Helpful ReplyAnyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors?

Author
Jimbo21
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 696
  • Joined: 2010/02/08 19:35:48
  • Status: offline
2015/09/29 20:21:27 (permalink)

Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors?

I've read several things (admittedly mostly on forums) where you should only use a sub to check your mix occasionally. Well, happy birthday to me, I got one (KRK 10s) and got it set up tonight.  I set it up using this article from SOS: 
 
http://www.soundonsound.c...rticles/subwoofers.asp
 
I think, if I read the article right that the goal is to have the sub on most of the time. I still plan on checking my mixes with the sub off and I also have one of those Behritone Auratone clones for mono and small speaker checking.
 
Does anyone here use a sub most/all the time?

Dell XPS 8700 i7 4770 3.4GHZ, Windows 7 64bit, 8gb Ram, Focurite 18i6, Sonar Platinum
 
https://soundcloud.com/jimmy-james-and-the-blue
#1
Leadfoot
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2817
  • Joined: 2011/04/26 11:08:38
  • Location: Indiana
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/09/29 20:55:21 (permalink)
I use my sub pretty much all the time. As long as you have it dialed in correctly, it's indispensable for letting you know what's going on with your low end. It's equally important to hear how your mixes sound on bass deficient systems though. But once you learn your monitoring environment with the sub, and how it translates on real world systems, you'll probably find that you have your sub on most of the time too.
#2
Jimbo21
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 696
  • Joined: 2010/02/08 19:35:48
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/09/29 21:30:07 (permalink)
Thanks Leadfoot. I've been listening to varied musical genres since I got it going to get used to how things sound with it and I'm really liking how everything sounds. 
 
It's kinda funny, I first set up the sub from the KRK manual and their website where you download test tones and use an SPL meter to set levels. After dong this, the sub was WAYYYYY too loud.  I then followed the SOS article (above) subjective way to dial it in and that worked much, much better.

Dell XPS 8700 i7 4770 3.4GHZ, Windows 7 64bit, 8gb Ram, Focurite 18i6, Sonar Platinum
 
https://soundcloud.com/jimmy-james-and-the-blue
#3
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 24398
  • Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
  • Location: NC
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/09/30 07:37:01 (permalink)
Yep..I let mine run all the time. The only time I turn it off.... I have it plugged into a switched power strip for that purpose.... is when I need to double check something in the low end.

If it's set up properly, you should be able to let it run.  If it's not set up properly, and that tends to be most often,  "the sub is a bit too loud" the mixes will show it by being mixed "bass lite" .  Very few people add a sub and don't turn it up loud enough because that's the problem they were trying to solve by buying one.
 
Getting the proper balance is very important. Once you get it set.... trust it and don't touch the level control or the crossover freq knob.  If the bass is then too loud or too soft, fix the mix, not the gear.
 
It's ear candy for the bass and kick.  I love what mine did for the sound I hear.
post edited by Guitarhacker - 2015/09/30 07:53:13

My website & music: www.herbhartley.com

MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW   
Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface


BMI/NSAI

"Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer 
#4
dcumpian
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4124
  • Joined: 2005/11/03 15:50:51
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/09/30 08:16:16 (permalink)
All the time. After my first couple of mixes with it, I had the sub level set to where I can barely hear it most of the time, but it's there. If I start to really hear it, I know I've gone too far with the bass/kick in the mix, unless that's what I want.
 
Regards,
Dan

Mixing is all about control.
 
My music:
http://dancumpian.bandcamp.com/ or https://soundcloud.com/dcumpian Studiocat Advanced Studio DAW (Intel i5 3550 @ 3.7GHz, Z77 motherboard, 16GB Ram, lots of HDDs), Sonar Plat, Mackie 1604, PreSonus Audiobox 44VSL, ESI 4x4 Midi Interface, Ibanez Bass, Custom Fender Mexi-Strat, NI S88, Roland JV-2080 & MDB-1, Komplete, Omnisphere, Lots o' plugins.    
#5
doncolga
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1519
  • Joined: 2006/01/03 17:15:48
  • Location: Statesboro, GA USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/09/30 08:46:01 (permalink)
This is weird but it works for me.  I love my subwoofer, but I'm honestly getting better results checking the bass on headphones and spending more time mixing and listening on this thing and more time listening in mono.  I run a line to it from my headphone amp and put it directly in front of/below my computer monitor and lean it back to it points right at me.  I can get a mix I'm happy with using just this and headphones actually.  After that my Mixcubes in mono first, then stereo, then my regular monitors, mono first, then stereo.  If someone had told me this six months ago I would have called BS, but I'm happier doing this this way.  If I can make it comparable to a commercial mix on this and bass is good on headphones, it good.  If it was desert island mixing, I'd probably go with just this.
 
