Ricebug
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 181
- Joined: 2014/06/21 18:54:51
- Location: Nampa-Caldwell, Idaho
- Status: offline
Insert Vs Send
Can someone explain the difference between using a 'send' effect and an 'insert' effect. I've used both, but don't really get the advantages of choosing one over the other.
Sonar Platinum / AMD 5 ghz 8-core CPU w/8 GB RAM / nVidia GTX-780 graphics / Roland A-500Pro MIDI keyboard / Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 interface / Komplete 9 Ultimate / Melodyne Essential / Digitech Vocalist Live Pro/ Roland MSGS synth module / Rode NT2 microphone / an understanding wife
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Insert Vs Send
2016/01/05 16:09:30
(permalink)
Use a send effect if you want to treat a bunch of tracks with the same effect - like Reverb or Delay. Use an insert effect for a specific treatment to a single track - like Compression or EQ Sometime the lines get blurred. This of a Send as a COPY of your source track. This copy is then blended in with the original along with the Effect (nearly always set to 100% wet in the case od Reverb/Delay) Another way to look at it, think of Insert Fx as a SERIES effect, think of using SENDS for parallel processing
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
BRuys
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 192
- Joined: 2011/04/26 15:13:16
- Location: New Zealand
- Status: offline
Re: Insert Vs Send
2016/01/05 16:18:16
(permalink)
In the hardware mixer days, before the digital revolution, one did not have an unlimited number of FX instances like we do in the digital world. So, an engineer may have only one reverb unit. Now, if that engineer was live mixing three vocalists and wanted reverb for all of them, he'd/she'd put that reverb on a bus and use a send from each channel to send some of the audio from each vocalist to the reverb unit. The wet output from the reverb would be presented to a bus which would be mixed in with the overall mix. The result would be that all of the dry sound from the vocalist's channels would be in in the main mix and the appropriate amount of reverb return was mixed in - all with just one reverb unit. This method was fine for something like a reverb, but if you needed dynamic control of a channel with a compressor, you'd need to put it in series with a channel. This was a situation where you would insert the compressor into the channel and generally you needed a channel of compression for every vocalist or instrument you wanted to compress. Things have changed a lot since the hardware days - mainly that we have effectively innumerable instances of things like reverbs, so people have taken to just inserting them into the channel they want, rather than setting up a send/return for a reverb. That said, if you want to configure a compressor to control dynamics (as opposed to parallel compression for effect), you generally need to insert it. This is because inserting FX places the FX in series with the signal flow, whereas placing an FX into a bus and using a send generally results in the FX being processed in parallel with the original signal. Cheers, Bill.
|
Sanderxpander
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3873
- Joined: 2013/09/30 10:08:24
- Status: offline
Re: Insert Vs Send
2016/01/05 17:00:14
(permalink)
Also, there is something to be said for using a single reverb for most tracks, namely that you are putting things in the same "space". Often I'll still have three reverbs in a given project but I would definitely not put separate reverbs on every track.
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Insert Vs Send
2016/01/05 17:13:30
(permalink)
I use different reverbs for different applications, as suggested by Mike senior in his excellent book. He suggests you use any combination of the following, provided the project calls for it. Size Blend Tone Size Spread I usually have a reverb for size and one for blend. Sometimes I'll have an extra size 'verb for different effect, combining early reflections of one with the tail/decay of another, as an example.
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
promidi
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1220
- Joined: 2014/11/21 18:46:39
- Location: South Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Insert Vs Send
2016/01/05 18:15:45
(permalink)
Ricebug Can someone explain the difference between using a 'send' effect and an 'insert' effect. I've used both, but don't really get the advantages of choosing one over the other.
I think this guy explains it pretty well IMHO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhlUZKXLdZE
Windows 10 64bit fully patched, 16 gig ram . PCR-800 Controller. (Working in Win 10 1809 64bit)CPU: i5 4670. Video: Nvidia GTX560ti (latest drivers). Audio IF: Focusrite 2i2 2nd Gen Internet always on. Software: Cakewalk by Bandlab (2018.09 B29) ASIO mode. 24bit 48khz 256 samples Rapture Pro, AAS GS2, VS-3, EP-4, VA-2, Chromophone 2, Z3TA+ 2, Addictive drums 2, Addictive Keys, Mpowersynth (latest), Iris 2, GPO5, Sampletank 3,
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: Insert Vs Send
2016/01/06 01:04:54
(permalink)
|
Mistergreen
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 155
- Joined: 2012/12/20 11:05:03
- Status: offline
Re: Insert Vs Send
2016/01/06 08:49:52
(permalink)
An insert effect such as a compressor affects the whole track. A send effect such as a reverb 'sends' some of the signal to the effect bus while leaving the original signal unaffected. The exception would be an effect that has a wet/dry control. That's how my brain understands it.
Intel Core i7 3770K Quad-Core 3.5 GHz Asus P8Z77-V LK 16 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) ASUS 512 MB DDR3 Graphics Card 8400GS-SL-512MD3 SIIG FireWire 2-Port PCIe (NN-E20012-S2) WD VelociRaptor 250 & 500 Windows 7 64 bit CbB 2018.07 x64 Saffire Pro 40
|