Helpful ReplyVideo recommendation for Sonar (updated)

Author
joeb1cannoli
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 199
  • Joined: 2012/09/22 20:07:26
  • Status: offline
2016/04/01 10:28:00 (permalink)

Video recommendation for Sonar (updated)

   I would like to shoot video of my band with the ability to edit the video and sync it to audio from within SPLAT.
   Does any one have a recommendation for video cameras that record in a format that's easy to import into Sonar?
   Also, does anyone know of video tutorials on how to work with video within Sonar? I'm too stressed and time constrained to read manuals 
  And one more thing. Can anyone recommend inexpensive video editing software. I'd like to work with 2 cameras and be able to switch between camera angles.
  Thanks
 
post edited by joeb1cannoli - 2016/04/07 08:54:54

http://soundcloud.com/joe-b-10
Windows 10 Pro x64, 6 core, Core i7 , 16GB ram
Sonar Platinum , Komplete 8, Ozone 8  
Presonus Studio 192 and DP88 ,uad-2 solo
#1
Karyn
Ma-Ma
  • Total Posts : 9200
  • Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
  • Location: Lincoln, England.
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar 2016/04/01 10:38:53 (permalink)
You can't work with video within Sonar.  It will playback video in sync so you can do your normal audio stuff, but that's it.
 
The usual way to do what you want is to import your finished audio to your video editor, then edit the video to match the audio.

Mekashi Futo
Get 10% off all Waves plugins.
Current DAW.  i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum

#2
dwardzala
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1470
  • Joined: 2008/05/26 19:18:33
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar 2016/04/01 11:53:16 (permalink)
I will make this recommendation - don't try to do this yourself if you are stressed and time constrained.  To do what you want will require a ton of effort on your part and could possibly end up not meeting your expectations when done.
 
As a rule of thumb, for every minute of video you want to produce, you should count on spending 1 hour of filming time.  Then you have the editing/post production time to consider as well.
 
Also, if you are trying to film and play in your band at the same time, you will probably end up doubling that 1 hour of filming per minute time.
 
i would recommend finding someone perhaps at a local university to work on this with you, that way you don't have to worry about learning new software, techniques and workflows.

Dave
Main Studio- Core i5 @2.67GHz, 16Gb Ram, (2) 500Gb HDs, (1) 360 Gb HD
MotU Ultralite AVB, Axiom 49 Midi Controller, Akai MPD18 Midi Controller
Win10 x64 Home
Sonar 2017.06 Platinum (and X3e, X2c, X1d)
 
Mobile Studio - Sager NP8677 (i7-6700HQ @2.67MHz, 16G Ram, 250G SSD, 1T HD)
M-Box Mini v. 2
Win 10 x64 Home
Sonar 2016.10 Platinum
 
Check out my original music:
https://soundcloud.com/d-wardzala/sets/d-wardzala-original-music
 
 
#3
Sylvan
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 793
  • Joined: 2005/04/14 14:51:02
  • Location: San Diego, CA-USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar 2016/04/01 12:45:44 (permalink)
I would recommend using Sony Movie Studio Platinum. It is cheap, very powerful and super easy to use. You can start new projects with musical tempo and meter and a lot of the shortcut keys are similar to the ones in SONAR.
 
I record, mix and master in SONAR, export that finished audio and import it into a SONY Movie Studio Platinum project where I sync the audio and video. I then edit all the different angles together with any visual effects or whatever. It works great. Sony and Cakewalk play very nice together. I have used this combo for many years.

SONAR Platinum
RME Fireface UFX
Tascam US 20X20
Tascam US 16X08
Intel i7-5830K LGA2011V3 (6 CORE)
Asus X99-AII
Corsair Vengeance DDR4 32GB
Geeforce GTX 970 4GB
#4
tenfoot
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2186
  • Joined: 2015/01/22 18:12:07
  • Location: Qld, Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar 2016/04/01 13:21:44 (permalink)
Hey Jb1. Karyn is absolutely right. The video function in Sonar is just for playback, and it makes more sense to edit your audio first. You can get away with a whole lot more fudging of video shots and angles than audio takes! There are lots of consumer digital cameras that will give you great results. I have a couple of Canon handycams that have served me well. Get creative and throw in a couple of GoPro's as well! Most consumer models use very compressed formats, such as avchd. Most editing suites now support these formats, but due largely to the compression they are processor hungry and do not support smart rendering, so production is a bit slower than the pro formats. This doesn't stop you from getting great results of course. If you are recording live gigs, one of the specs you should look at when choosing a camera is its low light recording performance as conditions will often be less than ideal.  Check the price, the specs, then watch some amateur video demos on YouTube - they will give you a much better idea than any manufacturers promo.
 