http://www.amazon.com/DKnight-Ultra-Portable-Bluetooth-Microphone-Blackberry/dp/B00F5NE2KG/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1443616857&sr=1-1&keywords=bluetooth+speaker
 
post edited by doncolga - 2015/09/30 09:08:43

HP Z220 Workstation I7 3770, 8 GB RAM, Windows 10, Sonar Platinum, RME Multiface II via PCIe, JBL 4326 w/sub, AvanTone MixCubes
#6
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/09/30 09:06:33 (permalink)
Same here. The sub's on all the time. I rely on alternate speakers and headphones to hear what it sounds like without that low end help.
 
But it took me awhile to get the sub placed and adjusted right. There is a natural tendency to turn it up too loud. I'd recommend recording a stepped or swept sine wave series to check levels and, more important, to identify your worst low-frequency room modes. The sub is going to excite problem frequencies that might not have been noticeable before.
 
Another tip: where you put the sub relative to the mix position is very important. As you're experimenting with different locations, keep in mind that it doesn't have to be directly on the floor and it doesn't have to be midway between your main speakers.
 
Depending on the type of floor (e.g. hollow space beneath vs. solid concrete) it can benefit you to raise the speaker off the floor and/or add some vibration dampeners underneath it.
 
Moving it off-center can help by changing the resonant peaks such that they're not reinforcing harmonics from your mains. For example, I have a 70 Hz resonance in my room, which means it's also problematic for multiples of 70 Hz (140, 210, 280 Hz, etc.), which my mains contribute to. Moving the sub to one side I found a spot where 70 Hz is not peaking at the mix position, so even though the mains are still resonating at least they're not conspiring with the sub to make it worse.
 
Set your crossover as low as possible. Figure out where your mains start to wimp out and set the crossover just above that and no higher. You might think that setting the crossover higher will help by taking some load off the mains, but in practice it's not going to be as smooth that way. My main speakers' -3dB point is about 50 Hz, so my crossover is set to about 55 Hz. Originally I had it up around 70 Hz but heard an immediate improvement after lowering it.
 
As with any new speakers, listening to commercial music and training your ears is the best preparation. It's a tough assignment: kick back and listen to your favorite tunes through your new setup, for as long as possible. After a hundred hours or so, all the technical stuff won't matter because your brain will just know what it's supposed to sound like.


All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
#7
BobF
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8124
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 18:43:11
  • Location: Missouri - USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/09/30 09:26:49 (permalink)
Sub on!  I'm able to quickly check without the sub with a button press on the monitor matrix.  Check with multiple speakers sets and headphones ... even with 8" monitors there is a lot of improvement.
 
Getting it tamed/dialed in took a LOT of time and tweaking though

Bob  --
Angels are crying because truth has died ...
Illegitimi non carborundum
--
Studio One Pro / i7-6700@3.80GHZ, 32GB Win 10 Pro x64
Roland FA06, LX61+, Fishman Tripleplay, FaderPort, US-16x08 + ARC2.5/Event PS8s 
Waves Gold/IKM Max/Nomad Factory IS3/K11U

#8
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10037
  • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
  • Location: SL,UT
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/09/30 10:23:09 (permalink)
i never use a sub.
 

Bats Brew music Streaming
Bats Brew albums:
"Trouble"
"Stay"
"The Time is Magic"
--
Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
 
#9
Jimbo21
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 696
  • Joined: 2010/02/08 19:35:48
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/09/30 18:50:32 (permalink)
Thanks for all the responses guys! It really makes listening to my music library that much more enjoyable. Right now, when I turn off the sub I can tell there's something missing but turning it back on it's not quite so noticeable. I hope that means I've got it set about right.

