rontarrant
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 643
- Joined: 2010/06/21 06:26:09
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario
- Status: offline
Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
I've been thinking about upgrading from an internal audio interface to USB, but I can see a few options and I'd like to get some opinions, if you guys don't mind... I have a Mackie 402-VLZ3 mixer which, if I don't have to replace it, will save me a few bucks. But every USB interface I've seen has its own pre-amps which raises some questions for me. - Running the output of the mixer into pre-amps on the USB interface will be redundant, but will it be a problem? How will it affect the quality of the signal that finally ends up in Sonar?
- Is it better to replace the 402-VLZ3 with some kind of USB mixer/audio interface and thus get everything all in one?
- Is there a good-quality bare-bones USB interface I could use with my mixer that wouldn't have pre-amps?
Any advice/information would be very much appreciated.
-Ron T. ---------------------------------------------------------- MSI GE72 2QF-247US, 12 gb, Focusrite 6i6, AT-2020 ---------------------------------------------------------- Windows 10 x64, Sonar Platinum
|
dcumpian
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4124
- Joined: 2005/11/03 15:50:51
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/10 08:48:23
(permalink)
I have a 1604 and route hardware synths and guitars through it into a Presonus Audiobox 44VSL. I haven't noticed any issues with the signal being adversely affected by the preamps on the Audiobox. Regards, Dan
Mixing is all about control. My music: http://dancumpian.bandcamp.com/ or https://soundcloud.com/dcumpian Studiocat Advanced Studio DAW (Intel i5 3550 @ 3.7GHz, Z77 motherboard, 16GB Ram, lots of HDDs), Sonar Plat, Mackie 1604, PreSonus Audiobox 44VSL, ESI 4x4 Midi Interface, Ibanez Bass, Custom Fender Mexi-Strat, NI S88, Roland JV-2080 & MDB-1, Komplete, Omnisphere, Lots o' plugins.
|
fireberd
Max Output Level: -38 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3704
- Joined: 2008/02/25 14:14:28
- Location: Inverness, FL
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/10 09:30:16
(permalink)
Dual preamps (some external device plus the built in preamps in a recording interface unit), as noted is not a problem, I do it all the time. But, most of the current USB interfaces probably have better preamps than the Mackie. In fact you may not even need the Mackie as you can connect instruments or mic's direct to the USB interface.
"GCSG Productions" Franklin D-10 Pedal Steel Guitar (primary instrument). Nashville Telecaster, Bass, etc. ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero M/B, i7 6700K CPU, 16GB Ram, SSD and conventional hard drives, Win 10 Pro and Win 10 Pro Insider Pre-Release Sonar Platinum/CbB. MOTU 896MK3 Hybrid, Tranzport, X-Touch, JBL LSR308 Monitors, Ozone 5, Studio One 4.1 ISRC Registered Member of Nashville based R.O.P.E. Assn.
|
rontarrant
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 643
- Joined: 2010/06/21 06:26:09
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/10 10:14:56
(permalink)
dcumpian I have a 1604 and route hardware synths and guitars through it into a Presonus Audiobox 44VSL. I haven't noticed any issues with the signal being adversely affected by the preamps on the Audiobox.
Thanks, Dan.
-Ron T. ---------------------------------------------------------- MSI GE72 2QF-247US, 12 gb, Focusrite 6i6, AT-2020 ---------------------------------------------------------- Windows 10 x64, Sonar Platinum
|
rontarrant
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 643
- Joined: 2010/06/21 06:26:09
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/10 10:20:26
(permalink)
fireberd But, most of the current USB interfaces probably have better preamps than the Mackie. In fact you may not even need the Mackie as you can connect instruments or mic's direct to the USB interface. Good points. Even the current generation of Mackie mixers use their Onyx pre-amps and--I'm assuming--are better quality. I just hate to spend more than I absolutely have to. For instance, I know some companies make really pared-down interfaces that can be got for under $50. With pre-amps already in place in the mixer, if I'm just going out of the mixer mains to the USB interface's inputs, how much degradation will there be?
