Helpful ReplyWhy is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase?

Page: < 1234 > Showing page 3 of 4
Author
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 11:48:28 (permalink)
Now that I think about it, working with Clip selections isn't well-documented. I should probably do a video showing the workflow.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#61
mettelus
Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5321
  • Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
  • Location: Maryland, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 11:49:23 (permalink)
The matrix view will already loop cells, so as long as the column contents are multiples of each other, that is not an issue (2-bar loops can run with 4, 8 and such). Being able to fire the matrix elegantly is lacking, and being able to modify the contents of a cell requires it to be pulled into another location for editing (such as the track view). This back-and-forth of editing can make an utter mess of things quickly (also requiring muting/soloing overhead), and "quick recording" to new (clean) tracks must be done manually (insert/assign tracks to each row). As Beeps said, it is not "quick and dirty" but with some streamlining it could be made much more useful (to any music genre). A secondary view for firing the matrix would make a "quick and dirty" arranger if present - this does not currently exist, so firing the matrix adds additional overhead for complex ideas (MIDI can be used for this, but requires some shenanigans as the MIDI learn wants to "see" a controller, not another VST).

ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
#62
Kylotan
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 995
  • Joined: 2007/09/10 17:27:35
  • Location: Nottingham, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 12:49:36 (permalink)
Anderton
The key is not to use the lassoo when dealing with song blocks that incorporate all tracks (which is what I need 95% of the time). I select all, then split at the beginning and end. Then I select all again, drag in the timeline, and have a keyboard shortcut to create a selection group. It takes longer to write about it than do it.

 
Usually I don't want to split the clips, as I want to preserve the extra beyond the end for cross-fading. (Also, I don't want that bit left behind when I move the section.) And sometimes there are MIDI notes with slow attack instruments where I play ahead of the first beat - splitting that clip will lose those notes.
 
But if you copy special and paste, they will. You can also drag and drop, then copy only the markers and paste later. I do that a lot of there are pitch markers for acidized clips.

 
I sometimes do the Cut Special and Paste routine; but since I can't split everything at measure boundaries, it usually ends up a mess.
 
As to clicking and selecting all being a pain when trying to remove a clip from a group, that happens if you use the Smart Tool but if you use the Select Tool, you can just Ctrl-Click to select the clips you want to exempt, then use the context menu to remove them from the group.

I'll give this a go, but generally I wouldn't want to remove clips from the group, just to quickly edit them individually. I did this with multi-tracked drums last year which were all grouped and it was a real hassle. In that case, it was worth paying the convenience price because it was essential that I was able to slide all the tracks around together, but in normal songwriting operation I don't think it would be.
 
All this would be irrelevant if the lasso worked in a sensible way, I think.
 
I'm sure more elegant ways could be invented, but I'm so used to this workflow in Vegas (where I'm always moving large blocks of video, audio, and automation around), that it's second nature and the fact that SONAR works the same way makes it easy for me. But it's also important to use the right tool for the right job or it gets klunky.



Have you ever tried Adobe Premiere? For the first 10 minutes you think, "wow, this is weird", but once you understand how it makes decisions on whether to ripple-edit or not, it's so much simpler than any alternative I've seen. No work arounds, no grouping, just drag and drop.

Sonar Platinum (Newburyport) / Win 8.1 64bit / Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 / Absynth / Kontakt / Play / Superior Drummer 2 / ESP LTD guitar / etc
 
Twilight's Embrace - gothic/death metal | Other works - instrumental/soundtracks
#63
Kylotan
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 995
  • Joined: 2007/09/10 17:27:35
  • Location: Nottingham, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 12:51:12 (permalink)
mettelus
The matrix view will already loop cells, so as long as the column contents are multiples of each other, that is not an issue (2-bar loops can run with 4, 8 and such)



I was talking specifically about a situation where I have 2 different drum loops filling the same time period as 1 guitar loop - I don't think Matrix View has a way of handling that.
 

Sonar Platinum (Newburyport) / Win 8.1 64bit / Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 / Absynth / Kontakt / Play / Superior Drummer 2 / ESP LTD guitar / etc
 
Twilight's Embrace - gothic/death metal | Other works - instrumental/soundtracks
#64
SGodfrey
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 268
  • Joined: 2012/03/27 14:13:57
  • Location: Bures, Suffolk. UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 12:54:38 (permalink)
Anderton
Now that I think about it, working with Clip selections isn't well-documented. I should probably do a video showing the workflow.