Video editing is great fun - and a nice break from audio. If you are familiar with a DAW, video editing software is not a huge leap, and there are many very capable editors for under $100: Sony Movie Studio,  Corel Video Studio, Cyberlink power director etc. My goto editor for many years has been Sony Vegas, but it is a bit more expensive (and recently discontinued!).
 
If you get the chance, record in the same venue over a couple of gigs. Then your 2 cameras turn into 4. If you do record the gig on a single night, I suggest one camera be raised up on a tripod and the other be hand held and mobile. That way you always have a stable shoot to return to when editing, but have the variety and creativity of the mobile camera. 
 
Good luck and have fun:)

Bruce.
 
Sonar Platinum 2017-09, Studio One 3.5.3, Win 10 x64, Quad core i7, RME Fireface, Behringer X32 Producer, Behringer X32 Rack, Presonus Faderport, Lemure Software Controller (Android), Enttec DMXIS VST lighting controller, Xtempo POK.
#5
TheMaartian
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2774
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 18:30:52
  • Location: Flagstaff, AZ
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar 2016/04/01 14:07:14 (permalink)
All good. I would just add that I would look for a camcorder with decent image stabilization. Even my old Canon VIXIA HF R500 has it, so that shouldn't be too big of a deal.

Intel i7 3.4GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB HD Win10 Home 64-bit Tascam US-16x08
Studio One 4 Pro NotionMelodyne 4 Studio Acoustica 7 Guitar Pro 7
PreSonus FaderPort Nektar P6 M-Audio BX8 D2 Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro
NI K9U XLN AK, AD2 AAS VS-2, GS-2, VA-2, EP-4, CP-2, OD Toontrack SD3, EZK
#6
joeb1cannoli
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 199
  • Joined: 2012/09/22 20:07:26
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar 2016/04/01 14:21:15 (permalink)
   Thank you guys for all of your input.
   We're renting a rehearsal room with a stage on Sunday as preparation for an upcoming show. I thought that it would be a good time to shoot some video to use to promote more gigs.
   We had a person lined up to shoot video that canceled. So now I'm the guitarist,engineer,music producer and video producer! 
   I'm thinking that I'll record the audio with a pair of mics into my laptop and then edit the video and line the audio up to it within Sonar. 

http://soundcloud.com/joe-b-10
Windows 10 Pro x64, 6 core, Core i7 , 16GB ram
Sonar Platinum , Komplete 8, Ozone 8  
Presonus Studio 192 and DP88 ,uad-2 solo
#7
mettelus
Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5321
  • Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
  • Location: Maryland, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar 2016/04/01 16:29:27 (permalink)
Shooting video to be edited later is a wise choice, just so you have it on hand and can finish it at your leisure. Quick suggestion for the video (now) that will help you when the time comes later on (to synch audio to video) is make some very blatant hand clapping easily seen by the video. Having those "easily found" transients in the audio/video will help you in the long run.

ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
#8
Unknowen
Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1276
  • Joined: 2014/11/07 11:27:09
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar 2016/04/01 16:43:20 (permalink)
Karyn
You can't work with video within Sonar.  It will playback video in sync so you can do your normal audio stuff, but that's it.
 
The usual way to do what you want is to import your finished audio to your video editor, then edit the video to match the audio.


I'm just asking not being a smart butt... I don't know in Splat but in Sonar8, I imported video then added and edited audio to the finished video. Deleted original audio and added new audio... that can't be done in Splat? 
 
I did this a few years back the, dog voice was added in Sonar 8 as the video played. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbsKKhTiJxQ
post edited by Dave000 - 2016/04/01 17:04:37

Hay look,
Somethings are not locked in stone... lol 3/18/2019
#9
dannyjmusic
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 237
  • Joined: 2015/01/19 12:41:06
  • Location: Atlanta, Ga
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar 2016/04/01 18:14:59 (permalink)
I do the exact same thing and it works like a champ... Have done paid videos for city promos, companies, products etc
There are lots of third-party effects that you can buy to that work great
#10
Sylvan
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 793
  • Joined: 2005/04/14 14:51:02
  • Location: San Diego, CA-USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar 2016/04/02 21:12:03 (permalink)
Dave000
Karyn
You can't work with video within Sonar.  It will playback video in sync so you can do your normal audio stuff, but that's it.
 