-Ron T. ---------------------------------------------------------- MSI GE72 2QF-247US, 12 gb, Focusrite 6i6, AT-2020 ---------------------------------------------------------- Windows 10 x64, Sonar Platinum
|
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8424
- Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/10 10:30:28
(permalink)
The thing to keep in mind with audio interfaces is your not just buying hardware, most important is the software,, drivers. Without good drivers the device is a door stop. You will not get good drivers for $60. Just look for an interface with stereo (a pair of) line inputs. This will either be as a channel 3/4 or with Combi jacks on the front. Avoid interfaces that have 1 mike and 1 instrument jack. I run a Mackie Mix 8 into my interfaces rear panel line inputs and have also used my front panel combi jacks on my Scarlett 6i6. Both work without issues if you toggle the correct pads and switches. The important thing is to match impedance. I would be looking at the Tascam for my next interface. Even though AT thinks the pre amps are all the same I do think think Tascam has upped the anti. And Mackies pre amps are still top notch too.
post edited by Cactus Music - 2015/06/12 01:15:12
|
rontarrant
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 643
- Joined: 2010/06/21 06:26:09
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/10 10:34:54
(permalink)
Cactus Music The thing to keep in mind with audio interfaces is your not just buying hardware, most important is the software,, drivers. Without good drivers the device is a door stop. You will not get good drivers for $60. Just look for a interface with stereo line inputs. This will either be as a channel 3/4 or with Combi jacks on the front. Avoid interfaces that have 1 mike and 1 instrument jack. I run a Mackie Mix 8 into my rear panel line ins and have also used my front panel combi jacks on my Scarlett 6i6. Both work without issues if you toggle the correct pads and switches. I would be looking at the Tascam for my next interface. Even though AT thinks the pre amps are all the same I do think think Tascam has upped the anti. And MAckies pre amps are still top notch too.
Thanks, Mr. Music... or may I call you Cactus? :) Good point about cheap drivers. I've been looking at the Scarlett 2i2, but I'll have a look at the Tascam stuff now as well.
-Ron T. ---------------------------------------------------------- MSI GE72 2QF-247US, 12 gb, Focusrite 6i6, AT-2020 ---------------------------------------------------------- Windows 10 x64, Sonar Platinum
|
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2567
- Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
- Location: West Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/10 10:53:46
(permalink)
I used a 1402VLZ for quite a while hooked up to an M-Audio Delta 66 PCI card and it turned in good results.
Most, maybe all, interfaces use a limited range of AD/DA convertor chips. For example, I understand thst the RME UFX and the Presonus Firestudio use the same PCM4104 chip. So at the conversion level interfaces should, in theory, have a similar performance.
Though in practice they don't quite because quite a lot depends on the circuitry that supports the convertor.
The big difference between interfaces is at the analogue circuitry level. Lower noise cleaner preamps, signal processing on the analogue side of the input and output and so on. Similar to the reasons one preamp costs £50 and another £1,000 really.
The good news for your purposes is that the weakest point in cheaper interfaces tends to be the mic pres, but for your setup you'd only need to be using the line level inputs and outputs so the mix pres are irrelevant.
Another difference between interfaces is the internal mixer they carry, the level of control over it and latency. Again, if you're using a mixer which can send individual channels to the interface via the Aux3/4 bus and has the interface outputs plugged into a mixer channel so there's no need to use Sonar's input echo function for monitoring that's not a problem.
How much degredation you'd get from the really cheap interfaces isn't easy to tell without testing them. Personally I'd look a little more up-market at some of the Focusrite range or maybe Roland with two or four line inputs and two or four line outputs. They'll have some mic pres, but they might come in handy (especially if one is high impedance for guitar/bass use) and will be decent quality. Whether they'll be equal to or better than the Mackie is hard to say.
One thing to watch if replacing the mixer is the number of inputs and outputs available on interfaces, and once you're mixer-less using input echo in the DAW for monitoring becomes more important if you need to hear effects while tracking because you'll no longer have the mixer's number of inserts and aux channels.
To completely get rid of a mixer I ended up with the RME/Focusrite setup in my sig. because of the number of ins and outs I require. Not a cheap way to go it has to be said.
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board, ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre. Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
|
rontarrant
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 643
- Joined: 2010/06/21 06:26:09
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/10 11:06:07
(permalink)
Thanks, tlw. That confirms some stuff I had wondered about. A few months back, I was almost ready to buy a Focusrite 2i2 and then read a bunch of horror stories about getting the drivers working properly. I also read that the 2i2 is in some way inferior to the other models in the Scarlett line (don't remember the details, unfortunately). But if I'm only using the line-level inputs (which, now that you point out, I should have realized [duh]) I'm wondering now if that difference in quality between the 2i2 and (say) the 2i4 will matter. Anyone know?
-Ron T. ---------------------------------------------------------- MSI GE72 2QF-247US, 12 gb, Focusrite 6i6, AT-2020 ---------------------------------------------------------- Windows 10 x64, Sonar Platinum
|
rontarrant
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 643
- Joined: 2010/06/21 06:26:09
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/10 15:33:55
(permalink)
Has anyone used the Mackie Onyx Blackjack with Sonar?
