sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Transformers more important than tubes?
I found this video interesting, the guy is basically saying that what is touted as "tube warmth" is more a result of the transformers used than the tubes. Is this generally considered to be true or is he talking BS? I really know little about tubes or transformers.
post edited by sharke - 2015/10/09 12:14:56
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/09 13:25:04
(permalink)
only your ears, with your gear, should be the judge. tubes offer distortion, when applied correctly, can add harmonics to the sound that some folks really dig. transformers, is where the buck stops.
|
fret_man
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 312
- Joined: 2009/05/14 23:57:37
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/09 16:39:47
(permalink)
I have an old Carvin transistor amp from the early 70's that used an output transformer and it sounded pretty awesome. So there may be some validity to his thesis.
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/09 17:40:04
(permalink)
it's not really the same animal we are talking about here.... every amp has a output transformer.... we're talking recording gear here, not tube guitar amps.
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/10 00:12:16
(permalink)
It isn't an either or. Both tubes and transformers affect the sound. There is something special about tubes, either live or for recording. And transformers, too, the way they round and soften a sound passing through them. And something funny, most of the tube stuff, esp. the older stuff, is full of transformers too, so you get a double-heapful helping of goodness I'll say one thing, solid state transformer gear can sound just as smooth as tube stuff and usually costs less, too. @
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24398
- Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
- Location: NC
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/10 08:38:06
(permalink)
Yes... Tubes are only part of the equation. Since tube amps always need a transformer on the output, that poor transformer is often overlooked as contributing to the overall sound. Just as saturating the plates affect the sound, so too saturating the magnetic core affects the sound. Wire diameter of the windings, number of turns in the coils, size of the core, all play a part in sculpting the sound whether it's a guitar amp or some other piece of "studio gear" with tubes. Just as sound quality can change from one set of tubes to the next...even with the same model number tube.... swap out the transformer in a repair job with another similarly rated transformer because the factory direct transformer is either not available or too costly, and you will very likely notice a difference in tone, quality and overall performance. The amp that was once crisp might become a bit spongy or vice versa. Someone familiar with the amp's sound will notice a slight difference in that amp.
My website & music: www.herbhartley.com MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface BMI/NSAI "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer "
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/11 10:48:08
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby ohgrant 2015/10/17 13:25:52
I laughed out loud at that video, not because it was BS but because it was funny. Tubes for warmth - just grab one with your fingers if you don't believe they get warm! My problem is with the word "warmth". Where does that word come from? Like so many audio metaphors, it's borrowed from a visual reference. When a photographer says a print needs to be "warmer", he means it needs more red, red being the closest visible color to infrared, which is heat. It means longer wavelengths, which should by analogous to bass frequencies in audio. But when we talk about the effect tubes and transformers have on audio, we are talking about harmonic distortion - adding high frequencies. This is why "warmth" has never made sense to me in this context. But I do understand what people mean when they use the term. In fact, adding harmonics to low frequencies actually makes those low frequencies more perceptible. If you have Ozone, you can easily hear this effect by creating a band below 120 Hz in the Exciter module (Tube mode) and start turning it up. You'll hear the bass guitar, kick drum and floor tom start to sound deeper and fuller, even though you're not adding more bass to the mix. Waves' RBass and Maxxbass plugins work on the same principle. I can see how people might confuse tubes and transformers, because they usually go together. Tube gear nearly always has transformers. Solid-state gear generally does not (power transformers don't count), unless they've been added specifically for tonal reasons, such as in a microphone preamp or inside a condenser microphone. So if the tube gear sounds richer, which component is responsible, the tubes or the transformers? The answer is "both". Half the harmonic goodness you get out of a tube guitar amplifier is from the high-gain triode stage at the front, the other half from the push-pull circuit at the output that incorporates a transformer. Some of that latter half is from the pentodes' nonlinearity and some is from transformer saturation. The triode gives you odd-order harmonics, while the transformer gives you even-order harmonics. Together, you get the whole set. The same thing a sawtooth waveform gives you in a synthesizer, btw, which is why that waveform is so popular in subtractive synthesis. It's silly to argue whether tubes or transformers are more important. Odd-order harmonics are easier to hear, so they have a more profound impact. But transformers, in addition to supplying even-order harmonics, also act as low-pass filters, which softens the effect of the tubes that precede them.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Paul P
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2685
- Joined: 2012/12/08 17:15:47
- Location: Montreal
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/11 11:08:22
(permalink)
In my limited view of things, I associate warmth with soft clipping, even-order harmonics (related), and less high-end (but that is perhaps less high-end odd-order harmonics). I have this purely intuitive feeling that a transformer on the output would tend to even things out, round things over, ie. generate more 'warmth' from all the electromagnetic fields interacting.
Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
|
wst3
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1979
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:28:11
- Location: Pottstown, PA 19464
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/13 13:58:02
(permalink)
EVERY device which sinks, sources, or passes current will impart an effect onto the audio. Most of these effects are considered non-linearities, and a lot of engineers spent a lot of time trying to minimize them. Tubes are active devices, while transformers are passive devices. That alone suggests that whatever personality they impart on the signal is going to be different. And they are<G>... Tubes can - they don't have to - generate harmonics. If they are biased as Class A/B or B they can also create some non-musically related components, the result of a nasty spike that can occur when the signal crosses the bias point. Transformers can - they don't have to - attenuate lower frequency energy, and when they saturate (again they don't have to) the start to slow rise times and compress the dynamic range a little. I am all for as many tools as possible to scuplt the sound, and I am a big fan of understanding why they do whatever they do, but I'm also pragmatic enough to realize that if I spent all my time making measurements I wouldn't have time left to make music<G>!
-- Bill Audio Enterprise KB3KJF
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/13 16:06:45
(permalink)
Not only is it good to know the fact that one is active and the other passive and also the idea that both can be used in many capacities but transformers do exist on their own, but also the fact that there are different ways of using these components. There what might be called Hi Fi mode where valves and transformers are set up for minimum distortion. eg Williamson class A valve power amplifier. (Classic situation of valves and transformers set up for the most perfect sound or valve RIAA preamps) Then there is distortion mode and lots of it and people such as Randall Smith from Mesa Boogie fame will know a lot about how to put valves and transformers into those non linearities to make guitars sound better. Then of course there are some modes midway between the two for Mic preamps and compressors say that are basically clean but verging on some slight controlled crunch. All interesting uses for them both but have an idea what mode you are into perhaps. And why you are passing signals through them. Makes you realise how great digital is because it has the ability to totally bypass them and let you hear how things actually sound. Better in most cases. And not only that but digital is emulating the sound of those things rather well too. In the very early days when the signal path was though valve preamps and transformers into valve reel to reel recorders and then back into more transformers and valves then into our record groove it could be said there is a lot of accumulation there of analog sound. No wonder we got used to what we heard then. The mistake might be to make it the bar that everything has to aspire to and pass. It is not necessarily right. We are hearing things differently now and we are better for it. Signal chains with and without valves and transformers are just different, not so much one better than the other. Here is a case in point. When a class A valve amplifier drives a Quad electrostatic loud speaker there are two transformers involved. The output transformer of the amp and the step up transformer inside the Quad electrostatic. I was lucky to hear one day a modification where the valve amp was made transformerless and also the step up transformer in the Quad was also bypassed so the valve amp output stage was directly driving the plates of the Quad speaker! I will never forget that sound. Breathless was a word that comes to mind. Showed up the fact that transformers are actually not much good at all in that situation
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
gcolbert
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1176
- Joined: 2010/11/13 18:34:06
- Location: Windsor Mill, MD
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/18 12:27:06
(permalink)
The finals (tubes), transformer, and the speaker all interact to create the distortion that we seem to call 'warmth.' When we really screw up the matching of all three components we end up with expensive guitar amplifiers. Poor speaker impedance matching is an important part of trashing an amplifier's linearity. Glen.