AAAaahhh!!
YES PLEASE!!
I posted this a while ago and got just one reply (with all due respect to the chap who responded)
http://forum.cakewalk.com/Confused-by-Clips-m3225663.aspx
I am still CONFUSED BY CLIPS.  Anything you could do would be great Craig.  YES PLEASE THANK-YOU! 

Sonar Platinum x64
Cakewalk UA-25EX
Asus X556UA-DM898T i7-7500U 8GB 1TB, Windows 10 Home
Komplete 11 Ultimate, Kontrol S49, Maschine Jam, Mikro mk2, Arturia V Collection 4
#65
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 13:07:31 (permalink)
Meh... Sonar is totally capable of the "block" workflow and I've learned how to force it to do so but really the point is it could be easier. I have been continuously pointed to other programs that do this (who shall for the moment remain nameless) but that is not enough of a reason for me to waste money on/time learning a new DAW. I would just like to do this in Sonar and it would probably draw in quite a few new customers who are used to working this way.
 
Unfortunately I am now coming to the realization that one of the DAWs in specific (that shall remain nameless) that does this type of stuff is being used by most of the people in my old crowd that I may be working with so I may have no choice but to at least get their base version. That kind of ticks me off but whatever.
#66
dubdisciple
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5849
  • Joined: 2008/01/29 00:31:46
  • Location: Seattle, Wa
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 13:13:06 (permalink)
listen
Use what you like and like what you use!!!
 


I don't think one person in this thread would dispute that. We are simply discussing some of the shortcomings(and possible workarounds and solutions) when it comes to workflow for genre specific production. Most of the comments are from long time Sonar users who love the product :)
#67
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 13:31:42 (permalink)
I like Sonar. I think it's the best creative tool for a creative tools like me.
 
I came from the old boring paradigm and will have to probably snag a recent version of such to stay compatible with people I'll likely be working with.
 
My priorities look like this...
 
Artist > Producer > Engineer...
 
Not the other way around. SPlat is an artist's tool IMO. To define it further I think it is an AUDIO artist's tool more than an "electronic" artist's tool. For the latter other platforms might work better (but not come with as robust of an instruments package).
 
It is almost kind of niche and boutique level as far as DAWs are concerned and it fits my particular "niche" very well... especially since it has been becoming more stable and handling the edit/mix stuff better these past couple years.
 
 
Edit: and to expand on that a little... look at how many guitar players and keyboard players we have here on the forum. It is very useful for those workflows and has the toolset in the base package to support them. I think a large amount of the negative posts criticizing the flow are by people that really would be better served by the DAWs that cater to other areas.
 
Still block arrangement, yo... that would be the b-dizzles.
post edited by Beepster - 2015/07/01 13:44:44
#68
mettelus
Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5321
  • Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
  • Location: Maryland, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 13:32:06 (permalink)
Kylotan
mettelus
The matrix view will already loop cells, so as long as the column contents are multiples of each other, that is not an issue (2-bar loops can run with 4, 8 and such)



I was talking specifically about a situation where I have 2 different drum loops filling the same time period as 1 guitar loop - I don't think Matrix View has a way of handling that.
 


Not as a simple column fire, correct. The alt pattern would require another column.

ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
#69
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 13:34:32 (permalink)
Kylotan 
I sometimes do the Cut Special and Paste routine; but since I can't split everything at measure boundaries, it usually ends up a mess.

 
Sorry, I thought this was in the context of EDM, where there's usually quantization so splitting on boundaries isn't an issue. As I mentioned, if you split within MIDI notes, it gets messy.
 
Have you ever tried Adobe Premiere?

 
Yes, I wrote two Adobe "Classroom in a Book" projects for Peachpit press. Premiere seemed more convoluted to me than Vegas, but that's probably because Vegas is based on a DAW's workflow so it makes sense to me. However the integration between Adobe and Premiere was very cool.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#70
dubdisciple
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5849
  • Joined: 2008/01/29 00:31:46
  • Location: Seattle, Wa
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 14:06:18 (permalink)
Anderton
Kylotan 
I sometimes do the Cut Special and Paste routine; but since I can't split everything at measure boundaries, it usually ends up a mess.

 
Sorry, I thought this was in the context of EDM, where there's usually quantization so splitting on boundaries isn't an issue. As I mentioned, if you split within MIDI notes, it gets messy.
 
Have you ever tried Adobe Premiere?