Dell XPS 8700 i7 4770 3.4GHZ, Windows 7 64bit, 8gb Ram, Focurite 18i6, Sonar Platinum
 
https://soundcloud.com/jimmy-james-and-the-blue
#10
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 24398
  • Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
  • Location: NC
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/10/01 07:34:56 (permalink)
bitflipper
As with any new speakers, listening to commercial music and training your ears is the best preparation. It's a tough assignment: kick back and listen to your favorite tunes through your new setup, for as long as possible. After a hundred hours or so, all the technical stuff won't matter because your brain will just know what it's supposed to sound like.



 
There you go.... I agree 100% with this.  Dave nails it.

My website & music: www.herbhartley.com

MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW   
Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface


BMI/NSAI

"Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer 
#11
joel77
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 489
  • Joined: 2004/01/14 11:47:08
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/10/01 08:40:00 (permalink)
I keep mine on except to check how a mix sounds without it. I also have the level set pretty low. Just enough to add a bit of low end punch. Seems to work for me.
 
Like any change in the room, it takes a bit of listening to get used to it.

Joel  Glaser
Studio 52     

God Bless America
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sonar x64, Win 7 Pro, Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R, 
Intel i7-930 2.86GHz dual quad core, 12GB Corsair DDL3,
Asus ATI Radion HD 4350, WD 500 GB SATA, 
Dual WD 1TB SATA HDs, ME RayDAT, Alesis HD24XR - A/D-D/A
 
https://www.facebook.com/...dio-52/811309178917929
www.thebrothersglaser.com
#12
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/10/02 00:30:21 (permalink)
I leave mine on at all times as well and have a sub for each system I use. The KRK 10 is awesome....I have one of those as well. The key is to not use too much. You want to hear a little low end but you don't want to FEEL much of it.
 
Put on a CD that you know really well and just turn up the sub until it sounds good to you. If you can feel it, you're using too much. From there try a few mixes and see how you fair. If you are bass light when you listen back on other systems, lower your sub and try again.
 
If you are bass heavy on other systems, turn up your sub and mix again. The hardest thing about the sub is deciding what frequencies you want need to accentuate. At my home studio, I'm pushing 85 Hz as that's what my room needed. At my real studio, 70 Hz is what we needed. You'll need to experiment a bit...but once you dial it in, you will never have to learn anything again.
 
Speaking of that, I've seen "learn your room" or "learn your monitors" posted a few times on these forums. For what it's worth, I have to sorta disagree with that. If you can tune your room and your monitors, there should be no need or reason to learn them really. If you can't, then yeah, I can see that. But keep this in mind...
 
When you have to learn something...a room or a set of monitors, you are forcing yourself to compensate in a sense. That's not how this field is supposed to work. When you tune your room and eq your monitors for flat, the only "learning" you *MAY* need to get used to, is what a flat and uncolored experience is supposed to sound like. If you've spent your life with bass boosters, excessive EQ and 3D enhancement or wideners in your media players or stereo systems, you're in for a rude awakening.
 
That said, when you are in the right room, what you hear should be what you hear. When I was learning to do this stuff, I'd go to a killer studio to listen to the mix I did in my home studio only to hear all the mistakes I made. The reason being? The pricey studio had a tuned room with monitors corrected for flat. When I listened to something I did, any mistakes were blatantly obvious. I wasn't familiar with that room or those monitors. They just sounded great and everything I listened to on them commercially sounded great too. My stuff was a notch above suck to be honest.
 
As soon as I did that tuning and correction to my studio, I was instantly able to hear the right stuff and make the right calls. There was no learning the room for me, honest. I listened, I heard, I made corrections. Those corrections stuck and sounded like the mix I did in my studio everywhere I listened. That's how it should be. This field should never be about learning to where it actually means compensating unless you absolutely have no other choice. My man cave is a 12x12 room. It's nothing to brag about. It sounds as good here and is as consistent as my big studio down the shore that has bass traps and Auralex all over. When I listen to something I did at my house at the real studio, it sounds as it should and vice versa.
 
If you have to compensate, it's probably time to fix your room and your monitors. If you can't....it's like bringing your CD out to your car and taking notes and then bringing the notes back into your studio while trying to make changes you can't even really hear in your studio. We've all been there. You are then forcing yourself to "learn" your room/monitors...which if you think about it, is silly. How can you try to fix something you can't really hear? Ludicrous, don't ya think? That's what "learning your room/monitors" means to me.
 