The usual way to do what you want is to import your finished audio to your video editor, then edit the video to match the audio.


I'm just asking not being a smart butt... I don't know in Splat but in Sonar8, I imported video then added and edited audio to the finished video. Deleted original audio and added new audio... that can't be done in Splat? 
 
I did this a few years back the, dog voice was added in Sonar 8 as the video played. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbsKKhTiJxQ


Well, yes, you can still do that in Platinum. If you prefer to import you edited video into SONAR, you can record, mix, and edit the audio to the video in SONAR. You just can no longer edit the video in SONAR. So many seem to prefer (for music related projects) to do all the audio in SONAR and import that audio into a video editor like Sony Vegas for video editing.
 
However, if you have a gig doing a score, sound design, foley, ADR, etc... for post production video, then you would normally be handed the already edited video which you would import into SONAR to do all the audio.

SONAR Platinum
RME Fireface UFX
Tascam US 20X20
Tascam US 16X08
Intel i7-5830K LGA2011V3 (6 CORE)
Asus X99-AII
Corsair Vengeance DDR4 32GB
Geeforce GTX 970 4GB
#11
joeb1cannoli
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 199
  • Joined: 2012/09/22 20:07:26
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/07 08:55:59 (permalink)
 I ended purchasing a Canon Vixia H RF700 and Sony Movie Studio 13 Platinum ( good recommendation Sylvan. thanks)
 With little time to learn how to use it and to small of a memory card (Best Buy employee recommendation), I ended up with a bit dark and a bit grainy video.
  I recorded audio with Rode NT5 pair into a small Mackie board into my laptop running Cakewalk Music creator. I was easily able to line up the audio and video within the Sony software.
  I was able to get the audio quality decent using some plugins. (I need to shout out to Melodyne 4 Studio's EQ and Izotope Ozone 7)
  The result is far from Professional, but it's a start and it got us some usable footage. I can see myself gear lusting for video equipment and video software upgrades now!
 

http://soundcloud.com/joe-b-10
Windows 10 Pro x64, 6 core, Core i7 , 16GB ram
Sonar Platinum , Komplete 8, Ozone 8  
Presonus Studio 192 and DP88 ,uad-2 solo
#12
dwardzala
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1470
  • Joined: 2008/05/26 19:18:33
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/07 10:50:01 (permalink)
I am happy to hear that you got something usable out of your efforts.
 
There is as much that goes into video to get a good quality picture (maybe more, but don't ever let any video guys know this) than getting good audio.  Lighting, camera settings (white balance, etc.) are all things that need to be taken into account.
 
If you continue to try to go on this path, I wish you luck.  There is awful lot of learning involved.  Finding an inexpensive contractor to do this stuff for you (at least the shooting part) will likely get you much better results faster.

Dave
Main Studio- Core i5 @2.67GHz, 16Gb Ram, (2) 500Gb HDs, (1) 360 Gb HD
MotU Ultralite AVB, Axiom 49 Midi Controller, Akai MPD18 Midi Controller
Win10 x64 Home
Sonar 2017.06 Platinum (and X3e, X2c, X1d)
 
Mobile Studio - Sager NP8677 (i7-6700HQ @2.67MHz, 16G Ram, 250G SSD, 1T HD)
M-Box Mini v. 2
Win 10 x64 Home
Sonar 2016.10 Platinum
 
Check out my original music:
https://soundcloud.com/d-wardzala/sets/d-wardzala-original-music
 
 
#13
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10654
  • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
  • Location: TeXaS
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/07 11:02:52 (permalink)
On a PC, Vegas is the way to go.  The studio version is basically the same engine as the pro/platinum, just without the effects.  Movie effects are like VSTs for video.  But for just for editing/sequencing etc., studio works as well as Pro the same way the entry level version of SONAR can record/edit your music - you just don't get the synths and reverbs and such.
 
