:26:32
- Location: Baton Rouge Area
- Status: offline
Re: why cakewalk sonar is not popular in award winner of sound engineers?
2015/04/25 19:18:44
(permalink)
konradh
No one can tell which DAW was used to make a record. As far as workflow and features go, you can make a reasonable case for any of the major DAWS. Why do posts like this keep showing up unless they are from people with agendas?
+1
Grem
Michael Music PC i7 2600K; 64gb Ram; 3 256gb SSD, System, Samples, Audio; 1TB & 2TB Project Storage; 2TB system BkUp; RME FireFace 400; Win 10 Pro 64; CWbBL 64, Home PCAMD FX 6300; 8gb Ram; 256 SSD sys; 2TB audio/samples; Realtek WASAPI; Win 10 Home 64; CWbBL 64 Surface Pro 3Win 10 i7 8gb RAM; CWbBL 64
|
SF_Green
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1403
- Joined: 2005/09/13 20:37:55
- Location: San Francisco
- Status: offline
Re: why cakewalk sonar is not popular in award winner of sound engineers?
2015/04/25 19:22:41
(permalink)
One of these days I'll muster the willpower to ignore these threads!
AMD FX-8370, Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3, Win7x64 SP1, 16Gb CorsairDDR3-1600, GeForce GTX 950 (390.65), SSD 525Gb (OS), SATA 3 & 1.5Tb, MOTU microlite, RME FireFace 800 (D 3.124, fw 2.77), UAD-2Q, Adam A7X, A-800 PRO, CC121 Cubase Pro 10.0.5, SonarPt- 2017.10 (x64), Reason10.2, Live 10.0.5 Suite, Wavelab Elements 9.5.40, Komplete10Ult, POD Farm2.5, Omnisphere2.5, BFD3, Alesis QS7.1, Arturia BeatStep Pro, POD HD500, Alesis ControlPad, ARP Omni, many things with strings. GrSltz My Studio
|
Grem
Max Output Level: -19.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5562
- Joined: 2005/06/28 09:26:32
- Location: Baton Rouge Area
- Status: offline
Re: why cakewalk sonar is not popular in award winner of sound engineers?
2015/04/25 19:24:12
(permalink)
SF_Green
One of these days I'll muster the willpower to ignore these threads!
I may try that one day myself!!
Grem
Michael Music PC i7 2600K; 64gb Ram; 3 256gb SSD, System, Samples, Audio; 1TB & 2TB Project Storage; 2TB system BkUp; RME FireFace 400; Win 10 Pro 64; CWbBL 64, Home PCAMD FX 6300; 8gb Ram; 256 SSD sys; 2TB audio/samples; Realtek WASAPI; Win 10 Home 64; CWbBL 64 Surface Pro 3Win 10 i7 8gb RAM; CWbBL 64
|
Re: why cakewalk sonar is not popular in award winner of sound engineers?
2015/04/25 19:28:17
(permalink)
Anderton
I've tracked lots of sessions in Mac Pro Tools, but then I would always take the WAV files and bring them into SONAR for adult editing.
I know you know such statements can damage your reputation as THE AUTHORITY for all things audio. No doubt a lapse of judgment brought on by the great taste of Founders Black Rye beer.
|
Karyn
Ma-Ma
- Total Posts : 9200
- Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
- Location: Lincoln, England.
- Status: offline
Re: why cakewalk sonar is not popular in award winner of sound engineers?
2015/04/25 19:31:36
(permalink)
Why do posts like this keep showing up unless they are from people with agendas?
There are some good responses to the OP here, but I see the potential for it degrading, so I'm bringing it to a close now.
Mekashi Futo. Get 10% off all Waves plugins.Current DAW. i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum
|