How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1?

Author
silvercn
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1238
  • Joined: 2007/12/04 12:14:24
  • Location: Midland, Texas
  • Status: offline
2015/05/27 18:37:13 (permalink)

How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1?

looking at a new laptop for location recording. I have recently downloaded info on minimum speed recommended for X1 Producer (I know "old !") as intel  2.67 GHz.  A lot of processors I have seen are 2.1 - so will this make a noticeable difference or glitches?? It runs fine on my desktop - but that is 2.7-2.8
 
Thanks
#1

12 Replies Related Threads

    scook
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 24146
    • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    Re: How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1? 2015/05/27 19:32:46 (permalink)
    More important than clock speed is the processor type. Clock speed by itself not mean very much.
    #2
    silvercn
    Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1238
    • Joined: 2007/12/04 12:14:24
    • Location: Midland, Texas
    • Status: offline
    Re: How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1? 2015/05/27 20:52:08 (permalink)
    Well I found one that is AMD A6-Series    2.1 speed 
    #3
    silvercn
    Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1238
    • Joined: 2007/12/04 12:14:24
    • Location: Midland, Texas
    • Status: offline
    Re: How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1? 2015/05/27 21:01:18 (permalink)
    or :  

    Intel Core i5 2.40 GHz 

    post edited by silvercn - 2015/05/27 21:15:45
    #4
    bvideo
    Max Output Level: -58 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1707
    • Joined: 2006/09/02 22:20:02
    • Status: offline
    Re: How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1? 2015/05/27 21:50:26 (permalink)
    For recording you might need to check the disk speed requirement with respect to number of tracks playing/recording.
    #5
    scook
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 24146
    • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    Re: How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1? 2015/05/27 22:12:59 (permalink)
    Yeah, it might be a good idea to discuss the laptops your are looking at rather than just the CPU. You will get more intelligent feedback about the suitability of your choices.
    #6
    tlw
    Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2567
    • Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
    • Location: West Midlands, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re: How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1? 2015/05/28 18:20:18 (permalink)
    I'd suggest looking at maybe slightly slower quad-core i7s to get the extra cores/hyperthreading rather than a slightly faster duo-core.

    The overall performance of all the PC components combined is at least as important as the cpu speed though. As is whether you use lots of resource-intensive vst instruments or not.

    Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board,
    ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre.
    Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
    #7
    slartabartfast
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5289
    • Joined: 2005/10/30 01:38:34
    • Status: offline
    Re: How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1? 2015/05/28 21:38:36 (permalink)
    The days when you could have a meaningful specification based on simple clock speed have passed. Unfortunately you still see it commonly in "system requirements" lists, even though it does not make a lot of sense. Even less useful to most users is something like "Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 2.67 GHz/AMD Phenom Quad Core 9750 2.4 Ghz".  That seems to indicate that only one CPU will work, and how do you know if a newer CPU is better? Even more confusing is that one CPU can blow away another in a math contest, and be slower in a database task. To see how performance compares, you can look at benchmarks, but that benchmark needs to match the use you plan to be truly predictive. That said, the Core 2 E8200 is now a pretty old CPU, and almost any decent quad core (or better) chip will be more efficient for most of what you will do in Sonar. Other factors besides the CPU power may make more of a difference in how well Sonar may perform, and in laptops especially, which are often designed to permit only limited configuration changes, a powerful CPU is no guarantee of success.
     
    http://www.howtogeek.com/...-computer-performance/
    https://www.cpubenchmark.net/
    http://www.adkproaudio.com/benchmarks.cfm
     
    #8
    fireberd
    Max Output Level: -38 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3704
    • Joined: 2008/02/25 14:14:28
    • Location: Inverness, FL
    • Status: offline
    Re: How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1? 2015/05/29 10:08:21 (permalink)
    I have two desktops.  My primary system is an i7 3770 and my backup is an i5 3550.  The i7 was down for almost a month for warranty service on the motherboard and I used the backup i5 system.  For Sonar (X3 at the time) I saw no difference.  However, I'm not doing any MIDI so that may make a difference. 
     
    I have a Lenovo laptop with an i5 in it, that I use for on-site recordings and again no MIDI but it will record 8 tracks of audio without problems.  I don't do any processing of the recording files, I move them to my primary system and do whatever on that system.
    post edited by fireberd - 2015/05/29 10:14:42

    "GCSG Productions"
    Franklin D-10 Pedal Steel Guitar (primary instrument). Nashville Telecaster, Bass, etc. 
    ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero M/B, i7 6700K CPU, 16GB Ram, SSD and conventional hard drives, Win 10 Pro and Win 10 Pro Insider Pre-Release
    Sonar Platinum/CbB. MOTU 896MK3 Hybrid, Tranzport, X-Touch, JBL LSR308 Monitors,  
    Ozone 5,  Studio One 4.1
    ISRC Registered
    Member of Nashville based R.O.P.E. Assn.
    #9
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re: How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1? 2015/05/29 10:28:27 (permalink)
    If the OP is looking for a laptop primarily for tracking:
    I'd take higher clock-speed over more CPU cores
    Make sure the machine has low/consistent DPC Latency (important to effectively work at ultra low audio latency)
     
    For tracking, I'd use an external USB3 drive... or install a high-performance drive.
    A common 2.5" 5400-RPM HD is slow... compared to a high-performance 3.5" 7200-RPM HD.

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #10
    charlyg
    Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 950
    • Joined: 2015/02/27 22:10:47
    • Location: West Hills, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re: How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1? 2015/05/29 11:37:18 (permalink)
    I went from an i3 duo core laptop to an i5 quad core desktop, but the thing that sped it up the most was when I went to an SSD. It still takes a bit to export audio.... I am thinking it is not processor speed that affects that operation. Everything else runs, how do they say it in GB? A treat...

     
     
    #11
    slartabartfast
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5289
    • Joined: 2005/10/30 01:38:34
    • Status: offline
    Re: How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1? 2015/05/29 13:25:52 (permalink)
    Jim Roseberry
     
    Make sure the machine has low/consistent DPC Latency (important to effectively work at ultra low audio latency)
     



    You have to look pretty carefully at the footnotes in the Dell spec sheet to find that information.
    #12
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re: How critical is a few decimal points of speed for X1? 2015/05/29 15:19:50 (permalink)
    A fast SSD is roughly three times the speed of a fast conventional HD.
    Much faster boot drive than a 2.5" 5400-RPM conventional HD
     
    Regarding audio export (bounce/mixdown); that definitely is affected by the speed of the CPU.
     
    DPC Latency specs certainly aren't readily available...  
    Most laptop BIOS don't expose parameters necessary to achieve lowest possible DPC Latency.
    Even with high-end custom laptops, you need a custom BIOS to achieve best possible performance.

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #13
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1