Sharkbite
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 102
- Joined: 2013/08/04 11:11:59
- Status: offline
Effects order changes sound
I have a feeling I am the last one to know this, but I just discovered how much different the sound can be depending order of the effects. I had 2 identical drum track set up with superior drummer, one track picked up right where the other ended and every setting was identical but you could here a volume difference as well as much more reverb on first track. I was using Nomad Blue Tubes Brickwall and then Blue Tubes Nomad Blue verb. I didn't realize I had them switched in there order on the 2 tracks. Just posting this for any other amateur like myself.
Perfect number of guitars formula: Current number of guitars + 1 more guitar = Perfect number of guitars. Windows 7 professional ver 6.1/Service pack 1/ 8 gig ram/ 64 bit operating system/ 1 TB hard drive/ Intel Core Quad CPU Q9400@2.66 GHz/ 4 TB external hard drive /Sonar X3 studio(64 bit)/ M-Audio fast track ultra interface
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/06/28 22:51:02
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Sharkbite 2015/07/02 20:52:17
Actually one of the most common questions people ask is about the "correct" order of effects. I was doing a workshop on voiceover and vocal recording in New York last week, and we spent a fair amount of time on the "EQ before or after dynamics" question. Sometimes the answer is pretty nuanced, and there's no single "right" answer. So it's good you posted this thread, it might encourage some questions about this topic. My general rule of thumb (and of course, rules are made to be broken) is dynamics first, EQ second, time-based effects third. But I often switch to EQ first followed by dynamics it I want to use the EQ to "pump" the dynamics. For example with a dance mix I can really boost the bass if it's before dynamics because the dynamics will tame it. But if recording jazz drums, then you probably want the EQ after any dynamics. The beauty of recording is that there is unlimited creative potential, and very often, the "wrong" technique produces the "right" sound.
|
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12010
- Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
- Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/06/29 00:20:39
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Sharkbite 2015/07/02 20:53:43
I'm pretty much with Craig. Dynamics, eq, time based effects in that order.
It seems to be the order where the least adjustment causes the most audible effect to me so it's a good basis for training your ear to the nuances of multi effects. When you change the order of the dynamics and eq the result is usually a very unexpected sound. Of course you can repeat your experiment easily by creating presets and fx chains. That's a must. Then comes creating a naming convention that allows you to find it again.
Mike V. (MUDGEL) STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64, PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz. Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2. Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub. Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX. Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor. Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
|
KPerry
Max Output Level: -44 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3120
- Joined: 2011/04/26 15:13:15
- Location: London, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/06/29 02:53:19
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Sharkbite 2015/07/02 20:55:24
That said, a high pass filter as the first thing in a chain isn't a bad idea...
|
Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2819
- Joined: 2011/02/03 04:31:35
- Location: Sound-Rehab, Austria
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/06/29 13:32:29
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Sharkbite 2015/07/02 20:55:27
KPerry That said, a high pass filter as the first thing in a chain isn't a bad idea...
definitely. I'd even go further and consider low cut (high pass) filters as among the most important ingredients of a transparent mix. a low cut in (almost) every channel, properly tuned of course ... plus again in selected buses (as some of the bus fx add unnecessary rumble to the low end) ... just don't add them with the piano player or guitarist looking over your shoulder and then make the mistake to solo the track for them ... they simply won't like it ;-)
GOOD TUNES LAST FOREVER +++ Visit the Rehab +++ DAW: Platinum/X3e, win10 64 bit, i7-3930K (6x3.2GHz), Asus Sabertooth X79, 32 GB DDR3 1600MHz, ATI HD 5450, 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility3, 2x 1TB WD HDD SATA 600 Audio-Interface: 2x MOTU 1248 AVB, Focusrite OctoPre, (Roland Octa-Capture) Control-Surface: VS-700C VSTi: WAVES, NI K10u, FabFilter, IK, ... (too many really)
|
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2567
- Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
- Location: West Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/06/29 16:19:18
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Sharkbite 2015/07/02 20:56:17
Anderton we spent a fair amount of time on the "EQ before or after dynamics" question.
Well, both at the same time, obviously :-) Before to act as an overall hi/lo/bandpass, compressor pumper or unpumper and surgical eq to reduce any resonances that are driving the compressor in an unwanted way. After for more general tone shaping and any further resonance reduction. There's often a good reason to use several eqs in one processing chain, similar to how a guitar has a tone control, overdrive or distortion pedals carry one or more tone controls to shape the pedal output, then the amp has its own tone stack.
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board, ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre. Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/06/29 16:27:36
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Sharkbite 2015/07/02 20:56:25
Totally agree. I generally use the Sonitus before for the filtering (it's good that you can stack bands at the same frequency for a steeper slope) and the QC afterwards for sweetening.