 
Yes, I wrote two Adobe "Classroom in a Book" projects for Peachpit press. Premiere seemed more convoluted to me than Vegas, but that's probably because Vegas is based on a DAW's workflow so it makes sense to me. However the integration between Adobe and Premiere was very cool.


Um...the integration between Adobe and Premiere? Did you perhaps mean between Premiere and other Adobe products. I do agree Premiere can be a little convoluted compared to Vegas, but it fits video professional workflow better; particularly when collaborating.
#71
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13933
  • Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
  • Location: NYC
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 21:26:18 (permalink)
Kylotan
 
Have you ever tried Adobe Premiere? For the first 10 minutes you think, "wow, this is weird", but once you understand how it makes decisions on whether to ripple-edit or not, it's so much simpler than any alternative I've seen. No work arounds, no grouping, just drag and drop.




 
Funnily enough I've been learning Premiere recently and on more than one occasion I thought man, I wish Sonar's timeline was more like this 

James
Windows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
#72
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4294
  • Joined: 2015/03/26 18:02:02
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 22:07:00 (permalink)
How did the topic get from 'why is Cakewalk advertising porno?' to this??

Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.6,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),2 x 1TB SSD (Samsung EVO 850),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5. Rap Pro,Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1,Addictive Keys,Waves Silver,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist,Acronis True Image 2015.
#73
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 22:18:18 (permalink)
dubdisciple
 
Um...the integration between Adobe and Premiere? Did you perhaps mean between Premiere and other Adobe products.



Ooops, yes, I meant to say Audition. Hey, they both start with "a." 

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#74
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 22:37:21 (permalink)
Spencer
 
sigh. this forum's reputation on other forums is entirely deserved, I'll leave it at that.


Did you ever find stats for Image-Line (or Ableton sales that updated what I provided for 2012)? I'm curious about your sources.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#75
konradh
Max Output Level: -42 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3325
  • Joined: 2006/01/16 16:07:06
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 23:07:46 (permalink)
dubdisciple, Sorry for the delay in responding, but if you are still reading this thread, I thought you made a very good point about age and loop-based music.  Thanks.
 
And I want to be sure I didn't give the wrong idea:  I think creating really good music in any style takes talent and work—I was just thinking of the younger guys I know who sort of play around making beats.  But what you said is really the right answer.

Konrad
Current album and more: http://www.themightykonrad.com/

Sonar X1d Producer. V-Studio 700. PC: Intel i7 CPU 3.07GHz, 12 GB RAM. Win 7 64-bit. RealGuitar, RealStrat, RealLPC, Ivory II, Vienna Symphonic, Hollywood Strings, Electr6ity, Acoustic Legends, FabFour, Scarbee Rick/J-Bass/P-Bass, Kontakt 5. NI Session Guitar. Boldersounds, Noisefirm. EZ Drummer 2. EZ Mix. Melodyne Assist. Guitar Rig 4. Tyros 2, JV-1080, Kurzweil PC2R, TC Helicon VoiceWorks+. Rode NT2a, EV RE20. Presonus Eureka.  Rokit 6s. 
#76
dubdisciple
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5849
  • Joined: 2008/01/29 00:31:46
  • Location: Seattle, Wa
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 23:14:15 (permalink)
Konradh, you didn't say anything off putting. :)
#77
dubdisciple
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5849
  • Joined: 2008/01/29 00:31:46
  • Location: Seattle, Wa
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 23:15:16 (permalink)
Doktor Avalanche
How did the topic get from 'why is Cakewalk advertising porno?' to this??

because the original topic cleared up pretty quickly and topics typically evolve
#78
listen
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 593
  • Joined: 2008/09/12 06:07:55
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/01 23:33:29 (permalink)
Anderton - Yes it would be nice to see a work flow video!!!!!!!!
 

- Listen -
FOH Mixer & Recording Studio Manager
Nothing but the grace of God - mggtg.



VS 700C - R / CONSOLE 1 / NEVE PORTICO 5017 / TASCAM UH-7000 / SONAR PLATINUM  / REASON RECORD 9 / VMP 2 / UREI 7110's / UA LA-610 MkII / AUDIENT ASP 880 / CREATION STATION 450 V 5 WINDOWS 10 / HOME 64 - BIT / SKYLAKE CORE i7 (i7 - 6700, 4 CORES/8 THREADS)
#79
dubdisciple
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5849
  • Joined: 2008/01/29 00:31:46
  • Location: Seattle, Wa
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/02 03:02:24 (permalink)
+1
 
#80
dappa1
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2949
  • Joined: 2007/02/26 04:18:57
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/02 03:19:49 (permalink)
I agree with the demographic Sonar really caters for 40 + crowd and that is one reason why we are not on the cutting edge and the powers that be move slow to make it so. 
 