-Ron T. ---------------------------------------------------------- MSI GE72 2QF-247US, 12 gb, Focusrite 6i6, AT-2020 ---------------------------------------------------------- Windows 10 x64, Sonar Platinum
|
rontarrant
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 643
- Joined: 2010/06/21 06:26:09
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/11 06:44:47
(permalink)
Never mind on the Mackie; it's USB 1.1 But... What about the TASCAM US-2x2? It comes with Sonar, so it should be a good bet, right?
-Ron T. ---------------------------------------------------------- MSI GE72 2QF-247US, 12 gb, Focusrite 6i6, AT-2020 ---------------------------------------------------------- Windows 10 x64, Sonar Platinum
|
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8424
- Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/11 11:01:08
(permalink)
I myself picked the Scarlett 6i6 over the 2i2 and the 2i4 because it has a power supply. I have read about lots of issues with using USB powered interfaces. It's just not enough juice to run the pre amps and especially 48 volt phantom power. On some systems they report a grounding issue too... Go with the Tascam if it comes with a power supply.
|
TheMaartian
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2774
- Joined: 2015/05/21 18:30:52
- Location: Flagstaff, AZ
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/11 11:09:31
(permalink)
+1 ^^^ The US-2x2 is USB-powered. The US-4x4 has a power supply with a switch inline with the power cord. The US-16x08 has a power switch on the front panel!!! My US-16x08 showed up last night. I'll be installing it shortly. My PreSonus AudioBox 44VSL will be relegated to mobile recording, using the Audio Evolution Mobile DAW running on my Google Nexus 10. I was waiting for a sale on the US-4x4, but when MF put the 16x08 on their Stupid Deal of the Day (for $50 less than the 4x4 and $100 less than everyone else's price on the 16x08), I jumped on it.
Intel i7 3.4GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB HD Win10 Home 64-bit Tascam US-16x08 Studio One 4 Pro Notion 6 Melodyne 4 Studio Acoustica 7 Guitar Pro 7 PreSonus FaderPort Nektar P6 M-Audio BX8 D2 Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro NI K9U XLN AK, AD2 AAS VS-2, GS-2, VA-2, EP-4, CP-2, OD Toontrack SD3, EZK
|
rontarrant
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 643
- Joined: 2010/06/21 06:26:09
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/11 11:13:45
(permalink)
Cactus Music I myself picked the Scarlett 6i6 over the 2i2 and the 2i4 because it has a power supply. I have read about lots of issues with using USB powered interfaces. It's just not enough juice to run the pre amps and especially 48 volt phantom power. On some systems they report a grounding issue too... Go with the Tascam if it comes with a power supply. Interesting. Perhaps the USB power is why there are bad reports floating around about the lower-end versions.
-Ron T. ---------------------------------------------------------- MSI GE72 2QF-247US, 12 gb, Focusrite 6i6, AT-2020 ---------------------------------------------------------- Windows 10 x64, Sonar Platinum
|
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2567
- Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
- Location: West Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/11 15:44:41
(permalink)
USB bus powered interfaces do seem prone to problems. Or at least, people who have them seem to turn up in forums asking about various problems.
Maybe one issue is that not all USB ports and sockets are created equal. Although they are supposed to carry a certain level of amps/watts not all do. It's quite common for PC motherboard USB not to have enough current to do more than barely trickle charge a switched on iPad for example, though Macs and some PC motherboards have no problem. If the power from the USB socket is marginal then that might explain things, especially if an interface is designed with the Mac market in mind (Macs seem to have more juice at the USB sockets).
Unless absolute portability is a requirement going for an interface with its own power supply is probably the safer bet.
It's also worth making sure any interface is certified by the manufacturer to work properly with USB3 sockets. Not all do, especially older designs. USB2 is still around in the PC world but it's probably only a matter of time before it disappears on new boards and laptops.
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board, ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre. Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
|
Vastman
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2508
- Joined: 2006/08/30 02:49:18
- Location: Oakland, CA
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/11 16:48:15
(permalink)
Focusrite Forte is superb, heads and tails above the other focusrite offerings.
Dana We make the future... Climate Change MusicVastMaschine:SP4L/W10/i74930K/32GB/RME/CAD E100s; The Orchestra! NOVO!/Inspire/BohemianViolin&Cello, ARK1&2,/MinimalCapriccioMaximoSoto/OE1&2, Action&Emotive/Omni2/Tril/RMX/All OrangeTree/Falcon/APE Jugs/Alpha&Bravo/BFD3 & SD3Gravity/DM307/AEON/DM/Damage/Diva/HZebra/Hive/Diversion/VC4/Serum/Alchemy/blablablaSpitfire/8DIO/SL/KH/EW/NI; Shred1&2/AGF,G,M&T Torch&Res&Ren/GD-6; Ibanez SR1200&SR505NOVAX FanFret Tele&Strat
|
rontarrant
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 643
- Joined: 2010/06/21 06:26:09
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/11 19:58:18
(permalink)
tlw It's also worth making sure any interface is certified by the manufacturer to work properly with USB3 sockets. Not all do, especially older designs. USB2 is still around in the PC world but it's probably only a matter of time before it disappears on new boards and laptops.