Platinum / VS-100 / 12 GB RAM / Win 10 Pro / AMD A8 / MP Touch MonitorsPlatinum / on-board audio / 4 GB RAM /Win 10 Pro / HP dm4 Laptop / stuffTHpfft!
|
jbow
Max Output Level: -0.2 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7601
- Joined: 2003/11/26 19:14:18
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/18 18:52:54
(permalink)
I don't imagine a power transformer can make much difference in tone but a good output transformer can. Otherwise Mercury Magnetics would likely go out of business, why pay more for the same thing? The first preamp tube can make a huge difference, sometimes the second... but speakers make the biggest difference. Having said all that, I can take pretty much any amplifier and dial in "my tone". Like Clapton on the Cream reunion tour, using a Stratocaster and what looked like a narrow panel tweed Fender amp, and a Leslie (he used a Leslie on Derek and the Dominoes in his chain too)... but Crossroads.. sounded like well, Cream. That doesn't stop me from wanting more amps and OD pedals. I do tend to change speakers in my favorite amps and use NOS preamp tubes in V1. I guess what I mean to say is your settings make the most difference in your tone. I sound like me no matter what I play through. Eh... The pickups you put in a guitar make more difference, to my ears than transformers or tubes... maybe more than speakers. Huge difference between a PAF and a JB. Fast Tracks and CS 54s. edit> I almost forgot. Even knowing all this... I am thinking of selling some stuff to get a Dr. Z Antidote head. It sound's like the ultimate 45w Marshall style head to me, at least for the money. Used ones on Reverb.com for around 1599.00 new 1999.00. You only live once, may as well live well, huh? Check out the Cast-engineering Texas Flood pedal. TONE. J
post edited by jbow - 2015/10/18 19:06:53
Sonar Platinum Studiocat Pro 16G RAM (some bells and whistles) HP Pavilion dm4 1165-dx (i5)-8G RAM Octa-Capture KRK Rokit-8s MIDI keyboards... Control Pad mics. I HATE THIS CMPUTER KEYBARD!
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/18 19:42:09
(permalink)
I've never tried a Dr Z head but my Dr Z head in AmpliTube is one of my favorites. Cutting tone.
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
jbow
Max Output Level: -0.2 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7601
- Joined: 2003/11/26 19:14:18
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/18 19:58:10
(permalink)
sharke I've never tried a Dr Z head but my Dr Z head in AmpliTube is one of my favorites. Cutting tone.
I don't know if it really sound's as good as the clips they have posted but if it does... wow. This is the one I'm talking about: http://drzamps.com/product/antidote/ and this guy, Dave Baker they have on some of the demos... man, he has some chops. So do the others. He makes this amp do some GOOD stuff: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jjel8Ja-3EI sorry, no picture link but straight from the Dr's website. I'd like to get lessons from this guy, just to learn some licks and riffs... Tell me this amp don't sound great... and RAIN... if you see this, check it out. It may do Marshall better than Marshall. J
Sonar Platinum Studiocat Pro 16G RAM (some bells and whistles) HP Pavilion dm4 1165-dx (i5)-8G RAM Octa-Capture KRK Rokit-8s MIDI keyboards... Control Pad mics. I HATE THIS CMPUTER KEYBARD!
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/18 21:48:29
(permalink)
Yeah from the clips it sounds like it produces the kind of tones you'd want to EQ everything else around.
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
kevinwal
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1066
- Joined: 2007/07/27 19:07:43
- Location: Rogers, AR
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/19 00:22:41
(permalink)
batsbrew it's not really the same animal we are talking about here.... every amp has a output transformer.... we're talking recording gear here, not tube guitar amps.
At the risk of going further afield, I just wanted to say that I have an old Hohner HI-210R SS amp from 1971 that has no output transformer. The speakers are wire directly to the power transistors. It actually sounds pretty awesome.
|
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24398
- Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
- Location: NC
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/19 13:36:10
(permalink)
jbow Having said all that, I can take pretty much any amplifier and dial in "my tone"
True Dat.... !! Or get very close with something that's workable. In a nightclub, many years ago, a certain picker in town sat in on another guitarist's rig. The original guitarist commented.... "How the #$%@ does he do that?" The guy who sat in had a sweet singing tone and the guitar owner had a clinky plain sound.... and knew it. Same rig, but different players. It's not all about the gear, although having good gear is certainly better.