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
Sharkbite
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 102
- Joined: 2013/08/04 11:11:59
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/02 20:48:34
(permalink)
"It seems to be the order where the least adjustment causes the most audible effect to me so it's a good basis for training your ear to the nuances of multi effects." Great point. thank you.
Perfect number of guitars formula: Current number of guitars + 1 more guitar = Perfect number of guitars. Windows 7 professional ver 6.1/Service pack 1/ 8 gig ram/ 64 bit operating system/ 1 TB hard drive/ Intel Core Quad CPU Q9400@2.66 GHz/ 4 TB external hard drive /Sonar X3 studio(64 bit)/ M-Audio fast track ultra interface
|
BRuys
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 192
- Joined: 2011/04/26 15:13:16
- Location: New Zealand
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/04 22:58:29
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Sharkbite 2015/07/05 11:28:45
mudgel I'm pretty much with Craig. Dynamics, eq, time based effects in that order.
If there is a lot of low frequency content that you will be removing with EQ anyway, I would be EQ-ing first to stop it from pumping the dynamics processor. I think every situation is different and the "rules" have to be reassessed for every task. It takes a combination of understanding and experimentation to come up with the right recipes to solve a particular problem or achieve a desired effect.
|
RD9
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 154
- Joined: 2015/04/04 02:51:09
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/05 02:18:04
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Sharkbite 2015/07/05 11:28:30
Sharkbite I have a feeling I am the last one to know this, but I just discovered how much different the sound can be depending order of the effects. I had 2 identical drum track set up with superior drummer, one track picked up right where the other ended and every setting was identical but you could here a volume difference as well as much more reverb on first track. I was using Nomad Blue Tubes Brickwall and then Blue Tubes Nomad Blue verb. I didn't realize I had them switched in there order on the 2 tracks. Just posting this for any other amateur like myself.
Sharkbite, Thanks, you make an important point; it seems you have embarked on a fantastic journey which has no unique path as you can see from the posts above. E.g. the placement of EQ in the signal path can be quite variable; one of my channel strips even has a button which switches the EQ to either before or after the compressor. I personally like to use a high pass filter early in my chain. There are some rules of thumb which are best followed in the first instance, though. Below is a link to an article that I found useful. SOS is a great resource for this type of advice. However, remember that how it sounds is more important than any rule. http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jul99/articles/20tips.htm Cheers, R
post edited by RD9 - 2015/07/05 02:25:40
|
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
- Total Posts : 6475
- Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
- Location: Boston, MA, USA
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/05 08:17:11
(permalink)
FreeFlyBertl just don't add them with the piano player or guitarist looking over your shoulder and then make the mistake to solo the track for them ... they simply won't like it ;-)
Ha I've definitely been guilty of that.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/05 08:41:56
(permalink)
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
FreeFlyBertl just don't add them with the piano player or guitarist looking over your shoulder and then make the mistake to solo the track for them ... they simply won't like it ;-)
Ha I've definitely been guilty of that.
It's especially awkward when you're married to the piano player, no?
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
- Total Posts : 6475
- Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
- Location: Boston, MA, USA
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/05 10:19:48
(permalink)
Actually its me - I've had people kill the mids from my sound and I'm a midrangy kind of guy <g>
|
Zargg
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10666
- Joined: 2014/09/28 04:20:14
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/06 04:35:15
(permalink)
Hi. I usually use er before and after dynamics. Depending om the song , I sometimes use a subtractive eq first, dynamics, and boost eq. Or the other way, if needed. I switch them around to see/hear what I like best. As mentioned earlier, there are no specific rules. If it sounds good to you, it is good😀
Ken Nilsen ZarggBBZWin 10 Pro X64, Cakewalk by Bandlab, SPlat X64, AMD AM3+ fx-8320, 16Gb RAM, RME Ucx (+ ARC), Tascam FW 1884, M-Audio Keystation 61es, *AKAI MPK Pro 25, *Softube Console1, Alesis DM6 USB, Maschine MkII Laptop setup: Win 10 X64, i5 2.4ghz, 8gb RAM, 320gb 7200 RPM HD, Focusrite Solo, + *
|
Karyn
Ma-Ma
- Total Posts : 9200
- Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
- Location: Lincoln, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/06 06:21:44
(permalink)
There is a 'natural' order to certain effects. Take any acoustic instrument (lets use a piano), the natural order is dynamics (how hard you hit the keys), EQ (the shape/construction of the instrument), then time based (room reverb). Once you start looking at artificial effects, like compression, distortion, chorus, flanging, then you have to understand exactly what they're doing to the sound in order to decide where best to put them in the chain. Placing a chorus before distortion will give an entirely different sound to placing it after...
