jude77
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1146
- Joined: 2013/08/27 21:31:34
- Location: South Saturn Delta
- Status: offline
Any reviews on Slate Virtual Mic System
It seems like Slate has finally released the Virtual Mic System, but I'm surprised that the 'net has been so quiet about it. I expected bombastic statements, both positive and negative, at this point, but there seem to only be two or three reviews online. Has any one heard it or used it? What do you think?
You haven't lived until you've taken the Rorschach. Windows 10 Home Edition 64-bit /6th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.0 GHz)/16GB (1x16GB) DDR4 2133MHz SDRAM Memory/ NVIDIA(R) GeForce(R) GT 730 with 2GB DDR3 Graphics Memory/ Dell KB216 Wired Multi-Media Keyboard English Black/ 802.11ac + Bluetooth 4.0/Integrated 7.1 with WAVE MAXXAudio Pro/Wireless 3165 driver
|
TheMaartian
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2774
- Joined: 2015/05/21 18:30:52
- Location: Flagstaff, AZ
- Status: offline
Re: Any reviews on Slate Virtual Mic System
2016/06/20 14:11:47
(permalink)
Only my opinion, but this just sounds stupid.
1. A microphone's audio characteristics are primarily determined by its physical design, diaphragm and discrete electronics. Everything after that is an FX...as is this "system". I don't deny that you can trick the ear very convincingly, but it's still not LIVE; it's just MEMOREX.
2. I refuse to use anything that requires a physical dongle, an iLok in this case (PC activation works, but Slate refuse to offer it as an option).
3. I would need to have a DAW up and running with their plugin loaded on an audio track to use their "system".
4. Finally, if I'm going to spend $999 on a mic, I'm going to buy a $999 mic.
Perhaps others feel the same about one or more of this issues.
Intel i7 3.4GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB HD Win10 Home 64-bit Tascam US-16x08 Studio One 4 Pro Notion 6 Melodyne 4 Studio Acoustica 7 Guitar Pro 7 PreSonus FaderPort Nektar P6 M-Audio BX8 D2 Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro NI K9U XLN AK, AD2 AAS VS-2, GS-2, VA-2, EP-4, CP-2, OD Toontrack SD3, EZK
|
jude77
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1146
- Joined: 2013/08/27 21:31:34
- Location: South Saturn Delta
- Status: offline
Re: Any reviews on Slate Virtual Mic System
2016/06/20 14:21:12
(permalink)
@themaartian:
Those are all excellent points (especially #1 and #3). I guess what I was wondering was given the passions, both for and against, when VMS was announced, that by now I expected a full conflagration. Instead there has been only silence. It just surprised me.
thanks for weighing in!
You haven't lived until you've taken the Rorschach. Windows 10 Home Edition 64-bit /6th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.0 GHz)/16GB (1x16GB) DDR4 2133MHz SDRAM Memory/ NVIDIA(R) GeForce(R) GT 730 with 2GB DDR3 Graphics Memory/ Dell KB216 Wired Multi-Media Keyboard English Black/ 802.11ac + Bluetooth 4.0/Integrated 7.1 with WAVE MAXXAudio Pro/Wireless 3165 driver
|
TheMaartian
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2774
- Joined: 2015/05/21 18:30:52
- Location: Flagstaff, AZ
- Status: offline
Re: Any reviews on Slate Virtual Mic System
2016/06/20 14:57:10
(permalink)
Yeah, they sure had a great marketing launch, right up there with PreSonus! But I think peeps are figuring Steven "Here's Looking At Me" Slate out. I spent a bunch of money on Slate Digital plugins when I was first getting back into music, but struggled getting the stinking iLok to work reliably. They never ONCE responded to any of my attempts to contact them (both support and The Steven (apologies to forum member TheSteven) himself). At this point, all of it has been uninstalled. I'm going to make up numbers here, but the idea is germane: I just don't think most peeps are willing to spend $1K on a $300 mic, a $200 preamp plus some software. I wonder how many units are actually in customers' hands, being used regularly. The silence you find surprising might be a direct reflection of the success (or lack thereof) of VMS. I hope Steven eats a boatload of VMS returns. I can still visualize the Seagate ad showing a garbage barge loaded with IBM PC 10MB hard drives being taken out to sea to be dumped. 
Intel i7 3.4GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB HD Win10 Home 64-bit Tascam US-16x08 Studio One 4 Pro Notion 6 Melodyne 4 Studio Acoustica 7 Guitar Pro 7 PreSonus FaderPort Nektar P6 M-Audio BX8 D2 Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro NI K9U XLN AK, AD2 AAS VS-2, GS-2, VA-2, EP-4, CP-2, OD Toontrack SD3, EZK
|
Leadfoot
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2817
- Joined: 2011/04/26 11:08:38
- Location: Indiana
- Status: offline
Re: Any reviews on Slate Virtual Mic System
2016/06/20 15:29:25
(permalink)
I have to agree. I wouldn't waste my money on Slate, when you can buy the Antares Mic Mod EFX for $99.
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: Any reviews on Slate Virtual Mic System
2016/06/20 18:52:47
(permalink)
What's funny to me is it's supposed to be a 'neutral' mic. What happens to it over time?
Maybe I'm wrong , but I'm hard pressed to believe that every mic in the world sounds the same 10, 15 or 20 years later as it did on day one.
|
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 41704
- Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
- Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
- Status: offline
Re: Any reviews on Slate Virtual Mic System
2016/06/20 19:52:58
(permalink)
Well, it's virtually neutral anyway... 
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
|
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9871
- Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
Re: Any reviews on Slate Virtual Mic System
2016/06/21 10:46:39
(permalink)
Many speakers are claimed to have flat frequency response.
None actually do...
I agree with TM.
If I'm going to spend $1000+ on a mic, I'm going to get the real thing.
These days, $1k buys a nice mic.
|
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2567
- Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
- Location: West Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Any reviews on Slate Virtual Mic System
2016/06/22 16:36:48
(permalink)
So Slate are saying their (relatively) inexpensive mic has a flat frequency response and a level of detail that matches very expensive mics. Then you impose the plots from the very expensive mics on top of their mic's flat response.
My first thought is why? Is Slate have produced the holy grail of microphones - one with a flat, neutral response - why would I want to superimpose over that the response of an inferior microphone?
High end vintage mics were developed with a view to them making as little difference between the sound they were recording and their output as possible...
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board, ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre. Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
|