Vegas is a great audio recorder program, too, tho no midi (at least in the older versions I worked with).

https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
 
there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
#14
Brian Walton
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 584
  • Joined: 2014/10/24 22:20:18
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/07 11:47:32 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby mettelus 2016/04/07 13:56:39
joeb1cannoli
 I ended purchasing a Canon Vixia H RF700 and Sony Movie Studio 13 Platinum ( good recommendation Sylvan. thanks)
 With little time to learn how to use it and to small of a memory card (Best Buy employee recommendation), I ended up with a bit dark and a bit grainy video.
  I recorded audio with Rode NT5 pair into a small Mackie board into my laptop running Cakewalk Music creator. I was easily able to line up the audio and video within the Sony software.
  I was able to get the audio quality decent using some plugins. (I need to shout out to Melodyne 4 Studio's EQ and Izotope Ozone 7)
  The result is far from Professional, but it's a start and it got us some usable footage. I can see myself gear lusting for video equipment and video software upgrades now!
 


The Canon 700 is essentially the exact same camera they have been using since the 400/40 series (maybe even longer).  Though the new Canon has a longer battery life.  
 
Video with these Cams needs a lot of light to look correct.  Since you are recording yourself, this may or may not work, but consider setting the Mode to "P" instead of "Auto" and setting the White Balance manually.  (You will need a sheet of white paper on the stage, zoom in on it and "set" it at that.  I find that the auto setting can be decent in the right light, but manually setting the white balance can make things look much more natural.  
 
Also, since you are just using a stereo pair.  The 700 has a mic in, just for temporary work you can use the manual levels and a cord run to the outputs of your mixer.  While it is still better to sync the final version in post after you have mastered things, it can give you something that is easier to listen to as you are doing your work in post (since the on board cam mics are brutal with loud volumes).  
 
Certainly experiment.  
post edited by Brian Walton - 2016/04/07 13:05:43
#15
patm300e
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 845
  • Joined: 2007/09/28 09:14:18
  • Location: USA - Maryland
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/07 13:47:51 (permalink)
Just out of curiosity for Video, did you consider using your camera (not the one on your phone, but DSLR or equivalent)?  Some of them shoot video up to 4K now and do a decent job.  As far as audio goes, maybe replacing the built in mikes with RODEs?  This MAY give you a usable video.  I would also record the audio using SONAR  and if necessary, you will have to sync them up.  Note on syncing:  A friend of mine IS a technical director and knows video.  He says the best thing to sync bands is to have the drummer hit his sticks together (Like counting into a song at the beginning.  This performs the same function as the clapper used for films!

SPLAT on a Home built i3 16 GB RAM 64-bit Windows 10 Home Premium 120GB SSD (OS) 2TB Data Drive.  Behringer XR-18 USB 2.0 Interface. FaderPort control.
#16
mettelus
Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5321
  • Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
  • Location: Maryland, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/07 14:01:47 (permalink)
joeb1cannoli
 
With little time to learn how to use it and to small of a memory card (Best Buy employee recommendation), I ended up with a bit dark and a bit grainy video.




+1 on the experimenting (and have fun with the learning). Test takes are as important as with doing audio to check picture quality and performance. Lighting may be the main issue with "dark" but when you mentioned "grainy" it may also be affected some by resolution (lower quality). When you mentioned "memory card," I wanted to throw out that high quality video consumes massive amounts of memory quickly (1GB or so per minute +/-) ... definitely puts audio consumption to shame. The best recording method for highest quality is to stream the video/audio from the camera to a computer (and possibly a separate computer from the one capturing audio, depending on performance). Streaming not to process, but simply write to disk.
 
The memory card is useful for "on the fly" portable scenarios, but if you can stream to disk, it will allow you to capture the highest possible quality and then "dither it down" as you do post-production (chop it up into songs, adjust resolution, etc.)
 
When testing, try maxing out resolution in a good lighting situation (brightest lights behind the camera focused on the subject), and note the memory consumption. Can be short-and-sweet (like 15 seconds) and then look at that in Movie Studio. Note the memory usage and use that as a thumb rule for planning your setup going forward.
 
Note: For audio, the camera mic is often captured, but the "real audio" comes from a second source (good mic), which is where the "obvious hand claps" are useful for aligning the mic audio to the video audio (then deleting the video audio track).

ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
#17
Brian Walton
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 584
  • Joined: 2014/10/24 22:20:18
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/07 14:47:50 (permalink)
patm300e
Just out of curiosity for Video, did you consider using your camera (not the one on your phone, but DSLR or equivalent)?  Some of them shoot video up to 4K now and do a decent job.  As far as audio goes, maybe replacing the built in mikes with RODEs?  This MAY give you a usable video.  I would also record the audio using SONAR  and if necessary, you will have to sync them up.  Note on syncing:  A friend of mine IS a technical director and knows video.  He says the best thing to sync bands is to have the drummer hit his sticks together (Like counting into a song at the beginning.  This performs the same function as the clapper used for films!