I'm sure there may be several that disagree with me, so I'll say this. If you are struggling with your mixes, call a studio you trust that has good gear with a tuned room and corrected monitors and ask them to book you a listening session. They'll either charge you nothing if you go on their down time, or a VERY small fee. You'll only need 20 minutes tops. (Heck, come to NJ and hang with me for the price of your gas and travels.) Tell them you just want to listen to the stuff you have recorded and mixed on your system, on their system. Take notes of what you feel you did wrong, and then ask them for their take. If you go in the right room, there is nothing to learn! You just "hear it" and know what is wrong.
 
I don't have any awards other than writing the longest posts on the Sonar forums, but everything I mix and master sounds the same everywhere (good or bad, I'm VERY consistent! LOL) I play it other than on laptops. I've never heard commercial recordings sound good on them either...so I don't feel so bad for striking out there. :)
 
-Danny
post edited by Danny Danzi - 2015/10/02 00:42:08

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#13
Jimbo21
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 696
  • Joined: 2010/02/08 19:35:48
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/10/02 21:12:59 (permalink)
Danny Danzi
Speaking of that, I've seen "learn your room" or "learn your monitors" posted a few times on these forums. For what it's worth, I have to sorta disagree with that. If you can tune your room and your monitors, there should be no need or reason to learn them really. If you can't, then yeah, I can see that.



 
This is partially the reason I finally bought a sub. I'm tired of trying to compensate. My mixes were generally lacking in low mids with tons of kick and bass making the mixes boom way too much. I put up bass traps in the corners and some more sound proofing at the side of the mixing position.  Helped a little. I got  ARC2, did the measurements and found a large dip around 65hz at my listening position, as well as fairly large bumps in the spectrum at around 110 - 250 or so. When I applied ARC, At first I thought it was great, because all that low mid congestion was gone when I played CDs  through it.  Then, I noticed there was this tubby low end sound in some cases, especially my mixes, I think because of ARC having to boost around 65hz to get a flatter response (I'm pretty sure that's a null there, though I'm stuck in that spot pretty much for now).  And yes, I still had problems translating the mixes to other systems just like before ARC, just a different set of problems. Not too long ago I took ARC off and mixed a song and then listened on other playback systems and it was closer. I'm a little disappointed in myself that it took me so long to hear the truth (or my current understanding of it).
 
I intend to setup ARC again with the sub and see what difference, if any, the sub makes.
 
Thanks for your reply and everyone else's as well!

Dell XPS 8700 i7 4770 3.4GHZ, Windows 7 64bit, 8gb Ram, Focurite 18i6, Sonar Platinum
 
https://soundcloud.com/jimmy-james-and-the-blue
#14
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/10/02 23:23:16 (permalink)
Jimbo21
Danny Danzi
Speaking of that, I've seen "learn your room" or "learn your monitors" posted a few times on these forums. For what it's worth, I have to sorta disagree with that. If you can tune your room and your monitors, there should be no need or reason to learn them really. If you can't, then yeah, I can see that.



 
This is partially the reason I finally bought a sub. I'm tired of trying to compensate. My mixes were generally lacking in low mids with tons of kick and bass making the mixes boom way too much. I put up bass traps in the corners and some more sound proofing at the side of the mixing position.  Helped a little. I got  ARC2, did the measurements and found a large dip around 65hz at my listening position, as well as fairly large bumps in the spectrum at around 110 - 250 or so. When I applied ARC, At first I thought it was great, because all that low mid congestion was gone when I played CDs  through it.  Then, I noticed there was this tubby low end sound in some cases, especially my mixes, I think because of ARC having to boost around 65hz to get a flatter response (I'm pretty sure that's a null there, though I'm stuck in that spot pretty much for now).  And yes, I still had problems translating the mixes to other systems just like before ARC, just a different set of problems. Not too long ago I took ARC off and mixed a song and then listened on other playback systems and it was closer. I'm a little disappointed in myself that it took me so long to hear the truth (or my current understanding of it).
 