All the young people move with Ableton...FL Studios they seem to be the DAWs that real musicians flock to. Not saying they are not real musicians here. The think with old people is that they are usually set in their ways and new ideas are not embraced. That is probably what makes it hard for Sonar to be truly innovative they maybe scared to lose their customer base. But you can always have new customers who become your customer base and then you may start getting in there with the top three four DAWs that are out there now.
 
Sonar is good for the hobbyist obviously they maybe one or two who are professionals and can afford the really really good plug ins that we mere mortals will never be exposed to but still it doesn't mean that we are not able to make it, though it is a DAW for the more mature crowd. This is proved to be true when I view reviews on you tube they are no young people saying hey I use Sonar most of the videos are done by fifty yr old men and upward!

Sonar X series 
https://youtu.be/9YNplnhTAZY Steal My Girl
 https://youtu.be/A0VPi_UZmLo Moon & Stars
 
KRK VXT6 Studio One 3  Main: SPLAT for Lifetime: Formerly known as...
Nothing beats the best!
#81
dantarbill
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1820
  • Joined: 2004/12/15 10:48:18
  • Location: Monrovia, CA
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/02 11:34:49 (permalink)
dubdisciple
Doktor Avalanche
How did the topic get from 'why is Cakewalk advertising porno?' to this??

because the original topic cleared up pretty quickly and topics typically evolve




Hello!  OP here...
 
Personally, I find the evolution of this thread absolutely fascinating.  I typically avoid any thread that has gone to three pages or more because, by that time, it has devolved into total nonsense.  This time though...well...my name's at the top, so I've chosen to pay attention.
  • Who knew that a single Whole Foods store nets more than your typically DAW vendor in a year?
  • Who knew that Cakewalk and Steinberg don't stab each other in the back at trade shows?
  • I didn't know that some see SONAR as the "DAW for old farts".  (I unfortunately speak as a card carrying "old fart".)
  • I didn't know anything about the editing style in Vegas vs Adobe Premiere.
  • Who knew that some equate Cubase with porno?  Is that how they got all their users?
You gotta love it!

Dan Tarbill
#82
charlyg
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 950
  • Joined: 2015/02/27 22:10:47
  • Location: West Hills, CA
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/02 11:45:00 (permalink)
Some seem to forget new is not always better. Innovative is not always better. It can be, but it is NOT a given.  There is a reason a re-formed trash can lid is still used in music. In case anyone hadn't noticed, some music lasts, other music doesn't but is a hoot for a while. Pick a side and have at it, and leave the other side alone.

 
 
#83
mettelus
Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5321
  • Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
  • Location: Maryland, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/02 11:51:24 (permalink)
I went to a college that had no "arts" but ended up teaching myself guitar the last couple years. I went to the library and they had only one book on music theory... I flipped to the copyright page and was 1913! Oddly enough, that book was (and is) still relevant (funny how that works).

ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
#84
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/02 12:11:21 (permalink)
dappa1
I agree with the demographic Sonar really caters for 40 + crowd and that is one reason why we are not on the cutting edge and the powers that be move slow to make it so. 
 
All the young people move with Ableton...FL Studios they seem to be the DAWs that real musicians flock to. Not saying they are not real musicians here. The think with old people is that they are usually set in their ways and new ideas are not embraced. That is probably what makes it hard for Sonar to be truly innovative they maybe scared to lose their customer base. But you can always have new customers who become your customer base and then you may start getting in there with the top three four DAWs that are out there now.
 
Sonar is good for the hobbyist obviously they maybe one or two who are professionals and can afford the really really good plug ins that we mere mortals will never be exposed to but still it doesn't mean that we are not able to make it, though it is a DAW for the more mature crowd. This is proved to be true when I view reviews on you tube they are no young people saying hey I use Sonar most of the videos are done by fifty yr old men and upward!


So now Sonar is the nursing home DAW. You heard it here first folks. If that can be inferred from who does or doesn't create YouTube videos then I won't share with you what I could conclude from your comments.

Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#85
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/02 12:24:52 (permalink)
dappa1
I agree with the demographic Sonar really caters for 40 + crowd and that is one reason why we are not on the cutting edge and the powers that be move slow to make it so. 
 
All the young people move with Ableton...FL Studios they seem to be the DAWs that real musicians flock to. Not saying they are not real musicians here. The think with old people is that they are usually set in their ways and new ideas are not embraced. That is probably what makes it hard for Sonar to be truly innovative they maybe scared to lose their customer base. But you can always have new customers who become your customer base and then you may start getting in there with the top three four DAWs that are out there now.
 
Sonar is good for the hobbyist obviously they maybe one or two who are professionals and can afford the really really good plug ins that we mere mortals will never be exposed to but still it doesn't mean that we are not able to make it, though it is a DAW for the more mature crowd. This is proved to be true when I view reviews on you tube they are no young people saying hey I use Sonar most of the videos are done by fifty yr old men and upward!




Ludicrous. I won't be 40 for another few years, make "young people" music (just not dance/electronica) and I've been enthusiastically using Sonar for over 3 years.
 
In fact all the young people who are focused on becoming REAL pro ENGINEERS would be using Cubase. I get this from talking to young upstart studio hounds and even retailers. That is understandable because they have the bigger name and it is a good program BUT in the past few years Cake have upped their game. I was about to bail to Cubase a couple years back but now I am glad I didn't. Sonar is more useful to me as an artist.
 
For "oontz, oontz" stuff and live DJ's... no, Sonar is not the best choice but it is a program that has everything needed to create "youthful" music. Much more so than other platforms out there without sacrificing the "dinosaur" element which, hate to be the one to break it to you, has only been having a MASSIVE resurgence in popularity amongst young people for... oh the past decade or so.
 
Methinks you may be the one who is getting a little long in the tooth. The young electronic artists fully understand the advantages of having live instruments interspersed amongst the "zip, zaps, blaps" and "ooglety bloozles".
 
It is about integration of styles and genres these days. Not isolation and staunch closed mindedness. Sonar provides the tools to acheive such integration. It could be better but that could be said of everything.
 
Peace.
#86
charlyg
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 950
  • Joined: 2015/02/27 22:10:47
  • Location: West Hills, CA
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/02 12:31:30 (permalink)
It could be better but that could be said of everything.

 
Well, the orgasm I had the other day.....but I digress....
 
There is a way to prefer one to the other(of anything) without having to take a shot at the alternative(s). In fact, it is almost an art....which I am still learning.
post edited by charlyg - 2015/07/02 12:38:48

 
 
#87
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/02 12:49:21 (permalink)
dappa1
I agree with the demographic Sonar really caters for 40 + crowd and that is one reason why we are not on the cutting edge and the powers that be move slow to make it so.

 
And the factual basis for this conclusion is...?
 
First, the entire music business is skewed toward over 40 because a) that's where a demographic bump occurred and b), music was important to that demographic bump so it has stayed with music for a long time.
 
Second, SONAR is gaining new users mostly through sales of Artist, which reaches a younger demographic. Even more tellingly, Music Creator is a major success thanks to STEAM...not exactly an old age home. 
 
All the young people move with Ableton...FL Studios they seem to be the DAWs that real musicians flock to.

 
No, they seem to be the DAWs that musicians doing particular genres of music (for which those programs are optimized) flock to. I use Ableton Live for live performance, SONAR for everything else. I'm not stupid: I know that programs don't care what age you are, and that it's a good idea to choose the right tool for the right job.
 
The think with old people is that they are usually set in their ways and new ideas are not embraced.

 
Well again, you're wrong. According to the International Music Summit Report 2015, interest in EDM on YouTube among 35 to 49 year olds grew 80% last year. They seem less set in their ways than someone who would assume they are...
 
That is probably what makes it hard for Sonar to be truly innovative they maybe scared to lose their customer base.

 
You've got to be kidding. First to go 64-bit. First to have a 64-bit mix engine. First to do loop construction, hard disk recording, and deep MIDI editing (and this was 15 years ago...try editing your Acidized loops in FL Studio or Ableton...you can't). First to do Mix Recall in a DAW. First to integrate Microsoft media platform. First (and only) to allow REX to Acid file conversion and editing so you don't have to use ReCycle. First to have a 16-track REX player. First to create a standard for MIDI FX. One of the first DAWs to integrate ReWire (which Propellerheads told me was the best integration they'd seen up to that point). First to create seamless integration among step sequencing, piano roll view, and an arrangement page. Not the first, but included an EDM-friendly Matrix View. One of the first (if not the first; not sure) to handle VST2, VST3, and Direct X plug-ins. First to create native (non-Melodyne) applications for ARA - VocalSync and Drum Replacer.
 