Many DSLRs have a ~10min record time limitation which is brutal for shooting a live band.  They also are less forgiving in the setup, for someone that wants to just leave it running (not actually man the cam while filming).  
 
Agree on the drummer stick hits for sync points.  
post edited by Brian Walton - 2016/04/07 15:13:51
#18
patm300e
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 845
  • Joined: 2007/09/28 09:14:18
  • Location: USA - Maryland
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/08 06:59:24 (permalink)
Brian Walton
Many DSLRs have a ~10min record time limitation which is brutal for shooting a live band.  

My relatively cheap (~250$ US) Bridge Camera Panasonic Lumix FZ200 does not have that limit, it is limited by the size of the SD card.  It IS HD, but not 4K.
 
I agree that they are less forgiving than a dedicated camera, but I have gotten fairly good results with it. 
+1 on experimentation  If possible try to get there early and set up some tests with different lighting.  Fluorescents can cause issues if that is the lighting!
 

SPLAT on a Home built i3 16 GB RAM 64-bit Windows 10 Home Premium 120GB SSD (OS) 2TB Data Drive.  Behringer XR-18 USB 2.0 Interface. FaderPort control.
#19
Pragi
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1173
  • Joined: 2010/09/19 11:46:59
  • Location: Village of the sun
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/08 08:13:31 (permalink)
Hello,
 I can also recommend a panasonic camera-work with the Hc V707 since years-
delivers good results even by  darker light (good focus lens aso). The Panasonic 700th
replacemnet should be a good choice.
As video software I like to work with Sony Movie Studio 12 (there are upgrades available- around 40 bucks or so)
which is imo very intuitiv to handle for someone who works with Splat.
regards
 
 
#20
joeb1cannoli
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 199
  • Joined: 2012/09/22 20:07:26
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/08 09:16:04 (permalink)
mettelus
joeb1cannoli
 
With little time to learn how to use it and to small of a memory card (Best Buy employee recommendation), I ended up with a bit dark and a bit grainy video.




+1 on the experimenting (and have fun with the learning). Test takes are as important as with doing audio to check picture quality and performance. Lighting may be the main issue with "dark" but when you mentioned "grainy" it may also be affected some by resolution (lower quality). When you mentioned "memory card," I wanted to throw out that high quality video consumes massive amounts of memory quickly (1GB or so per minute +/-) ... definitely puts audio consumption to shame. The best recording method for highest quality is to stream the video/audio from the camera to a computer (and possibly a separate computer from the one capturing audio, depending on performance). Streaming not to process, but simply write to disk.
 
The memory card is useful for "on the fly" portable scenarios, but if you can stream to disk, it will allow you to capture the highest possible quality and then "dither it down" as you do post-production (chop it up into songs, adjust resolution, etc.)
 
When testing, try maxing out resolution in a good lighting situation (brightest lights behind the camera focused on the subject), and note the memory consumption. Can be short-and-sweet (like 15 seconds) and then look at that in Movie Studio. Note the memory usage and use that as a thumb rule for planning your setup going forward.
 
Note: For audio, the camera mic is often captured, but the "real audio" comes from a second source (good mic), which is where the "obvious hand claps" are useful for aligning the mic audio to the video audio (then deleting the video audio track).


Thanks
What do i need to stream video to a PC, a USB video capture device?
 

http://soundcloud.com/joe-b-10
Windows 10 Pro x64, 6 core, Core i7 , 16GB ram
Sonar Platinum , Komplete 8, Ozone 8  
Presonus Studio 192 and DP88 ,uad-2 solo
#21
Brian Walton
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 584
  • Joined: 2014/10/24 22:20:18
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/08 09:41:37 (permalink)
patm300e
Brian Walton
Many DSLRs have a ~10min record time limitation which is brutal for shooting a live band.  

My relatively cheap (~250$ US) Bridge Camera Panasonic Lumix FZ200 does not have that limit, it is limited by the size of the SD card.  It IS HD, but not 4K.
 
I agree that they are less forgiving than a dedicated camera, but I have gotten fairly good results with it. 
+1 on experimentation  If possible try to get there early and set up some tests with different lighting.  Fluorescents can cause issues if that is the lighting!
 