My website & music: www.herbhartley.com MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface BMI/NSAI "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer "
|
jbow
Max Output Level: -0.2 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7601
- Joined: 2003/11/26 19:14:18
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/19 17:43:39
(permalink)
kevinwal
batsbrew it's not really the same animal we are talking about here.... every amp has a output transformer.... we're talking recording gear here, not tube guitar amps.
At the risk of going further afield, I just wanted to say that I have an old Hohner HI-210R SS amp from 1971 that has no output transformer. The speakers are wire directly to the power transistors. It actually sounds pretty awesome.
Opps, sorry. I should have paid more attention... when I hear transformers and tubes I default to guitar amps.. I'll do better, I promise I will... Julien
Sonar Platinum Studiocat Pro 16G RAM (some bells and whistles) HP Pavilion dm4 1165-dx (i5)-8G RAM Octa-Capture KRK Rokit-8s MIDI keyboards... Control Pad mics. I HATE THIS CMPUTER KEYBARD!
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/19 22:33:55
(permalink)
Thanks jbow for that link to the Dr Z Antidote. I enjoyed those videos a lot and yes the playing is nice for sure. (helps!) I worked in a shop that was into importing Mesa Boogie amps into Australia around 1983 so I was into those designs as well. I got to know Randall and some of the ideas he was using then too. I built a stereo Williamson Class A valve hi fi power amp in the 70's around two KT66's as the output stage. This is a sweet sound. I am wondering if the designer has done something similar here. I had to use a special output transformer that had multi-taps. Key to its sound I think. Power transformers help a lot (not so much in sound but a little though) if they can deliver high current at the high voltages. Big and heavy. I had a very hefty power transformer in my valve power amp. It delivered punch and had a full sounding low end delivery. All requires power. The plate voltage is 500V DC in the Williamson design. I have hooked myself across that voltage a few times too! It can melt a screwdriver! It was hard getting an electrolytic capacitor to work safely at that voltage and deliver heavy current surges. Phillips made those for us in Holland. I had to get a transformer manufacturer to wind the output transformers for me. They were big and heavy too. They would only do 10 minimum so I got 4 others to build stereo power amps with me at the time too. (All the Williamsons are alive and well and all sounding perfect today in one ctiy still. Canberra, Australia) They are doing something nice and sweet in that guitar amp design. I loved the sound too when the crunch was not coming from a pedal preceeding the amp. The natural amp cruch is killer. And also to be able to disable the EQ sound like that. That sound rocks. That whole amp just oozes valves and transformers working well together.
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
kevinwal
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1066
- Joined: 2007/07/27 19:07:43
- Location: Rogers, AR
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/21 00:19:02
(permalink)
jbow
kevinwal
batsbrew it's not really the same animal we are talking about here.... every amp has a output transformer.... we're talking recording gear here, not tube guitar amps.
At the risk of going further afield, I just wanted to say that I have an old Hohner HI-210R SS amp from 1971 that has no output transformer. The speakers are wire directly to the power transistors. It actually sounds pretty awesome.
Opps, sorry. I should have paid more attention... when I hear transformers and tubes I default to guitar amps.. I'll do better, I promise I will... Julien
Lol, no worries, I'm guilty of mixing subjects, sorry about that. That Hohner is a guitar amp. The clean tone has a great Marshall growl mixed with a lovely Fender chime.
post edited by kevinwal - 2015/10/21 00:36:19
|
ston
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
- Total Posts : 965
- Joined: 2008/03/04 12:28:40
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/21 09:08:11
(permalink)
It's all about the rectifiers, man! [...might help to use true DC to heat the damn tubes too...]
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re: Transformers more important than tubes?
2015/10/21 09:52:50
(permalink)
No, it is all about the iron used in those old transformers. I read that theory once. New iron is bad sh... stuff. Then one of the old Neve/St. Ives engineers joined in said that they bought scrap iron as cheap as possible. That new iorn is actually a lot purer. Maybe all the impurities gave the old transformers that vintage grunge factor? Fun stuff. Now, how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|