I intend to setup ARC again with the sub and see what difference, if any, the sub makes.
 
Thanks for your reply and everyone else's as well!




I totally feel your pain....which is why I did the stuff I did as well. Hmm...yeah, you may need to redo your ARC corrections. If anything, it should tighten your low end. Funny thing for me, I have corrections with and without my sub. ARC compensated so well for me, realistically, the corrections made without the sub sound like the sub is on. So if God forbid one of my subs died, I'd still be in good shape.
 
We used ARC 2 for our corrections down at my other studio. I didn't do them this time around and wondered what didn't sound right when I was down there. My other engineer did the correction and totally hosed the procedure. He was running with ARC totally off because it sounded so bad. I'm still not a fan of ARC 2 like ARC 1. There are things lacking in ARC 2 that are present in ARC 1 that just sound better in my opinion. If you have both of them and used ARC 2, try ARC 1 just to see if it makes a difference.
 
It's not a huge difference on my end....but right now, my mixes are pretty good in the low end area as well as highs. If I use ARC 2, it seems a little brighter and a is missing a little low end...which would make me cut my highs a little and boost my lows a bit.
 
Anyway, I redid the corrections with ARC 1 and it fixed everything and even redid them with ARC 2 (it came out close) because we can't use ARC 1 on our MAC. Just make sure you totally do the procedure right Jimbo or ARC will tank BAD. I have a little document I typed up for it if you feel you need it....pm me and I'll send it to you. It's just the steps I take to get the best correction out of it. So far it's been foolproof for me in all the places I've used it.
 
That said...it has failed for a few people that I know did it the right way. Definitely worth trying it again. If it fails....don't use ARC and maybe get someone to come in and do a room analysis for you where they sound test the room with noise and lock in on an eq that you supply. That method has worked for years in every commercial studio known to man....it will definitely get you a flat response. Most of the guys that attempt to do this on their own don't do it right. They use these programs with mic's that don't give them the right readings.....you went this far, hire a guy to come do it if ARC fails and your second guessing days will hopefully be over. Good luck man!
 
-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#15
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/10/04 09:20:46 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby joel77 2015/10/04 10:51:25
If ARC fails to mitigate the problem, it's because ARC is an electronic cure for an acoustical problem. It's like turning up your radio because your muffler's too loud - it'll help, but the real solution will have to eventually involve the muffler.
 
 


All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
#16
Leadfoot
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2817
  • Joined: 2011/04/26 11:08:38
  • Location: Indiana
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/10/05 18:28:21 (permalink)
Nice analogy, bit.
#17
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10037
  • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
  • Location: SL,UT
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/10/05 18:50:57 (permalink)
arc2 just works fine for me

Bats Brew music Streaming
Bats Brew albums:
"Trouble"
"Stay"
"The Time is Magic"
--
Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
 
#18
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/10/08 05:09:51 (permalink)
batsbrew
arc2 just works fine for me




It actually works fine for me too now that I saw there was an update for it and spent the last 2 days re-correcting everything. Whew...major difference for the better compared to ARC 1. It still fails on my NS10's though unless I correct with a sub. Ever try corrections with and without your sub? It did such a good job on all mine, I can barely tell the difference between my "with sub" corrections vs. "without sub". But the old NS10's I use from the 80's...ARC hates them unless I correct with the sub..then they sound fantastic.
 
(Hey Obi if you still read here...have your guys do a few tests on some early model NS10's without a sub to see why ARC fails on them. Even ARC 1 failed...but ARC 2 was way closer.)
 
-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#19
clintmartin
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3893
  • Joined: 2009/10/11 12:16:43
  • Location: Fort Smith, AR
  • Status: offline
Re: Anyone use a sub most/all the time for main monitors? 2015/10/08 07:32:07 (permalink)
Obi doesn't work for IK anymore. I haven't heard from him in a while.

Cakewalk, Harrison Mixbus 4, Waveform 9, ADK intel i7 2600 3.40 ghz, 8gb Ram, Win 7, Presonus Audiobox 44VSL. 
http://www.youtube.com/c/clintmartinmusic
https://itunes.apple.com/...lint-martin/1010966023
https://open.spotify.com/artist/4x4TBz32i56bTJkgu7b4tN
 
 
 
#20
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1