The Panasonic Lumix FZ200 isn't actually a DSLR though.
 
 
#22
Pragi
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1173
  • Joined: 2010/09/19 11:46:59
  • Location: Village of the sun
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/08 11:00:55 (permalink)
joeb1cannoli
mettelus
joeb1cannoli
 
With little time to learn how to use it and to small of a memory card (Best Buy employee recommendation), I ended up with a bit dark and a bit grainy video.




+1 on the experimenting (and have fun with the learning). Test takes are as important as with doing audio to check picture quality and performance. Lighting may be the main issue with "dark" but when you mentioned "grainy" it may also be affected some by resolution (lower quality). When you mentioned "memory card," I wanted to throw out that high quality video consumes massive amounts of memory quickly (1GB or so per minute +/-) ... definitely puts audio consumption to shame. The best recording method for highest quality is to stream the video/audio from the camera to a computer (and possibly a separate computer from the one capturing audio, depending on performance). Streaming not to process, but simply write to disk.
 
The memory card is useful for "on the fly" portable scenarios, but if you can stream to disk, it will allow you to capture the highest possible quality and then "dither it down" as you do post-production (chop it up into songs, adjust resolution, etc.)
 
When testing, try maxing out resolution in a good lighting situation (brightest lights behind the camera focused on the subject), and note the memory consumption. Can be short-and-sweet (like 15 seconds) and then look at that in Movie Studio. Note the memory usage and use that as a thumb rule for planning your setup going forward.
 
Note: For audio, the camera mic is often captured, but the "real audio" comes from a second source (good mic), which is where the "obvious hand claps" are useful for aligning the mic audio to the video audio (then deleting the video audio track).


Thanks
What do i need to stream video to a PC, a USB video capture device?
 


There is a usb socket in the most newer camera´s,
so that you need only a usb cable.
Hope I understood your question right.
#23
Brian Walton
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 584
  • Joined: 2014/10/24 22:20:18
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/08 11:14:04 (permalink)
joeb1cannoli
mettelus
joeb1cannoli
 
With little time to learn how to use it and to small of a memory card (Best Buy employee recommendation), I ended up with a bit dark and a bit grainy video.




+1 on the experimenting (and have fun with the learning). Test takes are as important as with doing audio to check picture quality and performance. Lighting may be the main issue with "dark" but when you mentioned "grainy" it may also be affected some by resolution (lower quality). When you mentioned "memory card," I wanted to throw out that high quality video consumes massive amounts of memory quickly (1GB or so per minute +/-) ... definitely puts audio consumption to shame. The best recording method for highest quality is to stream the video/audio from the camera to a computer (and possibly a separate computer from the one capturing audio, depending on performance). Streaming not to process, but simply write to disk.
 
The memory card is useful for "on the fly" portable scenarios, but if you can stream to disk, it will allow you to capture the highest possible quality and then "dither it down" as you do post-production (chop it up into songs, adjust resolution, etc.)
 
When testing, try maxing out resolution in a good lighting situation (brightest lights behind the camera focused on the subject), and note the memory consumption. Can be short-and-sweet (like 15 seconds) and then look at that in Movie Studio. Note the memory usage and use that as a thumb rule for planning your setup going forward.
 
Note: For audio, the camera mic is often captured, but the "real audio" comes from a second source (good mic), which is where the "obvious hand claps" are useful for aligning the mic audio to the video audio (then deleting the video audio track).


Thanks
What do i need to stream video to a PC, a USB video capture device?
 


I don't think that what that poster was talking about has any relevance to your particular Camera.  Just record to the SD card, you can change the settings and formats on the Camera.  
 
The 1GB a minute comment is also inaccurate.  
#24
patm300e
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 845
  • Joined: 2007/09/28 09:14:18
  • Location: USA - Maryland
  • Status: offline
Re: Video recommendation for Sonar (updated) 2016/04/08 14:13:49 (permalink)
Brian Walton
The Panasonic Lumix FZ200 isn't actually a DSLR though.

 
True it is a Bridge camera...It is all I have...I have done hours of video with it though.  I used DSLR because pretty much everyone knows what that is, while less know what a bridge camera is.
 
 

SPLAT on a Home built i3 16 GB RAM 64-bit Windows 10 Home Premium 120GB SSD (OS) 2TB Data Drive.  Behringer XR-18 USB 2.0 Interface. FaderPort control.
#25
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1