Know any EDM artists who use loops, REX files, MIDI FX, plug-ins, matrix views, step sequencers, and drum replacers? Just sayin.' But to be fair, SONAR was so ahead of the curve all this may have occurred before you were aware DAWs existed.
 
Sonar is good for the hobbyist obviously they maybe one or two who are professionals and can afford the really really good plug ins that we mere mortals will never be exposed to but still it doesn't mean that we are not able to make it, though it is a DAW for the more mature crowd. This is proved to be true when I view reviews on you tube they are no young people saying hey I use Sonar most of the videos are done by fifty yr old men and upward!

 
You mean like this 50 year old man? Are you a DJ who's played Madison Square Garden? I doubt it.
 
Or maybe you mean old guys like Vivek Madala, Murder FM, Javier Colon, Call of Duty composer Sean Murray, DJ Spooky, Eliud Ortiz, Adventure Club (another EDM act), Luigi Gozalez, Joerg Kohring...here, educate yourself
 
Regarding EDM, sure, you can use a program that's optimized for it, and that's great. But the reason why someone like Ilan Bluestone, or me for that matter, uses SONAR is because it has all the EDM tricks up its sleeve AND a whole bunch of additional features that let EDM users...embrace new ideas and not be set in their ways.
 
(And if you've tried SONAR's Kick Start and KickMaster instrument and processor for creating the ultimate EDM kick drum, or the electro loops in the new percussion library, you'd be aware that content is being generated for EDM as well.)

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#88
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/02 12:53:42 (permalink)
Beepster
The young electronic artists fully understand the advantages of having live instruments interspersed amongst the "zip, zaps, blaps" and "ooglety bloozles".



This is very, very true. The theme of this year's International Music Summit in Ibiza, which is concerned solely with EDM, was "Back2Live" because of the trend of traditional instruments being integrated with electronics. Some examples:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykdvLAfG7gY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeCRfv_M35w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyiemSg_Tv8

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#89
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Why is Cakewalk advertising for Cubase? 2015/07/02 13:10:02 (permalink)
To expoound on what I was trying to say earlier...
 
When I listen to music I like listening to "specialists". That is the best of the best or those who create something so off beat and interesting that entices the mind.
 
However the artists I most look up to, and aspire to be like, are the ultra flexible musicians who are able to immediately hop on something, like a mood, genre, style, emotion, etc and reproduce it well. They may not be "specialists" so I might not listen to a full album of theirs but they are intersting, USEFUL to the industry and generally highly intelligent and creative.
 
Zappa was like that. I actually, and don't stone me for this, don't really like LISTENING to Zappa but that freaky old buzzard knew how to do what he needed to to convey a style. I've always had respect for Paul Schaffer for being able to go on stage night after night and lead his band in all sorts of renditions of this that or the other and even use not only his own instrument but direct his band to accentuate a comedic performance. More recently I have gained a lot of respect for Brandon Smalls who not only created and wrote the animated series Home Movies and Metalocalypse but also wrote and played most of the music for the shows.
 
So as someone who wants to be flexible like that (and still be able to be a "specialist" for my own serious artistic projects) I knew what I wanted when I updated my "studio" gear. Sonar was the best fit for that and continues to get better at it yearly (and now monthly).
 
Those other platforms? Fuggedabouttit. I would have had to spend WAY more to get the same options. There are certainly other things those programs do better but without purchasing and installing a half dozen DAWs to just get SLIGHT improvements in a FEW specific areas and LEARNING all those DAWs (never mind having to shuffle files around endlessly between programs) well... Sonar is a nice little cockpit for how I think and work.
 
I came from Nuendo and it was boring. The only other serious DAW I have installed locally is Reaper... again boring (but useful). The first DAW I will invest in if I had the money to use ALONGSIDE Sonar will be Cubase simply for compatibility with other people I will likely have to work with (and since I come from the Steinberg paradigm the learning curve should be low).
 
I will eventually take a poke at Ableton but only to see if it will work for live performance triggering. I would never write/record/mix into it. FL? Not a freaking chance. I have always hated that thing. It's annoying.
#90
Page: < 1234 > Showing page 3 of 4
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1