Good point. Since I'm going to be getting rid of my desktop and going to a notebook soon, I'm thinking this is a good reason to hold off on buying a new audio interface for now. Thanks.
-Ron T. ---------------------------------------------------------- MSI GE72 2QF-247US, 12 gb, Focusrite 6i6, AT-2020 ---------------------------------------------------------- Windows 10 x64, Sonar Platinum
|
rontarrant
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 643
- Joined: 2010/06/21 06:26:09
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/11 19:58:49
(permalink)
Vastman Focusrite Forte is superb, heads and tails above the other focusrite offerings.
Sure does look sweet. I don't have the money for something like that ATM, though. :)
-Ron T. ---------------------------------------------------------- MSI GE72 2QF-247US, 12 gb, Focusrite 6i6, AT-2020 ---------------------------------------------------------- Windows 10 x64, Sonar Platinum
|
Vastman
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2508
- Joined: 2006/08/30 02:49:18
- Location: Oakland, CA
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/12 00:36:48
(permalink)
I think you should be able to pick one up at GC for around $300 during their sale... just find a manager and talk to um... it is truely amazing, the best sounding mic pre's ever (I'm a singer) and the Direct ins are just ****en. Haven't used a db since. And it is glistening. I still have several interfaces and auditioned a few others like the Audiobox 44 and presonus thingy and they were all just dull compared to the advanced rednet based pres... kicks but on my old focusrite pro-24dsp units (I've have two of them...plus an NI audio4 plus the big nice emu package...) I can't ever imagine upgrading again. do it once... do it right... just wangle a deal! talk to cclary... he'll agree!
post edited by Vastman - 2015/06/12 00:44:45
Dana We make the future... Climate Change MusicVastMaschine:SP4L/W10/i74930K/32GB/RME/CAD E100s; The Orchestra! NOVO!/Inspire/BohemianViolin&Cello, ARK1&2,/MinimalCapriccioMaximoSoto/OE1&2, Action&Emotive/Omni2/Tril/RMX/All OrangeTree/Falcon/APE Jugs/Alpha&Bravo/BFD3 & SD3Gravity/DM307/AEON/DM/Damage/Diva/HZebra/Hive/Diversion/VC4/Serum/Alchemy/blablablaSpitfire/8DIO/SL/KH/EW/NI; Shred1&2/AGF,G,M&T Torch&Res&Ren/GD-6; Ibanez SR1200&SR505NOVAX FanFret Tele&Strat
|
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8424
- Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/12 01:20:43
(permalink)
He is using a Mackie mixer so the pre amps are not on the agenda. When you use a audio interface's line inputs you are by passing the pre amps. So the topic is still, a low cost interface that has good drivers. Why worry about interface pre amps when adding better quality is easy and not supper expensive. This is why I bought a Joe Meek ThreeQ. I don't like the Scarlett's Pre amps but I'm OK because I never use them. I use the Joe Meek for 80% of my work. When I have other musicians in the studio I sometimes use the Mackie Mix 8 pre Amps and they are also way better than the Scarlett's. The Mix 8 was only $65. Can you believe it has replaced my $2,500 Yamaha 01V ? The Scarlett 6i6 pre amps are overly sensitive and clip at the drop of a hat. You end up recording at way to low a level. Maybe the high end Focusrite interfaces uses better pre amps but the Scarlett's fail to please. You can hit the Joe Meek or the Mackie hard. My old Tascam us1641 was the same way, it could take abuse and not clip. But the Focusrite drivers are better than my old Tascam so there you go. Drivers are paramount to me. So from my point of view, if the new Tascam interfaces now have better drivers and they also sport what the Craig claims are very good pre amps.. then ? Seems simple to me. And wouldn't the Steinberg be using cheaper Yamaha pre amps? But if the drivers are good then that's another pick.
post edited by Cactus Music - 2015/06/12 01:43:17
|
rontarrant
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 643
- Joined: 2010/06/21 06:26:09
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario
- Status: offline
Re: Bare-bones Audio Interface to Use with Mixer
2015/06/12 07:22:21
(permalink)
Thanks, Cactus Music and Vastman.
-Ron T. ---------------------------------------------------------- MSI GE72 2QF-247US, 12 gb, Focusrite 6i6, AT-2020 ---------------------------------------------------------- Windows 10 x64, Sonar Platinum
|