Mekashi Futo. Get 10% off all Waves plugins.Current DAW. i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum
|
synkrotron
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5263
- Joined: 2006/04/28 16:21:21
- Location: Warrington, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/06 06:40:27
(permalink)
Oh dear... It looks like I'm doing it all wrong then... Typically, on most of my recent projects, I insert an EQ plug as the first item in the effects bin, and apply that to the dry sound, in order to get the sound "sculpted" to fit in with each of the other tracks. Only if I feel that it is absolutely necessary do I add a dynamics plug into a track effects bin. If I am adding reverb to a track, I have since settled on always creating a buss for that effect and sending individual tracks to that, which is then routed to the master buss. If I add delay to a track then I will generally add that to a track, usually because I am after a particular delay effect just for that track, rather than trying to emulate playing in a canyon or something. And I place it last in the bin. I use mainly VST instruments, many of which come with their own EQ, dynamic and reverb/delay. If I am unable to attain the same effect with one of my VST plugs then I will use the effect that comes with the VSTi, otherwise I turn it off, thereby giving me more control over effects order, as well as using a plug that is sometimes better than the same "on-board" effect. On my master buss I have recently started using final "mastering" (I use that term loosely) EQ, followed by a limiter and finally spectrum display. So, to recap, I am using EQ > Dynamics (if required) > Reverb on tracks and then EQ > Dynamics on the master buss. I'm going to have to do a bit more research on this...
http://www.synkrotron.co.uk/Intel Core™i7-3820QM Quad Core Mobile Processor 2.70GHz 8MB cache | Intel HM77 Express Chipset | 16GB SAMSUNG 1600MHz SODIMM DDR3 RAM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M - 2.0GB DDR5 Video RAM | 500GB Samsung 850 Pro SSD | 1TB Samsung 850 Pro SSD | Windows 10 Pro | Roland OCTA-CAPTURE | SONAR Platinum ∞ FFS| Too many VSTi's to list here | KRK KNS-8400 Headphones | Roland JP-8000 | Oberheim OB12 | Novation Nova | Gibson SG Special | PRS Studio
|
Karyn
Ma-Ma
- Total Posts : 9200
- Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
- Location: Lincoln, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/06 07:19:12
(permalink)
There's nothing wrong with the way you're adding reverb, in fact a send to a reverb bus is the "standard" way to work. It goes back to the days when reverb units were very expensive (and big) and most studios had one (or two). Today you could put a reverb in every tack FX bin if you wanted, but because of the way we perceive sound (specifically reverb) it's best if each instrument using reverb has exactly the same reverb (you're creating physical space) and the best way to achieve that is to have a single instance in a bus that you send other tracks to. As for EQ and dynamics. Altering the volume will not normally affect the frequency content* but altering the frequency content WILL affect how a dynamics processor reacts. Every gate/expander/compressor/limiter is basically just an automated volume/gain control and the control input is frequency sensitive. There are no rules to say you should not put EQ before dynamics, but you could end up chasing your tail as every EQ change will affect the dynamics as well. * A very fast attack on a gate can add artificial hi frequencies to give a kick drum that '80's click
Mekashi Futo. Get 10% off all Waves plugins.Current DAW. i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/06 10:10:22
(permalink)
1 + 2 * 3 = ? Whether the answer is 7 or 9 depends upon the order in which you perform the addition and multiplication. Everything that happens under the hood of a DAW comes down to addition and multiplication. The difference is that in arithmetic we've settled upon rules of precedence in order to assure consistent results. In the real world such rules do not exist, so 7 and 9 are both legitimate answers.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Zargg
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10666
- Joined: 2014/09/28 04:20:14
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/06 12:50:20
(permalink)
I think there is no such thing as a specific order of plugins. I use plugins in the order I think fits the song / part. There is no spoon...
Ken Nilsen ZarggBBZWin 10 Pro X64, Cakewalk by Bandlab, SPlat X64, AMD AM3+ fx-8320, 16Gb RAM, RME Ucx (+ ARC), Tascam FW 1884, M-Audio Keystation 61es, *AKAI MPK Pro 25, *Softube Console1, Alesis DM6 USB, Maschine MkII Laptop setup: Win 10 X64, i5 2.4ghz, 8gb RAM, 320gb 7200 RPM HD, Focusrite Solo, + *
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/06 15:24:14
(permalink)
if you think of 'effects' as more 'sound shapers', and understand that GAIN STAGING is important in this equation, then you will get a better handle on stacking effects.
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Effects order changes sound
2015/07/06 17:05:09
(permalink)
A good thing to do is monitor VU levels going in and out of every effect in a chain. Using effects is creative so there is no real correct way of connecting effects. Having said that for mastering it is different I feel. The EQ should come before the compressor. Once the sound is nicely balanced EQ wise before the signal hits the compressor the compressor will be happier usually and will often sound better as a result. eg suppose yoyur mix has way too much bass then the (single band) compressor will always be over reacting to the bass end. EQ it and get it sounding normal again and then the whole spectrum of the signal will be hitting the compressor much more evenly. Nicer sound from the compressor.
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|